|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,755
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,755 |
Thought I'd share a success/enlightenment story that may be useful to others.
I do a fair amount of bass guitar, keyboard and drum pad recordings and on my last one a significant amount of noise ended up on my bass track. Studio One has a handful of built-in noise reduction tools and Strip-Silence is one I go to frequently. But someone mentioned the Stem Separator. At first I dismissed this idea since (in my mind) the Stem Separator is intended to separate instruments, not noise. But, the curious guy I am drove me to give it a try.
Here was my test:
1. I dragged in a complete song and separated out the bass (no problem as I do this quite frquently).
2. I then created a track of white noise using the Tone Generator.
3. I then exported the bass line and white noise tracks as a mixdown.
4. Then I dragged the mixdown back into Studio One to verify the bassline was heavily contaminated with the noise (and it was).
5. Then I Stem-Separated the contaminated track to extract the bass, and it worked like a charm. The bass was noise-free.
I have to say Kudos to the Presonus engineers for designing such a robust stem separator, it even works as a noise reduction tool.
As a side note, I'm beginning to look at Studio One as a general purpose audio-editing programming environment rather than just a "musicians DAW".
I know other DAWs are capable but the more I explore Studio One the more I realize how powerful it is.
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677BiaB 2026 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 597
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 597 |
Thanks, this is very interesting and good to know.
I am a bit qurious about the actual stem separation itself.
Will the separated bass stem be more or less exactly at the same quality as the recorded played bass itself or is it degraded in some way?
BIAB 2026, Studio Pro 8, Song Master Pro, Win11 Home. i7-9700K CPU, 32GB, ESI MAYA44eX, ZOOM UAC-2, Guitar Pro 8, Transcribe, (EZKeys2, EZD3, SD3, EZBass, EZMix3)
Amateur: fiddle, guitar, vocal, beginner on bass.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,755
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,755 |
Thanks, this is very interesting and good to know.
I am a bit qurious about the actual stem separation itself.
Will the separated bass stem be more or less exactly at the same quality as the recorded played bass itself or is it degraded in some way? This is a very good question and I don't have (but would also like) an answer. From a practical perspective, meaning to my ears, an S1 separated bass stem sounds clean, crisp, full and fat enough for my purposes. But my ears are not perfect, no one's ears are. But the engineer in me says that there must be some (perhaps tiny) amount of distortion that results from every separation process. Especially if there are other low frequency content in the neighborhood of what the bass guitar is putting out. I remember a test case last year on this forum involving SongMaster, but as I recall a deep acoustic analysis was never done. Perhaps someone here has a tool that can do the following subtraction: Original Bass Track - Separated Bass Track = The Difference If "The Difference" isn't exactly zero in evey bar and at every millisecond, then there would be some level of distortion or artifacts at play. Are there any digital audio experts in the house?
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677BiaB 2026 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,766
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,766 |
Perhaps someone here has a tool that can do the following subtraction: Original Bass Track - Separated Bass Track = The Difference
If "The Difference" isn't exactly zero in evey bar and at every millisecond, then there would be some level of distortion or artifacts at play. Use any DAW. Load the original bass on one track and the separated bass on another, making sure they're both aligned. Using a plugin or tool of some sort, invert the polarity of ONE track. Then play back both tracks together and you'll hear the difference. If you then render the output you can then see the difference.
I work here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,755
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,755 |
Use any DAW. Load the original bass on one track and the separated bass on another, making sure they're both aligned. Using a plugin or tool of some sort, invert the polarity of ONE track. Then play back both tracks together and you'll hear the difference. If you then render the output you can then see the difference. Well, I have an answer and my engineering instincts once again did not fail me. As suggest by Simon I inverted the polarity and can clearly hear a muffled but audible difference when non-inverted and inverted are played at the same time. Definitions:"Bass Track A" is the separated bass from a popular song from the 70s. The source audio is an MP3 file. "Bass Track B" is "Bass Track A" with significant white noise added. "Bass Track C" is the bass separated from Bass Track B (which contains no audible noise). "Bass Track D" is the inversion of Bass Track C (and when played sounds just like Bass Track C) Test Results:1. The first test I ran was to ensure that the inversion took place properly. So I played C and D at the same time and got no audio out. This makes sense as they cancel one another out. 2. Then I played A and D and the result is an audible, distorted and muffled bassline that I could easily identify as the bassline to this song. I interpret what I hear when these tracks are played as error (albeit small error) produced by the separation algorithm. Conclusion1. Based on this one "simple" test, there is in fact distortion and artifacts generated from the Studio One stem separation process. This makes sense because an AI trained algorithm is generalizing how to extract bass from a finite number training examples. We can't expect it to be mathematically perfect. 2. Bass Track C contains distortion and/or artifacts even though someone with good hearing can't hear them. But from a practical standpoint the separations are so good, especially when mixed with other tracks that I (and I'm sure others) can't tell the difference. The other point worth mentioning is that this was somewhat of a best case (low stress) case because white noise is sonically much different from bass guitar and therefore should be relatively easy to separate from bass. On the other hand, songs with bass guitar, low-end keyboard, etc would be more difficult for the algorithm. But even in such cases it does a good job for my ears. Here is an interesting spin-off question. At what point is the error (observed and described above) deemed unacceptable to the developers of the algorithm? I'd think this would be an important question for those releasing product containing stem separation capability. Presonus obviously got it right. Simon, thanks for mentioning inversion, I wouldn't have known Studio One could do this without your idea.
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677BiaB 2026 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,766
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,766 |
Simon, thanks for mentioning inversion, I wouldn't have known Studio One could do this without your idea. Happy to help! I'm not terribly surprised that the extraction isn't perfect, however if it sounds good then I'd be happy.
I work here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,755
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,755 |
Happy to help! I'm not terribly surprised that the extraction isn't perfect, however if it sounds good then I'd be happy. Although the stem separation in Studio One, and I would say all stem separators, can only be approximations of "unbaking the cake", nonetheless Studio One's implementation is so good that the unavoidable artifacts are below my threshold of hearing. And I have good hearing, so yes, I'm very happy with it. This is my recap of what I learned thru this exploration: 1. Studio One's built-in stem separator is so strong that it can actually remove noise from my bass recordings 2. Studio One continues to impress me with its collection of availabe plugins, my most recent discoveries are the Tone Generator (for white noise, pink noise and pure tones) and the Mix Tool (for inverting audio waveforms) 3. There is so much more to discover in this DAW I'm guessing that sound engineers of yesteryear would have given their right arms for capability that is readily available today.
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677BiaB 2026 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,018
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,018 |
And don't forget Simon's trick to duplicate track output then invert the track polarity of one of the tracks to compare if the waveforms are the same. Added bonus, you found out Studio One has the capability to invert the polarity of a track.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 2,005
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 2,005 |
Added bonus, you found out Studio One has the capability to invert the polarity of a track. If there’s a DAW that can’t, I’ve not heard of it.
BIAB 2025 Audiophile Mac
24Core/60CoreGPU M2 MacStudioUltra/8TB/192GB Sequoia, M1 MBAir, 2012 MBP
Digital Performer11, LogicPro, Finale27/Dorico/Encore/SmartScorePro64/Notion6 /Overture5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,018
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,018 |
Mike, very likely true. I based my comment on Bass Thumper's last comment Simon, thanks for mentioning inversion, I wouldn't have known Studio One could do this without your idea in +++ THIS +++ post. Some of us users have no or little experience with using a mixer, console, observing or working in a control booth, recording in a studio or investigated all the features available in a DAW. When you're self learning it's easy to have wide gaps in what many consider basic knowledge because you don't know what you don't know until you encounter it or need it and go hunting for it. Even if you're a big studio veteran recording pro you may not have much knowledge about what goes on in the control booth if you're always on the recording side of the studio window.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,755
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,755 |
Some of us users have no or little experience with using a mixer, console, observing or working in a control booth, recording in a studio or investigated all the features available in a DAW.
When you're self learning it's easy to have wide gaps in what many consider basic knowledge because you don't know what you don't know until you encounter it or need it and go hunting for it. Very well put. The reason I went down the inverter path was to help answer shlind's question about stem degradation. And in that process I ended up learning something. If you're not growing/learning you're dying . . . and I'm not yet ready to die 
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677BiaB 2026 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,075
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,075 |
... If you're not growing/learning you're dying . . . and I'm not yet ready to die A very good philosophy. I'm planning to hang around for a while longer also  (I better keep learning...)
BIAB & RB2026 Win.(Audiophile), Windows 10 Pro & Windows 11, Cakewalk Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Session Keys Grand S & Electric R, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M, Pioneer Active Monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,527
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,527 |
I enjoyed reading this thread. The experiment was logical, well-documented, and beneficial.
I might only suggest the post title be modified to reflect that it was an experiment and used stem separation, because I chose not to read it on first glance thinking it was about a routine function.
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Presonus Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 7,244
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 7,244 |
I'd be more concerned about the source of the problem.
I use ReaFir in Reaper to sample and filter noise I can't deal with at source, (in my circumstances that's RF/EMF interference peak at around 20Khz that sneaks in on ALL tracks recorded in my space. The only solution that would work at source would be turning the room into a Faraday cage.
The BIAB stem splitter works rather well.
Cheers
rayc
"What's so funny about peace, love & understanding?" - N.Lowe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
PowerTracks Pro 2026 for Windows is Here!
PowerTracks 2026 is here—bringing powerful new enhancements designed to make your production workflow faster, smoother, and more intuitive than ever.
The enhanced Mixer now shows Track Type and Instrument icons for instant track recognition, while a new grid option simplifies editing views. Non-floating windows adopt a modern title bar style, replacing the legacy blue bar.
The Master Volume is now applied at the end of the audio chain for consistent levels and full-signal master effects.
Tablature now includes a “Save bends when saving XML” option for improved compatibility with PG Music tools. Plus, you can instantly match all track heights with a simple Ctrl-release after resizing, and Add2 chords from MGU/SGU files are now fully supported... and more!
Get started today—first-time packages start at just $49.
Already using PowerTracks Pro Audio? Upgrade for as little as $29 and enjoy the latest improvements!
Order now!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows Special Offers End Tomorrow (January 15th, 2026) at 11:59 PM PST!
Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PST on Thursday, January 15, 2026!
We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.
Another exciting new addition is the new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. You can view the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to process an entire track or focus on specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Windows to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!
Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.
If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® Special Offers Extended Until January 15, 2026!
Good news! You still have time to upgrade to the latest version of Band-in-a-Box® for Windows® and save. Our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® special now runs through January 15, 2025!
We've packed Band-in-a-Box® 2026 with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can process an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PST on January 15th, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® today! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,118
Posts800,425
Members40,036
| |
Most Online44,367
Mar 4th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean