|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,148
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,148 |
non-destructive editing tools..............doesn't RB save backups so you can call up a version where you didn't make the edit you now don't want? and can't you choose to close and not save changes so going back to the file as you opened it and before you started work?
maybe i'm not appreciating the full concept but i have never been unabled to correct my many disasters!
Last edited by Bob Calver; 09/29/25 02:04 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,808
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,808 |
Bob that is a perfect example of what i am talking about. Yes it does have back up which is a way to handle the issue. Yet if you have worked in Studio one, Reaper, Logic etc. you know that when you edit there are a lot of ways to fix a problem undo, and such that do not require a complete return to an older version of the song. In clip based editing you can move clips of material around and change them at will In RB that is a bit more work. That said it still has a way to do what you want it just requires a bit more effort to find that path. This is at the heart of the issue RB may have a few less fancy new tools, but it does have some things the other do not have. I still love working in it!
I think one way to get others to really dig into it would be through some updated videos showing the way it does things. Many of the videos are 5 or more years old.
HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini Sonoma with 16 gig of ram, BiaB/RB 2026, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 11 , Presonus Audiobox USB96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,650
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,650 |
i understand rb is programmed (and bb ??) in delphi. ive never used delphi so ive done some digging. if one googles 'delphi compiler advantages' one will see that delphi has various advantages to a developer. (see you tube also.) one major one being compiling fast to a standalone executable with no run time dependencies. whereas C++ which lots of music apps/daws are programmed in DOES...which can be a pain sometimes to a dev....and users. (correct me if i'm wrong.) from what i see so far i see no reason if one is useing delphi for daw development why delphi might a limiting factor. in summary it has various advantages...a reason why it has a very dedicated user base. SOOO...useing delphi...imho a nice nde (non destructive) daw could be built. its no biggie to me re nde (which i have in reaper) as i do frequent back ups anyways like others have said...each backup always dated/detailed. so i dont see the use of delphi is an issue. imho a developer can do anything he/she wants in it....as it compiles to 'native code'. frankly i dislike compilers that rely on external dependencies so this is a plus that delphi doesnt need them. what i DO believe might be an issue is rb (like bb) has some very old code in it...as pg have responded to various user demands over the years. in this respect a dev like pg is in a no win situation. its like gui's...there are lots of different user opinions out there as to what their ideal gui is. all a dev can do is strive as much as possible to keep both old users (used to the way things have always been) and new users happy. been there done that. its nearly impossible...its like herding cats...lol. any seasoned dev will know this is true. (i agree with rob...more rb vids are needed showing tha many unique and wonderfull things rb can do re other music apps. i believe pg need to bring out a table with tick markers showing what each of bb and bb plugin and rb can or cannot do. its badly needed imho to stop new user confusion....ie wanna do X ? use this kinda idea.) i hope i make some sense. happiness. om ps...if one wants to get into programming a bit and realise a great appreciation of what pg have achieved with rb/bb (warts and all.) try this...whch compiles to a standalone native exe. https://www.purebasic.com/if you want to build your own even basic audio/midi daw i'll hear from you in a few years imho...lol. i believe there is a demo available.
Last edited by justanoldmuso; 09/29/25 10:44 AM.
my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..) https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs(90 songs created useing bb/rb) (lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,632
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,632 |
Most every coding/compiling option has a free version that works.
That's not an issue.
The issue with Delphi is nobody else is doing cutting edge audio with it so finding any help/ideas is pretty limited, and then you have to adapt whatever concept they had to fit your need.
Coding is not as plug/play as many think.
That decision to use Delphi was done long ago, and thus changing at this point is a massive undertaking.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,670
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,670 |
I still wonder why we get so many BIAB queries about things that are dead easy to do in RB. Do new users not try RB? Is there a reluctance to leave BIAB when a project is in progress? Or just that its only in this RB forum that the benefits of using RB are laid out. Those of us that started on floppy discs and midi only BIAB got used to editing in PT in the days when the programs were much easier to navigate with much less steep learing curves. So maybe the current daunting task of mastering BIAB puts people off jumping into another program. Speaking personally, I originally bought BiaB in 2012 as a better replacement for iRealPro ... my bandmates all said it was much better for practice. They were all also seasoned users of BiaB. For me, BiaB itself was a steep learning curve and, as I've mentioned before, the older interface simply wasn't usable on the small laptop I was using. I gave up on BiaB and, with the steep learning curve of it, didn't do any more than briefly look at RB. Both had the same VGA-style interface with a whole mess of big, clumsy, buttons. I walked away. I came back a year or few later when the newer interface had come out, persuaded again by my bandmates. It's better to my eyes and is usable on that small laptop. But the learning curve and, I'm afraid, the number of bugs the year I returned really put me off of trying anything else. It's better, but I still find it takes far too long to do most things I want for practice, so I'm still using iRealPro. I used RB recently to adapt a MIDI song to a custom purpose and RB seemed to do it quite well, but I'm not sure it solved any of the "too hard" problems with using BiaB as a practice tool. The bottom line is that I want to practice making music, not spend hours messing about with a, to me at least, clunky user interface. Just me perspective. Others will have different views. Edit: putting iRealPro into perspective, under a little pressure I can enter the chords and structure for a song while a bandmate reads them out to me and then go on to use the chord-sheet in the session and the player later for practice. BiaB usually takes me an hour or so per song, even now I'm used to avoiding its Repeats screw-ups.
Last edited by Gordon Scott; 09/29/25 03:12 PM.
Jazz relative beginner, starting at a much older age than was helpful.
AVL:MXE Linux; Windows 11
BIAB2026 Audiophile, a bunch of other software.
Kawai MP6, Ui24R, Focusrite Saffire Pro40 and Scarletts
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,632
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,632 |
RB has the same chord method entry as BiaB .. I don't see the chord entry part taking that long though.
If you are generating in a space that needs faster speed, well, BiaB generates faster
/mostly true, except RB lets you do odd times, if needed, and handles the chords a little different in those areas.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,650
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,650 |
Rharv. re delphi...thats a great point youve made. but what i'm grappling with is what features are missing from delphi that would make c/c++ a better solution ? i would love to know pg's viewpoint as to why C/C++ werent used. as i understand it one advantage of delphi is those C++ headers. in the end whatever the compiler used the devs would need to interface with the win api's//audio api's...no ?? i'm gonna delve more as to if in fact c/c++ is better for daw coding/development than delphi. maybe JY can jump in. as to a perspective. ........................................................... on another matter for people/lurkers wanting to do ritardandos... noel has a tip which would suggest that rb is the better vehicle. the fill feature is very nice...and i'm kicking my A cos i didnt think to mention it. kudos noel....heres the link.... https://www.pgmusic.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=863843#Post863843heres another poser...why do people use rb over say the new bb plugin ?? reason i ask is i keep on coming back to rb. ps..i love aussies. happiness to all. om
Last edited by justanoldmuso; 09/29/25 05:51 PM.
my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..) https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs(90 songs created useing bb/rb) (lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,632
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,632 |
I know when he was looking for VST3 clues for Delphi, I sent him a link to the only useful thing I found, which was in no way an exact match for what he needed, just an idea pretty much
Looked at a lot of crap, found a single link that looked applicable.
One
No idea if he even looked at it, but he got VST3 into RB, so it's all doable once you figure it out.
It's just finding a few clues to get started. I mean, every application these days uses a library ... and there are tons of libraries, so finding the right library leads to clues
Last edited by rharv; 09/30/25 04:11 PM.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,670
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,670 |
Rharv.
re delphi...thats a great point youve made.
but what i'm grappling with is what features are missing from delphi that would make c/c++ a better solution ?
i would love to know pg's viewpoint as to why C/C++ werent used. Obviously I can't and don't speak for PGM here, but Delphi was created by Borland and was then, IIRC, a RAD (Rapid Applications Development) platform for Pascal. That would imply that BIAB was likely originally written in Pascal, not C, and the switch to Delhpi would have looked sensible. I went through some similar things with RADs and occasionally still have to clean up consequences of using them. RADs are great ... until they're not ... then they can be a real PITA. Coding is not as plug/play as many think. Amen to that.
Jazz relative beginner, starting at a much older age than was helpful.
AVL:MXE Linux; Windows 11
BIAB2026 Audiophile, a bunch of other software.
Kawai MP6, Ui24R, Focusrite Saffire Pro40 and Scarletts
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,650
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,650 |
Rharv. re vst3... correct me if i'm wrong but vst was created by steiny right ? wouldnt there be info from steiny re vst 3 implementation ??...eg ?? https://steinbergmedia.github.io/vst3_dev_portal/pages/Technical+Documentation/Index.htmlGordon.. lets face it and ive worked with code wizards many times in my life (i'm not one...lol.). every dev tool/compiler has its potential problems...because the underlying OS eg win or mac os or whatever is the controller...ie 'big daddy'..lol.....like a boss in a workplace. every tool has its plusses and minuses. i would love to hear from people what advantages the bb new plugin has over rb. cos i dont see it....just the rb multitude of tracks/features/tracks view and bars view are but a few of many adantages of rb....as well as all the ton of features re midi....recording/playback etc etc....and audio/midi editing sooo...what is the advantage of bb plugin over rb ?? why did bb users want it ? what are the reasons ? frankly i really wish newbies would get past the surface look of rb and drill down....its the only way to appreciate rb imho....but then you must learn the app of course which its obvious some dont have the inclination to do...or even read the manual ?...sigh. god knows why... oh well. lets turn to 2026 rb....what new exciting features would you all like to see ? happiness. om
Last edited by justanoldmuso; 10/01/25 10:19 AM.
my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..) https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs(90 songs created useing bb/rb) (lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,670
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,670 |
Gordon..
lets face it and ive worked with code wizards many times in my life (i'm not one...lol.).
every dev tool/compiler has its potential problems...because the underlying OS eg win or mac os or whatever is the controller...ie 'big daddy'..lol.....like a boss in a workplace. every tool has its plusses and minuses. Definitely not a correction. The difficulty in my mind with RADs is that they form an abstraction over and above the machine/OS to make access to the functions of that machine from a "higher level". But RADs are "middle management" that sometimes is radically changed, or even removed completely. Sometimes they stop supporting features one needs, because nobody else is using them so they're not worth supporting. All of a sudden the RAD no longer delivers what one needs and sometimes there's no workaround for that. Sometimes the only real option is to rewrite the program in a different RAD or language. This is no copy+paste exercise, this usually really can only be from the ground up. So much for a RAD making my job easier!
Jazz relative beginner, starting at a much older age than was helpful.
AVL:MXE Linux; Windows 11
BIAB2026 Audiophile, a bunch of other software.
Kawai MP6, Ui24R, Focusrite Saffire Pro40 and Scarletts
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,632
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,632 |
Amen to that
A lot of programs currently are layered abstractions that have become quite bulky to maintain.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Special Offers Extended Until May 31st!
Good news- we've extended our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® special offers until May 31, 2026!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 is packed with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can transcribe an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, and much more!
There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®.
When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PDT on May 31st, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.
Check out the Band-in-a-Box® for Mac packages page to find the best package for you.
Holiday Weekend Hours
It's Victoria Day Long Weekend in Canada. Our Customer Service hours are:
Saturday, May 16: Closed
Sunday, May 17: Closed
Monday, May 18: 8:00am - 4:00pm
Regular hours resume Tuesday, May 19th!
Today's the Last Day of the Band-in-a-Box 2026® for Mac Special!
Order before 11:59pm PDT today (May 15, 2026) to save up to 50% off your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® upgrade and receive a FREE Bonus PAK loaded with great new Add-ons to use with this new version!
Don't wait - order today!
Check out all the new features in the redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac - Special Offers End at 11:59pm PDT on Friday, May 15th, 2026!
Order before 11:59pm PDT on Friday, May 15th and SAVE up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® version 2026 for Mac Upgrade packages... and that's not all! With your version 2026 for Mac purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks... that's 222 NEW RealTracks available with version Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac!
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® today for as little as $49! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all available purchase options.
Learn more about the Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK here.
If you have any questions about which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We're here to help!
202 New RealTracks Released with Band-in-a-Box 2026!
With Band-in-a-Box® 2026, we've released 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 468-488) in a variety of genres—featuring your most requested styles!
Jazz, Funk & World (Sets 468-475):
Our new jazz, funk & blues RealTracks include a groovin’ collection of RealTracks and RealDrums! These include more requested “soul jazz” RealTracks featuring artists Neil Swainson (bass), Charles Treadway (organ), Brent Mason (guitar), and Wes Little (drums). There are new “smooth jazz” styles (4), which include a RealTracks first: muted trumpet, as well as slick new smooth jazz brushes options for drums. Blues lovers will be thrilled—there are more “classic acoustic blues” styles, including guitar (5), bass (4), and drums (10) with blues master Colin Linden, featuring understated and tasty background acoustic soloing, plus brushes drums and acoustic bass. There are also new electric blues RealTracks, including electric blues with PG favorite Johnny Hiland (3) and soulful electric slide guitar from Colin Linden (4). If you love funk & gospel, there are great new options this year, including gospel organ (3) from Charles Treadway, as well as new funk, tango, and rock ’n’ roll drums (3) and bass (1). And for big, bold arrangements, we have uptempo soul horns (4) featuring a three-part hip horn section with options for a full mix or stems of each individual horn — plus an accompanying rhythm section (4) of drums, bass, guitar, and electric piano!
Rock & Pop (Sets 476–482):
Our new rock & pop RealTracks bring a powerful mix of requested favorites, fresh genres, and modern chart-inspired styles! We have more of our popular “Producer Layered Acoustic Guitars (15)” featuring Band-in-a-Box favorite Brent Mason. We’ve continued our much-requested disco styles (10), and added new Celtic guitar (5) with a more basic, accessible approach than our previous Drop-D or DADGAD offerings. There are also highly requested yacht rock styles (17), inspired by the smooth, polished soft-rock sound of the late ’70s and early ’80s — laid-back grooves, silky electric pianos, warm textures, elegant harmonic movement, and pristine production aesthetics. Fans of heavier styles will love our new glam metal (13), capturing the flashy, high-energy sound of ’80s arena-ready guitar rock. We also have a set of rootsy modern-folk rock (18), with a warm, organic sound combining contemporary folk textures and driving acoustic strumming. And we’ve added lots of new modern pop styles (16) — the kinds of sounds you’re hearing on the radio today, featuring exciting new drums, synths, and cutting-edge RealTracks arrangements.
Country, & Americana (Sets 483–488):
Our new country & Americana RealTracks deliver a rich collection of acoustic, electric, and roots-inspired styles! We have new country pop (9) with legendary guitarist Brent Mason. There is also a potpourri (14) of bouzouki, guitars, banjo, and more, perfect for adding texture and character to contemporary acoustic arrangements. We’ve added funky country guitar (5) with PG favorite Brent Mason, along with classic pedal steel styles (5) featuring steel great Doug Jernigan. There are more country songwriter styles (8) that provide intimate, rootsy foundations for storytelling and modern Americana writing. Finally, we have “background soloing” acoustic guitar (12) with Brent Mason — simpler, but still very tasty acoustic lines designed to sit beautifully behind vocals or act as a subtle standalone solo part.
Check out all the 202 new RealTracks (in sets 468-488)!
And, if you are looking for more, the 2026 49-PAK (for $49) includes an impressive collection of 20 bonus RealTracks, featuring exciting and inspiring additions to add to your RealTracks library. You'll get new country-rhythm guitar styles from PG Music favorites Johnny Hiland and Brent Mason, along with modern-pop grooves that capture today’s radio-ready sound! There are also new indie-folk styles with guitar, bass, 6-string bass used as a high-chording instrument, acoustic guitar, and banjo. Plus, dedicated "cymbal fills" RealDrums provide an added layer that work very well with low-key folky styles with other percussion.
The 2026 49-PAK is loaded with other great new add-ons as well. Learn more about the 2026 49-PAK!
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
With your version 2026 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
- MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
- Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
- Playable RealTracks Set 5
- RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
- SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
- iOS Android Band-in-a-Box® App
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
- Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
- RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
- SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)
Learn more about the Bonus PAK and 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,319
Posts803,328
Members40,096
| |
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean