|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,758
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,758 |
Now yer starting to get it.  Yes I am starting to get it. But let's be clear, not because of any human on this thread, but because of a lifeless bot that could understand ambiguous chords. The question is are you getting it? Do you understand what an ambiguous chord is? If so, can you give an example different from what the bot provided? You were stuck on the dead-end example of C - Bb - Gm. By definition, C - Bb - Gm are not ambiguous chords.
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677BiaB 2026 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,503
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,503 |
It is not important for every instrument that can play a chord, to play every note in the chord. In fact, if that happened, a lot of songs would be ruined. To cite and earlier reference and to give the simplest example I can, think about this: On the sheet music score, the pianist, or guitarist is playing C E G. We all should agree it's C Major. But on the same score, the bassist is playing an A. Now it's an Am7 It can get much more involved than that, but this illustrates it. It's not all black and white (except on the keyboard of the piano). 
Bob "Notes" Norton Norton Music
https://www.nortonmusic.com
100% MIDI Super-Styles recorded by live, pro, studio musicians for a live groove
& Fake Disks for MIDI and/or RealTracks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,758
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,758 |
I was in a rush when typing the last message and I made a major typo. Those chords should have read:
1-C-E-G
2-B-C-E-G
3-A-C-E-G
Sorry for any confusion I may have caused.
Yes, you are staring to get it. If you study the picture in my previous post you will notice that the fingerings shown are on a guitar. IF there is only a guitar then any chord is an ambiguous chord because there is no bass. Attached is a picture of a GMaj7 as a guitarist could play it. The other chords listed is what the chord would be called if a bassist would play any note of the chord outside of the tonic. It can get very confusing when the bassist play any other note outside of the chord. Also attached is a guitarist playing a C chord in the 1 first inversion, i.e. E-G-C. The chord finder assumes the lowest note on the guitar is the bass note, Emb6. That is not the name of the chord if a bass player is playing any other chord note, i.e bass plays a C then the chord is called a C major, i.e. a C chord. Mario, no need to apologize for confusion, I appreciate your efforts in explaining this from your perspective. This is the 1st time I’m being exposed to the idea that any chord played on guitar (and presumably piano) is in fact ambiguous without a bass player playing a note. You say: “ IF there is only a guitar then any chord is an ambiguous chord because there is no bass.” Are you sure about this? If so, can you provide a reference for this? I understand that guitarists can play ambiguous or unambiguous chords. C-E-G would be a Cmajor unambiguous chord even if no bass player is present. And here is my understanding of the tonic. In music, the tonic is the first note scale degree (1) of the diatonic scale (the first note of a scale) and the tonal center or final resolution tone that is commonly used in the final cadence in tonal (musical key-based) classical music, popular music, and traditional music.Finally, it's not entirely clear on how to interpret your images. Can you clarify by showing your example(s) in this format? Guitarist Plays: X – Y – Z, (or X – Y) notes (an ambiguous chord) If bassist plays U note, then the chord is tbd1 If bassist plays V note, then the chord is tbd2 If bassist plays W note, then the chord is tbd3
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677BiaB 2026 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,662
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,662 |
You say: “IF there is only a guitar then any chord is an ambiguous chord because there is no bass.”
Are you sure about this? If so, can you provide a reference for this? I understand that guitarists can play ambiguous or unambiguous chords. C-E-G would be a Cmajor unambiguous chord even if no bass player is present. FWIW I think it's the presence of a bass note, played by whomever, that anchors the chord. AFAICS and major or minor triad is probably unambiguous. Just about anything else has the potential, at least, to be ambiguous unless that bass note is present. We have on keyboards, and I presume also on most or all chording instruments, what we call rootless voicings, which rely on someone else, normally the bass player, to supply the anchor for the chords, however it's also not that unusual to play those rootless voicings solo. The effect is of both some ambiguity and some lack of stability, which helps to keep the music evolving. Whether or not that's what you mean here by ambiguity I'm not sure, but it may be an area to explore.
Jazz relative beginner, starting at a much older age than was helpful.
AVL:MXE Linux; Windows 11
BIAB2026 Audiophile, a bunch of other software.
Kawai MP6, Ui24R, Focusrite Saffire Pro40 and Scarletts
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,602
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,602 |
Are you sure about this? If so, can you provide a reference for this? I understand that guitarists can play ambiguous or unambiguous chords. C-E-G would be a Cmajor unambiguous chord even if no bass player is present. How do you know it's not Em(add#5) (?) Or for that matter an inversion of D11, whether minor or major? What key is the song? What was the previous and next chord? Those two questions can be important when determining how to refer to the chord.. I'm talking strictly from a theory point of view, not everyday use of a C chord (or G Bb D, or whatever it was), C just seems to be the prevalent choice. What key the example is in doesn't matter. Here's an example: Song is in D Guitar player says the fourth chord before it starts again is a C major In My head I'm thinking "OK" but I'm also thinking "is it really an Am7 leading back to D?" I mean both could work, and maybe in this particular song it works better if you use C the first time thru and then Am7 the second time right before the chorus. Point is, it's all just theory but it helps
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,758
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,758 |
FWIW I think it's the presence of a bass note, played by whomever, that anchors the chord.
Just about anything else has the potential, at least, to be ambiguous unless that bass note is present.
We have on keyboards, and I presume also on most or all chording instruments, what we call rootless voicings, which rely on someone else, normally the bass player, to supply the anchor for the chords, however it's also not that unusual to play those rootless voicings solo. The effect is of both some ambiguity and some lack of stability, which helps to keep the music evolving. I had little idea on how important the bass is until this thread. I think I'm slowly understanding this, but I think more discussion is needed to really clarify this. What if in your studio there is no song and no key, you just play C-E-G (with pitch increasing from left to right) as a chord on your piano. Is that an ambiguous chord? And no one else has used the term "rootless voicing", I think that brings some clarity.
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677BiaB 2026 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,197
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,197 |
Aren't these chords ambiguous since the root isn't specified? Depending on the root, the name of the chord changes. Ambiguity comes from various places. Part of disambiguating something is determining what sort of thing it is. When we hear a chord with no context, we generally listen for stable intervals to determine the root of the chord, as the root is generally how we determine function. With a C-E-G, the most stable intervals are C-G (perfect fifth) and C-E (major third). An inversion of those notes G-E-C gives less stable intervals, but we'll often infer a chord anyway. If we can "find" an arrangement that gives a more stable explanation, we'll hear it as an inverted stable chord. The lowest note interacts with the higher notes, creating tensions via waves interacting. And some chords are unstable by nature, like the Dim7 chord. That's a stack of minor thirds (with a diminished fifth and dom7) so there's no stable interval to be found. Each one of the notes has equal claim to being the root, but the lowest note usually wins. Jazzers often like to think of a diminished chords as a 7th chord missing the root, because we like to "understand" things using stable intervals, even if they aren't there at all.
-- David Cuny My virtual singer development blogVocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?BiaB 2025 | Windows 11 | Reaper | Way too many VSTis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,602
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,602 |
Dave, I think that was one your best posts.
Nicely said.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,602
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,602 |
I had little idea on how important the bass is until this thread. Combination of username and comment made me smile <grin>
Last edited by rharv; 01/07/26 05:39 AM.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,699
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,699 |
Steve, you have gotten some good information in this thread. IMHO the most important was what is the key signature and what is the chord progression. Why? Because sometimes the bass note, regardless what instrument plays it (bass guitar, tuba, piano, etc) determines the chord's name. Sometimes the same bass note does not determine the chord's name; go back to the C6, Am7, C/A , posts. What names the chord is usually the combination of the key signature and what comes prior to and after the chord regardless of the bass note. This has been mentioned before. For an examples Google/Bing "Ambiguous chords in music" and you will get answers to your questions. Here is one example: https://www.beyondmusictheory.org/harmonic-ambiguity/I give you credit for throwing your yourself into this deep music theory topic. Now I say this in all due respect Steve but what is missing is the music theory foundation. Getting it piecemeal like this helps but IMHO getting a music theory book will build the foundation much faster. YMMV
OK, a random thought;
Why does toilet paper need a commercial? Who's not buying it?
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,758
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,758 |
Or for that matter an inversion of D11, whether minor or major?
What key is the song?
What was the previous and next chord?
Those two questions can be important when determining how to refer to the chord. Rharv, you bring up some good questions that go to the complexity of this subject; context seems to be very important. So what if we establish 3 different contexts so they can be specifically addressed separately? Context 1(most simple): Piano player in his studio by himself and only plays individual chords with his right hand. No songs are played. Context 2 (a little complex): Piano player still plays chords with only his right hand but a bass player is with him. Again, no songs are played. Context 3 (complex): Piano player, bass player and drummer come together and play a complete song in a single unambiguous key. The goal here is to understand Levitin’s 2 statements. “Joni’s genius was she creates chords that are ambiguous, chords that could have two or more different roots.”
“The brilliance of Jaco, Joni said, is that he instinctively knew to wander around the possibility space, reinforcing the different chord interpretations with equal emphasis, sublimely holding the ambiguity in a delicate, suspended balance.”Regarding the simplest case, Context 1, if the piano player plays C – E – G (increasing pitch as you move from C to E to G, my question is this an ambiguous or unambiguous chord? My answer: It’s an unambiguous Cmaj chord. Reasoning: The pianist is providing a root, a 3rd and a 5th, therefore it’s a fully voiced, unambiguous chord. Am I wrong?
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677BiaB 2026 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,197
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,197 |
TL;DR Determining the root (bass) note of the chord is critical to understand what the harmonic function of the chord is.
One other point: music can be thought of a series of resolutions.
That means that a chord isn't so much defined by what comes before, but what comes after.
Most harmony can be understood as one of these, and sometimes functioning as more than one:
I-IV-V: These chords can freely move between each other. Example: C-F, C->G, F->C, F->G, G->F, G->C in the key of C
Circle of Fifths: The 5 of the chord is the root of the prior chord. Example: G -> C, since C = C-E-G, and the prior chord was a G of some sort.
Stepwise or Chromatic Root Movement: The root of the chord moves up/down to the next letter or stepwise note. Example: A -> Bm
Change one Note The note that follows only differs from the prior by one note, often a stepwise change. Example: C (C-E-G) -> Am (A-C-E)
By "sometimes functioning as more than one", you can see the movement G -> C as a I-IV-V movement and/or V -> I circle of fifths motion.
For example, I was looking at the song Kaerou by Fujii Kaze, and it's got some really nice progressions. Here's one bit:
Amaj7 Dmaj7 C#m7 Fdim F#m7 Em Edim Dmaj7
My reading of the progression is:
Amaj7 We're in the key of A for the moment
Dmaj7 simple I -> IV (I-IV-V movement)
C#m7 stepwide downward root motion
Fo what's this dissonant sound? have to see where it goes.
F#m7 oh, the Fdim interrupted the C#m7 -> F#m7 circle of fifths (V -> I) movement
Em continuing to move stepwise down, setting up an expected ii ->V circle of fifths progression
Eo another wtf chord, I need to find out where it's going to figure it out
Dmaj7 cadence back to I, so I treat the Edim as a tension chord, functioning as a sort of funky V7
Back to my point: for much of this lazy analysis, I could just look a the bass note and ignore everything else, and pretty much get the same understanding.
-- David Cuny My virtual singer development blogVocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?BiaB 2025 | Windows 11 | Reaper | Way too many VSTis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,602
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,602 |
Or for that matter an inversion of D11, whether minor or major?
What key is the song?
What was the previous and next chord?
Those two questions can be important when determining how to refer to the chord. Rharv, you bring up some good questions that go to the complexity of this subject; context seems to be very important. So what if we establish 3 different contexts so they can be specifically addressed separately? Context 1(most simple): Piano player in his studio by himself and only plays individual chords with his right hand. No songs are played. Context 2 (a little complex): Piano player still plays chords with only his right hand but a bass player is with him. Again, no songs are played. Context 3 (complex): Piano player, bass player and drummer come together and play a complete song in a single unambiguous key. The goal here is to understand Levitin’s 2 statements. “Joni’s genius was she creates chords that are ambiguous, chords that could have two or more different roots.”
“The brilliance of Jaco, Joni said, is that he instinctively knew to wander around the possibility space, reinforcing the different chord interpretations with equal emphasis, sublimely holding the ambiguity in a delicate, suspended balance.”Regarding the simplest case, Context 1, if the piano player plays C – E – G (increasing pitch as you move from C to E to G, my question is this an ambiguous or unambiguous chord? My answer: It’s an unambiguous Cmaj chord. Reasoning: The pianist is providing a root, a 3rd and a 5th, therefore it’s a fully voiced, unambiguous chord. Am I wrong? No, you are not wrong, in that if the piano player intended to play a C chord (and did) it is unambiguous in the simplest sense. But again, three (or even 4) notes does not necessarily define a chord, as a few people have pointed out (theoretically). Key of song, surrounding chords.
Last edited by rharv; 01/07/26 03:50 PM.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,758
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,758 |
Ambiguity comes from various places. Part of disambiguating something is determining what sort of thing it is. When we hear a chord with no context, we generally listen for stable intervals to determine the root of the chord, as the root is generally how we determine function. With a C-E-G, the most stable intervals are C-G (perfect fifth) and C-E (major third). An inversion of those notes G-E-C gives less stable intervals, but we'll often infer a chord anyway. If we can "find" an arrangement that gives a more stable explanation, we'll hear it as an inverted stable chord. The lowest note interacts with the higher notes, creating tensions via waves interacting. And some chords are unstable by nature, like the Dim7 chord. That's a stack of minor thirds (with a diminished fifth and dom7) so there's no stable interval to be found. Each one of the notes has equal claim to being the root, but the lowest note usually wins. Jazzers often like to think of a diminished chords as a 7th chord missing the root, because we like to "understand" things using stable intervals, even if they aren't there at all. David, I agree with rharv. In my opinion, this is one of your better posts and one of the better posts so far in this thread on the subject of chord ambiguity. Hopefully, the "what sort of thing it is" will be addresses as we work thru Contexts 1, 2 and 3. I'm going to try to capture in a document the "gem statements" that get made so I don't lose them in the sometimes cacophony of this thread. One gem for me is: "When we hear a chord with no context, we generally listen for stable intervals to determine the root of the chord, as the root is generally how we determine function."Keep these gems coming
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677BiaB 2026 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,662
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,662 |
I had little idea on how important the bass is until this thread.
I think I'm slowly understanding this, but I think more discussion is needed to really clarify this.
What if in your studio there is no song and no key, you just play C-E-G (with pitch increasing from left to right) as a chord on your piano. Is that an ambiguous chord?
And no one else has used the term "rootless voicing", I think that brings some clarity. Bass is fundamental, if you'll forgive the pun. It's also the thing to which the various modes (syn church modes) are anchored. It's quite possible that rootless voicings are used more by keyboard players than anyone else. Obviously it's a chording thing, but maybe it's less often used by, e.g., guitarists. I'd not really thought about it. A quick web search shows them for guitar. Two things that keys frequently do that may be less used by other instrumentalists are the rootless voicings and voice leading. The former means no root notes and the latter results in at least some chords in inversions, i.e., not having the root note at the bottom of the chord ... we'll usually expect the bass player to supply that, whilst the bass player usually prefers that we stay out of their tonal area. That's a fair deal  Rootless voicing by themselves, almost(?) by definition don't really resolve anywhere ... the chord progression is never quite 'done'. They need the bass note for them to be able to resolve.
Jazz relative beginner, starting at a much older age than was helpful.
AVL:MXE Linux; Windows 11
BIAB2026 Audiophile, a bunch of other software.
Kawai MP6, Ui24R, Focusrite Saffire Pro40 and Scarletts
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,662
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,662 |
Jazzers often like to think of a diminished chords as a 7th chord missing the root, because we like to "understand" things using stable intervals, even if they aren't there at all. The other thing about diminished triads and fully diminished 7 chords, of course, is that there are effectively only three of them for the whole octave because they invert seamlessly. Again a separate bass note gives the context.
Jazz relative beginner, starting at a much older age than was helpful.
AVL:MXE Linux; Windows 11
BIAB2026 Audiophile, a bunch of other software.
Kawai MP6, Ui24R, Focusrite Saffire Pro40 and Scarletts
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,758
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,758 |
Steve, you have gotten some good information in this thread. IMHO the most important was what is the key signature and what is the chord progression. Why? Because sometimes the bass note, regardless what instrument plays it (bass guitar, tuba, piano, etc) determines the chord's name. Sometimes the same bass note does not determine the chord's name; go back to the C6, Am7, C/A , posts. What names the chord is usually the combination of the key signature and what comes prior to and after the chord regardless of the bass note. This has been mentioned before. For an examples Google/Bing "Ambiguous chords in music" and you will get answers to your questions. Here is one example: https://www.beyondmusictheory.org/harmonic-ambiguity/I give you credit for throwing your yourself into this deep music theory topic. Now I say this in all due respect Steve but what is missing is the music theory foundation. Getting it piecemeal like this helps but IMHO getting a music theory book will build the foundation much faster. YMMV Yes, I/we have gotten good info here and thanks for the weblink. I had already found that webpage and am reading it. I do have a music theory book but there is no "Ambiguous Chord" entry in the index, it's probably covered deep under another topic. Music theory is a vast subject and my goal is not to master it all, just fill in some gaps I'm curious about. Hopefully others will also have their gaps filled. And I'm curious about the Joni/Jaco musical relationship as stated earlier. Getting it piecemeal can be useful as we can ask very specific questions. Plus, how can we attract and retain young, intelligent muscians to be ambassadors for this forum and BiaB unless we have smart, interesting and useful discussions here? Btw, you never gave a reference for your “IF there is only a guitar then any chord is an ambiguous chord because there is no bass.” statement. Did you read that at a website?
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677BiaB 2026 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,197
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,197 |
Btw, you never gave a reference for your “IF there is only a guitar then any chord is an ambiguous chord because there is no bass.” statement. Well, some guitarists consider the low two string on the guitar the "bass" strings, so...  The song "Witchita Lineman" is often used as an example of a pop song where the key is ambiguous, as it plays between F major and D minor: https://tonyconniff.com/the-chords-of-wichita-lineman-blew-me-away/The point of this is not that chords can be ambiguous, but the intentional and artful use of that ambiguity can elevate a song.
-- David Cuny My virtual singer development blogVocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?BiaB 2025 | Windows 11 | Reaper | Way too many VSTis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,699
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,699 |
................................................................
Btw, you never gave a reference for your “IF there is only a guitar then any chord is an ambiguous chord because there is no bass.” statement.
Did you read that at a website? From searching ambiguous chords "An interval or chord is said to be harmonically ambiguous when it does not imply a clear root.........." Go back and look at the guitar chord pictures I posted earlier in this thread and you will see two examples of where a guitar only chord can have different names based on what note in the guitar chord the guitarist calls the bass note. That note does not have to be the lowest note in the chord. This is because there is no one playing the bass, whether it is a bass guitar, piano, tuba, etc. In the guitar only situation the key signature and the chords prior and after would determine the chord name.
OK, a random thought;
Why does toilet paper need a commercial? Who's not buying it?
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,758
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,758 |
No, you are not wrong, in that if the piano player intended to play a C chord (and did) it is unambiguous in the simplest sense.
But again, three (or even 4) notes does not necessarily define a chord, as a few people have pointed out (theoretically). I didn’t think you would disagree. OK, we’ve established that the piano, and by extension, any instrument capable of playing multiple notes simultaneously can play unambiguous chords. And clearly, they can play ambiguous ones as well, like E – G. So now let’s move on to Context 2 where we have a pianist and a bass player. We saw that when the guitarist plays E-G (ambiguous chord) If the bassist plays C we get Cmajor (1-3-5), pretty straight forward. If the bassist plays D we get Dsus2sus4 My logic train: 1. Reference scale is Dmaj: D E F# G A B C# 2. The note pile D-E-G is a 1-2-4 3. The 3rd (F#) is missing in the pile, therefore it’s a suspended chord 4. E indicates sus2 5. G indicates sus4 6. Because A (the 5th) is not specified, it is simply omitted 7. Final chord name: Dsus2sus4 If the bassist plays some other note, that too can create a different unambiguous chord from the ambiguous E-G chord. I’ve always loved the bass, see my signature, but I’m only now gaining an appreciation of how important the bass player actually is. I think all bass players deserve a pay raise, a personal Lear jet and maybe a summer home on the French Riviera But when you say " But again, three (or even 4) notes does not necessarily define a chord, as a few people have pointed out (theoretically)." My understanding is that any combination of 2 or more notes does form a chord. In Western music theory, a chord is a group of notes played together for their harmonic consonance or dissonance.--Wikipedia
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677BiaB 2026 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,194
Posts801,818
Members40,064
| |
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean