Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
#185115 12/17/12 09:36 AM
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 120
Harpo Offline OP
Apprentice
OP Offline
Apprentice
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 120
Hi All

I just responded to a new BIAB buyer/user who just purchased the BIAB Audiophile Edition.
I've been eyeballing this option for some time now, and really haven't seen many (if any) people posting on the forum any info about these files.

So what I want to know is,
"Are there any people out there who have opted to buy the Audiophile Edition of BIAB?
And those who have,
"What is your experience? Have you purchased the compressed files in the past and were not satisfied, Is there a drastic difference in sound quality between the two, are they easier to work with within RealBand or other DAW's out there, etc?"

It would really be awesome if PG Music had some sound demos to show the quality difference between the two for us to hear. Maybe they woud get more people to buy that particular edition if we could actually "hear" the advantages.

So the next best thing is to hear from you "Audiophiles" who have purchased it, and hear your views (the pros and cons, if any).

Can anyone convince me to buy into it?

Harpo


It's not what you're "Playing", It's what you're "Saying"!
Harpo #185116 12/17/12 10:35 AM
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 392
A
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
A
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 392
I haven't purchased the audiophile version and would have no use for it but just a couple of thoughts.

Most importantly, the quality of the OUTPUT of sound has a LOT to do with the equipment used to produce that output.

I am certain that PG could provide statistics on the amount of DATA generated by the audiophile version vs. standard. But that would only describe what data is PRESENT...and would have nothing to do with what data anyone's system is capable of PRODUCING.

Having been in a LOT of recording studios in my life, I guarantee you that there is a STUNNING difference between how the SAME musical data sounds when produced via different combinations of amps/speakers.

Trust me...a lot of recording engineers sort of laugh in their sleeves when mixing/mastering music on rigs costing twenties of thousands of dollars MINIMUM when they know that a lot of that music will be listened to on car stereo systems or cheap in-home systems. Heck...one German company offers an Ipod speaker system for FOUR GRAND!!!!

And high end audiphile sound systems can cost WAY more than $100K!!!! So listening to audiophile music over inexpensive systems is sort of the opposite of "garbage in--garbage out."

(-:

So my own personal take is that unless you are producing music for commercial release and/or are able to listen to your BIAB files on a VERY high end stereo system AND you have very highly critical hearing, then you just won't HEAR the enhanced data contained on the audiphile version.

Just my 2 cents.

Best,
Jim

Band-in-a-Box for Windows
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,610
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,610
I agree with Jim. The average ear will not hear any difference...

Cheers,
Mike


Cheers,
Mike

My Music * Asus ROG Strix G15CF 32 GB DDR4 4TB HDD + 1 TB SSD NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8GB Win 11 AKAI EIE PRO Sound Interface. BIAB/RB 2024 UltraPak Build - Latest
MikeK #185118 12/18/12 05:24 AM
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 28
Enthusiast
Offline
Enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 28
Hi Harpo,

I can't really help answer your question at this point in time because UPS has screwed me around good and proper and STILL not delivered my shipment of BIAB, so I'm unable to give you any feedback on the Audiophile edition. However, if you go back FOUR pages on this same forum, you will find my original thread titled "Confusion over compressed files vs un-compressed files". It's the THIRD thread down from the top. Peter Gannon is the the first thread on the same page.

It may be worthwhile having a look at my first thread, because several members here kindly explained how the two file types (compressed and un-compressed) differ from each other, and how in the main, most people would never be able to tell the difference between the two, and how the quality of your recordings depends a lot on the quality of the gear one uses, more than the different file type. It's worth reading.

Like you, I would have liked to have heard demos from both the Regular edition as well as the Audiophile edition prior to my purchase, just so I could tell from my own personal audio perspective if I could actually detect any difference between the two, but there was no demos offering a comparison, so, I weighed up the knowledgeable information given to me by the other members, and made my purchase. For personal reasons, I needed to commit to purchasing one edition or the other by the end of this year. So, in the end, I simply chose to buy the Audiophile edition.

I'm sure there are a number of members here who have either the Audiophile or the Regular edition, or have had experience with using both. I sincerely hope a few of those members can chime in and help answer your initial question regarding the Pros and Cons of each edition or their comparison from personal use.

All the best,
Dome

EDIT: Before I asked the forum members here what the difference between the two file types was, I sent an e-Mail to PG sales and asked them this same question, but didn't hear back from them for several days, so I decided to ask my question here on the forum. When PG Sales eventually got back to me, the answer I got from two of the sales team (they answered my message twice) was ..."The un-compressed files sound better". Still very difficult trying to make an informed decision with an answer like that and no demos comparing the two file types.

Last edited by Dome; 12/18/12 05:44 AM.

BIAB Audiophile, Reaper, Kontakt Full Edition, Roland A90-EX Master Controller MIDI keyboard, Windows 7 x64
Dome #185119 12/18/12 07:39 AM
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 23
D
Enthusiast
Offline
Enthusiast
D
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 23
Consider the following analogy:

When you print a document out on a laser printer it looks sharp with no artifacts around the edges of text. That`s the uncompressed first-generation version. When you make a photocopy of that page it generally looks very good but a keen eye will distinguish the difference. That`s the compressed second-generation version. If you were to photocopy the copied page you would begin to see noticeable artifacting. You are essentially compressing an already compressed version, making it third-generation.

When you play music through BIAB using the compressed version you are hearing high quality second-generation audio. When you save that music as a MP3 or WMA file you are recompressing the compressed files, giving you third-generation audio. If you futher manipulate the music in a DAW and save it out again, you are compressing it even further.

Still, as Jim and Mike point out most people can not tell the difference.

When deciding on which edition to purchase, the driving consideration should be 'What is the intended purpose of the generated tracks?'

If your tunes are backing tracks for gigging or jamming with, or background music for videos, then the compressed version is completely adequate, in my opinion. If your needs are more professional, such as charging people to make demos, you should buy the Audiophile version.

If you plan on editing the tracks in a DAW then you would benefit from the uncompressed tracks of the Audiophile because there is more `headroom` in the files for the nuances of musical overtones and such. Naturally you would work in the realm of WAV as much as possible. (For the record, WAV files themselves are compressed and the concerns around recompression exist here, too.) CD quality is 16-bit, 44.1 KHz but modern recording is now done at 24-bit, 192 KHz to allow for more manipulation without artifacting.

"The un-compressed files sound better" is an accurate but lazy response. IMHO the response should be "The un-compressed files are higher quality samples better suited for further audio editing." Or something like that.



- Walter


BIAB 2016, build 427, i7-2600k, 10 GB RAM.
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 59
S
Enthusiast
Offline
Enthusiast
S
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 59
If you want to buy it just for your own listening pleasure, I would think the Audiophile is overkill. I bought it first time for 2013 now. I am busy producing an album and will use mainly the accoustic guitar from realband for this.

Maybe it is just my imagination, but I think it makes a huge difference. When audio is compressed, the high end is usually lost, or at least impacted more severely than the mids.

Accoustic guitars are usually mixed in a busy rock mix by taking the bottom out, and even the mids, to make place for the vocals. What you are left with is the highs. So, all you end up with in a rock mix is the highs - exactly those areas that has been lost when the waves are compressed as wmv.

When I got my audiphile disc, I dropped the new files into my songs, and had to re-adjust all my mixes again.

So, yes, in my opinion, it does make a difference.

Last edited by Sepheritoh; 12/19/12 07:15 AM.
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 120
Harpo Offline OP
Apprentice
OP Offline
Apprentice
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 120
Sepheritoh,

I'm sure there's a difference or they wouldn't be available as a separate option from PG Music, but I wonder if it comes down to the individuals expertise as an engineer/mixer that would allow the compressed tracks to sit in the mix as well as the uncompressed tracks.

Which brings us to "samples". Are they not compressed as well?
Samples are used almost as much as live sounds these days in music production and they seem to not have any derogatory effect on the mix as far as sound is concerned. Something to think about.

What do you think?

I still wish i could hear them side by side.

Harpo


It's not what you're "Playing", It's what you're "Saying"!
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 886
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 886
Quote:

Maybe it is just my imagination, but I think it makes a huge difference. When audio is compressed, the high end is usually lost, or at least impacted more severely than the mids.




^^^^
This...

The Upper-Mid to Highs sound "edgy", or "washy", especially in the Cymbals & Acoustic Guitar Range, when .wav's are converted to.wma, .mp3 or .ogg or any other "lossy" format. Tho using a higher bit rate "320kb instead of 160kb) helps SOME, the artifacts are still there.

Like has been said, most folks would not even notice, but you would be surprised how many do....


i5 3.20GHz, 32gb RAM, 1tb SSD OS, 12tb HDD, 4gb gForce vid card, 32" monitor, Audient id44, Win10 x64, BiaB/RB 2023, Reaper 6,IK Multimedia Total Studio 3.5 MAX, Waves 10
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows Special Offers End Tomorrow (January 15th, 2026) at 11:59 PM PST!

Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PST on Thursday, January 15, 2026!

We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!

Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.

Another exciting new addition is the new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. You can view the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to process an entire track or focus on specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.

There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!

Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Windows to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!

Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.

If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!

Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® Special Offers Extended Until January 15, 2026!

Good news! You still have time to upgrade to the latest version of Band-in-a-Box® for Windows® and save. Our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® special now runs through January 15, 2025!

We've packed Band-in-a-Box® 2026 with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can process an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!

There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.

When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PST on January 15th, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.

Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® today! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.

Happy New Year!

Thank you for being part of the Band-in-a-Box® community.

Wishing you and yours a very happy 2026—Happy New Year from all of us at PG Music!

Season's Greetings!

Wishing everyone a happy, healthy holiday season—thanks for being part of our community!

The office will be closed for Christmas Day, but we will be back on Boxing Day (Dec 26th) at 6:00am PST.

Team PG

Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: The Newly Designed Piano Roll Window

In this video, we explore the updated Piano Roll, complete with a modernized look and exciting new features. You’ll see new filtering options that make it easy to focus on specific note groups, smoother and more intuitive note entry and editing, and enhanced options for zooming, looping, and more.

Watch the video.

You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!

Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: AI Stems & Notes - split polyphonic audio into instruments and transcribe

This video demonstrates how to use the new AI-Notes feature together with the AI-Stems splitter, allowing you to select an audio file and have it separated into individual stems while transcribing each one to its own MIDI track. AI-Notes converts polyphonic audio—either full mixes or individual instruments—into MIDI that you can view in notation or play back instantly.

Watch the video.

You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!

Bonus PAK and 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®

With your version 2026 for Windows Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!

These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!

This Free Bonus PAK includes:

  • The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK: -For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles. -For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles. -For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
  • MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
  • MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
  • Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
  • Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
  • Playable RealTracks Set 5
  • RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
  • SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
  • Android Band-in-a-Box® App (included)

Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:


  • 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
  • FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
  • MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
  • MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
  • Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
  • Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
  • RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
  • SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)

Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!

Forum Statistics
Forums57
Topics85,739
Posts795,613
Members39,946
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
Newest Members
LaneWright55, Diddlysquat, pun61, smitoz, Jonnyfartpants
39,945 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 191
DC Ron 117
Noel96 114
DrDan 103
rsdean 102
dcuny 93
Today's Birthdays
Ariloum, colly, dedou83, jlewis67, matzemu, Mike Levin, zakbosco
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5