This is going to be perceived as a “Get off of my lawn!” observation by some.
I listen to quite a few music podcasts to turn my attention to artists I haven’t heard before. Discovering new music to me is one of life’s great pleasures. Sharing those discoveries with others is part of that enjoyment.
Today on the September 7 2018 All Songs Considered podcast they featured two different artists who used the word f-ing as an adjective. The use had nothing to do with describing sex.
One of the artists was described as a great lyricist.
I’m sorry, but that use of the word as a 2 syllable placeholder for the thousands upon thousands of available 2 syllable adjectives and adverbs in the English language is just plain lazy. That artist is a lazy and uninspired lyricist.
If you have resorted to this use of f-ing, please ask yourself next time: “what might fit better here instead of f-ing?”
Unfortunately it’s use doesn’t even shock any longer. It’s not cool. It’s not hip. It’s not useful as a word of protest or praise; nor does it’s root offer any of these benefits.
Fellow songwriters, if you agree with me please share these words. I will sign it here with my actual name. Let’s encourage our fellow songwriters to reach a little farther. I want to hear more of their creativity rather than this laziest of word selections. Signed, Scott Lake
I agree with this 1000% and I will gladly add my name.
Anyone who has spent five minutes around me will tell you I am no prude and I can get kinda "out there" sometimes. WAY out there. As in, you have NO IDEA how out there.
But ever since I was a kid my opinion on this has not changed:
If you have to use the f-word to conjure up emotion or anger, or whatever it is you are trying to conjure up, you don't know how to write--in my opinion. If you have to use any vulgarity with regularity as a stylistic device, you don't know how to write--in my opinion. To me, it's a cheap carnival trick and it makes my skin crawl. Kind of the literary equivalent of a pie in the face. Couldn't you think of something else??? But hey, you're talking about a guy who can't sit through a David Mamet play like Glengarry Glen Ross. Ok I get it. You know the f-word. You know how to use it every other word. Point well taken. But I'm outta here. I'm very bored now.
Also, that James Blunt song--"You're Beautiful." Let's talk about that.
Ok, I have stood on many a NYC subway platform catching the morning train, the midday train and the midnight train. I have stood on every platform in that city at every hour of the day. And I am thinking: Smokin' hot Upper East Side woman fresh from Saks is standing there with her hedge fund husband.
A kid who has been smoking dope all day is standing there in his busted sneakers, walks up to her and says:
"I saw you from across the way. And hey, I'm so f.....high, I don't have a job...and I know you are living in a 10 million dollar apartment with this f..ing banking dude who bought you that 5 carat ring, but I just think you're f...ing beautiful, and I'm so f....ing high, don't you want to f...ing ditch that money grubber and come live with me on my piece of cardboard on 14th street?"
And she turns to him says:
"Get lost you lazy loser."
But I digress.
Anyway, I sign my name.
DAVID SNYDER
For the "Please find another word for the Love of God!!" Campaign
Thank You!!!!
David Snyder Songwriter/Renaissance Man Studio + Fingers
Unfortunate but coarse and foul language is becoming more common and accepted by society. It's not just the "F" word, the "D" word is in everyday use too.
Artists use to make multiple versions of a song, one explicit for "the album" and a second revised for airplay. That doesn't seem to be as common anymore.
I know Bill Crosby is not as looked up to as he was in his prime but I agree with one statement he made, "you don't need to resort to foul language to be a funny comedian".
I'm a grown up so I realize coarse and foul language have there place, but I feel the language is not intended for common use. When I hear it in a song or as dialog in a program or movie it instantly ruins whatever mood I was in.
So I agree with you rockstar_not. It is a lazy way to write a song.
I saw that on Face Book.... didn't realize that was you. I didn't comment but the majority of those f'ing people disagreed and thought it was ok to f'ing cuss in a lyric.
I'm of the opinion, if you can't f'ing find a better word to use.... well, you're lazy and probably not all that literate in the King's English anyway.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.com Add nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.
The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
Now, I am not a prude and have myself used naughty words when for example hit my thumb with a hammer or other similar human catastrophes .
Using the " F word " has no place in music and when i hear those words in music i simply hit stop and move on to another song and memorize the name of the so called artist to never ever play or listen to his/her songs .
Mac Audiophile 2020 2019 2018 2017 USB plus previous years versions
As a 71 year old....I'm in total agreement with all others.
It makes one wonder what demographic they're (successfully) marketing too?. My guess....it's the rapper genre thugs who think they're actually being creative outside the lyrical box or the teeny boppers that think it's cool and hip to sing along when the parents aren't home.
I don't know, but like many here I've been doing music/writing/recording for decades and it would never occur to me/us to write lyrics with such course language. It's just one more reason I detest the bulk of contemporary music....in all my subjectivity. (And the videos out there?....OMG.....that's for another topic.)
In a screen-play or in a lyric which has characters talking, it's a sure fire way to identify the character as inarticulate. It may have some purpose otherwise, but if it is just tossed around that's why. If the songwriter is writing in his own voice, then obviously he IS inarticulate.
Didn’t know you were in the February Album Writing Month Facebook group! Or was it in the All Songs Considered podcast group? In the FAWM group most of the dissenters seemed to think I was advocating censorship. Not that at all. Just wishing for more creative lyric writing.
I copied the following from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7G8ni5y6gjw "King of Fuh" by Brute Force. Arranged by George Harrison, championed by John Lennon and released on The Beatles Apple Records (Apple8). And then it was banned in the U.S., making it the rarest of Apple singles. Originally released in 1967.
Also I remember at school in English Literature when we had to read "The Canterbury Tales" by Geoffrey Chaucer written in 1392, especially The Reeve's Tale where the noun is written.
"Through this long night there'll be for me no rest; But never mind, 'twill all be for the best. For, John," said he, "as ever I'll take my luck, As, if I can, that very wench I'll f***."
I think it really depends on the rest of the writing for the lyrics. What were the rest of the lyrics like? I think it's hard to judge unless you can read all the lyrics and have a better context. At the end of the day, it's ultimately just a word. Not one I personally use in my day-to-day, but I don't think that someone is necessarily a lazy lyricist based off a single word. I'd need it in context with the rest of the lyrics before I could pass judgement, but that's just my opinion. I respect what everyone has had to offer on this conversation so far and it has been an interesting read!
I think it really depends on the rest of the writing for the lyrics. What were the rest of the lyrics like? I think it's hard to judge unless you can read all the lyrics and have a better context. At the end of the day, it's ultimately just a word. Not one I personally use in my day-to-day, but I don't think that someone is necessarily a lazy lyricist based off a single word. I'd need it in context with the rest of the lyrics before I could pass judgement, but that's just my opinion. I respect what everyone has had to offer on this conversation so far and it has been an interesting read!
At the end of the day, it's ultimately just a word. Not one I personally use in my day-to-day, but I don't think that someone is necessarily a lazy lyricist based off a single word.
That's correct. Personally, I'm not offended by any words by anyone and I've used every word in the book. People can write what they want.
The point of my response was that (with respect to writing a song and performing it) I wouldn't write a song using that language thinking it would actually make the song more appealing or listenable to the audience. From my personal writing perspective, I wouldn't be employing that sort of language (under current perceptions) and I think it's unnecessary, uninteresting and 'lazy' in general.....regardless of the 'context' I chose to write about.
Apparently it's working great for thug rap though.
I've waited a bit to say anything about this. It's a touchy subject when someone feels so strongly towards one side.
Scott, I totally understand where you are coming from. What it boils down to for you, I believe, is you feel people should try harder to come up with better ways of expressing themselves. To me, it seems that's asking a lot if that's not their goal.
There are a few other things to consider though. It's not always just being lazy.
One thing to consider is demographic. If I said the word "Frick" around my Mom; she would be appalled at my "potty mouth." If I said it around my kids, they would would giggle and ask me what I just said!
On that same subject, over the weekend my wife, my two youngest, and myself stopped for a quick bite to eat. A guy was on his phone and dropping F-Bombs here and there; with a few other choice words. NOT in an angry way. He was just talking. My wife and I glanced at each other for a second; but the kids didn't seem to even notice. It's not that my wife and I speak that way. It's that a lot of the rest of the world does. If it's become common in everyday conversation; it's natural that it would become common in lyrics. Which bring me to my next point.
Being relatable. That obviously is something that CAN be so important. For certain types of music or songs, to throw that word in meets an expectation for the audience or genre. I personally don't feel it's needed; but understand where others do. They feel it helps them connect with both their audience AND who they personally are. That congruency for an artist can be huge in emoting what they are trying to convey.
I have seen you comment about Beck before. Even he has a song that is titled F*****g With My Head. I'm thinking that song is saying what he wanted it to say.
So, again, I do get what you are saying. I personally have never written a song with that in the lyrics...and have no plans to. I also feel there are more creative choices; however, it's not always about the pure craft of it. I really like some songs of with ridiculously stupid lyrics. But...they make me feel great.
Anyway, I think if you feel posting this on the PG Music forum and signing your name is going to change an industry...actually society; you may be in for disappointment. Look at the average age on the forum, verses the average age of the people writing the lyrics you have issue with and I have a feeling you will see there would be a difference. You will get plenty of agreement here though.
Any shot of real change would be in you contacting every artist as you come across what you feel is lazy writing and see how what kind of reception you get. Most care about dollars over anything you have to say. Again, not everyone is in it for the craft...which I know you already know.
BTW, please don't take my post as against what you are saying. There are PLENTY of times when I hear songs and think "really?"
Chad (Hope that makes it easier)
TEMPO TANTRUM: What a lead singer has when they can't stay in time.
I definitely don't think that cursing in music automatically means the writer is lazy. Some of the most creative lyrics I've come across incorporated swear words. And some of the stupidest lyrics I've ever heard had none whatsoever. It goes both ways too. I've listened to plenty of music with swearing that is pointless and adds nothing to the message. It's a double edged sword.
I do strongly side on that cursing can can add emotion to a song. But you've got to be careful with what you're writing because if you use profanity with reckless abandon you're going to sound downright ridiculous too. There's a fine line that you've got to tread. But if you do it right, the spirit it encapsulates is worth every second. I think swearing can display anger, sadness, vulnerability, desperation, and many other things when utilized properly.
I am admittedly younger than most here, so I grew up with swearing in the mainstream. I don't bat an eyelash at it, and really think nothing of it. It's just another word to me. All in all, I think swearing in music has its place - but in moderation. Too much and it sounds like you just learned your first swear word. But use it a few times in an album and it sounds like you mean it.
I believe context in these situations are everything.
Cursing and music have existed since...well...cursing and music.
I am of the opinion that any word can be grating if used as a lazy crutch. Honestly, how many times have you heard 'Baby' in a song.
I don't think you can claim clean songwriting is objectively better.
Say what you will about John Lennon, we can all agree he was a pretty good songwriter. When I first read this form I immediately thought about 'Working Class Hero', as a classic that drops the ol' F bomb.
I think lazy writing is just lazy writing, no matter the lyrics used to get there.
One thing to keep everything in scope. There are seven credited songwriters for Beyonce's - Run the World (Girls)
C-sharp when you cross the street… or you’re going to B-flat.
Then of course.... there was Country Joe McDonald and the Fish with the Woodstock song..... Gimme an F .... Gimme a U..... Gimme a C...... Gimme a K... What's that spell? What's that spell? What's that spell? Whereupon he starts what was ultimately the biggest anti-vietnam war song ever written. This was before any of the current crop of rappers were even a twinkle in their daddy's eye.
Then.... there's the David Allen Coe Black albums..... look that one up at your own risk.....
Last edited by Guitarhacker; 09/10/1807:37 AM.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.com Add nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.
The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
I copied the following from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7G8ni5y6gjw "King of Fuh" by Brute Force. Arranged by George Harrison, championed by John Lennon and released on The Beatles Apple Records (Apple8). And then it was banned in the U.S., making it the rarest of Apple singles. Originally released in 1967.
OMG... This is the first I've ever heard of this song and I laughed my [*****] off.
Obviously I'm not offended by curse words or using them in songs. I do believe they can add intense emotion where desired. I do however feel that in some genres (mostly rap) that the F word can be over used for no good reason and that I would agree is lazy writing.
When it comes to the word f*ck it really is one of the most versatile words in the English language. It can be used as a noun, a pronoun, an adjective, a verb, an adverb, and more. It can display intense feelings of pain, pleasure, hate and love. It can also be used as nearly every word in a sentence.
Maybe instead of being offended by a word we should learn to embrace it's creative possibilities.
We’ve expanded the Band-in-a-Box® RealTracks library with 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 449-467) across Jazz, Blues, Funk, World, Pop, Rock, Country, Americana, and Praise & Worship—featuring your most requested styles!
Jazz, Blues & World (Sets 449–455):
These RealTracks includes “Soul Jazz” with Neil Swainson (bass), Mike Clark (drums), Charles Treadway (organ), Miles Black (piano), and Brent Mason (guitar). Enjoy “Requested ’60s” jazz, classic acoustic blues with Colin Linden, and more of our popular 2-handed piano soloing. Plus, a RealTracks first—Tango with bandoneon, recorded in Argentina!
Rock & Pop (Sets 456–461):
This collection includes Disco, slap bass ‘70s/‘80s pop, modern and ‘80s metal with Andy Wood, and a unique “Songwriter Potpourri” featuring Chinese folk instruments, piano, banjo, and more. You’ll also find a muted electric guitar style (a RealTracks first!) and “Producer Layered Guitar” styles for slick "produced" sound.
Country, Americana & Praise (Sets 462–467):
We’ve added new RealTracks across bro country, Americana, praise & worship, vintage country, and songwriter piano. Highlights include Brent Mason (electric guitar), Eddie Bayers (drums), Doug Jernigan (pedal steel), John Jarvis (piano), Glen Duncan (banjo, mandolin & fiddle), Mike Harrison (electric bass) and more—offering everything from modern sounds to heartfelt Americana styles
And, if you are looking for more, the 2025 49-PAK (for $49) includes an additional 20 RealTracks with exciting new sounds and genre-spanning styles. Enjoy RealTracks firsts like Chinese instruments (guzheng & dizi), the bandoneon in an authentic Argentine tango trio, and the classic “tic-tac” baritone guitar for vintage country.
You’ll also get slick ’80s metal guitar from Andy Wood, modern metal with guitarist Nico Santora, bass player Nick Schendzielos, and drummer Aaron Stechauner, more praise & worship, indie-folk, modern/bro country with Brent Mason, and “Songwriter Americana” with Johnny Hiland.
Plus, enjoy user-requested styles like Soul Jazz RealDrums, fast Celtic Strathspey guitar, and Chill Hop piano & drums!
With your version 2025 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Or upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
The 2025 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 33 new RealTracks and 65+ new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 29 new RealTracks and 45+ new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 20 new RealStyles.
Look Ma! More MIDI 13: Country & Americana
Instrumental Studies Set 22: 2-Hand Piano Soloing - Rhythm Changes
MIDI SuperTracks Set 44: Jazz Piano
Artist Performance Set 17: Songs with Vocals 7
Playable RealTracks Set 4
RealDrums Stems Set 7: Jazz with Mike Clark
SynthMaster Sounds and Styles (with audio demos)
128 GM MIDI Patch Audio Demos.
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyles,
FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
Look Ma! More MIDI 14: SynthMaster,
Instrumental Studies Set 23: More '80s Hard Rock Soloing,
MIDI SuperTracks Set 45: More SynthMaster
Artist Performance Set 18: Songs with Vocals 8
RealDrums Stems Set 8: Pop, Funk & More with Jerry Roe
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Mac!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
New! XPro Styles PAK 9 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and higher for Mac!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 9 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 29 RealTracks/RealDrums!
We've been hard at it to bring you the latest and greatest in this 9th installment of our popular XPro Styles PAK series! Included are 75 styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres (25 styles each) that fans have come to expect, as well as 25 styles in this volume's wildcard genre: funk & R&B!
If you're itching to get a sneak peek at what's included in XPro Styles PAK 9, here is a small helping of what you can look forward to: Funky R&B Horns, Upbeat Celtic Rock, Jazz Fusion Salsa, Gentle Indie Folk, Cool '60s Soul, Funky '70s R&B, Smooth Jazz Hip Hop, Acoustic Rockabilly Swing, Funky Reggae Dub, Dreamy Retro Latin Jazz, Retro Soul-Rock Fusion, and much more!
Special Pricing! Until July 31, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Windows!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
New! XPro Styles PAK 9 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and higher for Windows!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 9 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 29 RealTracks/RealDrums!
We've been hard at it to bring you the latest and greatest in this 9th installment of our popular XPro Styles PAK series! Included are 75 styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres (25 styles each) that fans have come to expect, as well as 25 styles in this volume's wildcard genre: funk & R&B!
If you're itching to get a sneak peek at what's included in XPro Styles PAK 9, here is a small helping of what you can look forward to: Funky R&B Horns, Upbeat Celtic Rock, Jazz Fusion Salsa, Gentle Indie Folk, Cool '60s Soul, Funky '70s R&B, Smooth Jazz Hip Hop, Acoustic Rockabilly Swing, Funky Reggae Dub, Dreamy Retro Latin Jazz, Retro Soul-Rock Fusion, and much more!
Special Pricing! Until July 31, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: VST3 Plugin Support
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® now includes support for VST3 plugins, alongside VST and AU. Use them with MIDI or audio tracks for even more creative possibilities in your music production.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Macs®: VST3 Plugin Support
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: Using VST3 Plugins
One of our representatives will be happy to help you over the phone. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday, and 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST Saturday. We are closed Sunday. You can also send us your questions via email.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you on our Live Chat or by email. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday; 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST (GMT -8) Saturday; Closed Sunday.
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean