Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 723
Journeyman
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 723 |
Posting your creativity online is not for the faint of heart. You have to have a rather thick skin. Thankfully, most people on the BIAB site are respectful and nice. However on some sites there are always that one or two. While I think it's helpful to get real positive constructive feedback, rather than just LIKES, there are other responses that go far beyond helpful. The other problem I find with social media is that you only have someones written word without all the other communication we usually see, someones facial expressions, tone of voice, body language, etc. Many people are just not good at writing appropriately.
They say everyone has an opinion. As a songwriter, though, you deal with an aspect of modern life that people even just 15 years ago didn’t have to deal with: how quickly an online consumer of your music will offer that opinion.
It’s not just the immediacy of opinions, though. If you’re involved in the creative arts at all, it can be shocking — if you’re not used to it — how harsh, callous and hateful those opinions can be.
How do you deal with haters? And what’s happened to common decency when it comes to expressing a dislike for music?
It’s an important aspect of being in the arts these days, and I don’t suppose it will change much in the foreseeable future. So how do you deal with negativity?
If you’ve been posting or streaming your songs online, and you’re having a hard time coming to terms with people who express hate for what you do, I offer some advice:
Stop reading comments. Easier said than done, but do what you can to simply quell the interest in what others are saying online. This is not the same thing as saying that you shouldn’t care what people think. But there are other — and frankly, better — ways to get people’s opinions.
If you must read and respond, always take the high road. Never let someone’s hateful comments allow you to respond in kind. No matter how harsh they are, reduce it in your mind to the essential “point” they’re making, and then respond as if they worded their comment respectfully. You’d be surprised how much this can disarm an online troll.
Don’t take someone’s negative comment as evidence that you’ve written something bad. Everything you ever write will have those who love it and those who hate it. A bad comment, on the face of it, is not evidence that your song is bad. Be courageous, and keep your long term vision. You became a songwriter for a reason, and one person’s (or even thousands of people’s) opinions shouldn’t be allowed to sway you from that vision.
Online bullying is horrible, there is no doubt. The people who do it can be amazingly normal in most other aspects of life, and it simply makes you shake your head to understand why they allow themselves to descend to the levels they do to express hatred.
The worse thing you can do is succumb and descend to their level. Be strong, remember why you’re doing this, and keep moving forward.
Last edited by Belladonna; 03/23/19 06:58 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,791
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 6,735
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 6,735 |
Belladonna, nicely said. I have slightly different take. In my opinion, there is a huge difference between "hate" comments and negative comments. Hate comments...well, they are hate comments, nothing to argue there. Negative comments can actually be very helpful if they are sincere and offer a backdoor for improvement. I am a proponent of what can be referred to a harsh critique...At times it is better to scrape off wound, so new skin can re-grow faster 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,075
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,075 |
This is an interesting topic for a variety of reasons.
First of all, a person's comments say more about the person making the comments than about the person who is the object of the comments. Comments are generally opinions, and as such, they testify to the mind and heart of the person who is sharing them.
Another interesting aspect of sharing our opinions about music or any kind of personal expression is that some reviewers are actually just saying whether they like it or not, which is highly subjective and not usually what the song writer wants to know. Given the large number of musical genres, the chances are probably slim that any of us will post a song that appeals aesthetically to most people on the forum. Yet, the average person, in the spirit of "honesty" feels compelled to share their dislike or like for the song.
Any time I've ever posted a song, I started with the assumption that subjective comments weren't going to be useful to me. What I wanted to hear was whether or not people could detect what I was trying to accomplish. Whether they noticed the effort made to achieve good time, rhythm and meter. Whether they noticed word play, dual meanings etc, especially if two possible interpretations of a word gave the song two completely different meanings. Whether they noticed and could accurately identify the hook and the melody and the signature guitar riffs. Those are completely different considerations than whether or not all those elements work together to please the listener.
An intelligent person can appreciate things he/she doesn't find pleasing to the ear, if there are other things about it that stand out as being done well. As a general rule, I think its good to ask yourself what the song writer was trying to accomplish, then comment accordingly. I never listen to country music, but some of my favorite BIAB song writers are masters of that genre, and it is a pleasure to watch how they make their magic happen over and over again. But if you were to ask me if I liked the songs for the sake of listening, I'd probably say no. That answer is not a reflection on the songs (which are awesome), it is a reflection on my preferred musical genre, which isn't country.
Does that make sense?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 723
Journeyman
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 723 |
JohnJohnJohn yes!!! RustySpoon I do like your idea of honest, frank but constructive comments. I wouldn't really call that negative, but a constructive comment, if you really have something to say that might help someone or make a difference to improve the song. However as we all know, some people are really sensitive to anything said about a song and may not benefit from the comment and unfortunately it raises negative emotions in that person. Also, sometimes it's way over someone's head the advice given and also may not be helpful. I do think sometimes we would all benefit more from honesty rather than "Good write" or "Another Good One", but I think most people would think it's close to suicide. I think it's in the way something's presented and a lot of people may not know how to do that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 723
Journeyman
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 723 |
Pat Marr, Yes, a technical, objective comment about the write is more helpful than just "Likes". But then I've also found some raw, unpolished less technical songs that stirred my emotion, so for me I can't really say it's all about how professional or polished the writer or musician is. I've found great songs in all genre's, even metal music my son listens too. I tend to like COOL Lyrics and music that emotes and that can happen in many genre's, but again that's just my preferences. I do agree everyone should be applauded for all their hard work and effort just to produce a song as we all know it's not easy.
Last edited by Belladonna; 03/23/19 02:07 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 15,422
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 15,422 |
Obviously the write is of importance but for the User Showcase IMO the most important factor is your use of BiaB and the roll it played in your production. I’ve frequented another forum where the focus is primary on the lyric and melody with little emphasis on production/arrangement values. Those folks can get vicious in a heartbeat. They rip people apart over one line, etc. They seem to have enormously inflated senses of self importance. I think think folks here take a more holistic view of the song. But if one asks specifically for feedback on an aspect of a production they will typically receive it, negative or positive, and it is almost always well stated and civil (even when negative). As a “reviewer” if one is looking at the lyric, the melody, the chord structure, the arrangement, the miix, the mastering, the vocal or instrumental performances and, of course, the use of PG Music products there is a LOT to comment on if one chooses to do so. I tend to comment on the aspects that I feel comfortable in offering a honest opinion and avoid those for which I have little or no experience. FWIW, etc
Bud
Our albums and singles are on Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, YouTube Music, Pandora and more. If interested search on Janice Merritt. Thanks! Our Videos are here on our website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 6,735
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 6,735 |
Well, when you can't control trolls, you just ignore them, but here is idea that can potentially resolve some issues related to misunderstanding that can arise among normal human beings: Sorry, not trying to be sarcastic, I honestly think this is very important topic and if one wants honest critique, there should be a way to indicate if that person is open to less than "positive" comments 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 723
Journeyman
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 723 |
Bud Well said, you summed up this site perfectly and most of us here really appreciate BIAB and PG Music. Also, all the super talented people on this site. It has made all the difference in our music experience.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 723
Journeyman
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 723 |
RustySpoon, So great, Love this, funny!!! We all need a personal threat level symbol. Ha! Ha!
Last edited by Belladonna; 03/23/19 04:44 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,819
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,819 |
I think many times a song is posted without much direction regarding why the post exists.
When a song is posted for listening pleasure, say so. If a song is posted as a lyrics showcase, say so. If the poster is seeking advice, then say you're seeking advice about so and so.
When a person seeks to develop or showcase an audio production skill or technique and is seeking advice or feedback then state that is the goal. I believe it is also nice for the reader to be given some background information so there is an understanding of what skill level the poster believes they are at. Obviously there are different expectations of someone posting "my first ever recording" versus a song released by someone that earns an income from recording or audio production.
There are many different reasons for a song posting. Without knowing why a song is posted it is way too easy to have feelings hurt.
By the way, great topic in need of much discussion. Belladonna I'm very glad you opened this topic.
Jim Fogle - 2025 BiaB (Build 1128) RB (Build 5) - Ultra+ PAK DAWs: Cakewalk Sonar - Standalone: Zoom MRS-8 Laptop: i3 Win 10, 8GB ram 500GB HDD Desktop: i7 Win 11, 12GB ram 256GB SSD, 4 TB HDD Music at: https://fogle622.wix.com/fogle622-audio-home
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,325
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,325 |
I think many times a song is posted without much direction regarding why the post exists. When a song is posted for listening pleasure, say so. If a song is posted as a lyrics showcase, say so. If the poster is seeking advice, then say you're seeking advice about so and so. I totally agree....it's best to be specific about what type of 'direction' the OP desires. Me....if I post a song, it's finished, and I'm only concerned about how the mix translates to other systems....not if my song is appealing or deserves a second listen. If one does give a listen I'm sincerely grateful and more so if they commented on the mix and thought the song actually sucked.  Knowing that song writing is an extremely personal endeavor it takes courage to put one's song writing efforts out for public comments or scrutiny. But....we're all adults here and there's always going to be someone that chimes in who will be perceived as too honest, rude, not patronizing enough or just plain insulting. No matter...I must take the bitter and the sweet, maintain thick skin and ignore the 'bitter'. I have no tolerance for anyone being cruel with their comments. That's my take....a good day to all.
Last edited by chulaivet1966; 03/24/19 10:53 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,276
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,276 |
My take on the showcase is that any song posted is open to comment. Most comments are very positive. On occasion I will give a suggestion based on my perception of said song. However I never do it in a hateful or negative way. I feel all of us on these forums are very respectful to those whom post here.
I have had hateful negative posts on other forums. One person said my stuff was not music at all, it was just garbage. But I tried to listen to his music and it was all rap. Of course his view of music is totally different then mine.
Here people from different genres are very respectful to others. I for one really appreciate that.
I got banned from Weight Watchers for dropping a bag of M&Ms on the floor. It was the best game of Hungry Hippos I've ever seen!
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 723
Journeyman
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 723 |
Jim, I like your idea of the song creator actually giving more information if they want more of a critique other than just presenting a song. Here on the BIAB Forum, it says "User Showcase" so in some ways that says it all. I think many people are just showing what they created with BIAB. But sometimes someone may want more feedback on their songs the production, mix, melody, lyrics, etc. Also, people are at different levels of abilities. So, I think you're correct in that if someone wants more information other than just "Likes" then more information from the poster is helpful. Any I like Misha's sensitivity meter. Ha!! just kidding.
The other thing is that some of us, myself included, may not be skilled enough with technology to really offer input on the mix, production other than just what we would hear, so I notice I tend to comment about lyrics, melody and overall feeling, emotion of the song.
Last edited by Belladonna; 03/25/19 05:22 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 723
Journeyman
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 723 |
Thanks Chulaivet for weighing in. Mario, I have had the same on other sites, so nice this one is friendlier. Also, I've heard "Don't Mess with Old People" They don't like being old in the first place, so are already in a bad mood. Ha!! Just Kidding. We're all headed there if we're lucky.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,325
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,325 |
I have had hateful negative posts on other forums. One person said my stuff was not music at all, it was just garbage. But I tried to listen to his music and it was all rap. Of course his view of music is totally different then mine. Oh boy....shaking my head. Being reminded of what I think of "rap" that person sure had some nerve.  One person's perception of music is another person's definition of noise. Back to it....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,591
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,591 |
Well done piece of thinking, Belladonna. Advice that may be well taken. Also, a praiseworthy line of responses from distinguished forum members. I'll add a thought and be brief, if that's possible. When I hear one of the contributions, just about the last thing on my mind is how that song could be better. There are plenty of threads that allow for technical and aesthetic discussion. Hearing a song is hearing a song, IMHO. If I simply say, "good job," that's a way of saying, "listened, liked, keep up the good work." After a while, we begin to follow each other's work. If I have been lavish with praise at any time, it has been to add extra encouragement to something going the way I like it to go. There is something of the Simon Cowell complex that many people today want to be a part of. Notice, Simon surrounds himself with warm and friendly supportive judges. A little bit of Simon goes a long way.
Last edited by edshaw; 03/25/19 02:37 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 723
Journeyman
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 723 |
Ed Shaw, You have a wonderful, simple reflection on just appreciating someone's creativness without alot of judgement and a cheering on when things are going well. That's a nice way of commenting, unless someone is wanting more and probably they should ask and give more specifics as to what they are seeking feedback on. I agree a little Simon Cowell goes a long way and too many people are trying to be one and come across that way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381 |
Sorry for the bump, but here goes. When I think of all the things that "we" go through as independents to get to something presentable, there aren't enough people commenting at all to cover them all. I'm happy if someone notices one thing about what made "me" think this was a project worth completing, and if some of them are urging me on to stretch a bit further, I'm happy to read them--even if I'm exhausted and just put it in the suggestion box for future stuff. I think it's probably always been this way. Unless I write a song that affects large numbers or even impacts a culture, then no individual will ever give as much thought to that song as I did. At the level of my "audience", everybody combined can't give as much reaction. That's why we have to please ourselves first, last and foremost. On that note, where are you guys posting that draws hate comments? I like Pat's comments. When I was posting at Acid Planet (now defunct), it was a posting venue heavy with EDM and other electronica makers. I knew if one of my songs peaked into the "charts" I'd be getting comments like, "I don't usually like this kind of music, but I think this was pretty good." Even more likely, I'd get comments like "Great track. Check out my latest joint." Now, neither of those was "hateful" (though there were certainly trolls there) but neither was either of them helpful...except every comment tended to get you more exposure. So you could get more comments like that. Does a version of that happen here? That jury is still out with me. Am I posting too much? Probably, but when I'm done, up it goes. In between, I'm just trying to clear out the archive for Dave, and promote other uses of BIAB.  As for comments, I try (and sometimes fail) to gauge where a person is on the great continuum of "talent" and "skill" and not post negative/destructively constructive comments to people who maybe can't benefit from another POV anyway. More power to us all. I've told this before, but it is worth repeating. When I was just a boy, I wrote a song that I was sure would change the spiritual lives of millions. My grandmother said it was "cute". That wasn't "hateful", but it still hurt. My skin is way thicker now, but it was a good lesson in refusing to let the opinions of others deter you. That doesn't (to me) mean you shouldn't let them influence you. For the record, she was way righter than I was.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,681
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,681 |
I've written but a few songs ever meant to have meaning, purpose or social impact. If I have something to say, it's said lyrically. I write for personal enjoyment and fun. If you ask me, I'll typically say I can write a song about any topic one would request. I can but most likely it will be woefully lacking. I rush things and I can go back to every song I've recorded and find something wrong lyrically, arrangement, production or performance - most times, something with each of those elements because I rush and don't take care to critically examine and correct little and not so little things I'm capable of completing. Criticism is expected and deserved.
I love Noel96's critiques and analysis and if one of your songs get his review, you should feel like you've written a gold record because he has the knowledge and talent from years of study and he's seen something worthwhile to take some time with your song and to comment. It's a songwriters highlight to get one of his critiques. At the same time, I've paid money to have Taxi throw away one of my songs. None of my User Showcase releases have ever drawn the attention or comment from Dr. Gannon. He rarely comments, but you've done good work if he does take time to comment.
My guess is if any here on the forum ever achieves commercial success with one of their songs, it will likely to be viewed and interpreted by the public in such a way that was not foreseen by the writer.
As a songwriter, I look good on paper but that has not translated into me becoming a songwriter by trade or even to attempt to make a living from music. I'm curious to know if anyone has been writing longer than me. I had my first song copywrite in 1959. Anyone go back further? I've had a home recording studio of some type since 1968. I've had more than a dozen songs commercially released. I've sold a song to a two time Grammy nominated Producer and it's being distributed worldwide. I've had a song stolen. It's all a paper castle.
I have a long and storied love-hate relationship with songwriting, recording and performing. I've become frustrated at times and given away my entire studio worth thousands of dollars and lost all interest in writing, recording or performing only to rebuild it all again. I only enjoy performing when I'm actually performing. I do not like the preparation, practice or commitment of performing. I do enjoy being a sound engineer for bands and events.
Good songs and good songwriting success boils down to exposure. Read about Gordon Lightfoot, John Mellencamp, Bob Segar and so many others who were touring and playing many of their original songs years before they garnered a break and achieved fame. Their songs were always great songs but were not accepted or sought after by the public until the song became associated with the artist and their fame. If Steve Young, Bob Dean, Floyd Jane, Tom Adams, Bud and Janice, Tangmo, and countless others here on the forum are ever discovered and become a huge commercial success, their existing catalog will also be discovered and some of their work we've been enjoying may become staples and standards in the music industry.
BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New RealTracks Released with Band-in-a-Box 2025!
We’ve expanded the Band-in-a-Box® RealTracks library with 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 449-467) across Jazz, Blues, Funk, World, Pop, Rock, Country, Americana, and Praise & Worship—featuring your most requested styles!
Jazz, Blues & World (Sets 449–455):
These RealTracks includes “Soul Jazz” with Neil Swainson (bass), Mike Clark (drums), Charles Treadway (organ), Miles Black (piano), and Brent Mason (guitar). Enjoy “Requested ’60s” jazz, classic acoustic blues with Colin Linden, and more of our popular 2-handed piano soloing. Plus, a RealTracks first—Tango with bandoneon, recorded in Argentina!
Rock & Pop (Sets 456–461):
This collection includes Disco, slap bass ‘70s/‘80s pop, modern and ‘80s metal with Andy Wood, and a unique “Songwriter Potpourri” featuring Chinese folk instruments, piano, banjo, and more. You’ll also find a muted electric guitar style (a RealTracks first!) and “Producer Layered Guitar” styles for slick "produced" sound.
Country, Americana & Praise (Sets 462–467):
We’ve added new RealTracks across bro country, Americana, praise & worship, vintage country, and songwriter piano. Highlights include Brent Mason (electric guitar), Eddie Bayers (drums), Doug Jernigan (pedal steel), John Jarvis (piano), Glen Duncan (banjo, mandolin & fiddle), Mike Harrison (electric bass) and more—offering everything from modern sounds to heartfelt Americana styles
Check out all the 202 New RealTracks (in sets 456-467)
And, if you are looking for more, the 2025 49-PAK (for $49) includes an additional 20 RealTracks with exciting new sounds and genre-spanning styles. Enjoy RealTracks firsts like Chinese instruments (guzheng & dizi), the bandoneon in an authentic Argentine tango trio, and the classic “tic-tac” baritone guitar for vintage country.
You’ll also get slick ’80s metal guitar from Andy Wood, modern metal with guitarist Nico Santora, bass player Nick Schendzielos, and drummer Aaron Stechauner, more praise & worship, indie-folk, modern/bro country with Brent Mason, and “Songwriter Americana” with Johnny Hiland.
Plus, enjoy user-requested styles like Soul Jazz RealDrums, fast Celtic Strathspey guitar, and Chill Hop piano & drums!
The 2025 49-PAK is loaded with other great new add-ons as well. Learn more about the 2025 49-PAK!
Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac!
With your version 2025 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Or upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2025 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 33 new RealTracks and 65+ new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 29 new RealTracks and 45+ new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 20 new RealStyles.
- Look Ma! More MIDI 13: Country & Americana
- Instrumental Studies Set 22: 2-Hand Piano Soloing - Rhythm Changes
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 44: Jazz Piano
- Artist Performance Set 17: Songs with Vocals 7
- Playable RealTracks Set 4
- RealDrums Stems Set 7: Jazz with Mike Clark
- SynthMaster Sounds and Styles (with audio demos)
- 128 GM MIDI Patch Audio Demos.
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyles,
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- Look Ma! More MIDI 14: SynthMaster,
- Instrumental Studies Set 23: More '80s Hard Rock Soloing,
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 45: More SynthMaster
- Artist Performance Set 18: Songs with Vocals 8
- RealDrums Stems Set 8: Pop, Funk & More with Jerry Roe
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®!
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Mac!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 20.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 20 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
New! XPro Styles PAK 9 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and higher for Mac!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 9 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 29 RealTracks/RealDrums!
We've been hard at it to bring you the latest and greatest in this 9th installment of our popular XPro Styles PAK series! Included are 75 styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres (25 styles each) that fans have come to expect, as well as 25 styles in this volume's wildcard genre: funk & R&B!
If you're itching to get a sneak peek at what's included in XPro Styles PAK 9, here is a small helping of what you can look forward to: Funky R&B Horns, Upbeat Celtic Rock, Jazz Fusion Salsa, Gentle Indie Folk, Cool '60s Soul, Funky '70s R&B, Smooth Jazz Hip Hop, Acoustic Rockabilly Swing, Funky Reggae Dub, Dreamy Retro Latin Jazz, Retro Soul-Rock Fusion, and much more!
Special Pricing! Until July 31, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 9 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Windows!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 20.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 20 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
New! XPro Styles PAK 9 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and higher for Windows!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 9 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 29 RealTracks/RealDrums!
We've been hard at it to bring you the latest and greatest in this 9th installment of our popular XPro Styles PAK series! Included are 75 styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres (25 styles each) that fans have come to expect, as well as 25 styles in this volume's wildcard genre: funk & R&B!
If you're itching to get a sneak peek at what's included in XPro Styles PAK 9, here is a small helping of what you can look forward to: Funky R&B Horns, Upbeat Celtic Rock, Jazz Fusion Salsa, Gentle Indie Folk, Cool '60s Soul, Funky '70s R&B, Smooth Jazz Hip Hop, Acoustic Rockabilly Swing, Funky Reggae Dub, Dreamy Retro Latin Jazz, Retro Soul-Rock Fusion, and much more!
Special Pricing! Until July 31, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 9 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: VST3 Plugin Support
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® now includes support for VST3 plugins, alongside VST and AU. Use them with MIDI or audio tracks for even more creative possibilities in your music production.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Macs®: VST3 Plugin Support
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: Using VST3 Plugins
Join the conversation on our forum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums58
Topics84,393
Posts778,632
Members39,644
|
Most Online25,754 Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|