|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 297
Apprentice
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 297 |
I'm curious to see what others think the greatest technical advancement for musicians is over the last decade. In my opinion, I believe it has to be the availability of on-demand video of great teachers on just about any instrument or production technique you want to learn. What are your thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,732
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,732 |
I think software tools have really advanced. Two that I have in mind are Melodyne and iZotope products.
Melodyne has really made break throughs in pitch correction and MIDI conversion.
iZotope's Ozone and Neutron have really come up with some good tools like Tonal Balance, Track Referencing, Mix Assistant, and TONS more.
These tech tools really make life easier for those of us who don't have the coin to visit a professional studio. They work flawlessly with our personal home recording studios.
 Steve BIAB/RB 2022, Pro Tools 2020, Korg N5, JBL LSR 4328 Powered Monitors, AKG/Shure Mics.
PC: Win11 PRO, 4 TB M2 SSD, 2 TB HD, 128 GB Memory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,791
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,791 |
I definitely agree it is software! Tools like BIAB, Reaper (or any modern DAW) and Izotope are the Great Equalizers that mean I can release professional tracks without taking a second mortgage to pay for musicians, studio recording/engineering and mastering!
And BIAB is def at the top of that list. It is nothing short of AMAZING what it can do! That is why I'm so passionate about seeing it fixed and improved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
For me it was affordable 24 bit A/D.
I can't remember the last time I thought about spending more than 30 seconds setting recording levels. I know that if I'm getting some green lights on my Scarlett, I've got more than enough clean signal to work with.
I know, kind of boring. But it makes getting clean ideas down so much easier and with less worry about noise.
-Scott
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 57
Enthusiast
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 57 |
For me, it was Bandlab (Sonar reborn) as a free DAW. Impressive and totally free with many added features including Melodyne and several other mastering tools. Definitely the decade was a great advancement in software for the everyday user.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,378
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,378 |
It would be the advances in software. Things like BiaB, Melodyne, Ozone.....to name only a few.... unheard of quality and ease of use.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 15,422
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 15,422 |
Ditto on the software with an emphasis on the power to cost ratio of the latest DAW's. My Logic Pro X costs $199 which includes lifetime frequent upgrades, a zillion plug-ins, loops, sounds and drums.
Bud
Our albums and singles are on Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, YouTube Music, Pandora and more. If interested search on Janice Merritt. Thanks! Our Videos are here on our website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,591
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,591 |
Cheating a little, in that 2007 was 13 years ago, but I'm going to have to say Real Tracks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,275
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,275 |
Ditto on the software with an emphasis on the power to cost ratio of the latest DAW's. My Logic Pro X costs $199 which includes lifetime frequent upgrades, a zillion plug-ins, loops, sounds and drums.
Bud I agree. What we have in Biab, soft synths and hard synths and our DAWs, including RB, would have cost us thousands of dollars 20-30 years ago. That would put all of us out of music for fun and I'll bet most of us would have stopped playing by now.
I got banned from Weight Watchers for dropping a bag of M&Ms on the floor.
It was the best game of Hungry Hippos I've ever seen!
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,819
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,819 |
I think number 1 is the decade long continual advancement in mechanical and solid state memory technologies. In 2009 1 GB SD cards were expensive and hard drives were phasing from 40 GB to 80 GB storage space. It was common for computers to ship with 1 GB of ram and 4 GB was extravagant. I don't think consumer solid state drives were available in 2019.
Jim Fogle - 2025 BiaB (Build 1128) RB (Build 5) - Ultra+ PAK DAWs: Cakewalk Sonar - Standalone: Zoom MRS-8 Laptop: i3 Win 10, 8GB ram 500GB HDD Desktop: i7 Win 11, 12GB ram 256GB SSD, 4 TB HDD Music at: https://fogle622.wix.com/fogle622-audio-home
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 15,422
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 15,422 |
I think number 1 is the decade long continual advancement in mechanical and solid state memory technologies. In 2009 1 GB SD cards were expensive and hard drives were phasing from 40 GB to 80 GB storage space. It was common for computers to ship with 1 GB of ram and 4 GB was extravagant. I don't think consumer solid state drives were available in 2019. Below are the specs for my first Mac in 2009. This was the base model. I ordered it with the terabyte drive and cheaply and easily upgraded it to 24 GB RAM. Perhaps Apple was ahead of the curve:) “The iMac "Core 2 Duo" 3.06 21.5-Inch Aluminum (Late 2009) features a 3.06 GHz Intel "Core 2 Duo" processor (E7600), with two independent processor "cores" on a single silicon chip, a 3 MB shared level 2 cache, a 1066 MHz system bus, 4 GB of RAM (1066 MHz PC3-8500 DDR3 SDRAM), a 500 GB or 1 TB (7200 RPM) hard drive. .”
Our albums and singles are on Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, YouTube Music, Pandora and more. If interested search on Janice Merritt. Thanks! Our Videos are here on our website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,057
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,057 |
As a programmer it's hard for me to vote against software, but I vote for SSD drives.
BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,681
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,681 |
The widespread ownership and power of today's home PC is the glue to nearly all of the choices commented on. As the common denominator, most of the advances mentioned are advances that increase PC power and complexity while in many cases, greatly reducing cost. I think of the difference between 1 GB SD card and 1 TB SSD hard drive as more a convenience than a technical advancement to a home studio.
The home studio environment broke the 10-50 thousand dollar barrier in 1972 when TEAC (Tascam) introduced their 2340/3340 reel to reel decks. Other manufacturers quickly followed with their own versions and models and the true home studio market was born. TEAC exploded the market in 1979 introducing the cassette based Porta-Studios. Again other manufacturers quickly followed with their own versions and models.
The home recording studio recorder quality evolved from amateur demo quality to commercial radio ready quality in 1990 when consumer digital hardware became available at a reasonable cost. If $3,499 can be considered reasonable. It was a reasonable cost to what major commercial studios used. A home studio project now had access to a physical recorder capable of matching any recorder in any major studio in the world in recording quality. Tascam DA-88's and similar Alesis digital 8 tracks were in major studios, minor studios and bedrooms.
These are milestones that changed the recording industry for both commercial and consumer recording. The common denominator between both markets was cost and track limitations.
Next came the PC based software DAW's. Software overcame both the cost and track limitation barriers. Cost is somewhat a misnomer because although the cost itself has been enormously reduced, in many studios, and all studios to some degree, that cost reduction is reduced and offset with the purchase of software programs, VST's, VSTi's that in some studios run tens of thousands of dollars cost themselves. The strangest thing I find about PC software is it's entirely based on emulating and imitating classic hardware accessories like compressors, equalizers, reverb, delays, and channel strips and also hardware recorders and preferred over hardware choices even though it comes with a difficult learning curve.
In much the same way that I think of the advances in digital storage benefits in a home or commercial studio being more of a convenience than an advancement that changes the core and path of the recording industry, I think subsequent advances and improvements in PC software to be the same, convenient. An exception could be software that manipulates audio in a manner that did not exist before its invention or is impossible to do with hardware, but I can't think of an example at the moment of such a software that has fundamentally changed how audio and music is recorded in pro studios and home studios. I think of Software in comparison to a toaster. The introduction of toasters changed how we make toast. After that initial introduction to cooking, future toasters could make four, eight or 16 pieces of toast which improved the efficiency and further reduced the cost of making toast but did not change fundamentally the process of making toast.
The problem naming the greatest music tech advance of the past decade is most, if not all the things mentioned were introduced prior to 2010. If they transformed the commercial and consumer music industry, they did so at the time of their introduction, not with subsequent improvements and advances. Edshaw's 2007 example of the introduction of RealTracks is an excellent example. RealTracks have increased in quantity and quality but they are still RealTracks that changed BIAB when they were introduced. Of course, BIAB itself was a fairly old software program by the time RealTracks and RealDrums were introduced.
PC audio software did fundamentally change how music is recorded and processed in both the commercial and consumer markets. It's advanced and improved how we record and process audio and narrowed the gap between quality and quantity of the commercial and consumer markets. The biggest barrier between commercial and consumer end product is now the investment cost of a commercial recording studio environment versus a home bedroom/garage setup. The investment commercial studios put into high quality, professional grade software programs. The operator's education, experience and expertise operating these complex software programs. The investment in hardware such as microphones and external processors. The gap, even with actual recorder of equal quality, remains huge.
To me, although initially introduced in 2004, the newest version of computer hardware to impact and technically advance home and small commercial recording abilities over the last decade is the stand alone, multi track, digital recorder.
A stand alone digital recorder immediately eliminates every tracking issue users face in every DAW recording the user makes. It completely eliminates the need for an audio interface, audio drivers, interface power source, CPU, OS requirements, Physical connections and types, available connection slots, Audio interface installation and updates, Microsoft and Mac OS updates screwing with and changing or disabling your system setup. It will work with whatever computer one currently has for audio and will also work with any and all audio computers you will have in the future. It eliminates operational obstacles like latency.
These factors and others aren't always truly appreciated by users for the immediate benefits received and removal of the above constant distractions from the recording tracking process. There are many benefits to not tracking through a consumer audio interface and doing it without losing quality in the audio. You will always find the input specs of a modern stand alone recorder and the line level outputs to be comparable to any similar cost audio interface. But you will almost always get more inputs, outputs, routing options, digital effects engines, the ability to move more than a single fader at once. They are completely zero latency devices. These devices are portable. Some can be battery operated and are smaller than a paperback novel. They come with many options and differences between brands and models making it super easy to get a unit that has features optimized for your personal recording (tracking) needs and preferences. They all have multiple means to interface and transfer files to and from a PC and DAW. You do not lose any capability of current or future software programs.
So for me, the greatest music tech advance of the past decade is the latest iteration of the stand alone, digital multi track recorder like the Tascam Model 16/24. For $700, the Model 16 provides 10 preamps equal in quality and specs to four and eight channel audio interfaces and record at A/D Resolution of 24-bit/48 kHz. Optimized for a home studio, the Tascam DP-24/32 is in most cases, an even better choice. $400 current cost is very appealing. For artists that record mostly for personal entertainment, using portable units like the Tascam DP-006. 008, 03 or the zoom R8 that all list for $300 or less would be a solid and good choice. Don't be fooled or taken back by their size and cost, properly paired with quality recording gear like condenser mics, external channel strips, external mic preamps, analog or digital mixers, these units are very capable of capturing commercial grade audio clips.
Examine today's digital multi track recorders to be used the same way the DA-88 digital recorders were connected into analog recording chains in the 1990's where the DA-88 replaced analog reel to reel recorders to fully realize the recording functionality that's often overlooked and certainly under-used in modern home recording studios.
I'm not sure how these devices gained a reputation of being sub-standard to a DAW because they're not. They're not toys. Do a side by side comparison of the 4 Track Teac 3340s of 1972 that sold for more than $1,000 to the 24 track Tascam 2488 of 2004 that sold for less than $1,000 or the $199 four track DP-004 from 2008 and both units hands down have more features and better specs that the 3340 that made home recording affordable, possible to produce commercial grade audio and sophisticated enough to reside in bedrooms and main stream studios.
In comparison to PC's for tracking, these devices are more stable, easier to use, easier to learn and operate, and though some are plastic, with normal care, these devices will last for decades and never become obsolete.
Last edited by Charlie Fogle; 01/11/20 08:33 AM.
BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 1,362
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 1,362 |
Well, 3 things come to mind: 1. Sample libraries with orchestral stuff is now generally of such a quality, that discussions about which is best these days is more about personal taste than about if it sounds naturally. Huge improvement compared with how they sounded 15 years ago. 2. That I now can play with and program synths like CS-80, Synclavier and Fairlight - synths that were completely out of my - and most other musicians - reach in the 70s and the 80s. 3. All the new possibilities in sound design we got with things like editing of wavetables, resampling and granular synthesis which got a breakthrough in the last decade with synths like Halion, Iris 2 and recently Pigments 2. Life is good!  Will
Last edited by Will Josef; 01/11/20 01:56 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,588
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,588 |
For me, all of the above and high speed internet. Here in Hong Kong, I have 100 mb or whatever almost everywhere I go. Widespread wifi. It's also part of the glue.
Windows 10 Home 20H2 Build 19042.487
BIAB 2021 (Build 818)
Intel(R) Core(TM), i3-4160, CPU @3.60 GHz RAM 16 GB, 64 Bit X64-based processor
Zoom UAC-2 (USB 3 interface-built in midi)
VoiceLive 3 Extreme, Sputnik Valve Condenser Mic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,753
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,753 |
Me! My technical abilities have advanced greatly in the past decade. But only due to all the cool stuff made available to me.
Does the noise in your head bother me ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,591
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,591 |
Charlie Fogle: Thanks for again going into that wealth of knowledge and experience and taking the time to share it. As a faithful TASCAM user, I always pay close attention to your remarks. For example, I spent a couple of days last week with an Antares Voice and Instrument Processor I hauled out of a closet, still in the same Gator case it has been in for 15 years. I used it to tech the stage of a hip coffee shop in the 80's. In this recent incarnation, it will serve to feed a processed and monitored signal into the digital recorder allowing multiple mikes and guitars as needed.
As an aside, who could forget the iPod, 2001? Originally 512 Mb, capacity soon soared. I still have a classic 256 Gb. No moving parts. Now, there is a case where the product was designed to cram MP3's into a small space and before they were through, there wasn't the same need for compressed audio as there was at the outset. Somewhere in there, there is a message for each of us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 15,422
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 15,422 |
I went from a summer of recording two track reel to reel in a 1966 Atlanta studio > a Tascam Sound on Sound reel in the 70’s > Tascam porta 4 track cassette/8 track cassette units in the 90’s > several Fostex and Tascam HD units in early 2000’s > my current Logic Pro X DAW.
I could not envision working again with the 2000’s tech. The ability to quickly comp multiple RTs (and any other tracks of course) alone is worth way, way more than many times the price of my DAW. Not to mention the hundreds of fx, sounds, etc., that reside only a click or two away.
FWIW, IMHO, grains of salt, etc.
Bud
Our albums and singles are on Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, YouTube Music, Pandora and more. If interested search on Janice Merritt. Thanks! Our Videos are here on our website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,819
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,819 |
Charlie,
As long as you're talking about strictly audio recording, I agree with you. But there is an area of music production standalone digital recorders have forgotten, MIDI.
As far as I know none of the recorders offered at this time have midi input or output capability. None can act as a master and send MIDI transport data to remotely control a midi equipped keyboard. None can accept midi data.
Why did I say forgotten? Because many digital recorders sold in the 2000's had that functionality including the Zoom MRS series, TASCAM 2488 and Boss BR series.
Jim Fogle - 2025 BiaB (Build 1128) RB (Build 5) - Ultra+ PAK DAWs: Cakewalk Sonar - Standalone: Zoom MRS-8 Laptop: i3 Win 10, 8GB ram 500GB HDD Desktop: i7 Win 11, 12GB ram 256GB SSD, 4 TB HDD Music at: https://fogle622.wix.com/fogle622-audio-home
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,681
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,681 |
<<< Why did I say forgotten? Because many digital recorders sold in the 2000's had that functionality including the Zoom MRS series, TASCAM 2488 and Boss BR series. >>>
They were not forgotten but instead, evolved beyond. I think research found those features unused and other devices were developed with far better features and capability to handle midi. A feature found on some models is the inclusion of a jack to accept a foot switch to control transport functions.
That all manufacturers jointly dropped midi is evidence it was obsolete to how the recorders were ultimately used by the greater majority of users. Every digital recorder, even the cheapest models, have stereo or 2 mono input that accepts line level audio output from keyboards, drum machines, effects machines and computers where midi manipulation is better suited.
EDIT: Here's a claim I can speculate about a digital stand alone recorder that separates it from every other music tech advance post 1970: Put a modern Tascam DP-24 in the hands of George Martin and the Beatles or Brian Wilson and the Beach Boys/wrecking crew in 1967 and give them only two hours to learn the physical operation and controls, and in the third hour that followed, the DP-24 would be connected and the artists would be making music beyond anything they could create with the existing technology of that day. Stand alone recorders are the only technology and medium that bridges the technology across the entire span of musical multi track recording from the late 50's - early 60's to today. Because it is completely a self-contained operating system that's not dependent on any other exterior connections than the physical audio connections, the OS technology would have worked just fine in 1967. From an operational standpoint, the terminology, physical connections, dials, buttons and faders would be familiar to the engineers, producers and artists back then. The physical audio connections were compatible. What I'm saying is if it were possible, a Tascam (or similar) digital stand alone recorder could directly replace the Ampeg 4 track 2" reel to Reel recorder in Abby Road Studios with a 24 track digital recorder in 1967 and every internal and external connection with he exception of USB and other operations specific to computer communication would work. From a tracking perspective, any lower end 4 track models with compatible connections could replace the tape machine.
Both keyboards and synthesizers technologies existed in this time period and were integrated and utilized in major studio recording by major artists like the Beatles and Beach Boys. Digital recorders did not exist so I suggest and think digital recorders, rather than DAW's, keyboards and synthesizers, are the greatest advance spanning the entire musical multi track existence. It is the single medium that would integrate and work in the same manner today.
Last edited by Charlie Fogle; 01/13/20 03:01 AM.
BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New RealTracks Released with Band-in-a-Box 2025!
We’ve expanded the Band-in-a-Box® RealTracks library with 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 449-467) across Jazz, Blues, Funk, World, Pop, Rock, Country, Americana, and Praise & Worship—featuring your most requested styles!
Jazz, Blues & World (Sets 449–455):
These RealTracks includes “Soul Jazz” with Neil Swainson (bass), Mike Clark (drums), Charles Treadway (organ), Miles Black (piano), and Brent Mason (guitar). Enjoy “Requested ’60s” jazz, classic acoustic blues with Colin Linden, and more of our popular 2-handed piano soloing. Plus, a RealTracks first—Tango with bandoneon, recorded in Argentina!
Rock & Pop (Sets 456–461):
This collection includes Disco, slap bass ‘70s/‘80s pop, modern and ‘80s metal with Andy Wood, and a unique “Songwriter Potpourri” featuring Chinese folk instruments, piano, banjo, and more. You’ll also find a muted electric guitar style (a RealTracks first!) and “Producer Layered Guitar” styles for slick "produced" sound.
Country, Americana & Praise (Sets 462–467):
We’ve added new RealTracks across bro country, Americana, praise & worship, vintage country, and songwriter piano. Highlights include Brent Mason (electric guitar), Eddie Bayers (drums), Doug Jernigan (pedal steel), John Jarvis (piano), Glen Duncan (banjo, mandolin & fiddle), Mike Harrison (electric bass) and more—offering everything from modern sounds to heartfelt Americana styles
Check out all the 202 New RealTracks (in sets 456-467)
And, if you are looking for more, the 2025 49-PAK (for $49) includes an additional 20 RealTracks with exciting new sounds and genre-spanning styles. Enjoy RealTracks firsts like Chinese instruments (guzheng & dizi), the bandoneon in an authentic Argentine tango trio, and the classic “tic-tac” baritone guitar for vintage country.
You’ll also get slick ’80s metal guitar from Andy Wood, modern metal with guitarist Nico Santora, bass player Nick Schendzielos, and drummer Aaron Stechauner, more praise & worship, indie-folk, modern/bro country with Brent Mason, and “Songwriter Americana” with Johnny Hiland.
Plus, enjoy user-requested styles like Soul Jazz RealDrums, fast Celtic Strathspey guitar, and Chill Hop piano & drums!
The 2025 49-PAK is loaded with other great new add-ons as well. Learn more about the 2025 49-PAK!
Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac!
With your version 2025 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Or upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2025 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 33 new RealTracks and 65+ new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 29 new RealTracks and 45+ new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 20 new RealStyles.
- Look Ma! More MIDI 13: Country & Americana
- Instrumental Studies Set 22: 2-Hand Piano Soloing - Rhythm Changes
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 44: Jazz Piano
- Artist Performance Set 17: Songs with Vocals 7
- Playable RealTracks Set 4
- RealDrums Stems Set 7: Jazz with Mike Clark
- SynthMaster Sounds and Styles (with audio demos)
- 128 GM MIDI Patch Audio Demos.
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyles,
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- Look Ma! More MIDI 14: SynthMaster,
- Instrumental Studies Set 23: More '80s Hard Rock Soloing,
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 45: More SynthMaster
- Artist Performance Set 18: Songs with Vocals 8
- RealDrums Stems Set 8: Pop, Funk & More with Jerry Roe
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®!
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Mac!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 20.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 20 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
New! XPro Styles PAK 9 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and higher for Mac!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 9 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 29 RealTracks/RealDrums!
We've been hard at it to bring you the latest and greatest in this 9th installment of our popular XPro Styles PAK series! Included are 75 styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres (25 styles each) that fans have come to expect, as well as 25 styles in this volume's wildcard genre: funk & R&B!
If you're itching to get a sneak peek at what's included in XPro Styles PAK 9, here is a small helping of what you can look forward to: Funky R&B Horns, Upbeat Celtic Rock, Jazz Fusion Salsa, Gentle Indie Folk, Cool '60s Soul, Funky '70s R&B, Smooth Jazz Hip Hop, Acoustic Rockabilly Swing, Funky Reggae Dub, Dreamy Retro Latin Jazz, Retro Soul-Rock Fusion, and much more!
Special Pricing! Until July 31, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 9 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Windows!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 20.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 20 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
New! XPro Styles PAK 9 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and higher for Windows!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 9 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 29 RealTracks/RealDrums!
We've been hard at it to bring you the latest and greatest in this 9th installment of our popular XPro Styles PAK series! Included are 75 styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres (25 styles each) that fans have come to expect, as well as 25 styles in this volume's wildcard genre: funk & R&B!
If you're itching to get a sneak peek at what's included in XPro Styles PAK 9, here is a small helping of what you can look forward to: Funky R&B Horns, Upbeat Celtic Rock, Jazz Fusion Salsa, Gentle Indie Folk, Cool '60s Soul, Funky '70s R&B, Smooth Jazz Hip Hop, Acoustic Rockabilly Swing, Funky Reggae Dub, Dreamy Retro Latin Jazz, Retro Soul-Rock Fusion, and much more!
Special Pricing! Until July 31, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 9 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: VST3 Plugin Support
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® now includes support for VST3 plugins, alongside VST and AU. Use them with MIDI or audio tracks for even more creative possibilities in your music production.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Macs®: VST3 Plugin Support
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: Using VST3 Plugins
Join the conversation on our forum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums58
Topics84,390
Posts778,603
Members39,643
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean