Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Songwriting
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,022
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,022
Originally Posted By: Tangmo
A song is an entity. It's a bit like a marriage in that way. Doubt it?

Listen to an instrumental version of "Yesterday" and tell me it's not an instrumental version of A SONG. The song is "Yesterday". Arrange it differently, reharmonize it, slow it down, speed it up, embellish the melody--it remains "Yesterday".

In addition, print the lyric out, and it is the LYRIC of "Yesterday".

It isn't the lyric, and it isn't the tune that wholly makes the song "Yesterday". It simply IS "Yesterday". And that song is what is protected under copyright, such as it is.


And a follow on from this is, that has been discussed before on the forums is the misconception that though chords can't be copyrighted, if you create a fake version of the song and call it Yesterday with the unique chords to that song included (but no melody) then if it was to go to court you could well loose the copyright infringement case.

Last edited by musiclover; 11/14/20 07:37 AM.

Musiclover

My music https://www.youtube.com/user/donegalprideofall

Windows 10 (64bit) M-Audio Fast Track Pro, Band in a Box 2025, Cubase 14, Cakewalk and far too many VST plugins that I probably don't need or will ever use smile
Songwriting
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 266
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 266
I'm opposed to any form of plagiarism.
You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one.

Vintage

Songwriting
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 732
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 732
Originally Posted By: musiclover
Originally Posted By: Tangmo
A song is an entity. It's a bit like a marriage in that way. Doubt it?

Listen to an instrumental version of "Yesterday" and tell me it's not an instrumental version of A SONG. The song is "Yesterday". Arrange it differently, reharmonize it, slow it down, speed it up, embellish the melody--it remains "Yesterday".

In addition, print the lyric out, and it is the LYRIC of "Yesterday".

It isn't the lyric, and it isn't the tune that wholly makes the song "Yesterday". It simply IS "Yesterday". And that song is what is protected under copyright, such as it is.


And a follow on from this is, that has been discussed before on the forums is the misconception that though chords can't be copyrighted, if you create a fake version of the song and call it Yesterday with the unique chords to that song included (but no melody) then if it was to go to court you could well loose the copyright infringement case.


Which is why the chord only versions in say a Norton Fake Book collection is named "Yesterday, et. al." Which essentially says these are the chords that are found in that song and others. Since we all know chord progressions are used over and over and over in all different songs. The melody and then the lyrics make it the song we recognize as Yesterday. Same as online Jazz instruction, when they rename a standard, yet it is still the same chord progression, then improvise over it without angering the take down gods.


My wife asked if I had seen the dog bowl. I told her I didn't even know he could.
Songwriting
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,022
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,022
Joe read this thread which appeared on the forum some time ago, especially the eighth post down and see what you make of that.

https://www.pgmusic.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=591161&page=3

Just because someone includes a well known song in a fake disk, without a melody (because they assume that under no circumstances are chords copyrightable) does not mean this always is the case.


Musiclover

My music https://www.youtube.com/user/donegalprideofall

Windows 10 (64bit) M-Audio Fast Track Pro, Band in a Box 2025, Cubase 14, Cakewalk and far too many VST plugins that I probably don't need or will ever use smile
Songwriting
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,022
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,022
Originally Posted By: VintageGibson
I'm opposed to any form of plagiarism.
You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one.

Vintage


Yep The town I love so well, has a great melody to it, maybe if we write a different lyric to it, we could well have a hit on our hands.

smile


Musiclover

My music https://www.youtube.com/user/donegalprideofall

Windows 10 (64bit) M-Audio Fast Track Pro, Band in a Box 2025, Cubase 14, Cakewalk and far too many VST plugins that I probably don't need or will ever use smile
Songwriting
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 785
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 785
Well having read replies and thinking this over, I have changed my mind completely, Lyrics are nothing more than random words thrown together for a rhyme and should never be allowed copyrights!!!. Ha, just joking folks. Yeah, I still think that while yesterday, being used as an example, has it's own flavor, as a tune it would not be copied as is, to make a song, it would never sell, yesterday is too well known, and any song that is so well known would not be something anyone could reproduce exactly in the original tune and sell to the public. So that alone would keep it's autonomy. But, my suggestion still stands.

Songwriting
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 253
R
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
R
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 253
So who gets to adjudicate which music is "well known" enough to remain immune to being copied? And what about a piece of music that is not "well known" but it clearly unique and different than anything else? See the problem with what you're suggesting? There's no practical way to do it, and I can assure you that there would be 0.0% support for something like this in the music industry, songwriting community, or the Federal government.

Kudos to sticking to your guns on your suggestion, it just happens to be one that has no basis in law and would never happen in a real world scenario.

Songwriting
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,265
Veteran
Online Content
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,265
Originally Posted By: Roger Brown
1:Kudos to sticking to your guns on your suggestion, 2:it just happens to be one that has no basis in law and would never happen in a real world scenario.

1:Yes, and 2: (hopefully) Yes.


BIAB & RB2025 Win.(Audiophile), Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors, AKG K271 Studio H'phones
Songwriting
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 732
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 732
Originally Posted By: musiclover
Joe read this thread which appeared on the forum some time ago, especially the eighth post down and see what you make of that.

https://www.pgmusic.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=591161&page=3

Just because someone includes a well known song in a fake disk, without a melody (because they assume that under no circumstances are chords copyrightable) does not mean this always is the case.


I think the recent stairway to heaven case is a good example. That chord progression, even the way it was played in that song, has been used numerous times. One could say Led Zep stole it from My Funny Valentine, or any number of other standards that have the exact same progression. The plaintiff in this case said they stole it from them because it sounded like their song. They ended up losing. Rhythm Changes (I Got Rhythm). I could list thousands of examples. Without the melody they are just chord progressions. How many songs have II V I, or I vi ii V progressions? There is a great comedy act band that plays the same progression over and over and sings the different songs that used it. It is funny and true.

I agree there could be a case where a chord progression is so unique, never been used before, that the song is instantly knowable without a melody or lyric, but I just can't think of any right off.

Doesn't matter too much to me anyway as I have said before nobody is clamoring to steal anything of mine!


My wife asked if I had seen the dog bowl. I told her I didn't even know he could.
Songwriting
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,250
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,250
Who gets to decide?

A jury of your peers, after being persuaded by the judge and attorneys.


You can find my music at:
www.herbhartley.com
Add nothing that adds nothing to the music.
You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.

The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
Songwriting
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 253
R
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
R
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 253
To be clear:

There is a colossal difference between a chord progression and a melodic passage.

I can use the C-Am-F-G all day long in writing and not be infringing. On the other hand, if (over the same chord progression) I write a song with the same melody as Buddy Holly's "Everyday", I could (and should) get my butt sued.

Courts have erred, in the opinion of many, in applying too broad of an infringement brushstroke over chord progressions and "feels". Several such cases are under appeal and will probably be overturned (if common sense prevails).

Just a point of clarification to hopefully make apples to apples comparisons and conversations.

Songwriting
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 732
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 732
Originally Posted By: Roger Brown
To be clear:

Courts have erred, in the opinion of many, in applying too broad of an infringement brushstroke over chord progressions and "feels". Several such cases are under appeal and will probably be overturned (if common sense prevails).


This.


My wife asked if I had seen the dog bowl. I told her I didn't even know he could.
Songwriting
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,590
E
Expert
Offline
Expert
E
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,590
I looked into the history a bit. One reason we see royalty getting in on it was because the Kings were the authorities. What was happening in the early days of printing was people would go to great expense to publish a book only to have copycats produce the same thing and pirate it for cheaper. It reached a point where investors were no longer interested. So, really, the original European copyrights were to protect the businessmen and assure a supply of books. The King used his authority for the benefit of the nation.


Link: www.soundcloud.com/ed_shaw (Feel Free to Use)
https://www.Rumble.com/edshaw
Biab for WIN 2020 -- Win 10 64bit -- Reaper/Audacity
Zoom R-16 -- Tascam DP-03-SD -- SoundTap -- Crescendo --
Songwriting
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 114
S
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
S
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 114
There is a reason that the laws are written the way they are. It would be impractical to copyright chord progressions. Melodies are unique. With chord progressions there are often many many songs that utilize the exact same chord progression.

As far as legal copywrite protection goes...I like what my old music biz professor said, 'court is not fun".

It is arrogant to think you need to legally copywrite.

No way will it ever come into play unless you are very well known.

And even then...it is still often NOT worth doing because of the legal costs.

Songwriting
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,686
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,686
Originally Posted By: cliftond
Yeah, I know I am going to stir the pot here again. I am a believer that song lyrics should be copyrighted, but, I dont think melodies should be. Take tunes out of the copyright equation and we would have real original music all over the place again on radio. Just my 2 bits and I am sure I am in the minority here. Cliff
The Copyright Office of the Library of Congress and Title 17 of the US Code do not agree with you.

Originally Posted By: VideoTrack
Why would the melody be less copyrightable than the lyrics?
I think that musically, the melody is even more important than the lyrics.
You are entitled to your opinion but you are quite wrong on this. See my previous paragraph.

In February, I may have more to say about this for reasons that will be clear if I decide to weigh in again. I might even explain my last statement.

It's still January, however.


BIAB 2024 Audiophile Mac
24Core/60CoreGPU M2 MacStudioUltra/8TB/192GB Sequoia, M1 MBAir, 2012 MBP
Digital Performer11, LogicPro, Finale27/Dorico/Encore/SmartScorePro64/Notion6 /Overture5
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Andrew - PG Music, PeterGannon 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Band-in-a-Box 2025 Italian Version is Here!

Cari amici
È stata aggerate la versione in Italiano del programma più amato dagli appassionati di musica, il nostro Band-in-a-Box.
Questo è il link alla nuova versione 2025.

Di seguito i link per scaricare il pacchetti di lingua italiana aggiornati per Band-in-a-Box e RealBand, anche per chi avesse già comprato la nuova versione in inglese.

Band-in-a-Box 2025 - Italiano
RealBand 2025 - Italiano

Band-in-a-Box 2025 French Version is Here!

Bonjour à tous,

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 pour Windows est disponible en Français.
Le téléchargement se fait à partir du site PG Music

Pour ceux qui auraient déjà acheté la version 2025 de Band-in-a-Box (et qui donc ont une version anglaise), il est possible de "franciser" cette version avec les patchs suivants:

BIAB 2025 - francisation
RealBand 2025 - francisation

Voilà, enjoy!

Band-in-a-Box 2025 German Version is Here!

Band-in-a-Box 2025 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!

Die deutsche Version Band-in-a-Box® 2025 für Windows ist ab sofort verfügbar!

Alle die bereits die englische Version von Band-in-a-Box und RealBand 2024 installiert haben, finden hier die Installationsdateien für das Sprachenupdate:

https://nn.pgmusic.com/pgfiles/languagesupport/deutsch2025.exe
https://nn.pgmusic.com/pgfiles/languagesupport/deutsch2025RB.exe

Update Your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 to Build 1128 for Windows Today!

Already using Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 1128 now from our Support Page to enjoy the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.

Stay up to date—get the latest update now!

Update to RealBand® 2025 Build 5 Windows Today!

Already using RealBand® 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 5 now from our Support Page to ensure you have the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.

Get the latest update today!

PowerTracks Pro Audio 2025 for Windows is Here!

PowerTracks Pro Audio 2025 is here! This new version introduces many features, including VST3 support, the ability to load or import a .FLAC file, a reset option for track height in the Tracks window, a taller Timeline on the Notation window toolbar, new freeze buttons in the Tracks window, three toolbar modes (two rows, single row, and none), the improved Select Patch dialog with text-based search and numeric patch display, a new button in the DirectX/VST window to copy an effects group, and more!

First-time packages start at only $49. Already a PowerTracks Pro Audio user? Upgrade for as little as $29!

www.pgmusic.com/powertracks.htm

Video: Summary of the New Band-in-a-Box® App for iOS®

Join Tobin as he takes you on a tour of the new Band-in-a-Box® app for iOS®! Designed for musicians, singer-songwriters, and educators, this powerful tool lets you create, play, and transfer songs effortlessly on your iPhone® or iPad®—anytime, anywhere.

Band-in-a-Box® for iOS® :Summary video.

Check out the forum post for more information.

Forum Statistics
Forums58
Topics84,140
Posts775,220
Members39,567
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
Newest Members
greypeter1, AudioQuestions, jl1, DKL, EdHumbleton
39,566 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 192
DC Ron 100
rsdean 95
WaoBand 93
dcuny 68
BYOBand 68
Noel96 68
Today's Birthdays
Hiram
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5