BIAB 2021 has extended the number of tracks thanks to utility tracks.
This is a good first step, absolutely necessary. Thank you !
Now we will have to converge the standard tracks and the utility tracks and ensure that in the future there are only unified tracks, offering all the basic functionalities (support for bars setting, export to the DAW ... ).
It seems to me an essential step to move towards a coherent and industrialized product.
Yes. Every track should have exactly the same functionality. Presently, some tracks only do certain things, other tracks only do other things. Consistency and Standardization would be the way to resolve all of these confounding issues. I hope the developers are working towards that goal.
+1
BIAB & RB2026 Win.(Audiophile), Windows 10 Pro & Windows 11, Cakewalk Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Session Keys Grand S & Electric R, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M, Pioneer Active Monitors.
Based on comments from the developers, and the fact that improvements were already made toward that goal after the initial release, I think we are all in agreement.
+1
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
----------------------- Videotrack, "Every track should have exactly the same functionality."
I agree BUT... how do you envision a workflow were you want shots/holds/rest/pushes used with Utility tracks? I do not believe a quarter of the chord bar cell would support these for many tracks. I was thinking about this for some time now, and the most logical solution would be to place these items in the bar settings.
Of course "visual" consistency and convenience of typing in the bar function would be lost for these Utility tracks. But it seems the only logical place to put these. I am posting my idea here in hope that other folks will chip in and offer other ideas of how to achieve MOST of function / consistency for UtilityTracks. To me it is like a puzzle...would be interested to learn of other possible solutions. .. and of course hoping PG team is listening.
Rusty, Yes, plan is to make the util tracks same functionality as regular tracks. (Note that you can generate realtracks on them now, but not as a part of styles).
Thanks for the graphic, shots/holds/rests/pushes would need to go into chord settings dialog, where they are now. For people who like to type them in, something like u1,u2 could describe the tracks. So that Am..bdu1u3 Would rest all tracks except bass, drums, util 1 and Util 3 Peter
I agree BUT... how do you envision a workflow were you want shots/holds/rest/pushes used with Utility tracks?
It seems that you are still identifying Utility Tracks as being separate tracks with separate functionality that needs to be handled differently.
I'm actually suggesting that all tracks should work the same.
BIAB & RB2026 Win.(Audiophile), Windows 10 Pro & Windows 11, Cakewalk Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Session Keys Grand S & Electric R, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M, Pioneer Active Monitors.
Peter, Videotrack Thank you for joining the discussion! Please excuse my ignorance, but I am still confused how "typing in" would work in some situations. Lets imagine a potential stress scenario. All tracks are used (legacy + Utility). As it works now, you can "type in" within each of 4 beats in the bar (and even that if used to full extent can look quite complex).
This is hypothetical, but how would this fit in a single bar by typing in such action:
I suggested doing shots, holds etc., at the "Bar Settings" for 3 reasons:
1)I believe chord bar might have issues with supporting huge lines of potential "type in" cell commands for shots, holds etc and a possible mistake might lead to a looong rewrite, because it does not act as text in notepad. You can not edit it without re-typing whole thing
2)Most likely larger number of tracks would require constant changes at the bar menu (F5) anyway, so I figured it would take much less steps if done under single menu (tabs?) + More coherent, because there is more space for created "names" of the tracks which could be applied dynamically to the list. Meaning, if you re-name a Utility track to: "CrazyViolin", it will show up as "CrazyViolin" at the bar setting menu, that way you will now exactly what you are holding, shotting or resting or excluding. With U1, U2 etc... it might be like the memory game, the one that you have to find two of same cards when they are face down. Forgive me, but I am not being sarcastic about this. I think it might pose a challenge to people of cross-referencing legacy tracks + 16 new Utility tracks in "type in" or even at the "chord menu" with u1, u2 names., Actual screen space at Bar Settings can support dynamic (given) or even condensed real names that could be displayed instead of U1, U2.
3)Potentially in future, it would be possible to use Shift or Control (or other methods) to bulk change groups of tracks and it is easier if they lined up in certain grid.
P.S. I hope I am making some sense and you did not fall asleep
I thought I remembered making a graphic for that. Maybe if you ctrl click the chord when it has a shot hold etc.. it could bring up the track option and mirror it also in F5 like you show. Also have a select all/none check box. This will prevent the cramming. Maybe you could have the b,d,g,s,p in that also ? So it's backward compatible let it read C...b,d into the check boxes already checked to be exempt and just display C... Maybe it can be another color if there are exempt tracks ? Or C...x
Yes, there are lots of ingenious ways to deliver the required functionality. RustySpoon's suggestions and your suggestions are all worthy of consideration.
No doubt, PGM developers will have thought out all the detail, the traps and the pitfalls as they proceed with the functionality. In the meantime, I'm sure they appreciate the input and suggestions from the users.
BIAB & RB2026 Win.(Audiophile), Windows 10 Pro & Windows 11, Cakewalk Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Session Keys Grand S & Electric R, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M, Pioneer Active Monitors.
Videotrack, most likely I am a minority in these discussions with my views, but I do believe that workflow is nearly important as functions. Sure, there are "fifty ways" things can be made to work, but if they are not made ergonomically, they will be features for selected group of power users. Average user will not be able to see / use many benefits program has to offer. I just wish there would be more discussion on user end design to offer Peter and crew different views and opinions on same feature. Especially on important item of this magnitude, which is tripling the amount of available tracks.
To me personally, Util.Tracks are single most important added feature in BIAB, most likely for years to come. To echo OP post: "This is a good first step, absolutely necessary. Thank you !" +1 big thank you from me!
Videotrack, most likely I am a minority in these discussions with my views, but I do believe that workflow is nearly important as functions. Sure, there are "fifty ways" things can be made to work, but if they are not made ergonomically, they will be features for selected group of power users. Average user will not be able to see / use many benefits program has to offer. I just wish there would be more discussion on user end design to offer Peter and crew different views and opinions on same feature. Especially on important item of this magnitude, which is tripling the amount of available tracks.
I do not believe that you are in the minority. I for one completely agree with you.
Originally Posted By: Rustyspoon#
To me personally, Util.Tracks are single most important added feature in BIAB, most likely for years to come. To echo OP post: "This is a good first step, absolutely necessary. Thank you !" +1 big thank you from me!
I agree that the utility tracks and the VSTi are both the most important improvements in years. But in both cases they were not fully developed prior to making them available to the consumers. I wonder how many potential customers they lost because of this and the workflow issues.
OK, a random thought; Why does toilet paper need a commercial? Who's not buying it?
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
Rusty. i like your graphic idea useing the F5 dialogue. for shots/holds/pushes etc. OR in pipelines graphich just insert instead of the tick, how bout entering S or H or P etc.
OR how bout that linear view i proposed in one of my wishes. ie. bars/beats/chords linearly over time >>>> at the top. and the 16 tracks down left hand side. and like the bb piano roll "cels" covering everything. right clik on a cel at a particular time/beat within a chord for a particular track and a dialog pops up with a bunch of functions. like shot or hold or push or freeze or regen or patch change or volume or pan change for example for that particular instrument at that particular beat within that particular chord. ie the general layout would look like piano roll, but, instead of a keyboard on left hand side like most piano rolls, there are 16 vertical traks, and the white space //cels is used for instrument beat/bar settings/changes ? add into the linear view markers vertical to match ones daw markers, and YES ! how bout it ?
note. hiliting a series of cels would cover changes over several beats/bars etc etc.
go ahead and critique me.
best. muso.
Last edited by justanoldmuso; 03/23/2104:57 AM.
my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..) https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs (90 songs created useing bb/rb) (lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)
Some great suggestions here. I agree that typing in the ‘except’ track names into a quarter of a cell is unworkable, and some sort of editable representation like Pipeline showed is needed. There have been several viable suggestions of how these new extra (and someday equal) tracks should be named. I think the only idea I might rule out is single letters. We don’t want the position of single letters in a long string to be critical, such as this: Am7..d,b,s,l,t,s,b,t
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
Rustyspoon, I certainly don't think you are in the minority. That's why I wrote this earlier:
Quote:
Yes, there are lots of ingenious ways to deliver the required functionality. RustySpoon's suggestions and your suggestions are all worthy of consideration.
No doubt, PGM developers will have thought out all the detail, the traps and the pitfalls as they proceed with the functionality. In the meantime, I'm sure they appreciate the input and suggestions from the users.
BIAB & RB2026 Win.(Audiophile), Windows 10 Pro & Windows 11, Cakewalk Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Session Keys Grand S & Electric R, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M, Pioneer Active Monitors.
I'm a bit worn out from being here too long fighting to make things better and are trying to phase out of this, so it's good to see Rusty coming up also with all these great ideas and graphics to help take PG forward.
See with typing in all the hold exemptions after the chord is a pain to change if you change your mind to to put one track back in.
Videotrack, I know, you always try to spot valid ideas. I was just tripped with what you said: "It seems that you are still identifying Utility Tracks as being separate tracks with separate functionality that needs to be handled differently"
As I explained above, it will not be possible to have legacy tracks + 16 Utility tracks be written in cell as we are familiar with legacy tracks. Artificially limiting "written in" U.Tracks, would not be a good idea either for obvious reasons. So in a sense Utility Tracks should have a separate mechanism to achieve rests, shots, holds, exemptions etc.
I think the real question / challenge with this is hidden in workflow. Pipeline has some excellent points with possibility of shortcut, which is in a way advanced. I am proposing a suggestion to combine "Chord Options" and "Bar settings" in one. With a tab in Utility Track section which could follow right after legacy tracks. I have a visual idea in mind. I will make a sketch when time permits.
Pipeline, You need a beer, or a glass of wine Limit your load, gears will spin more freely. We need you here. ---------------------------------- Riccoboni, sorry for intrusion and thank you for starting this thread. It is a big subject that I hope people will contribute ideas to.
I think this is going to be great once Utility tracks can do what any other track can do. And now, PG Music is alerted to some of the concerns about how we would work with them. It should be fun to see what they come up with.
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
I think this is going to be great once Utility tracks can do what any other track can do. And now, PG Music is alerted to some of the concerns about how we would work with them. It should be fun to see what they come up with.
Yes, that's exactly what I've been trying to say.
BIAB & RB2026 Win.(Audiophile), Windows 10 Pro & Windows 11, Cakewalk Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Session Keys Grand S & Electric R, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M, Pioneer Active Monitors.
"I think this is going to be great once Utility tracks can do what any other track can do." +1
But... still I think it is equally important on HOW (workflow) it will be achieved. Because if it is not done right, it will be frustration class 101.
I am trying to push idea of combining 2 menus: Bar settings + Chord menu for pushes, holds (that will facilitate these for U.Tracks. Bar setting is probably one of the most used menus in arrangement. This combining would eliminate many steps and cleaner gui (LeSs separate menus). Since both items (bar settings + chord menu) relate to a specific bar, it makes logical sense to me to open ONE location (F5) for most of settings related to specific bar.
P.S. I believe there was a discussion about condensing some of menus recently. I think this is a perfect opportunity to do that for functions of U.Tracks. Kind of getting two rabbits with one shot.
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you over the phone. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday, and 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST Saturday. We are closed Sunday. You can also send us your questions via email.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you on our Live Chat or by email. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday; 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST (GMT -8) Saturday; Closed Sunday.
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean