Quote:

Normally, at this point, I would make a reference to "now for something completely different, a march would play, a long shepperd's crook would appear, and hook you stage right to music and the gong would go." I have however learned that in someplaces in the world dour and humoursless is the drill so I don't say things like that any longer if I can help it. (See ended the sentance improperly!)

I am also giving a try to not posting anything except very technical notes, such as "in 3/4 time played at x we expect the music as presently written, to take precicely 3:31.08 seconds, except on Leap year." This leads to an increase sense of camaraderie and backslapping amongst the masses when done properly.

In an attempt to inject some down to earth feeling in posts I am also introducing an unspell checker, for I have been accused of a very serious faut pas, being precice in diction and form in reference to language. How 'horrible'. I should however comment on the 'mericanness of the spell checker for words like precice where the c is found in the non-verb form and the s is found in and verb, elude the dictionary as would a raccoon absconding with your last salmon sandwich whilst having an informal lunch outdoors on a blanket in the warm spring sun.

Now in accepted construct of a communication I would, thus, offer a succinct conclusion to the above, however in doing my best to conform I shall eschew that convention and in it's elimination endear myself to those who hold dear such erratic and reckless behavoiur.

I should go back to the study of British humour, once I get over this nasty cold.



Just wondering: is your walking silly?