I agree on this one too. Those style names are far too cryptic. When they include names especially.... A style including a name like "Bob".... geeze. Bob who? Dylan? Willis? Some say "train". Some say "stomp". I understand what they are trying to do. What does train mean?

So, when you don't have 10 years of BIAB experience to know who those style shorthand terms mean, you simply have to load every one and listen. I once spent 94 minutes loading styles until I found what I wanted. Yes, one hour and 34 minutes. By then I barely remembered the song.

Gotta be a better way to describe them, sort them, and filter them when looking to select one. Maybe it's time to start thinking about cutting down on styles that are so similar they are close to exactly the same. More styles, to me, just means "takes longer to sift through".

Also, if it is a "waltz" style, either always call it "waltz", or always call it "wlz", or "wltz", or whatever you choose. Just be consistent. When I am writing a country waltz, I want to be able to filter and see just the waltzes, but every one of them, not search 3 times, once with "waltz", once with "wltz", again with "wlz". The term "watlz"means more to me in searching that some artists name, like for example "conwaywlz" (not a real style - made up example). It wouldn't matter to me at all that ONE Conway Twitty song had a style similar. I really want to know it is a waltz rather than see some old time singer's name in it.