|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251 |
I’ve found the best way to present BIAB to other musicians is to tell them it’s a great practice tool for backing you up while you play. “Beats the hell out of a metronome or drum machine”. I also point out that it allows them to play for their friends and having it sound like a band. ………………………………………………… Now let me use an analogy to point out why so many musicians look down on it. Let’s say “Acme Artistry”, (or PGM - Pretty Good Mural's  ), came out with “Painter-In-A-Box”. You select “New”, click on landscape “style”. Click to include birds, trees, flowers, a stream, and then top it off with a sunset. You then click “create”. Shazam!!!! You have a painting! You then print it out and take it to your “artist” friends and say “Look at my new painting! How do you like it ?” Sound familiar??? The degree to which other musicians accept your BIAB song will depend largely on how much you’re contributing to the final product. If you’re playing most of the instruments and doing the singing, the reception will likely be better, (unless of course your playing and singing sucks!)  If you just type in a chord progression and select a style while BIAB does all the work, then your new "song" will have about as much meaning as the "art" from Painter-In-A-Box! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 904
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 904 |
What a rubish. I am a professional jazz guitarist and guitar teacher. I use this programm myself on a daily basis for practising. I also recomment it to all my students.
The only reason I could imagine a pro who doesn`t know the programm would say a thing like that, is if the songs/playbacks you presented sounded cheesy and midi-like. I hear those kinda playbacks/songs with country music a lot (dunno why) and it sounds just terrible. But if you use the programm properly it sounds great with any style.
Sandra
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,198
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,198 |
I think if you presented BIAB as a 'tool' then more musicians, at least at the pro level, would be accepting of it. Give them a few bars of something you cooked up, and show them the basics. Then, pop Matt Finley's Brazilian Wish in the CD player, and say 'Yeah, it's all live musicians, but the genesis of the songs started in BIAB.' Goes and pops Brazilian Wish in my playlist for Napster.  Gary
Last edited by Gary Curran; 09/09/11 12:30 PM.
I'm blessed watching God do what He does best. I've had a few rough years, and I'm still not back to where I want to be, but I'm on the way and things are looking far better now than what they were!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251 |
Sandra, Quote:
What a rubish. I am a professional jazz guitarist and guitar teacher. I use this programm myself on a daily basis for practising. I also recomment it to all my students.
LOL. I assume you meant “rubbish”. You obviously misunderstood the analogy.
I LOVE BIAB and wouldn’t want to be without it. It took practicing from being boring and tedious to being a quasi “jam session”! I also recommend the program to all musicians, from budding “newbies” to seasoned professionals.
On most all of the songs I recorded prior to having BIAB, I wrote the songs, played all of the instruments, and sang lead and harmony. If I ever start recording again, the first thing I’ll “lay down” will be BIAB. I’ll then play and record as many of the other instruments as possible, and probably just end up using drums and piano from BIAB, and any other instrument I can’t play or don’t have access to.
If I ever start “gigging” again, it’ll probably be with BIAB backing tracks. But I’ll be playing rhythm and lead guitar and doing the vocals.
So what was the point to the “Painter-In-A-Box” analogy? If you just type in a progression into BIAB and select a style, and you don’t play an instrument to accompany it, don’t compose a melody, and/or don’t write and/ or sing lyrics, then you didn’t write … nor do you have a song. You have a chord progression with computer generated tracks.
That deserves the same amount of respect from your fellow musicians as using “Painter-In-A-Box” will get you from your fellow artists.
By the way, I love your playing! Nice guitar too.
If you want to hear any of my playing, there’s a radio program posted on Soundcloud. The songs range from bluegrass to jazz to new acoustic. If I recall correctly, Minor Swing is included. I pulled my originals from the site.
http://soundcloud.com/bobcflatpicke/music-in-the-mountains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 904
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 904 |
@ Bob: Oh no, no. I wasn't referring to you or your statement.
With "rubbish" I meant the persons who think that BIAB isn't cool enough fot them. Actually I was answering Jan Larkins post and his musicians friend opinion on BB.
Sandra
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251 |
Cool! I thought I'd ticked you off! By the way, I just listened to that old radio program and Minor Swing isn't on there. Two songs you may like: Opus 57 @ 34:46 Dawg's Rag @ 44:58 Take care and keep pickin'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,441
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,441 |
There was a period when a lot of folks at KVR were of the "Well, if you're not using this particular product (usually Pro Tools), you're not a real musician". Fortunately, given some of the amazingly good free and inexpensive software toys out there, e.g., Reaper, the free synths by HG Fortune and U-He, the Alchemy player, etc., that has shifted, at least to the extent that the gear snobs aren't as obvious anymore.
I just like sitting people down in front of my laptop, typing in a twelve-bar blues, assigning a few RTs, and clicking "Play", and then watching their eyes bug out. Anybody who wants to tell me it's not valid music can go jump.
Best, Tom SmithWin10/64 • i7-8700K • 24 GB RAM BIAB 2025 • Reaper 7 • Izotope MPS AKG C1000S • IK iRig I/O Pro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,107
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,107 |
Quote:
So what was the point to the “Painter-In-A-Box” analogy? If you just type in a progression into BIAB and select a style, and you don’t play an instrument to accompany it, don’t compose a melody, and/or don’t write and/ or sing lyrics, then you didn’t write … nor do you have a song. You have a chord progression with computer generated tracks.
Consider the fact that the great composers didn't play all the instruments in their masterpieces... they just laid out the structure and then turned it over to skilled performers. To some extent, that's what happens here. Its not just a tool for performers, its also a tool for composers, arrangers, and studio gurus.
The ability to take an idea from conception to completion before you're tired of it means that more people who use this software are actually completing their songs, and getting to the final polish stage of mixing and mastering.
On the Sonar forum I mostly see discussions about how to make the software work, or how to do rudimentary tasks... on this forum there is more discussion about advanced topics which only come up at the end of the song creation cycle (mixing, mastering, copyright, marketing, performing etc)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251 |
Pat, Quote:
Consider the fact that the great composers didn't play all the instruments in their masterpieces... they just laid out the structure and then turned it over to skilled performers. To some extent, that's what happens here.
That’s not a very good comparison Pat. The “great composers” laid out EVERY note to be played by EVERY instrument. That’s a helluva lot different than typing in a chord progression with NO input what ANY instrument plays.
It’s a disservice to any songwriter or composer to even make the comparison! 
Jeez! Let's not misrepresent the program. If we do, we deserve whatever scorn other musicians heap on us and BIAB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,672
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,672 |
Even if all you do is type in the chords, i think it could be a tad arrogant to say it is not of value, or would, could or should be looked down on. (not calling Bob arrogant by the way, but talking about the concept) One still has to know what chords to type in. Plus you have to mix it and master it, effects, panning and such or it will sound rather dull.
We could get into what is an instrument, midi , guitar, vocal, keys, wood, brass, etc. There were heated debates over at Acid Planet over whether loop built music was music or not. Someone had to chose loops that worked well, and then put then together properly, and mix and master the end result.
If you type in the chords, and select a style, and do nothing but sing a track over it, are you not a musician? Is not a voice one of the worlds finest instruments, and one of the hardest to master?
If one who programs a synth not a musician as well!
HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini Sonoma with 16 gig of ram, BiaB 2025, Realband, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 9 32c , Melodyne 5 editor, Presonus Audiobox 1818VSL, Presonus control app.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251 |
Robh, Quote:
If you type in the chords, and select a style, and do nothing but sing a track over it, are you not a musician?
LOL. Let’s please not get into “Are Singers Musicians” again. We drug that one out for a long time just a few months back.
So, I’ll take the “fifth”.
Quote:
If one who programs a synth not a musician as well!
Not necessarily. They may just be a programmer with a little knowledge of music theory or math. Either will work.
Quote:
if all you do is type in the chords, i think it could be a tad arrogant to say it is not of value
Okay, … I’ll be a tad arrogant. If I sit here and type in 32 bars of C, F and G into BIAB, that doesn’t mean I’ve composed anything! If I add lyrics and/or a melody, it means I’ve written a song, even if I can’t play an instrument or sing.
BIAB is a great songwriters tool and you don't have to be a musician to be a songwriter, but it helps a lot.
Last edited by bobcflatpicker; 09/09/11 10:12 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,079
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,079 |
Some one asked me a while back when we were "discussing" the use of BIAB (I was discussing but the rest were rubbishing) what would Beethoven have written if he had comupters and BIAB etc and I said it certainly would not have been what he is now famous for. Imagine Lennon and Mcartney with BIAB, what would Yesterday sound like without George Martin's input re strings? Totally different, maybe as good but never, IMHO, beating having 100% human input. I have written songs since the 1960's but I sounded like a blunt drill bit trying to cut dry driftwood in an echo chamber on just guitar and voice. My first "studios" with 4 and 8 tracks sounded better but this time covered in hisszzzzzzzzzzzz. Then came MIDI and then I discovered BIAB. YAY!! and I now have full instrumentation at my finger tips with VSTi's etc etc. I would love to be able to write like a classical composer in the 18th century or actually have thought of, for eg, the signature sound of the Glenn Miller orchestra with the sax and clarinet. Progress has meant that I can now just pick a style, press generate and have a song without any intervention from me inputing the chord sequence. This is what I did with BIAB initially with the inbuilt styles. Now with real tracks a professional sounding song materialises. This is without any input of the "button pressers" ideas for a song, chords etc. BUT inputting one's own chord sequence turns BIAB into the best band ever, no drunks, no chatting up the wimmin, no broken strings and forgotten leads and best of all no arguing and fights. Been there done that too often, usually a combination of drink and wimmin With work my songs now sound,as near as possible to the version inside my head with a reasonably professional end result. And all at home in my lickle "studio". The user showcase also shows how good BIAB can be in the right hands BUT I always wonder if those songs would have ever seen the light of day without BIAB and I THANK PG Music for making it all possible. Helping us all, maybe, realise a dream. Without BIAB I would not have fans in Vietnam and Japan or have been called WIllie Nelson's ugly brother!!! I was classically trained on piano BUT BIAB has taught me more about music than I have ever learnt from teachers. Apart from that Saturday in the 1970's when Jeff Beck showed me how to play Jeff's Boogie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4A_s0Kyh2qQ in a music shop in Charing Cross road, London. He said FFS this is how you do it and showed me hammer-ons and pull offs, cheers Jeff!!! I say BIAB is now a musical instrument and as with all instruments you need to learn how to play it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251 |
Gibson, Quote:
I say BIAB is now a musical instrument and as with all instruments you need to learn how to play it.
Oh my goodness! ……………Seriously? I mean really, …… are you serious??????
I thought I’d found a place where musicians could use technology to enhance what they can actually PLAY. Notice I said enhance WHAT THEY CAN PLAY!
So if anyone who can double click on a BIAB icon and type in a chord progression is a musician, …… then what’s next? Let’s see. If you can recite the alphabet from A to G or count from 1 to 7, are you a musician?
In the process of defending BIAB against the “naysayers”, you are actually building their case against it!
Maybe some of you guys don’t put any stock into the hours, days, weeks, months and years you’ve put into learning to play your instrument, … … but I do! Saying that anyone who can use BIAB is a musician is OFFENSIVE to anyone who can actually play an instrument! No wonder some folks look down their nose at it. I would too if I hadn’t used it for years, and I based my opinion on statements like this!
Maybe I am in the wrong place. If the accepted definition of a “musician” is anyone who can use BIAB, …… then I definitely am in the wrong place. I hope not, but maybe so.
I find that kind of statement unbelievable!
...................................................
EDIT: Maybe we should add a new term to the music biz. “Music Programmer”. That would cover the “loop” users and folks who can only use BIAB or another program to create music.
That still doesn’t make you a “musician”. You have to earn that title by actually learning to play an instrument. It shouldn’t be “granted” to someone who hasn’t learned to play.
Last edited by bobcflatpicker; 09/10/11 01:33 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,107
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,107 |
We have people here on the forum who write songs completely in BIAB/RB (with help from other software sometimes). My first impression of that was exactly like yours, Bob... because it isn't how *I* want to use the software.
observation #1: the way I use the software does NOT set the standard for how other people should use it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,107
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,107 |
my brother in law looks down on me no matter what I do. But that's a whole different thread. But regarding BIAB, when I showed him some stuff I was working on, he sneered at me and said "you're just pushing a button"
I replied "OK, then YOU push a button and come up with something as good." He's arrogant enough that he actually took me up on the challenge and messed with my equipment until he was so frustrated and angry that he left spitting nails. He has never brought the topic up again.
Observation #2:
If it's so easy to make amazing music (even with the automation) why is there such a learning curve? Why are forums like this even necessary?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,107
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,107 |
The followup to my observation about classical composers is right on. However, I don't think anybody here is using real band to write neo classical pieces. Pop and country are a far cry from that. Popular music construction is so utterly dictated by the "rules of the genre" that even if you assemble a real band of people, the results will be approximately the same as BIAB output, except for the judgments made by the composer about:
1) which chords to use
2) how to embellish those chords
3) which instruments to use in the song
4) whether to syncopate, rush, delay, swing etc the timing
5) and, if you're composing with MIDI, the creator DOES indeed have note by note control of melodies, harmonies
Observation #3
if you wrote a song (words, chords, melody, harmonies etc), then assembled a band to perform it with you onstage, how is that different from telling BIAB those same things? Is the guy who wrote his chord progression on the back of a napkin more of a musician than the guy who wrote his chord progression on BIABs grid?
The point is that the question of what constitutes a credible musician is completely separate from the question of what makes credible musical software.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,079
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,079 |
OK, yes I AM SERIOUS as I am a musician as I play piano/keyboards, guitar and violin and have done so for over 50 years. I have also played in many many Bands, Cabaret, Folk, Rock and a little bit of Jazz on guitar and on keyboards.I was a musician for maybe 30 years before I discovered BIAB. ALL my songs, with a few exceptions are composed on piano or guitar. At the moment an old Technics p60 and an Ibanez 12 str or heritage Les Paul, amongst other guitars/keyboards. Pressing play IMHO does not enhance what I PLAY ,it enhances my original song idea by providing me with the instrumentation I CANNOT play or afford to have hanging around in my house, in case I need that specific instrument. So BIAB, to me, is a "band of musicians" that provide me with the instrumentation that I feel the song requires and many times BIAB gives me ideas for an alternative take on MY song and I have learnt a lot of playing skills from using the Melodist and Soloist. Musical ideas I would never have thought of without BIAB. Sometimes the chord sequences provided by "pressing play" have given me ideas also. BUT you say Quote:
Maybe I am in the wrong place. If the accepted definition of a “musician” is anyone who can use BIAB, …… then I definitely am in the wrong place. I hope not, but maybe so.
I find that kind of statement unbelievable!
That would cover the “loop” users and folks who can only use BIAB or another program to create music. That still doesn’t make you a “musician”. You have to earn that title by actually learning to play an instrument. It shouldn’t be “granted” to someone who hasn’t learned to play.
I would assume that many owners of BIAB, and forumites, may fit into this category and take offence.
Quote:
Saying that anyone who can use BIAB is a musician is OFFENSIVE to anyone who can actually play an instrument!
SO from that statement you say that I am somehow offending myself, which I find offensive.  It was just my opinion that this wonderful program, BIAB, is in my arsenal of musical instruments as I have spent many many years learning how to make musical sounds out of it to MY satisfaction, so TO ME it IS an instrument.
So I STILL stick to my statement and say: "A musical instrument is a device created or adapted for the purpose of making musical sounds. In principle, any object that produces sound can serve as a musical instrument—it is through purpose that the object becomes a musical instrument ". Thanks initially to BIAB my computer is now adapted for the purpose of making musical sounds and by the above definition becomes an instrument. For clarity I ignore the presence of my D.A.W., virtual instruments and say, by choice, I do not use the Real Instrs and Real Drums as I prefer the flexibilty afforded by MIDI.
Is a singer not a musician because they do not play a physical instrument, but they "play" the voice? Was Pavarotti a musican or just a singer? And by the same rote was Johnny Rotten of the Sex Pistols a musician as he also portrayed his idea of music by his vocal chords? He definitely wasnt a singer IMHO . Is THIS MAN making music as a musician or is it just a man with a wood saw and a bow??
I believe that the term Music Programer has existed since the 1980's and the advent of the mega synths by Yamaha, MOOG, Korg etc. I too spent time programing synths using system exclusive albeit MT32, TG100 and DX7 but gave up as I had to press the reset button too often. I too have used loops from ACID and the EJAY series.
I feel I have to give you the advice I received from an old teacher who said "Read what is actually written NOT what you THINK is written, two different things".
But then that is the alleged beauty of the Internetz, anonymity.
But no offense taken.
Alyn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,079
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,079 |
Pat,
In total agreement with your posts.
Alyn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,107
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,107 |
Buying a top-of-the-line table saw does not make you a carpenter; but a good carpenter is more likely to envy your expensive table saw than he would an inferior model
The power of any tool is that it gives the craftsman an advantage (speed, precision, power, flexibility) that he would not have without the tool. Tools don't provide expertise, but a good tool DOES provide the ability to use expertise more efficiently.
Although music making software enables you to quickly assemble components of a song, a person who knows something about music, computers, equipment, interfaces, MIDI, Continuous controllers, soft synths, hard synths, chords etc etc, it is going to get different results than somebody who doesn't.
Observation #4
when bad results come from a good tool, it speaks more of the person using the tool than it does of the tool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,107
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,107 |
Quote:
...................................................
EDIT: Maybe we should add a new term to the music biz. “Music Programmer”. That would cover the “loop” users and folks who can only use BIAB or another program to create music.
That still doesn’t make you a “musician”. You have to earn that title by actually learning to play an instrument. It shouldn’t be “granted” to someone who hasn’t learned to play.
I work in a machine shop. When CNC machines came on the scene the old school tool makers despised them. AFter all, CNC didn't require most of the fundamental skills required by a toolmaker. Indeed, it seemed like a CNC process was so "easy" that you didn't need skilled people anymore.. you just needed button pushers at the machine.
Ah, but there is still a skill set required, but it has taken a new form.
observation #5
in any given art or craft, skills and technique reflect common use.
If the only way to record a series of sounds so they can be repeated later is by black notes on paper, then that's the skill that will be learned and passed on by people who want to make musical sounds.
New technology changes the procedures that get passed down. Old passes away and new takes its place
200 years ago, blacksmiths kept your ride on the road... today its the Auto mechanic Tomorrow it may be something else.
And 200 years from now, black notes on paper may not be the technique that musicians teach their students as the best way to replicate the sounds that are currently used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: The Newly Designed Piano Roll Window
In this video, we explore the updated Piano Roll, complete with a modernized look and exciting new features. You’ll see new filtering options that make it easy to focus on specific note groups, smoother and more intuitive note entry and editing, and enhanced options for zooming, looping, and more.
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: AI Stems & Notes - split polyphonic audio into instruments and transcribe
This video demonstrates how to use the new AI-Notes feature together with the AI-Stems splitter, allowing you to select an audio file and have it separated into individual stems while transcribing each one to its own MIDI track. AI-Notes converts polyphonic audio—either full mixes or individual instruments—into MIDI that you can view in notation or play back instantly.
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Bonus PAK and 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®
With your version 2026 for Windows Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
- MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
- Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
- Playable RealTracks Set 5
- RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
- SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
- Android Band-in-a-Box® App (included)
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
- Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
- RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
- SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
Video: New User Interface (GUI)
Join Tobin as he takes you on a tour of the new user interface in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®! This modern GUI redesign offers a sleek new look with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, and a smoother workflow. The brand-new side toolbar puts track selection, the MultiPicker Library, and other essential tools right at your fingertips. Plus, our upgraded Multi-View lets you layer multiple windows without overlap, giving you a highly flexible workspace. Many windows—including Tracks, Piano Roll, and more—have been redesigned for improved usability and a cleaner, more intuitive interface, and more!
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Introducing XPro Styles PAK 10 – Now Available for Windows Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 10 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 28 RealTracks and RealDrums!
Few things are certain in life: death, taxes, and a brand spankin’ new XPro Styles PAK! In this, the 10th edition of our XPro Styles PAK series, we’ve got 100 styles coming your way! We have the classic 25 styles each from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, and rounding out this volume's wildcard slot is 25 styles in the Praise & Worship genre! A wide spanning genre, you can find everything from rock, folk, country, and more underneath its umbrella. The included 28 RealTracks and RealDrums can be used with any Band-in-a-Box® 2026 (and higher) package.
Here’s just a small sampling of what you can look forward to in XPro Styles PAK 10: Soft indie folk worship songs, bumpin’ country boogies, gospel praise breaks, hard rockin’ pop, funky disco grooves, smooth Latin jazz pop, bossa nova fusion, western swing, alternative hip-hop, cool country funk, and much more!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 10 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 10 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Introducing Xtra Styles PAK 21 – Now Available for Windows Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest Xtra Styles PAK installment—the all new Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher)!
Rejoice, one and all, for Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box® is here! We’re serving up 200 brand spankin’ new styles to delight your musical taste buds! The first three courses are the classics you’ve come to know and love, including offerings from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, but, not to be outdone, this year’s fourth course is bro country! A wide ranging genre, you can find everything from hip-hop, uptempo outlaw country, hard hitting rock, funk, and even electronica, all with that familiar bro country flair. The dinner bell has been rung, pickup up Xtra Styles PAK 21 today!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Energetic folk rock, raucous train beats, fast country boogies, acid jazz grooves, laid-back funky jams, a bevy of breezy jazz waltzes, calm electro funk, indie synth pop, industrial synth metal, and more bro country than could possibly fit in the back of a pickup truck!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 21 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 21 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 21.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 21 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 21 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Introducing XPro Styles PAK 10 – Now Available for Mac Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 10 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 28 RealTracks and RealDrums!
Few things are certain in life: death, taxes, and a brand spankin’ new XPro Styles PAK! In this, the 10th edition of our XPro Styles PAK series, we’ve got 100 styles coming your way! We have the classic 25 styles each from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, and rounding out this volume's wildcard slot is 25 styles in the Praise & Worship genre! A wide spanning genre, you can find everything from rock, folk, country, and more underneath its umbrella. The included 28 RealTracks and RealDrums can be used with any Band-in-a-Box® 2026 (and higher) package.
Here’s just a small sampling of what you can look forward to in XPro Styles PAK 10: Soft indie folk worship songs, bumpin’ country boogies, gospel praise breaks, hard rockin’ pop, funky disco grooves, smooth Latin jazz pop, bossa nova fusion, western swing, alternative hip-hop, cool country funk, and much more!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 10 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 10 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics85,362
Posts791,274
Members39,862
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean