|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 348
Journeyman
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 348 |
Shure sm58. built like tanks.
Very reliable.
Tim
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139 |
Quote:
Hey Bob, the Saffire unit looks good. How are the ASIO drivers ?
The ASIO drivers are stable. It's the pres that really impressed me though. Incredibly clean, with no artifacts. I still love my VTB-1, but since I'm already using a tube mic, the VTB-1 tube is overkill.
I've also used the Saffire with a Tele and a 335 direct in to Guitar Rig in Sonar, and that sounds great as well.
Regards,
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 581
Journeyman
|
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 581 |
Ended up getting the C1 and the VTB-1. That should do me just fine for what I plan to do. Thanks guys !
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139 |
Mitch,
You should be happy with that combination. I have heard that you can really improve the VTB-1 by swapping the tube with a Mullard, etc., but haven't tried it myself.
Regards,
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 581
Journeyman
|
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 581 |
Thanks Bob... Still want to check more into the Saffire 6.
Been using the M-Audio Fast Track Pro and it was fine, but got the Tascam US-144 at the 'hint' of someone in PG Support. The Tascam ASIO drivers seem much more stable and also, I can have BIAB, Real Band, Windows Media player all open at the same time and switch back and forth at any time ! No switching Sound configs to use ASIO (only 1 app), then changing default device to use Media player etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,558
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,558 |
The VTB-1 can be modded, but even without using the tube, just using it as solid state, it will be cleaner and clearer than a lot of mixers and most soundcards.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
On the VTB-1, is it like most of the other lower end pres, where the tube is not central to the pre-amp, but paralleled off as a saturation circuit?
Actually I just answered my own question by looking at the site - yes, it's a parallel path.
Cool that it has a high-pass switch built in. All recording mics should have that IMO, but if you have it on the pre, you are all set.
I see that the C1 has selectable hi pass filters - also cool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 581
Journeyman
|
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 581 |
I think these 2 will suit my modified needs... BUT the OCD part of me that's not dead yet is saying "But I haven't spent 7k on these 2 very important items !!"  ... But the part of me in checks n' balance says "You did the right thing. I'm proud of your self control"  Not as fun, but I'll still be married and get to do some music too ! (I *may* need a Shure SM7 Dynamic at some point however  Had one and loved it)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 583
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 583 |
I've been using the Shure Beta 58 for some time now and have been very pleased with the results, both live and recording. On stand-alone recorders, I've used various tube preamps with good results. Now, that I'm learning to use a DAW for the first time(Studio One), I plug straight into the Firestudio Mobile and use various effects in the software. Very clean sound.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139 |
Quote:
I've been using the Shure Beta 58 for some time now and have been very pleased with the results, both live and recording. On stand-alone recorders, I've used various tube preamps with good results. Now, that I'm learning to use a DAW for the first time(Studio One), I plug straight into the Firestudio Mobile and use various effects in the software. Very clean sound.
We use two Beta 87A's live, and they are the best live mics I've ever used. Vocal clarity, good GBF. If you're used to the old standby (58), try an 87A. It's like taking a blanket off of your mic. 
Regards,
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 581
Journeyman
|
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 581 |
Hey Bob, what is the difference between the 87a and the 87c ? For my non-acoustic treated room which would reject the most off-axis noise ? EDIT: Nevermind, did the research. Just picked up a used Beta 87a for a great price. So there, I HAVE indulged myself a tad and now have 2 mics and I will only use either very occassionally. Oh, the gasious flesh... 
Last edited by MitchC; 01/25/12 01:59 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139 |
Quote:
Hey Bob, what is the difference between the 87a and the 87c ? For my non-acoustic treated room which would reject the most off-axis noise ?
EDIT: Nevermind, did the research. Just picked up a used Beta 87a for a great price. So there, I HAVE indulged myself a tad and now have 2 mics and I will only use either very occassionally. Oh, the gasious flesh...
Mitch -
Frankly, I don't know the difference between the "A" and the "C". I've only used the "A". You should be very happy with the 87A. It's got a really tight pattern. We've used them indoors and out, in noisy bars and small stages, and they still sound great. As for "acoustically-treated" rooms, I think that is a canard used to sell room treatments. I'm recording with a tube mic with just a pop filter in a room cluttered with boxes, no Auralex. etc., and getting vocal tracks that I am satisfied with. If a plane flies over or a truck goes by, I just wait to do another track. Of course, I'm way back in the woods, so there isn't much ambient noise.
I'd be interested in how you make out with the C1 and the VTB-1.
Regards,
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 581
Journeyman
|
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 581 |
Thanks Bob. Yep, I almost owned stock in Auralex..it was all over the place. I'm a lot less picky these days. I used to record demos for folks and charge for engineering and time. Also produced 3 CD's of my projects.
Now it's just me, a laptop, an interface and the great PG products and having a great time of it. I'm sure the C1 and VTB-1 will work out fine. I used to own both so I know exactly what to expect from each.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Quote:
Quote:
Hey Bob, what is the difference between the 87a and the 87c ? For my non-acoustic treated room which would reject the most off-axis noise ?
EDIT: Nevermind, did the research. Just picked up a used Beta 87a for a great price. So there, I HAVE indulged myself a tad and now have 2 mics and I will only use either very occassionally. Oh, the gasious flesh...
Mitch -
Frankly, I don't know the difference between the "A" and the "C". I've only used the "A". You should be very happy with the 87A. It's got a really tight pattern. We've used them indoors and out, in noisy bars and small stages, and they still sound great. As for "acoustically-treated" rooms, I think that is a canard used to sell room treatments. I'm recording with a tube mic with just a pop filter in a room cluttered with boxes, no Auralex. etc., and getting vocal tracks that I am satisfied with. If a plane flies over or a truck goes by, I just wait to do another track. Of course, I'm way back in the woods, so there isn't much ambient noise.
I'd be interested in how you make out with the C1 and the VTB-1.
Regards,
Bob
The key there is your room cluttered with boxes. That actually breaks up reflection patterns not unlike products like this: http://www.auralex.com/sound_diffusor_minifusor/sound_diffusor_minifusor.asp
creating diffusion in the room. That is a very good thing. You'll see many folks recommend bookshelves stuffed with various sizes of books to accomplish the same type of treatment. Breaking up large flat surfaces is the key for diffusion.
Absorption is necessary if you are playing with loud levels and have a wide patterned microphone (many condenser mics will pick up reflections off of a low ceiling in a basement 'studio' for loud vocalists, etc.
-Scott
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 581
Journeyman
|
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Quote:
I may end up getting one of these thingies ... ?
http://www.amazon.com/Primacoustic-VoxGu...;sr=1-1-catcorr
Mitch, likely no need for that with the mics you are talking about. Just don't sing towards a nearby wall. Got a clothes closet in your room? Open the door, put the mic in the door opening, back of the mic pointing towards the closet, and sing away.
-Scott
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 581
Journeyman
|
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 581 |
Just saved me $100 Scott...was thinking the same thing myself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Quote:
Just saved me $100 Scott...was thinking the same thing myself.
Key is that the closet should have lots of clothes hanging in it. If it's an empty box, you just made your recording worse not better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139 |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Hey Bob, what is the difference between the 87a and the 87c ? For my non-acoustic treated room which would reject the most off-axis noise ?
EDIT: Nevermind, did the research. Just picked up a used Beta 87a for a great price. So there, I HAVE indulged myself a tad and now have 2 mics and I will only use either very occassionally. Oh, the gasious flesh...
Mitch -
Frankly, I don't know the difference between the "A" and the "C". I've only used the "A". You should be very happy with the 87A. It's got a really tight pattern. We've used them indoors and out, in noisy bars and small stages, and they still sound great. As for "acoustically-treated" rooms, I think that is a canard used to sell room treatments. I'm recording with a tube mic with just a pop filter in a room cluttered with boxes, no Auralex. etc., and getting vocal tracks that I am satisfied with. If a plane flies over or a truck goes by, I just wait to do another track. Of course, I'm way back in the woods, so there isn't much ambient noise.
I'd be interested in how you make out with the C1 and the VTB-1.
Regards,
Bob
The key there is your room cluttered with boxes. That actually breaks up reflection patterns not unlike products like this: http://www.auralex.com/sound_diffusor_minifusor/sound_diffusor_minifusor.asp
creating diffusion in the room. That is a very good thing. You'll see many folks recommend bookshelves stuffed with various sizes of books to accomplish the same type of treatment. Breaking up large flat surfaces is the key for diffusion.
Absorption is necessary if you are playing with loud levels and have a wide patterned microphone (many condenser mics will pick up reflections off of a low ceiling in a basement 'studio' for loud vocalists, etc.
-Scott
Close-micing a vocal track with a properly set gate will eliminate the necessity for any room "treatment". (unless, of course, if you live at the end of a runway. )
I've been recording since 1980, the days of tape hiss and noise floor. Now, with 24 bit recording and the processing at our disposal, good recordings can be made in less than optimal conditions. I'm a songwriter, not a RE. Auralex, room treatments, closets; been there done that. Now, I put up a good mic, set up a gate, and hit "Record".:)
Regards,
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,333
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,333 |
Does the gate work to keep the goats out? LOL Baaaaad, I know.
John Conley
Musica est vita
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
PowerTracks Pro 2026 for Windows is Here!
PowerTracks 2026 is here—bringing powerful new enhancements designed to make your production workflow faster, smoother, and more intuitive than ever.
The enhanced Mixer now shows Track Type and Instrument icons for instant track recognition, while a new grid option simplifies editing views. Non-floating windows adopt a modern title bar style, replacing the legacy blue bar.
The Master Volume is now applied at the end of the audio chain for consistent levels and full-signal master effects.
Tablature now includes a “Save bends when saving XML” option for improved compatibility with PG Music tools. Plus, you can instantly match all track heights with a simple Ctrl-release after resizing, and Add2 chords from MGU/SGU files are now fully supported... and more!
Get started today—first-time packages start at just $49.
Already using PowerTracks Pro Audio? Upgrade for as little as $29 and enjoy the latest improvements!
Order now!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows Special Offers End Tomorrow (January 15th, 2026) at 11:59 PM PST!
Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PST on Thursday, January 15, 2026!
We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.
Another exciting new addition is the new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. You can view the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to process an entire track or focus on specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Windows to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!
Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.
If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® Special Offers Extended Until January 15, 2026!
Good news! You still have time to upgrade to the latest version of Band-in-a-Box® for Windows® and save. Our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® special now runs through January 15, 2025!
We've packed Band-in-a-Box® 2026 with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can process an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PST on January 15th, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® today! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
Happy New Year!
Thank you for being part of the Band-in-a-Box® community.
Wishing you and yours a very happy 2026—Happy New Year from all of us at PG Music!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,096
Posts800,184
Members40,033
| |
Most Online44,367
Mar 4th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean