|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 996
Expert
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 996 |
Following on from Tono’s thread, I would be most grateful for some know-how and experience of fellow forum members who use Acronis True Image.
Specifically, I have 2 questions:
- the main thing I don’t get is the ‘Acronis Secure Zone’.
a) why would you want to store a backup on the same drive as the one that is being backed up?
b) surely creating the ASZ deprives the user of disk space (the manual, p 72, recommends that the disk space allocated to ASZ = 75% of the total volume of programmes and data being backed up)
c) can ATI be used without setting up this partition?
- have all the bugs now been ironed out?
Many thanks in advance,
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603 |
Good questions, Marc. Quote:
- the main thing I don’t get is the ‘Acronis Secure Zone’.
a) why would you want to store a backup on the same drive as the one that is being backed up?
If you had only one drive, it might provide insurance against OS corruption, for example. But it's certainly not the best plan and no help in the event of disk failure, or general computer catastrophe. Put backups on an external drive, or on DVD's, perhaps.
Quote:
b) surely creating the ASZ deprives the user of disk space (the manual, p 72, recommends that the disk space allocated to ASZ = 75% of the total volume of programmes and data being backed up)
The Secure Zone, of course, uses up disk space, but not more than the backups themselves. They can be fairly large, at 75% of the original.
Quote:
c) can ATI be used without setting up this partition?
Yes, you can ignore it, although backups saved outside a Secure Zone would theoretically be more exposed to accidental hosing. I do not use an SZ.
Quote:
- have all the bugs now been ironed out?
It's a completely mature program, operates without quirks.
You should nevertheless look into a newer image program called "MACRIUM REFLECT". I have tried it out extensively with good success. They offer a very capable FREE version, which works as well as Acronis -- same speed and perfectly equivalent results. Recommended.
Last edited by allis; 03/09/09 12:39 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 996
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 996 |
Thanks allis for that very helpful input.
all the best,
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,689
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,689 |
Quote:
You should nevertheless look into a newer image program called "MACRIUM REFLECT". I have tried it out extensively with good success. They offer a very capable FREE version, which works as well as Acronis -- same speed and perfectly equivalent results. Recommended.
Allis,
Thanks for the heads-up. I have REFLECT downloaded and the backup verified. Looks like it should do the job if needed.
Don S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603 |
That's good news, Don! You'll be happier, I bet. Musicians often have so many programs installed that re-installing Windows and re-registering everything might take days of miserably dull work. Using the image file, you do it in 40 minutes unattended. All your registration keys, bookmarks, Windows Theme, and such are preserved as they were when you backed up.
There are a number of good image programs. The Reflect thing seems the best free one. It's not horribly expensive if you decide to purchase it. The paid version will do "incremental" backups, which save a few minutes. I stayed with Acronis in the end, because it's just as good, and I already owned it. But switching to Reflect would cause no drama.
I hope you have made yourself a Boot CD, so you can start up when Windows is wrecked, to begin the reconstruction. That CD boots you into Linux point-and-click screens, and you restore from there.
Larry
______
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,689
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,689 |
Quote:
I hope you have made yourself a Boot CD, so you can start up when Windows is wrecked, to begin the reconstruction. That CD boots you into Linux point-and-click screens, and you restore from there.
Yes sir, I did.
Don S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 996
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 996 |
I bought a Maxtor external hard drive for backup purposes. The software pre-installed on this drive, Maxtor Manager, is fine as far as it goes but will only back up data files. It does not make disc images.
However, by virtue of owning a Seagate or Maxtor device, I was able to install and use another piece of Seagate software, DiscWizard which does, among other things, make and restore disc images. Interestingly, this software is ‘powered’ by Acronis True Image so perhaps can be thought of as ‘ATI lite’.
There does not seem to be any limit to the number of machines Disc Wizard can be used on, as long as your Seagate/Maxtor device is connected to the PC at the time of use.
I made bootable CDs and disc images for 2 of my PCs. I know that standard advice is to test such backups, but I ain’t that brave (or crazy, depending on which way you look at it).
For PC users seeking to pursue a backup strategy, there may be something to be said for buying even a modest spec Seagate/Maxtor drive in order to benefit from Disc Wizard. Bear in mind that the fully featured version of ATI currently sells for 50 US dollars and, if I am not mistaken, can only be used on a single machine.
Hoping that this post will have saved the PGMusic community many hundreds of dollars….
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,672
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,672 |
Quote:
I made bootable CDs and disc images for 2 of my PCs. I know that standard advice is to test such backups, but I ain’t that brave (or crazy, depending on which way you look at it).
Well, your results may vary, but I have definitely tested my Acronis images on a several different machines and it has performed well every time.
What I have found that works for me is to always do my image backups from the bootable CD. Yes, Acronis will let you run it live from within Windows, but I've had occasional hiccups doing that, so I now always do it from the CD. I usually just kick it off before leaving for work or going to church or whatever, and then it's done when I come home. The other thing I do is to set the option to verify the backup when it finishes. Those two things give me a higher comfort level and so far I've had no problems restoring my images.
John Laptop-HP Omen I7 Win11Pro 32GB 2x2TB, 1x4TB SSD Desktop-ASUS-I7 Win10Pro 32GB 2x1.5TB, 2x2TB, 1x4TB SATA BB2025/UMC404HD/Casios/Cakewalk/Reaper/Studio One/MixBus/Notion/Finale/Dorico/Noteworthy/NI/Halion/IK http://www.sus4chord.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 996
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 996 |
Thanks for that John.
I did take the precaution of running the 'verify' procedure after creating one of the images, thinking that the programme would have a quick look at the file, declare it wholesome, or otherwise, and then let me get on with whatever it was I was doing.
But not a bit of it! Verify takes just as long as the image making itself - although I was pleased to see that DiscWizard did declare its own work to be sound.
I'm pleased I have the images, but I can only see myself mounting them if everything has gone south. My 'users' (who operate very strictly on an 'if it ain't broke - don't fix it' principle) would not understand it if I broke what is currently a fully operational system.
Anyway, I'm much reassured by your testing and by your own faith in ATI!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603 |
Running the imaging program from the bootup disk is slow -- up to an hour to make an image of a small Windows partition. I can make that disk image on this machine in 8 minutes (and verify it in the same amount of time) when running in Windows and doing other tasks at the same time. No difficulties -- not even once -- have ever cropped up from that, and if they ever do, I'll just make another image in 8 minutes to replace the one that busted.
When you restore the image to the hard drive sometime, you'll have no choice. You must do that from the bootup disk environment and let it do its thing for an hour. When that time comes, you'll be startled at the smoothness of the procedure and wonder why you were ever worried about it.
One other thing: The commercial Acronis allows you to select your level of compression. Using highest compression saves me about 20% in image size, which goes down from 10 gigs to 8 gigs -- and takes 12 minutes instead of 8 to prepare. If your version allows that, you may want to investigate it. Or perhaps it isn't worth the bother. My smallish backup drive benefits from higher compression.
Larry
______
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,426
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,426 |
I just upgraded my DAW to a Qad Core 3Xs i7 system and Acronis came pre-installed. I've done one full backup so far on one of the three internal hard disks (which I'm keeping just for these backups) but I'm wondering how I'd go about recovery. When I switch the system on a message flashes up saying something like 'press F11 to start Acronis recovery manager', so I assume it's as easy as that? BTW, the new 3xs is an amazing piece of kit - no fans, totally quiet and amazingly quick. Sound On Sound rated it the fastest DAW they'd ever reviewed. So I can make mediocre music even quicker now!  John
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603 |
Quote:
...something like 'press F11 to start Acronis recovery manager', so I assume it's as easy as that?
Yes. As weird as it sounds, it's precisely that easy. Push the F11 and start following instructions. About four clicks later, the thing will be calmly rebuilding itself. It's the same when you start from the bootup disk, except in your case, you don't have to find the bootup disk.
That machine sounds wonderful. The ideal DAW uses all three hard drives for music, though. And your backup images would be safer on an outside disk stored apart. But you'll be all right anyway.
Larry
______
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,672
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,672 |
Hi, Allis -
I used to do images from within Windows originally (and it's definitely faster than using the boot CD)...until a couple of them said they were corrupted when I tried to restore them. That's when I switched to using the bootup disk exclusively and haven't had a bad one since. I'll take the time trade-off, since I usually just kick it off before I head out somewhere or before I go to bed at night. Maybe with ATI 2009 I might not have that problem anymore (I originally had the corruption with version 10 or 11). But, as they say, your backup is only as good as your ability to restore it (that's why I've always tested it). Having a successful backup doesn't necessarily mean the ability to successfully restore. If you can't restore using your backup, then it's just a big file sitting there.
To each his/her own...
John Laptop-HP Omen I7 Win11Pro 32GB 2x2TB, 1x4TB SSD Desktop-ASUS-I7 Win10Pro 32GB 2x1.5TB, 2x2TB, 1x4TB SATA BB2025/UMC404HD/Casios/Cakewalk/Reaper/Studio One/MixBus/Notion/Finale/Dorico/Noteworthy/NI/Halion/IK http://www.sus4chord.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603 |
I understood your point, John, and didn't mean to argue with your success. Only to reassure that this is not a shaky process needing white-knuckle concentration and iron nerves, as we all fear when we first try it.
The images you had that refused to restore: Had they previously been verified as being OK?
In any event, keeping one older image that has been proven to work takes the last bit of uncertainty out, even if like me, you don't even bother to verify them any longer.
Larry
______
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,672
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,672 |
Quote:
Had they previously been verified as being OK?
Yep, they were verified as being OK. I may try again, since I've got several backup copies of images I know work (because I've restored from them), so we'll see how it goes. Like I said, maybe it was a glitch in version 10 or 11; I'll try it with version 2009 and I'll let you know if I have any other problems. I'm glad it's worked well for you.
John Laptop-HP Omen I7 Win11Pro 32GB 2x2TB, 1x4TB SSD Desktop-ASUS-I7 Win10Pro 32GB 2x1.5TB, 2x2TB, 1x4TB SATA BB2025/UMC404HD/Casios/Cakewalk/Reaper/Studio One/MixBus/Notion/Finale/Dorico/Noteworthy/NI/Halion/IK http://www.sus4chord.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box 2025 Italian Version is Here!
Cari amici
È stata aggerate la versione in Italiano del programma più amato dagli appassionati di musica, il nostro Band-in-a-Box.
Questo è il link alla nuova versione 2025.
Di seguito i link per scaricare il pacchetti di lingua italiana aggiornati per Band-in-a-Box e RealBand, anche per chi avesse già comprato la nuova versione in inglese.
Band-in-a-Box 2025 - Italiano
RealBand 2025 - Italiano
Band-in-a-Box 2025 French Version is Here!
Bonjour à tous,
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 pour Windows est disponible en Français.
Le téléchargement se fait à partir du site PG Music
Pour ceux qui auraient déjà acheté la version 2025 de Band-in-a-Box (et qui donc ont une version anglaise), il est possible de "franciser" cette version avec les patchs suivants:
BIAB 2025 - francisation
RealBand 2025 - francisation
Voilà, enjoy!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 German Version is Here!
Update Your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 to Build 1128 for Windows Today!
Already using Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 1128 now from our Support Page to enjoy the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.
Stay up to date—get the latest update now!
Update to RealBand® 2025 Build 5 Windows Today!
Already using RealBand® 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 5 now from our Support Page to ensure you have the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.
Get the latest update today!
PowerTracks Pro Audio 2025 for Windows is Here!
PowerTracks Pro Audio 2025 is here! This new version introduces many features, including VST3 support, the ability to load or import a .FLAC file, a reset option for track height in the Tracks window, a taller Timeline on the Notation window toolbar, new freeze buttons in the Tracks window, three toolbar modes (two rows, single row, and none), the improved Select Patch dialog with text-based search and numeric patch display, a new button in the DirectX/VST window to copy an effects group, and more!
First-time packages start at only $49. Already a PowerTracks Pro Audio user? Upgrade for as little as $29!
www.pgmusic.com/powertracks.htm
Video: Summary of the New Band-in-a-Box® App for iOS®
Join Tobin as he takes you on a tour of the new Band-in-a-Box® app for iOS®! Designed for musicians, singer-songwriters, and educators, this powerful tool lets you create, play, and transfer songs effortlessly on your iPhone® or iPad®—anytime, anywhere.
Band-in-a-Box® for iOS® :Summary video.
Check out the forum post for more information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums58
Topics84,149
Posts775,399
Members39,568
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean