It really depends on what you want.

You were comparing two totally different things:
1. A dynamic microphone with a medium sized diaphragm,
2. A condenser microphone with a large diaphragm.

FWIW, in general *) large diaphragms are noisier than small diaphragms.
In general condenser mics are more sensitive than dynamic mics.

It really depends on what you want.
An omnidirectional small diaphragm condenser mic of good quality will probably deliver a more natural sounding recording than a cardioid **) microphone of similar quality.

Here is some literature that provides information delivered by microphone-pros***):
http://www.microphone-data.com/media/filestore/articles/Techno-physical-10.pdf


Enjoy the reading.
Guido



*) I do know that there is the exception to the rule, but I don't care about it here.
**) I don't care which cardioid characteristic. This is just general.
***) Depending on how you want you use the site www.microphone-data.com it requires registration. No problem, no cost. Lots of information about microphones.

Desktop; i7-2600k, 8 GB mem., Win 10 Pro, BIAB 2017; RB 2017 - latest build
Laptop: i5-2410M, 4 GB mem, Win 10 Pro, BIAB 2017; RB 2017 - latest build