|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,954
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,954 |
So I purchased my new Rode NT1A to go along with my prior SM57 for vocal recording (but you guys knew that..) So here is a side by side comparison of the two mics with my best impersonation of Hank Williams Jr. (even a jazz guy can appreciate good country blues). Each phrase, prior to solo, alternates between the two mic's (some recording magic which was really fun). After the solo I stick to one mic. Can you hear the difference?  Let me just say I am very happy with my purchase.  SM57 vrs Rode NT1A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,333
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,333 |
Often the proximal distance and the setup makes a big difference.
New mics, with modern technology, and good setup should not make a huge difference.
Perhaps for recording I guess maybe, but live, I don't dig the difference. Now if you are a showman,
and get the old mic, and can caress and hold it when you do
Dream, when you're feeling blue....
well that's going to sell if you have one of those old fashioned mics.
Some of them get in the way otherwise.
I'll give it a listen when I'm back from the Last night at the Proms on at 2:30 EST here, live from Royal Alber Hall. I know I'm going to end up blubbering like a baby.
I sure am getting weird though, the thyroid meds got me off my chair and I'm cleaning the garage, polishing the brass, and getting creative. I didn't realize how out of it I was. Now to slowly increase it and make me superman. LOL, NOT.
John Conley
Musica est vita
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,689
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,689 |
Quote:
Can you hear the difference? Let me just say I am very happy with my purchase.
Yes, I can hear a difference between phrases. Not sure that difference in anything more than signal level?
Of course, that just my humble opinion.
Pretty good guitar playing.
Don S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,954
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,954 |
Quote:
Yes, I can hear a difference between phrases. Not sure that difference in anything more than signal level?
Admittedly, it is subtle. I suspect it may take a very trained ear to hear the characteristic sound differences between a dynamic mic versus a condenser, the SM57 and Rode NT1A, respectively. Both are indeed excellent mics. In fact, in a blind study between coke and pepsi I can definitely identify each 100% of the time attesting to how “trained” my sense of taste is. My ear may not be so good in a blind test of the two mics.
But unless my voice developed a new sense of clarity between takes, I can hear a warmth which distinguishes the two mics – at least to my ear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,365
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,365 |
OK, here we go.
I see no one has dared to say which is which, so let me be the first to make a fool of themselves.
The first phrase is the SM57 and the second is the Rode NT1A.
If you want to keep the game going, Dan, please PM me to stop my curiosity eating me up!
ROG.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,954
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,954 |
Oh, sorry, I didn't notice that I had not indicated. I didn't mean to test anyone! My voice is way to narly to use as a test standard..  The vocals begin and end with the Rode. I panned it a little left on my system. Rode claim, " warmth , extended dynamic range, clarity and SPL capabilty only featured by some of the most expensive mics ..." Shure the SM57, "...exceptional for musical instrument pickup and vocals. With its bright, clean sound and contoured frequency response, the SM57 is ideal for live sound reinforcement and recording." So in my naive judgement, warm verus bright distinquishes the mics. Also the Shure appears to add some extra "color" to the sound which is not present in the Rode. I like the new Rode better in this example, hence, why I am glad in the investment for the studio. So maybe wen need a real sound engineer to tell us what we should be listening for here. And if it is actually heard in this simple example. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,365
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 886
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 886 |
I would have said the Rode first, only because the high end is "edgier" than the 2nd one....after that it would have been a guessing game really.
i5 3.20GHz, 32gb RAM, 1tb SSD OS, 12tb HDD, 4gb gForce vid card, 32" monitor, Audient id44, Win10 x64, BiaB/RB 2023, Reaper 6,IK Multimedia Total Studio 3.5 MAX, Waves 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,610
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,610 |
You may want to check your left/right connections if the description is accurate.
You said vocals start and end with Rode mic panned left.
However here the vocals start/end on right side.
When I first read it I thought the SM57 was on the right side .. but then I read the order of vocals for L/R. Something is not hooked up right. Either here or there.
First vocal (MR weather man) starts on right side here.
May explain ROG's confusion.
SM57 did a fine job never the less. Rode may need a little more preamp to appreciate it. As mentioned above by someone else, the 57 seems to be a little hotter, judging from the sound.
just MHO
I hear the little things like consonants better on the Rodes (to be expected) but since the 57 appears hotter it sounds very live and responsive.
Weird how one comparison like this can really blur the lines.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,954
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,954 |
Here is a quick Specs overlay of both mics:  Regarding the L/R - this always confuses me since, first I an not sure if it refers to stage L/R or audiance L/R , and I only get my wiring correct 50% of the time. Nevertheless, the Intro Phrase, "Mr. Weatherman", is the Rode.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,954
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,954 |
Quote:
First vocal (MR weather man) starts on right side here.
Well, that would be Stage R, on my system, since the phrase plays our of the left speaker (as I look at it). I would show you an image of the mix control panel, except I did not save the work since it was only supposed to be a quick test.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,954
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,954 |
The real problem here was setting the mics up outside and catching the thunderstorm!! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,365
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,365 |
The left and right on my system are the same as rharv, so you might want to look at that again, Dan.
Having said that, what really had me fooled was the high frequency response of the Rode. It certainly sounded less bright to me than did the SM57, which is the opposite of what I would have expected. I'm a great fan of the SM57, but I know it rolls off very fast above about 8K, much earlier than most condensers. At the same time, I must confess that I've never used a Rode mic at all, so it's useful to hear the comparison.
Thanks, Dan.
ROG.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Actually, using an .mp3 to shoot out between mics is a bit unfair. Here's why; most .mp3 codecs if not all, have a upper frequency response somewhere shy of 20kHz, if I recall correctly. Note that the SM57 response is greater than 0dB, meaning a boost, from about 2 kHz all the way well past 10 kHz, whereas, the Rode is nearly flat UNTIL about 14 kHz, where it then shows a bump. The SM57 is greater than 0dB from about 2 kHz all the way up to 15-16 kHz (difficult to read correctly on the log plot - but visible in greater detail on the .pdf: http://www.shure.com/idc/groups/public/documents/webcontent/us_pro_sm57_specsheet.pdf ) This would make the SM57 seem 'hyped' in the high end of the available spectrum in the .mp3 file compared to a more flat response of the Rode. The SM rolls off below 200 Hz, but most people high-pass recordings for vox between 100 and 200 Hz, so this wouldn't be necessarily apparent. Also take into account that many people have some age-related loss in the region where the two mics differ, particularly where the RODE shows a non-flat response in the teen kHz region, though it's pretty doggoned flat for a music microphone. You don't see much more flat response than that except with measurement microphones. Regardless, trying to do a shootout with out simultaneous recording at each mic's optimal position makes this kind of an exercise difficult, and lossy compression throws another curve into the situation that makes it difficult. Is it something to worry about - not at all. -Scott
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,333
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,333 |
OK some general hearing facts, I think we've been over this.
I cannot hear squat over 20kHz no matter how loud it gets. About the top 13 keys on an 88.
But I can tell you this. Compression makes TV incomprehensible to me. No consonants at all.
I need the closed captioning. Some of that is quite odd too. All wrong guesses. I think the sports is the best, they have to program in certain names, cause we have southern born announcers like Buck Martinez for the Jays and he can say Adeiny Hechavarria, and it comes out right, and there is no way the computer does that without some programming. But other shows have really crazy stuff.
ANYways, I don't understand the radio. I can't get what squeaky women say. I mean catch, who understands them anyway. (Now I'm Dangerfield!)
So explain that in a mic? Does it crack out the sibilance so you guys get it? Does the other mic loose the th or f's and c's. Heck a woman might say the magic words like containing _u__ o__ which I hear as u o and it was the travel and fornication bit.
So then the mic is good, the what about the pre-amp? Then the amp? Then the speakers? Then the environmental noises. And of course the crunch of the gravel as the tractors head back to the house after a day out in the field, right past the bar.
But all you spring type poo-lays, (french for barnyard fowl), have fantastical hearing.
Well, son, I say well son, speak up! Ya'll can really hear that stuff? I'm thinking of sticking with Jim Reeves and Geo Beverley Sahy something.
Have at 'er. The shootout of gear for old guys playing a bar. If the mic does your vocal range, are you playin' that bass past the bottom fret agin? Are you fiddling with the little string whilst scrapin? Furry is scratchin' his leg and playing that note at the bottom? Oh, alrighty then.
So, take one or two old rockers, the output of Band in a Box, a mic, and what freq range matters. Add in the other gear and convince me.
As for me, I'm still looking for the dang beer I opened 3 hours ago. I hope it warmed up. It's freaking cold here again, the furnace is going full blast and I'm wishing I had some coal. It did used to make a mess out of the house though, according to Mom, the day after it went down the chute into the basement. They got the truck stuck in the yard in the rain once, and the next day brought a horse to pull it out.
BTW, notice there is no seniors discount for Brand in a balk?
I lost my wallet today, and found my long lost car keys in the car. Why they were there only he knows.
John Conley
Musica est vita
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 913
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 913 |
The left speaker is the dynamic mike and the right speaker is the condenser mike.
Right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,333
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,333 |
What have you left out?
Peter Panned them after tinkering with the cowbell, get the hook!
Double entendre is not dead, it's stere-air-ee-oh!
John Conley
Musica est vita
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,086
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,086 |
Nobody else mentioned it but I heard some heavy ess rumble or distortion on the left one and the one you ended with. Try using a pop filter and/or back off from it a little bit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,954
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,954 |
Quote:
The left speaker is the dynamic mike and the right speaker is the condenser mike.
Right?
While that was appearing to be a consensus, I am convinced that Left and Right is relative, so can not be definitively defined as your right may or may not be my left.
The tune begins and ends on the Rode.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,954
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,954 |
Quote:
Nobody else mentioned it but I heard some heavy ess rumble or distortion on the left one and the one you ended with. Try using a pop filter and/or back off from it a little bit.
This song is prone to ESS as I have heard them very promenently on both mics.
At first I tried to de-ess with a plugin but then jsut ended up resinging. But still the ess. So I did some triming of the waveforms to remove the endings. That helped a bit. There is a pop shield on both mics, however, I am close. Still a work in progess (both me and the tune)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,221
Posts802,045
Members40,070
| |
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean