Quote:

Mario, I wonder why you go straight from BiaB to Sonar? What do you do in BiaB that you can’t do in RB? Have you thought (for example) of going to RB and generating an additional track for just a few bars?





Hi Pete, I have been using BiaB for a few years now but I’ve been using Cakewalk’s DAWS for a very long time. Thus I can work in Sonar a lot faster than I can in RB. This is not a knock against RB, it seems to be a very good DAW however I know already know Sonar. The one thing that RB can do that Sonar can’t is to generate backing tracks but that is what I use BiaB for plus Sonar can do a couple of things that RB can’t. So I use Sonar because I am very familiar with it.

Like I said I have used Biab for a number of years now. I generate backing tracks in BiaB but most of the time I modify, sometimes very heavily, the results BiaB gives me. I do all that work is Sonar for reasons already stated. I use BiaB as a sketch board using mostly midi but RealTracks at times and Sonar to polish and finish things off. That includes adding a few bars, additional tracks, deleting a few bars and/or tracks, blending two or three different BiaB styles, etc.

This is the workflow that works best for me. Many other forum members use just BiaB and RB. Some work like me, BiaB to a DAW of their choice. Others use RB to another DAW or BiaB, RB, to another DAW. The path you take should be the one that works best for you. There are no “rules in stone” on this.

If you have any questions feel free to ask.

The fitness trainer asked me, "What kind of a squat are you accustomed to doing?" I said, "Diddly."


64 bit Win 11 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware