I tried Defraggler two nights ago after reading this thread.

I have two machines, one XP SP3, and one Win7/64. Both have C drives plus two HDDs for data only.

The first step was to use Windows defragger on all the drives - none of the six drives were in need of defragging according to Windows defrag.

Then I ran Defraggler on all the drives. The worst one was a photo image storage drive that took about eight to ten hours of work. All the drives were fragmented, some up to 27 percent (according to Defraggler).

The image processing software is now running much faster; both machines start up faster on the internet and they DL e-mail faster.

My wife ran Defraggler on her machine last night and was surprised at how fast it became.

It seems that defragging DOES make a difference, and that Windoz isn't optimized for my type of work (music and photography).

Today I mentioned Defraggler on a photo forum, and discovered that many others have been using Defraggler for quite a while with good success.

Glenn

Last edited by Glenn Kolot; 12/14/12 01:34 PM.