|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 6
Newbie
|
OP
Newbie
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 6 |
I have spent many hours mixing my backing tracks. When I try to make demo recordings for marketing purposes
they do not sound like they do through my pa. Is there anyway to get my recordings to sound more professional.
Please excuse me if this is a stupid question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,950
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,950 |
Not a stupid qustion at all. First are you actually mixing via the PA as you suggest?
Answering this quesion will help us understand exactly where you are at. As this would certainly cause your PA to sound good, but when you render to a CD or play on other speakers it would indeed sound very different.
Best to mix through some monitors so you are not hearing all the bias of the PA system and speakers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,722
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,722 |
captainjohn,
Welcome aboard, I am betting not only will your question be answered but you will also find there are a very helpful group of people here on the forum.
Later,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Cap, we need to know what the sound source is. How are you getting that sound into your software? Live recording with room mics, mixing through a mixer....? Is it multi tracked input or one channel?
Once your stuff is actually recorded onto a computer, you can use a wide range of digital plugs into EQ, compress, add reverb, etc.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,258
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,258 |
another silly ? obvious question, do you render as wav or MP3 ? Wav is by far the better opition of course
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 6
Newbie
|
|
OP
Newbie
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 6 |
I am using a bose t1 mixer. I believe you can use more than one track with the bose.\, but have not figured out how. I think the end results need to be mastered to get the professional sound on differnt playback units. I am trying to learn the effects needed to achieve this. I thank you all for your advice. I assume once it was mixed it would be fine. I did not know there was another step.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Okay, we need to take a few steps back here and get the whole picture.
What do you have right now? A stereo mix of 2 channels, left and right? How were those 2 channels achieved?
A) Did a whole band play a live song through a mixer and it was mixed down to a 2 channel tape recorder?
B) Did various players and singers all do their tracks into a multi track system?
Depending on which of those 2 questions gets the "yes" answer, our answer to you will be different, and here's why.
If you have a "master" recording, master in this case meaning "the foundation tracks" and not to be confused with "mastering", then you have some file or tape with X number of individual, discreet tracks on it. Kick on one, snare on another, hat on another and so forth. In that case, each track can be equalized individually to take out any offensive overdriving, noise... in addition, if that is what you have, if a guitar was out of tune or a harmony was flat, you can also go back and record it again.
If you have a file or tape that was mixed as you played and recorded onto L and R channels, if those initial recordings are not clean, overdriven, dirty with background noise, out of tune at all..... It is what it is and there isn't much you can do about it.
There is an old saying that has been attributed to several old school music producers that says "You can't polish a turd", which essentially means "You can't make a silk purse form a sow's ear", or "garbage in garbage out". Whichever of those you choose, it is true. If your baseline tracks are bad, no amount of tweaking is going to fix them and your time is probably better spent recording them again. Not one person on these forums has done everything in one take, and I would say that the true pros of the bunch never SETTLE for one take. Much to be said for the attitude of "Let me try one more because maybe there is a magic moment I missed."
So, fill us in on what you are trying to make sound good. It is FAR from being as simple as using effects. The main thing is to not get frustrated, to not look for the easy way, and to make sure you learn something from every attempt. If it's as simple as "Okay, when I turn this knob, it sounds like crap, so I shouldn't turn that knob", that is progress.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 6
Newbie
|
|
OP
Newbie
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 6 |
I have what I believe are good sounding backing tracks which I have made using Pg's Music Realband. I have mixed midi and realband sounds to compile most of my backing tracks for the most part from midi files. I have used appropriate realtracks and the midi sounds from cakewalk, which I find to sound very much like real instruments. Through my Pa and live they sound full and well mixed. However, I have found a need for demo's to help market. On a low end sound system they loose all there fullness
and the mix changes.
I was simply looking for an explanation and any help anyone might offer.
I now believe that in order to make my existing or new files sound good on different audio systems I will need to master them.
I was simply ignorant of the fact that you had to do more than mix.
Thanks again for all yout input.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815 |
Quote:
...Through my Pa and live they sound full and well mixed. However, I have found a need for demo's to help market. On a low end sound system they loose all there fullness
and the mix changes.
I was simply looking for an explanation and any help anyone might offer.
I now believe that in order to make my existing or new files sound good on different audio systems I will need to master them.
I was simply ignorant of the fact that you had to do more than mix.
OK, the act of getting a mix to sound good on various systems is the job of the mixer. You need to mix it so it "translates" well on other systems (low and high end and in the middle!) BEFORE you worry about mastering.
As I stated in other thread that got lost, between your room and your PA you are being fooled. The good news is that if it sounds good to you there, then you know how to get a good sound. You just need room treatment, best room arrangement and good mixing monitors to hear what is really going on. If you can't afford all that, get some decent headphones and try mixing that way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
My rule of thumb is that it has to sound as good quiet as it does loud. Loud tends to negate the dynamics and subtleties. When you listen quiet what is it lacking? All we have so far is that it doesn't sound "as good" through your monitors as through your PA. Is it tinny? Is it hollow? Is it washed out and lifeless? Does the bottom resound too much? Can you give us a link to download one of the songs and listen?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,079
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,079 |
One piece of advice I was given many years ago was to play the mix at a reasonable to low volume in your "studio area" then leave the room,close the door and now listen to it. If it sounds good, ie an even balance, then it probably is. If you can hear one instrument playing too loud then adjust and repeat as necessary.
Hope this helps
Alyn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,602
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,602 |
Best mixing advice that comes to mind is to take a break from the project for a while.
Not a few hours but weeks, or at least many days. Then trust your first impression after the break.
Sometimes it's easy to keep improving it until it's wrecked, once a song gets 'burned in' to your ears. A fresh listen can work wonders.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,192
Posts801,805
Members40,064
| |
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean