Yes, there's lots about Defraggler that I think is better.

Ability to select only certain files and folders to defrag instead of the whole disk can save time. For example, if the disk is not overly full but you start to get probs when loading Realtracks, you might find joy by just defragging the Realtracks folders.

But that's just one example, Defraggler uses much more advanced algorithms in general.

Defraggler also contains a much more comprehensive report on Disk Health as well.

The Microsoft defrag works, but bear in mind that they are targeting the average computer user, who doesn't need much in the way of fast disk streaming, most programs use such smaller amounts of data that the Burst spec can load the entire file. Our rather large Audio files, in multiples, are another story.


--Mac