|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 15,831
PG Music Staff
|
OP
PG Music Staff
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 15,831 |
Do you have a system for categorizing or remembering "riffs"
When one learns "riffs", whether it is from transcribing a solo, or from other sources, it is important to be able to recall that in your playing.
100% of the great players I've heard give teaching lessons emphasize the importance of "copying" and learning solos by others. But the next step is incorporating this into your playing. If you've learned a great solo to "Stella By Starlight", but the tune is now "Sunny Side of the Street", how will you be able to incorporate what you have learned into your solo performance on a different song?
I was wondering if people have heard tips from teachers on this topic, or have developed a system for catalouging or remembering riffs.
For example, I saw a video with Joe Pass, where he calls them "lines", and categorizes them in 3 types (major, minor and dominant 7th). Then he plays a whole bunch of major "lines", and then a whole bunch of "minor" ones.
Please note that I am not suggesting remembering and recalling riffs is all there is to improvisation. And of course once you get good, you start forgetting these basic rules.
- Do you transcribe or learn solos?
- Once you have done this, do you have a system of remembering or removing parts of the solo that you might use in other solos? What is it?
- Do you have a system of categorizing types of riffs, similar to what Joe Pass has (3 types, major, minor, dominant 7th)
Have Fun!
Peter Gannon
PG Music Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 716
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 716 |
Having tried the 'licks over chords' approach I now find it results in a kind of tourists attempt to master a language rather than a deeper appreciation for the rules of grammar and syntax.
When I like part of a solo, I'm now trying to think more about what's going on inside the line in terms of grammar and syntax as well as vocabulary or note choices.
Considerations are along the lines of...
what sort of interval moves
what kind of ornamentation (deflections/ telescopes/rotations etc)
what scale or melodic cell is used,
Use of octave displacement
Beat displacement
Call and response
How the riff targeted the chord tones
How the longer pattern or riff grew from a smaller underlying rhythmic melodic/motif and how it was transformed,(augmentation/diminution etc) how the was the motif was sequenced etc.
When it's a complex modal lick that seems to unfurl over about 8 bars you want to be breaking it down into the melodic cells in use (often 4 note ones but not exclusively)and looking at how it went beyond the underlying harmony if at all.
If I was to categorize them which i don't..it would be more in terms of these factors. This way you can come up with your own based on the techniques you've discerned.
As far as transcribing goes..for me it's more a case of trying to get inside the mind of the soloist to see his longer term thinking rather than ransacking it for licks. If I take something from it then It'll be how to pace and structure the solo over a period of time. Mostly in I'm thinking about the broader sweep of the solo, how it was builds from its initial gestures, note placement in relation to the pulse and the use of space between phrases, how one phrase or motif leads to the next etc.
Really when your playing there often Isn't time for consciously using licks (if they happen to be there its usually subconscious). So if you are going to learn them make sure you can transform them and build upon them so they can be part of the natural flow rather than some discontinuous stream of quotations.
A really good resource for building coherent lines in an organic way is Bert Ligon 'Connecting Lines With Linear Harmony'. This is really about how you target guide tones and I think this is the best way for a beginner rather than learning a bunch of licks.
The 'licks over each chord' approach runs the risk of solos that sound stilted and contrived. Using a linear method gives you space to breathe and be spontaneous whilst keeping the overall structure in mind.
Beyond that you want to breaking tunes down to tonal centres to which a 4 or 8 bar group of chords resolve. the strong tonal points in a tune. Then you can experiment with various substitute ways of arriving at these strong tonal points that are different each time.
HTH
Regards
Alan
Last edited by alan S.; 04/11/13 07:10 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 15,831
PG Music Staff
|
|
OP
PG Music Staff
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 15,831 |
Hi Alan,
It's great to hear other perspectives, and thanks for the post. I explain below why the copy-from-the-pros method works for me, but there are many different ways to learn.
>>> Having tried the 'licks over chords' approach I now find it results in a kind of tourists attempt to master a language rather than a deeper appreciation for the rules of grammar and syntax.
Continuing with your analogy of learning to speak a language. The best learners of a language are children. They learn it by copying and imitating phrases that they hear. There is no study of rules of grammar needed or other analysis. This gets them fluent in the most natural sense, so that they can think and dream in the language. But it is not merely rote repetition. They also understand what they are saying, and make all kinds of connections, and put together new phrases that they have never heard. All this comes from copying and imitating.
This is the same type of approach that works for me in musical soloing. I play piano and guitar, and various styles in each. On piano I'm mainly playing jazz, blues, pop and boogie. For example, I can't imagine how I would learn 'boogie' piano without mainly copying other styles and riffs. It doesn't seem "derivable" to me from analyzing scales, modes, intervals, octave displacements, tonal centers - just seems like a bag of riffs, at least that's what works for me!
I've heard many students who have put too much time into scales, modes and theory, and not enough copying-from-the-greats. IMO, the results are very unmusical. Of course it's essential that in the copy-from-the-pros method, you need to also understand the theory of why the riffs sound good, so that you can properly integrate/modify them in your playing.
Have Fun!
Peter Gannon
PG Music Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 716
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 716 |
Peter
I hear what you're saying; jazz is/was primarily an oral tradition and is best learned through listening. Being aware of things like ornamentation, melodic cells, target notes on downbeats are best used a quick shorthand ways of understanding what's happening in a good line, no more than that. I agree also with the overemphasis on chord scales and modes and theory in general instead of listening. To say that knowing your scales is a guarantor of good solos is like saying that knowing the alphabet is a guarantee of becoming a good public speaker.
My suspicions about licks comes from hearing too many students string together so many regurgitated phrases out of context in the wrong places, and with no real attempt to personalize them or integrate them into an organic statement of their own.
There's also the problem of students showing little understanding about the difference between a fully formed melodic phrase and simply repeating/sequencing a 4 note cell throughout a scale or over the course of a progression. This kind of pattern is best used IMO as ways of linking one melodic idea to the next.
If on the other hand stimulates the kind of learning process you mention then its certainly a valid method. One lick can lead to many others and theory can help expand upon and highlight some of the things you can do to come up with variations of your own. But theory can't be allowed to dictate what is and isn't played to the exclusion of your own ear any more than simply playing licks verbatim by rote can be used as a replacement for developing a line.
Regards
Alan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 15,831
PG Music Staff
|
|
OP
PG Music Staff
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 15,831 |
Thanks Alan, I am in agreement with all of the above!
Have Fun!
Peter Gannon
PG Music Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 50
Enthusiast
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 50 |
I went to music school which emphasized chord scale theory. Transcription was discussed but the emphasis was mostly on memorizing scales and chords. As a result my improvising, while 'correct', seemed very mechanical.
At the same time I would go to clubs and hear self-taught players that learned 'licks' off records. To my ears, the playing sounded contrived. Some guys just sounded like they were imitating other famous guitarists. Also, I found many ear players avoid learning to read music or understand theory because they were afraid it would hurt their playing.
So, I think too much of one or the other isn't good.
I've never been one for learning licks and writing them down or playing them in all keys. It just never seemed to work for me. What did work for me was learning to solo using all chord tones, and then begin to apply various approaches to them.
Lately I've been doing more transcribing. But instead of just learning licks and inserting them, I've been trying to really learn what makes them work, and how to manipulate them to other situations.
There are some great articles on the Jazz Advice site that discusses this topic. Actually the whole site contains valuable information about jazz improvisation. If you haven’t checked it out I highly recommend it.
This is a great topic.
Dana
BIAB 2013
MacBook Pro 17"
2.5 GHz Intel Core i7
Mac OS X 10.8.4
Logic X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 716
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 716 |
Hi Dana
I was going to mention that very site but forgot to do so. It says much more concisely the very point about licks I was trying to get across. And as you say it's a great resource for the both the novice and the experienced improvisor looking to get out of a rut. I particularly liked the analysis of the Dexter Gordon lick in one of the articles and how you can generate 10 times the language from just one source.
Its as well to think how the greats arrived at the licks they created. They are primarily answers to recurring musical problems faced by the improvisor of outlining the harmony, marking the tempo, playing interesting chromaticism against the sound of the chord, using octave and rhythmic displacements and octave leaps to create motion and contrast. And this doesn't even begin to touch on the areas of articulation, timing, accents, playing ahead or behind the beat etc that make the difference between the same lick making an impact or not.
I feel the basics are much more about how to develop simple rhythmic melodic motifs through thematic variation techniques, so that you end up making your own phrases (paragraphs) that have a central argument or thread running through them.
Looking at it this way you might be surprised to pick out some interesting 'licks' of your own forged in the heat of the moment. However that's not how you conceived it at first and only in retrospect do they become solidified in the mind as 'licks'... this is the crucial point.
I think the problem with jazz at the moment is that rather like literal minded readings of ancient texts we've turned the products of a turbulent creative process into musical totem poles, forgetting that they were the answers to musical problems they came up with in their time. We have to discover the same 'heat of the moment' spontaneous solutions for our time rather than simply retread what has been already said. Taking music back to its elements and focussing on what is common to all musical genres is one way to achieve that.
The great jazz guitarist John Abercrombie, (perhaps the most consistently creative of all the 'big 4' with the possible exception of Frisell) is a master of adapting lines from different traditions; melding them together and playing each idea in about 20 different ways.
More importantly he is a fine exponent of the idea of improvising in a compositional way using the tune as material and building organically on small motifs and never forgetting to leave space, use his ears as a guide and let his wonderful sound make an impact. A master of the well timed intervention, even his smallest comping gestures behind other soloists seem so interactive they appear to take on a life of their own. Absolutely peerless, just ask the other big names who their top man is! So who am I to disagree!! I take him as my role model for how to improvise today by refusing to copy him!! (well okay I'm maybe influenced by his guitar tone..LOL)
Regards
Alan
Last edited by alan S.; 04/12/13 05:31 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,809
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,809 |
I must confess I dont learn many 'licks', I do learn tunes, is there a difference?
It's easier to learn a lick like a parrot, but that's not to understand it. One way to improve understanding of a lick is to take it through other keys - BAIB is perfect for this. If you can do this then you know the function of the lick and it's more likely to turn up when you play freely.
It's said above that the music school chords scale approach tend to bring 'mechanicalness' (words to that effect anyway IMO) This can be true, but when you really know a scale or chord - can play it in many ways, then it begins to 'melt' and become more liquid.
I sometimes think of scales and chords as beginning life as a rusty bicycle chain - immovable - but with a bit of effort the beauty of the thing tends to begin to reveal itself - the chain is oiled and is then "articulated" you can bend and twist it. I am always finding new ways of doing this, and my basic method is to play any pattern forward then backwards over a chord structure, then take a note from the sequence - such as a third or fifth and start the pattern from there. Like this the pattern soon starts to wriggle around.
Last edited by ZeroZero; 04/14/13 01:36 AM.
Win 11 64, Asus Rog Strix z390 mobo, 64 gig RAM, 8700k
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 15,831
PG Music Staff
|
|
OP
PG Music Staff
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 15,831 |
))) I must confess I dont learn many 'licks', I do learn tunes, is there a difference?
Yes, there is a big difference. A lick or riff is just a phrase, that's not part of the melody. It is part of the solo. It is typically 1 to 4 bars long.
Have Fun!
Peter Gannon
PG Music Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,109
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,109 |
Quote:
I must confess I dont learn many 'licks', I do learn tunes, is there a difference?
Think of learning a tune like learning a foreign language and memorizing Hamlet's "To be, or not to be" soliloquy and learning riffs like learning useful phrases like "My name is____", or "Can you give me directions to____" that can be woven together into a larger communication.
Keith
2025 Audiophile Windows 11 RYZEN THREADRIPPER 3960X 4.5GHZ 128 GB RAM 2 Nvidia RTX 3090s, Vegas,Acid,SoundForge,Izotope Production,Melodyne Studio,SONAR,3 Raven Mtis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 716
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 716 |
Quote:
))) I must confess I dont learn many 'licks', I do learn tunes, is there a difference?
Yes, there is a big difference. A lick or riff is just a phrase, that's not part of the melody. It is part of the solo. It is typically 1 to 4 bars long.
Okay, but you can break down most tunes into repeated licks that are sequenced or paraphrased. Think through the phrases that make up the tune 'All The Things You Are'. It's easy to see how these short riffs are strung together in call and response fashion.
From that angle, a tune could be seen as it's composer's way of developing licks; a sort of frozen or distilled improvisation if you like. Improvisation conversely is like a molten or instant form of composition where you're working out the thematic development on the spot.
I think the idea that tunes are primarily chord progressions over which you play licks that are nothing to do with the melody was one of the reasons that jazz moved beyond standards and towards more open self-composed forms that obliged the improvisor to know the tune and solo thematically. Think of how hard it is to improvise on many of Thelonious Monk or Wayne Shorter's more difficult tunes without knowing the tune and just running the chords. It doesn't work. You have to think of the implications of the melody and factor them in when you're soloing
Regards
Alan
Last edited by alan S.; 04/17/13 06:53 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,809
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,809 |
I was speaking toungue in cheek really. They are both sequences of notes - ast least on melody instruments. On sax there seems to be two kinds of palyers 'chordal' players and melody players. Lester Young or Getz would be melodists in my book. I learn both ways and some tunes are best treated one way or the other. Latin tunes seem to be better worked from the melody or head - e.g. girl from Ipaneama.
Yes thre is a difference function wise.
Win 11 64, Asus Rog Strix z390 mobo, 64 gig RAM, 8700k
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 484
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 484 |
Wow, what a great discussion. As one who taught music as well as loves music, the conclusion I come to is really on context. Pete, you mentioned how if you want to play a boogie you will use certain riffs from that genre. I think that stands with all genres. There are just traditional lines we do within the genre that people have grown accustomed to hearing.
What I am discovering about music is it is as much art as it is a science. That is to say, we approach styles in a scientific fashion where we understand the chord turns and melodic riffs associated. But, then there is the art. That is where we do the unexpected. The detour, if you will. It is that surprise that rejuvenates the song when done tastefully.
My example of such an application would be the band Chicago. I had just seen them for the fourth time last week. These guys have been playing their standards for 40 years now. Yet, they have groomed their audience to accept detours when hearing them live. That has afforded them the luxury of extending an intro several minutes leading their audience in an unsuspected journey that lands up at the foot of one of their classics leaving one to wonder, how did we get here? That’s the art. I would not call it canned riffs or lines. They actually play some lines that I never thought would go over those chords. But, they make it work.
The conclusion for me is the question: what are you looking to do? If you want the audience to read a familiar part you would naturally work the conventions that are familiar to that particular genre. On the other hand, what I like to do is take those conventional phrasings and add a detour or two. It is something where the melody skirts around the chords or the typical scale run associated with the chords. The context is determined by the mood I am in.
I did not mean to hijack the conversation. This is a very good topic that has no definitive black or white answer; just a lot of neat insights for people to glean!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,693
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,693 |
Quote:
My suspicions about licks comes from hearing too many students string together so many regurgitated phrases out of context in the wrong places, and with no real attempt to personalize them or integrate them into an organic statement of their own.
This is the best way of phrasing this I've read lately. I hear that all the time and it drives me crazy. Sax players seem to be the biggest offenders. I'm speaking from the pov of doing live gigs. On the one hand it's good to have someone with the chops to play Tunisia for example but I don't want to keep hearing the same 2/5 phrases that are right out of Charlie Parkers book over and over and over and over....
Sometimes I want to reach over my keyboard and slap someone upside the head and say STOP THAT. Play something from your heart even if it's a bit choppy and not as fluid as those exercises you keep playing. I want to hear something I can interact with. Open it up, play more rhythmically, put some space in there, come up with some kind of melody lick or something, ANYTHING, please.
I know what the problem is for horn players and it's big bands. Big band players are like classical cats, they're totally used to reading the ink and nothing else. They're killer sight readers but crappy soloists.
I'm the opposite, a poor to half decent reader but a good soloist because of years working in small groups and playing a lot of left hand bass. That's puts me in control of the band in a lot of cases. If I want to take it somewhere that's not on the chart, what are they gonna do? Follow me of course. I have a favorite guitarist I get to work with sometimes. He likes to do that too and when he does we all have some fun.
Anyway Peter to your original question, yes I have worked on some licks I may have heard but I've never been good at trying to fit a lick from one tune into another tune. I have never been one to play stuff exactly like any record except for an exact intro or hook or something like that. Otherwise I've always played tunes my way. For me I may practice something just to get it under my fingers but on the gig I may start that lick and realize I don't like it and morph into something else. Experienced players know what I mean here, this happens in a split second and it's based on what I'm hearing from the rest of the band. I may think I want to do something but at that exact moment the bass player does something very cool, I pick up on it and change what I was going to do and this goes on all the time. What I may be playing for a comp can influence someone else's solo too.
This is what interactive performing is all about and having a group of people who may have good chops but are just playing fast jazz exercises they learned in school is a total drag.
Bob
Biab/RB latest build, Win 11 Pro, Ryzen 5 5600 G, 512 Gig SSD, 16 Gigs Ram, Steinberg UR22 MkII, Roland Sonic Cell, Kurzweil PC3, Hammond SK1, Korg PA3XPro, Garritan JABB, Hypercanvas, Sampletank 3, more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,809
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,809 |
Quote:
Sax players seem to be the biggest offenders. I'm speaking from the pov of doing live gigs. On the one hand it's good to have someone with the chops to play Tunisia for example but I don't want to keep hearing the same 2/5 phrases that are right out of Charlie Parkers book over and over and over and over....
Sometimes I want to reach over my keyboard and slap someone upside the head and say STOP THAT. Play something from your HEART
Bob
Thank god Jazzmammal said this - so true!
I have been bothy sides of this fence. In my youth I played trumpet and cornet, learning from a Salvation Army player. I could read anything, lots of flash pieces like Zelda and Victorian theme and variation stuff, but take the notes away and I was silenced.
I then learned guitar, read a few pieces but then learnt its really not the way to go for contemporary music - on the guitar. I also realised that notation actually captures only bare minimums of a performance.
Then Sax, On this istrument I learnt both ways - playing a head then impro. I can now work from the melody or from the chords.
Now it's piano time, I can play over most chords, but my bass clef reading is like a snail with a limp, so at my age I am not going to bother too much. But, curiously, playing almost exclusively with BIAB, I find my solo piano needs work.
Seems sometimes you can go this way or that way, but not both
And no one has mentioned musical memory. IMO reading notation can really screw up musical memory, it stifles its development amongst the neurons, if there was no notation then we would all have great memories for phrases and pieces
Last edited by ZeroZero; 04/28/13 01:43 AM.
Win 11 64, Asus Rog Strix z390 mobo, 64 gig RAM, 8700k
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,267
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,267 |
This guy may have a very good answer to this topic! I really enjoyed it and found it helpful. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNh4kaHiSHM&feature=player_embedded
BIAB – 2025, Reaper (current), i7-12700F Processor, 32GB DDR4-3200MHz RAM, Motu Audio Express 6x6 - My SoundCloud (Tip: No need to create a SC account to hear music - just hit ESC ).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 15,831
PG Music Staff
|
|
OP
PG Music Staff
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 15,831 |
>> This guy may have a very good answer to this topic! I really enjoyed it and found it helpful. Thanks. Good ** ideas ** presented in the video (take a modal phrase, embellish it during the solo, all over one chord). Trouble is (for me), I don't want to solo like that, I want to solo like this... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTJhHn-TuDY
Have Fun!
Peter Gannon
PG Music Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,267
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,267 |
Playing like OP, sorry can't help you there! I think that is kind of a one in a million talent things.
But, actually that was not what caught my attentinn in the video. It was more the relating a solo to "story" telling, beginning at 05:42 and the development of a solo played with different "feelings and articulations".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,809
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,809 |
"Do you have a system for categorizing or remembering "riffs"" Quote:
"Do you have a system for categorizing or remembering "riffs""
Original posters question
I have been thinking about this again....
The system for categorising riffs IS learning scales and chords - then seeing them IN the riff.
Some learners learn note names only, not function. This way you can reproduce the riff, but you cant categorise it except as 'the Muddy Waters riff", you can't build up a flexible riff library this way, or at least this is the loooooong way.
If you categorise using the harmonic function of the notes. For example "scalar run to the seventh then hit the fifth" not only do you get the ability to transpose the riff easily, but you also get to understand what possibilities the riff has.
Win 11 64, Asus Rog Strix z390 mobo, 64 gig RAM, 8700k
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,151
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,151 |
The system for categorising riffs IS learning scales and chords - then seeing them IN the riff. Bingo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,151
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,151 |
And in answer to Peter's question, yes, I do transcribe licks that I find interesting. I write them out. Then I figure out where they're coming from, that's the important part.
I mainly listen to and transcribe licks that negotiate certain progressions. V7-I's and III-VI7's in particular. When I learn how a certain player is negotiating those changes it gives me ideas and makes my vocabulary a little more fluent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 15,831
PG Music Staff
|
|
OP
PG Music Staff
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 15,831 |
Aloha,
Yes, that's what I do. I categorize them based on the relative note of the scale that they start off with. I write them out, and file them away like that. So that all II-V-I that begin on the minor 3rd of the II chord are in the same place. Then, when you are soloing, and find yourself approaching a Fm7 chord (ie a Fm7 Bb7 EbMaj7 coming up), and you are around the Ab note (the minor 3rd of the Fm7 chord), it is easy to recall a bunch of phrases that begin on the minor 3rd, and you can compare them while you practice them.
Of course you don't end up playing the whole phrase, might just use part of it, but at least you don't completely forget phrases that you spent the time to transcribe and learn, just because you never see them again.
Have Fun!
Peter Gannon
PG Music Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 604
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 604 |
Playing licks on a sax (or any horn actually) is a lot different than doing it on a guitar. We don't have the advantage of positional changes making the same lick "transportable" across keys. Some theorize since Coltrane studied with Sandole (a guitarist) he didn't realize what was easy on a guitar was horrendously challenging on a tenor and did it anyway.
So, I guess I am a proponent of learning licks on a "per key" basis. Some might transpose to 2-3 other keys easily, but many will just "lay" right in 1-2 keys.
Jan - 12 Core AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
32GB DDR4
Win 10 64-bit
Samsung m.2 SSD Boot drive,other SSD internal and USB drives.
MOTO 2
Ketron SD4,SD1000
Yamaha RX-v381amp
VB-Audio virtual cables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,151
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,151 |
Playing licks on a sax (or any horn actually) is a lot different than doing it on a guitar. We don't have the advantage of positional changes making the same lick "transportable" across keys. Interesting but........wrong. Playing in different keys on a guitar isn't just a matter of moving a few frets up or down. It isn't practical to do that, especially in jazz. Guitar players need to be able to play in all positions. If we're transposng from Db to F we're not just "moving everything up" 4 frets. Check Martino out. He plays licks in every key within a span of 4 -5 frets. The guitar is a strange beast in that anyone can pick up a guitar, learn three open chords and call himself a guitar player. But it goes much deeper than that. Just my opinion, but I've been around for a while.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 303
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 303 |
it's really pretty simple, just memorize the riff. A riff is just a motive, if one can't memorize that, he should work on ear training.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,055
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,055 |
BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,129
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,129 |
I'm very much enjoying and learning from this topic. Being a person that can't solo well over chord progressions (I'm working on it with BB/RB right now), I'd love to hear and see (e.g. youtube) some of our more experienced players 'jamming' with BB/RB in real time, maybe trading 4's with the soloist...and possibly adding a voiceover to discuss what's going on 'under the hood' so to speak. Also, for a guitar player as myself, seeing the hands of another guitar player is really helpful for me to recognize scales and chords - real hands even more than a fretboard with notes lighting up  but I'm in the process of getting more used to the latter. If anyone knows of some learning links in this sort of format, please share the links. Thanks for the great discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,610
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,610 |
I know (just an example) the lead solo for 'Hotel California' by heart and I get through about half of it without a problem. They say the more you practice having arthritis, the easier it gets and the looser you get with you hands/fingers. That's not true for me on that particular solo. BUT, I never give up. On the bright side: I really don't gig anymore, so I don't have to do covers. I only do originals and when I slip a note or two here and there, I can claim "that was the idea". 
Cheers, Mike My Music * Asus ROG Strix G15CF 32 GB DDR4 4TB HDD + 1 TB SSD NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8GB Win 11 AKAI EIE PRO Sound Interface. BIAB/RB 2024 UltraPak Build - Latest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,179
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,179 |
I'm not trying to argue with Lee, but I see what you mean PhyillyJazz.
There is a lot more correlation on guitar than most horns. If the voicing doesn't work on guitar you may need to change a few fingerings, but with horns every key causes a whole new set of fingerings for almost every note.
That's what I meant by learning things differently. Learn by the intervals, and even more so if you play a horn. Once I have an instrument I play in my hands, I'm a lot better at 'going up a third from where I am now' than I am at thinking 'I know this song in G concert, and I'm on a trumpet so I need to transpose to A and then add another 5th for the key we're playing in now .. because we're doing this in D so I need to be in E .. and I started in G so .. umm'
If you are talking improvisation, that is much different than the topic started out. The topic started with learning melodies (I think). Then I started seeing posts about pasting different licks together. That's the next step after learning the licks in my mind.
However, I personally think if you learn to think in intervals for melodies, when you do want to recall a certain lick this method helps a lot; you may be improvising in key of 'X' and you originally learned it in 'Y'.
Confused yet?
/I can have that effect on people
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 897
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 897 |
YEAH...I REMEBER THAT CHICAGO BEE HIVE GIG...OR WAS IT A "A SCHOOL OF SORTS IN FRETFULLY UNIQUE ALL-POSITIONS-TOGETHER"
PLAYING...WITH A FRIGHTFULLY APPARENT KNOWLEDGE BY "JOHNNY"!
THAT WAS THE EVENING MANY STAFF CHICAGO GUITARIST, WALKED OUT INTO THE CHILLY EARLY MORNING AIR..JUST SHAKIN' THEIR COLLECTIVE HEADS.
I WALKED OUT WITH JOHNNY BETWEEN HIS WIFE AND I...
CALL IT "THE LOST TRIO...OR LOST TRIAD....
AND JOHNNY FOUND THEM ALL....BY PRACTICE AND DETERMINATION,
WITH A LITTLE TRUMPET-PLAYING EXPERIENCE TUCKED AWAY IN ANOTHER COMPARTMENT OF HIS RIGHT-SIDED BRAIN...
ASK STAN GETZ WHO LOVED PLAYING WITH JOHNNY AND HIS FRETLESS JAZZ GUITAR...AT LEAST WHEN STAN GLANCED OVER AT HIM WHILE THEY WERE BOTH "EXPLORING THE GALAZIES OF IMPROV"...HE DIDN'T THINK THE AX HAD ANY FRETS OR "POSITION MARKERS"!
SORRY PETER...AS A GUITARIST WHO STARTED WITH A GIBSON 125, LIKE WE DID...JUST PRACTICE AND PLAY TRUMPET TOO!! "CHROMATICALLY JIVING" AS THEY SAY... "
Yamaha...Motif ES-8, Motif Rack, CS6X
Korg...Karma,Triton Classic, PA-80, M-1+
AkaiSampler-S5000, Roland.. X5080 Rack/G-1000 Arranger
Various Guitars/Basses Amps Pedals Rec.Equip.
Plus, BIAB 2015 and Sonar Platinum 2015 Upgrade from Cakewalk's Sonar X-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 174
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 174 |
it's really pretty simple, just memorize the riff. A riff is just a motive, if one can't memorize that, he should work on ear training. I agree with ear training. Still a 'riff' for some of us is a challenge, despite having well trained ears. It is never just a succession of notes. It is also a specific feel, emphasis etc. That is where I have challenges copying another. In fact I can play competently, but cannot copy others well in the least. I just don't have anybody's else's natural phrasing. I have done this with success a few times, but it never sticks in muscle memory. I have my own natural phrasing that is so embedded that any riff I learn becomes a variation of the original. I know some players who can 'note for note' other players. It can be impressive and I can deeply respect the talent and yet it doesn't actually excite me. Cheers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New RealTracks Released with Band-in-a-Box 2025!
We’ve expanded the Band-in-a-Box® RealTracks library with 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 449-467) across Jazz, Blues, Funk, World, Pop, Rock, Country, Americana, and Praise & Worship—featuring your most requested styles!
Jazz, Blues & World (Sets 449–455):
These RealTracks includes “Soul Jazz” with Neil Swainson (bass), Mike Clark (drums), Charles Treadway (organ), Miles Black (piano), and Brent Mason (guitar). Enjoy “Requested ’60s” jazz, classic acoustic blues with Colin Linden, and more of our popular 2-handed piano soloing. Plus, a RealTracks first—Tango with bandoneon, recorded in Argentina!
Rock & Pop (Sets 456–461):
This collection includes Disco, slap bass ‘70s/‘80s pop, modern and ‘80s metal with Andy Wood, and a unique “Songwriter Potpourri” featuring Chinese folk instruments, piano, banjo, and more. You’ll also find a muted electric guitar style (a RealTracks first!) and “Producer Layered Guitar” styles for slick "produced" sound.
Country, Americana & Praise (Sets 462–467):
We’ve added new RealTracks across bro country, Americana, praise & worship, vintage country, and songwriter piano. Highlights include Brent Mason (electric guitar), Eddie Bayers (drums), Doug Jernigan (pedal steel), John Jarvis (piano), Glen Duncan (banjo, mandolin & fiddle), Mike Harrison (electric bass) and more—offering everything from modern sounds to heartfelt Americana styles
Check out all the 202 New RealTracks (in sets 456-467)
And, if you are looking for more, the 2025 49-PAK (for $49) includes an additional 20 RealTracks with exciting new sounds and genre-spanning styles. Enjoy RealTracks firsts like Chinese instruments (guzheng & dizi), the bandoneon in an authentic Argentine tango trio, and the classic “tic-tac” baritone guitar for vintage country.
You’ll also get slick ’80s metal guitar from Andy Wood, modern metal with guitarist Nico Santora, bass player Nick Schendzielos, and drummer Aaron Stechauner, more praise & worship, indie-folk, modern/bro country with Brent Mason, and “Songwriter Americana” with Johnny Hiland.
Plus, enjoy user-requested styles like Soul Jazz RealDrums, fast Celtic Strathspey guitar, and Chill Hop piano & drums!
The 2025 49-PAK is loaded with other great new add-ons as well. Learn more about the 2025 49-PAK!
Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac!
With your version 2025 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Or upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2025 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 33 new RealTracks and 65+ new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 29 new RealTracks and 45+ new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 20 new RealStyles.
- Look Ma! More MIDI 13: Country & Americana
- Instrumental Studies Set 22: 2-Hand Piano Soloing - Rhythm Changes
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 44: Jazz Piano
- Artist Performance Set 17: Songs with Vocals 7
- Playable RealTracks Set 4
- RealDrums Stems Set 7: Jazz with Mike Clark
- SynthMaster Sounds and Styles (with audio demos)
- 128 GM MIDI Patch Audio Demos.
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyles,
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- Look Ma! More MIDI 14: SynthMaster,
- Instrumental Studies Set 23: More '80s Hard Rock Soloing,
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 45: More SynthMaster
- Artist Performance Set 18: Songs with Vocals 8
- RealDrums Stems Set 8: Pop, Funk & More with Jerry Roe
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®!
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Mac!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 20.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 20 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
New! XPro Styles PAK 9 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and higher for Mac!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 9 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 29 RealTracks/RealDrums!
We've been hard at it to bring you the latest and greatest in this 9th installment of our popular XPro Styles PAK series! Included are 75 styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres (25 styles each) that fans have come to expect, as well as 25 styles in this volume's wildcard genre: funk & R&B!
If you're itching to get a sneak peek at what's included in XPro Styles PAK 9, here is a small helping of what you can look forward to: Funky R&B Horns, Upbeat Celtic Rock, Jazz Fusion Salsa, Gentle Indie Folk, Cool '60s Soul, Funky '70s R&B, Smooth Jazz Hip Hop, Acoustic Rockabilly Swing, Funky Reggae Dub, Dreamy Retro Latin Jazz, Retro Soul-Rock Fusion, and much more!
Special Pricing! Until July 31, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 9 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Windows!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 20.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 20 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
New! XPro Styles PAK 9 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and higher for Windows!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 9 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 29 RealTracks/RealDrums!
We've been hard at it to bring you the latest and greatest in this 9th installment of our popular XPro Styles PAK series! Included are 75 styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres (25 styles each) that fans have come to expect, as well as 25 styles in this volume's wildcard genre: funk & R&B!
If you're itching to get a sneak peek at what's included in XPro Styles PAK 9, here is a small helping of what you can look forward to: Funky R&B Horns, Upbeat Celtic Rock, Jazz Fusion Salsa, Gentle Indie Folk, Cool '60s Soul, Funky '70s R&B, Smooth Jazz Hip Hop, Acoustic Rockabilly Swing, Funky Reggae Dub, Dreamy Retro Latin Jazz, Retro Soul-Rock Fusion, and much more!
Special Pricing! Until July 31, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 9 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: VST3 Plugin Support
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® now includes support for VST3 plugins, alongside VST and AU. Use them with MIDI or audio tracks for even more creative possibilities in your music production.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Macs®: VST3 Plugin Support
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: Using VST3 Plugins
Join the conversation on our forum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums58
Topics84,379
Posts778,465
Members39,635
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean