|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251 |
A question about religion and politics on the forum
Since a discussion about religion popped up again recently on the forum, it prompted me to review the forum rules again. To my surprise, I didn’t see anything mentioned about either. I’ve read the forum rules at least a couple of times before, but it’s been a while. That was before the new forum format. I could have sworn there used to a rule earlier against discussing either, even though it was violated frequently.
I’ve participated in more than a few of those discussions in days gone by, but since then I’ve tried to avoid both and said “please don’t” on both topics when they come up.
So my question is simple:
Did there used to be a forum rule against discussing religion and/or politics?
Please be civil. This isn’t meant to be a contentious discussion, just a clarification of whether it was previously forbidden and possibly whether both topics should be forbidden.
I'll go ahead and say that I think both topics should be forbidden because I believe that it would accomplish nothing but producing ill will, hurt feelings and misunderstandings.
Your thoughts please. Be nice. I hope PG weighs in.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139 |
"Since a discussion about religion popped up again recently on the forum..." It wasn't a 'discussion' about religion, Bobo. It was just a guy who was on the edge of an inferno, possibly about to lose everything, asking anyone who did pray to pray for him. The fact that you are offended by that says more about you than him, methinks. Maybe PG will appoint you Ombudsman of Political Correctness, so you can censor anything you find offensive. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,116
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,116 |
Bob,
I understand where you are coming from and also understand that political correctness is not your motivation. Religion and Politics are very polarizing topics and the discussions quite quickly rise to insulting comments being made. I'm with you. We probably should avoid those topics.
I can't recall there being a rule before. If there was, it was not well enforced because most of the time when thing got hot is was over political comments.
Keith 2026 Audiophile Windows 11 RYZEN THREADRIPPER 3960X 4.5GHZ 128 GB RAM 2 Nvidia RTX 3090s, Vegas,Acid,SoundForge,Izotope Production,Melodyne Studio,SONAR,3 Raven Mtis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251 |
Bob,
Here are some comments from the prayer request thread, ( by the way, I have no problems with prayer requests).
“If God allowed the fires, what good will it do to ask Him to stop them?”
“Great question, Bud. I've asked this question and others similar to it countless times. Job in the Bible asked these types of questions to God when God allowed disaster upon disaster to come against Job's family. Prayers often seem futile. Very often; more often than not I would say. And yet we are challenged to bring our requests before Him. I'm not saying that I understand God and His ways. If I could really comprehend that then He could be contained in my or others' understanding of Him and frankly that would be a god not worth believing in in my opinion. I couldn't really look to Him to fix my brokenness or to be my source of hope, if I could really understand everything about Him.
It's really a great question.”
“Because we are fallen.
ALL of us.”
“Excuse me! Scott started this thread asking for prayer by those so inclined. Seems to me that those not so inclined should have tuned out then.
Scott then answered Rubberball's question regarding the need for prayer. All in the context of the original post. If Scott started the thread, he has every right to handle it as he sees fit.
Is the very mention of God so upsetting? I would hope not.”
By anyone’s standards, that’s a religious discussion. Now rubberball felt compelled to throw in some snide comments, which Scott misunderstood as a legitimate question.
Please hold the derogatory comments. Once again, contention isn’t the purpose of this thread. Clarification is the purpose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,932
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,932 |
bobcflatpicker, I don't recall but seems to me the rules are pretty clear,
9. All of the forums except for the Off Topic forum are for discussions of PG Music products only. The Off Topic forum is used for MUSIC-RELATED discussions that aren't about PG Music products. Please keep all your posts as constructive as possible.
They even used all caps to stress "MUSIC-RELATED"! It would be best for all if we left religion and politics completely off the forums.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 163
Apprentice
|
Apprentice
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 163 |
Many people here write Gospel/Praise/Worship songs. It would just about impossible to separate religion from music.
Ditto for politics.
If your offended by religious discussion, don't read a "prayer request" thread! If you wound up there by accident, use the back-button.
The back-button also works for politics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251 |
Prayer request's and gospel songs aren't religious discussions.
I've got more than a few gospel songs in my repertoire. That wasn't the question I asked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251 |
The Tooth Fairy and the Easter Bunny are just as real as god is. So is the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
No one has even a smidgen of proof for any of them.
So if I asked for folks on the forum to pray to the Flying Spaghetti Monster to help me out, it would have just as much validity as any other request for prayer.
Or should we vote for what the PG god should be? Even if we decided upon a Christian god, to which god of which denomination should we pray to?
Should he/she/it be Catholic or Protestant? Maybe we should pray to one of the MANY Hindu gods!
Is Jesus the answer, or did Mohammed have it figured out?
Or should we just leave god in all his/her/it’s forms out of a music forum and just talk about music?
It would be much simpler if we left the "Boogie Man In the Sky" out of the equation on here and encourage folks to visit their favorite religious forum to discuss religion and their favorite political forum to discuss politics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,926
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,926 |
Two sayings come to mind here: "That government is best which governs least," and "Be careful what you pray/wish for."
PG has historically exercised a light hand on the forums. I like that, as opposed to another music software forum in which political and religious threads are soon locked, if not removed entirely.
We must also give ourselves credit for restraint. Discussions here rarely become problematic. It does happen, but it almost always resolves on its own. I am reminded in particular of a heated exchange between myself and another senior member during the 2008 US presidential election which became extremely heated, but never got personal. We still respect each other and we moved on.
Almost all Off Topic discussions can be considered music related if you remember that we are all musicians. Personal situations and external events which affect us affect our music as well. I am often amazed, in an entirely positive way, by the gentle affection that is displayed as we show concern for each other's circumstances.
I would hate to see the opportunity for such exchanges lost to the perceived need to restrict what most of you will admit is a miniscule number of topics. I would vastly prefer that we continue in the spirit of "Live and let live."
Richard
Last edited by Ryszard; 06/25/13 11:07 PM.
"My primary musical instrument is the personal computer."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251 |
I would hate to see the opportunity for such exchanges lost to the perceived need to restrict what most of you will admit is a miniscule number of topics. I would vastly prefer that we continue in the spirit of "Live and let live." Good points Richard, except there's quite a few folks on here that will act as if you have 666 tattooed on your forehead if you say "lets PLEASE not talk about religion or politics". I honestly don't care what anyone believes for themselves about either. Since this is a music forum, wouldn't it be better if we left the two most contentious topics on the planet off the menu?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,439
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,439 |
I would argue that to completely ban religion related discussions would be to ban me, and *really everyone else on this forum.
I am who I am because of the beliefs I hold. To deny me religion related discussion is to ban the expression of my thoughts and feelings because they result from the thought processes and feelings I have which in turn are directly related to the beliefs I hold.
That said, I would agree that OVERT religious or political discussion can raise blood pressure in some individuals enough to make reasonable discussion impossible. Then there are, of course, the trolls - not too many of them here I'm happy to say.
However, it has been my experience on this forum, that as stated in an earlier post we are, as a group, reasonably well behaved and restrained.
Please let us not have rules for the sake of rules nor to muzzle free speech. If discussions become acrimonious enough to require excessive intervention, then that is the time to think about bans - not before.
As has also been stated - if you don't like a discussion, whatever the subject, then don't read it - there's plenty of other things to read.
* before you have a go at me over this statement you would need to understand my definition of religion - which may well differ from yours. The definition I use is rather broad and includes the worship of self, money, posessions and lots of other possibilities - it is possible to make "gods" of pretty much anything... I happen to prefer the Christian God but I'm not interested in having an argument about it.
--=-- My credo: If it's worth doing, it's worth overdoing - just ask my missus, she'll tell ya --=--You're only paranoid if you're wrong!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,605
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,605 |
Hi Bob,
I seem to remember that there used to be a direct reference in the forum rules about discussions on religion and politics. That was a few years ago. Nowadays, those statements now seem to have morphed into more general ones.
I agree with you. These forums are not designed for religion or politics.
Regards, Noel
MY SONGS...Audiophile BIAB 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,932
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,932 |
As has also been stated - if you don't like a discussion, whatever the subject, then don't read it - there's plenty of other things to read. that kind of a policy leaves it way too open IMHO! a conversation about the Quran would be acceptable and I should just not read that thread? politics would be OK? what about social causes? pornography? gardening? carpentry? etc.? much better to simply follow the stated forum rules and keep it about the music. if you wanna talk religion or politics or any of the myriad of other topics you should find a forum where that is welcome and not clutter up the music forum and potentially upset people who do not share your opinions on those other things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,926
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,926 |
. . . and potentially upset people who do not share your opinions on those other things. And there's the whole PC position in a nutshell. If we don't say anything for fear of offending someone, pretty soon we shall all be silent. That, and using the power of government (in this case, PG Music) to impose your values on others. It's all about control, innit? Pass. To expand a bit, if I hold a certain value, and tell you that I hold that value, and you are offended, that's your problem. As has been said earlier, if you don't care for the content of a discussion, stay out of it. I vastly prefer the laissez faire condition that exists now. There may be a time when restriction is needed, but I don't see it at the moment. Edited to add: I just tipped this thing over into politics, didn't I? Oh, wait--that's where it started. (No offense to Bobby C.--I know that wasn't your intent.)
Last edited by Ryszard; 06/26/13 12:38 AM.
"My primary musical instrument is the personal computer."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,439
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,439 |
that kind of a policy leaves it way too open IMHO! a conversation about the Quran would be acceptable and I should just not read that thread? politics would be OK? what about social causes? pornography? gardening? carpentry? etc.?
much better to simply follow the stated forum rules and keep it about the music. if you wanna talk religion or politics or any of the myriad of other topics you should find a forum where that is welcome and not clutter up the music forum and potentially upset people who do not share your opinions on those other things.
If no one responds, the discussion will soon die - if you don't take part how does it affect you? I've also noticed I said this badly: I would argue that to completely ban religion related discussions would be to ban me, and *really everyone else on this forum.
What I intended to convey was that everything I say and think is coloured by my beliefs - how do I divorce my beliefs without becoming someone else entirely? If I am someone else entirely then what I say will be different. Therefore what I say has a religious basis, whether or not I am directly addressing a religious topic. Politics is in pretty much the same boat.
--=-- My credo: If it's worth doing, it's worth overdoing - just ask my missus, she'll tell ya --=--You're only paranoid if you're wrong!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,932
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,932 |
. . . and potentially upset people who do not share your opinions on those other things. And there's the whole PC position in a nutshell. If we don't say anything for fear of offending someone, pretty soon we shall all be silent. That, and using the power of government (in this case, PG Music) to impose your values on others. It's all about control, innit? Pass. Baloney! You are confusing the public square with a private forum. To expand a bit, if I hold a certain value, and tell you that I hold that value, and you are offended, that's your problem. As has been said earlier, if you don't care for the content of a discussion, stay out of it. Again, that applies in the public square but not on a private forum. If I go to a movie and you decide to preach the gospel the owners of the theater will toss you out and rightly so because that is NOT what we came there for!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,926
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,926 |
J3, you have managed to miss my points completely. I don't know of anyone who comes here to "preach" as you so pejoratively put it. To use your simile, entering a theater to which you have gone for one purpose and have paid admission for the privilege is one thing. Yes, I went to see the movie, and no, I don't want to hear an unrelated speech instead.
But this IS a public square. Joining a forum topic (or not) is completely voluntary. If you (or anyone) are for some reason not interested in or do not agree with the topic, all you (or anyone) has to do is nothing.
Instead, certain individuals choose to inject themselves into the conversation and then complain that they disagree with the premise. The public square equivalent would be throwing tomatoes and rotten eggs. Now, what kind of person would choose to do that?
J3, we haven't interacted much if at all, but I value you as a member of and contributor to these forums. It would be great if everyone could afford others the same respect. Sometimes simply keeping one's peace is the way to do that, instead of demanding that others conform to their standards.
"My primary musical instrument is the personal computer."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,109
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,109 |
So my question is simple:
Did there used to be a forum rule against discussing religion and/or politics? I don't think so. The strongest argument anyone has ever been able to make from the rules is that a conversation isn't music-related. But then, there are lots of discussions on the forum that aren't music related. Talk of vacations, employment situations, health issues, local catastrophes, product recommendations, jokes, humorous stories, purchases, movies, TV shows have all been sighted here, but nobody complains... which leads me to believe that invoking the "not music related" rule is disingenuous to say the least. When people selectively use the same rule they often ignore to stifle discussion of a topic they don't like, it is indeed about control, and about someone trying to impose his will on the forum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,109
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,109 |
Again, that applies in the public square but not on a private forum. If I go to a movie and you decide to preach the gospel the owners of the theater will toss you out and rightly so because that is NOT what we came there for! yet if we are at a movie and someone quietly asks an acquaintance to pray for some situation he most certainly would NOT be kicked out of the theater. On the other hand, if somebody who overhears the request and stirs up a bunch of dissention trying to make that person stop asking for prayer... the one stirring up a fuss probably would get kicked out From my point of view, the ones who change an otherwise pleasant and community-based discussion into an argument are always the same ones who try to shut down the discussion on the grounds that such discussion creates bad feelings... when they are the ones who introduced contention in the first place! It isn't religious discussion that causes bad feelings... it is the purposeful introduction of sniping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,109
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,109 |
Since this is a music forum, wouldn't it be better if we left the two most contentious topics on the planet off the menu? with all due respects, Bob (and I really DO respect you a lot.. even though I am of a different opinion on this topic) 1) you say religious discussion is inappropriate and should not be allowed. But this is clearly a thread about religion (not doctrine bot about its appropriateness... so religion is the clear them of the thread)... and YOU started it, in violation of your own main point!! 2) the original discussion, OTOH, was clearly NOT about religion... it only became problematic when a few who really had no investment in the discussion decided to turn it into a religious argument by making the kind of statements that are classic barroom fight lines. 3) if memory serves me, MOST of the knock down drag out political discussions in the past were also started by you. The interesting thing about all of this is that this group has evolved from an impersonal forum into a group of international friends. Friends talk about all kinds of things. It would be one thing if somebody came in and started proselytizing... I would protest too, even though I would probably agree with the message. But no proselytizing is going on here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac - Special Offers End at 11:59pm PDT on Friday, May 15th, 2026!
Order before 11:59pm PDT on Friday, May 15th and SAVE up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® version 2026 for Mac Upgrade packages... and that's not all! With your version 2026 for Mac purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks... that's 222 NEW RealTracks available with version Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac!
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® today for as little as $49! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all available purchase options.
Learn more about the Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK here.
If you have any questions about which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We're here to help!
202 New RealTracks Released with Band-in-a-Box 2026!
With Band-in-a-Box® 2026, we've released 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 468-488) in a variety of genres—featuring your most requested styles!
Jazz, Funk & World (Sets 468-475):
Our new jazz, funk & blues RealTracks include a groovin’ collection of RealTracks and RealDrums! These include more requested “soul jazz” RealTracks featuring artists Neil Swainson (bass), Charles Treadway (organ), Brent Mason (guitar), and Wes Little (drums). There are new “smooth jazz” styles (4), which include a RealTracks first: muted trumpet, as well as slick new smooth jazz brushes options for drums. Blues lovers will be thrilled—there are more “classic acoustic blues” styles, including guitar (5), bass (4), and drums (10) with blues master Colin Linden, featuring understated and tasty background acoustic soloing, plus brushes drums and acoustic bass. There are also new electric blues RealTracks, including electric blues with PG favorite Johnny Hiland (3) and soulful electric slide guitar from Colin Linden (4). If you love funk & gospel, there are great new options this year, including gospel organ (3) from Charles Treadway, as well as new funk, tango, and rock ’n’ roll drums (3) and bass (1). And for big, bold arrangements, we have uptempo soul horns (4) featuring a three-part hip horn section with options for a full mix or stems of each individual horn — plus an accompanying rhythm section (4) of drums, bass, guitar, and electric piano!
Rock & Pop (Sets 476–482):
Our new rock & pop RealTracks bring a powerful mix of requested favorites, fresh genres, and modern chart-inspired styles! We have more of our popular “Producer Layered Acoustic Guitars (15)” featuring Band-in-a-Box favorite Brent Mason. We’ve continued our much-requested disco styles (10), and added new Celtic guitar (5) with a more basic, accessible approach than our previous Drop-D or DADGAD offerings. There are also highly requested yacht rock styles (17), inspired by the smooth, polished soft-rock sound of the late ’70s and early ’80s — laid-back grooves, silky electric pianos, warm textures, elegant harmonic movement, and pristine production aesthetics. Fans of heavier styles will love our new glam metal (13), capturing the flashy, high-energy sound of ’80s arena-ready guitar rock. We also have a set of rootsy modern-folk rock (18), with a warm, organic sound combining contemporary folk textures and driving acoustic strumming. And we’ve added lots of new modern pop styles (16) — the kinds of sounds you’re hearing on the radio today, featuring exciting new drums, synths, and cutting-edge RealTracks arrangements.
Country, & Americana (Sets 483–488):
Our new country & Americana RealTracks deliver a rich collection of acoustic, electric, and roots-inspired styles! We have new country pop (9) with legendary guitarist Brent Mason. There is also a potpourri (14) of bouzouki, guitars, banjo, and more, perfect for adding texture and character to contemporary acoustic arrangements. We’ve added funky country guitar (5) with PG favorite Brent Mason, along with classic pedal steel styles (5) featuring steel great Doug Jernigan. There are more country songwriter styles (8) that provide intimate, rootsy foundations for storytelling and modern Americana writing. Finally, we have “background soloing” acoustic guitar (12) with Brent Mason — simpler, but still very tasty acoustic lines designed to sit beautifully behind vocals or act as a subtle standalone solo part.
Check out all the 202 new RealTracks (in sets 468-488)!
And, if you are looking for more, the 2026 49-PAK (for $49) includes an impressive collection of 20 bonus RealTracks, featuring exciting and inspiring additions to add to your RealTracks library. You'll get new country-rhythm guitar styles from PG Music favorites Johnny Hiland and Brent Mason, along with modern-pop grooves that capture today’s radio-ready sound! There are also new indie-folk styles with guitar, bass, 6-string bass used as a high-chording instrument, acoustic guitar, and banjo. Plus, dedicated "cymbal fills" RealDrums provide an added layer that work very well with low-key folky styles with other percussion.
The 2026 49-PAK is loaded with other great new add-ons as well. Learn more about the 2026 49-PAK!
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
With your version 2026 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
- MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
- Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
- Playable RealTracks Set 5
- RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
- SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
- iOS Android Band-in-a-Box® App
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
- Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
- RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
- SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)
Learn more about the Bonus PAK and 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,301
Posts802,961
Members40,086
| |
Most Online64,515 Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|