|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,931
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,931 |
I have been reading a very interesting book called “We think” by Charles Leadbeater . The thesis of his book is that there is great power in creativity and innovation when a whole bunch of people contribute to something creative WITHOUT any intention of making money out of it. The best example he gives in his book is Wikipedia where you have thousands of volunteers contributing to something for the love of it and for recognition from their peers…not for money. He even goes on to say that this type of creativity will be the driving force of the century. It is an interesting book and worth a read.
The book got me thinking about song writing. This is a one huge creative and innovative pursuit, isn’t it? Say we started a wiki were anybody could post song ideas, song titles, licks, melodies or even just one sentence. Anything. People could add and build and change and we could eventually end up with full songs. Of course we would probably end up with many songs that are not finished, (and who would be able to say when a song is finished?) BUT the idea is that whatever is posted here is not copyrightable. It is public domain. Anybody can take the ideas and record and sell them or perform them without paying any royalties. But, they cannot copyright anything about song. This would apply equally to people who contributed to the ideas and songs and to people who had no input whatsoever. ( I can use Wikipedia even though I have never contributed to it).
I would be interested in finding out if this PG Music community would be interested in starting something like this? I feel like we already have a great community that is ideal to plant the seed. (Of course it would not be restrictive in any way and anybody can participate or use the ideas, whether they are PG Music users or not). Let me know your thoughts…..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,075
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,075 |
Hi Jo,
Interesting suggestion and concept.
I tend to agree with the premise that collaborative thinking can yield a result that is bigger than the sum of its parts. The fly in the ointment, from my perspective, is human nature.
Even though there are plenty of people who probably would contribute freely without expectation of gain, I think most people would tend to hold onto their good ideas.
However, nothing would please me more than to be proven wrong in this opinion.
I look forward to hearing other peoples thoughts. Good topic! Thanks for speaking up!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,538
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,538 |
Joanne, I think a collaboration forum would be a great idea. Why not post it on the wish list thread? In fact collaborations are one of the things we do over at Kara-Moon.com. We have never had a problem over there so I will respectfully disagree with Mr. Marr. I hope this site doesn’t prove me wrong!
One must remember when going into a collaboration is that the work is not theirs. Keep that thought and all will go well.
The potential down side is the song may take a turn that you may not like. I just had an experience over at Kara-Moon where I add some parts to a finished song; of course I had the authors permission to do so. Upon hearing it he said that is something that he would never do. He continued by saying but that is the purpose of a collaboration, you get things you would never think of. He did say although it’s not in the direction he would have gone that it was a good addition to his song.
The fitness trainer asked me, "What kind of a squat are you accustomed to doing?" I said, "Diddly."
64 bit Win 11 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,931
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,931 |
Thanks for commenting Pat and Mario. I think what I am proposing is slightly more radical. I am thinking that nobody owns the song. Even the person whose idea it originally was. So nobody can complain about a direction a song takes. They take it, leave it or change it. There would be no ownership of the songs or ideas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 19,933
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 19,933 |
Hi Joanne,
What an interesting topic!
What would you expect to happen if the song turned into a million dollar seller?
I remember reading an interview with Dolly Parton once where she said that a number 1 hit is worth around US$5,000,000. She was talking about "I Will Always Love You" and the fact that it's been number 1 on three separate occasions.
Also, I was at a Beth Nelson Chapman seminar a couple of years ago and she said that her one-third share of the writing royalties from "This Kiss" put her son through college.
What do you propose should happen in scenarios similar to the above? It's possible that something like the above could occur.
Regards,
Noel
MY SONGS...Audiophile BIAB 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,931
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,931 |
Hi Noel.
What I am saying is that there would be no song writing royalties at all. So if a song turned into a big seller then the person who recorded/produced it gets everything. So in the case of "I will always love you" Whitney Houston and her producer would get everything from her version and Dolly Parton would get everything from her own (dolly's) version. Of course in the proposed scenario it would not have been Dolly's song to start out with. It would have been everybodies. Similar to "happy birthday to you".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,538
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,538 |
Hi Noel.
What I am saying is that there would be no song writing royalties at all. So if a song turned into a big seller then the person who recorded/produced it gets everything. So in the case of "I will always love you" Whitney Houston and her producer would get everything from her version and Dolly Parton would get everything from her own (dolly's) version. Of course in the proposed scenario it would not have been Dolly's song to start out with. It would have been everybodies. Similar to "happy birthday to you". Joanne, “Happy Birthday” is a copyrighted song: http://www.ip-watch.org/2013/07/04/happy-birthday-to-you-copyrighted/So technically if you sing it the licensee should get compensated. However don’t worry. I doubt the music cops will go house to house to see if you are singing it! But you can’t put it in a movie without copyright permission: http://www.theguardian.com/music/2013/jun/14/happy-birthday-lawsuit-copyright-warnerA simple solution would be whomever’s contributions to the song were used in the finished product would be included as a composer of the song.
The fitness trainer asked me, "What kind of a squat are you accustomed to doing?" I said, "Diddly."
64 bit Win 11 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,931
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,931 |
Hi Mario
So maybe "Happy Birthday" is a bad example. Lets change that to "The Entertainer". I believe that is public domain.
The point is that the power comes from not trying to attribute the creation to any person(s) but from it being completely open and free. We do it for the love of it not for the money. And from that effort everybody learns, whether they contribute or not. "Everybody" owns the song, whether they contributed or not. It is public domain before the 75 years (or whatever the rule is) is up.
There is a lovely quote in the book that quotes Woody Guthrie's copy right notice; "This song is Copyrighted in US, under Seal of Copyright 154085, for a period of 28 years, any anybody caught singing it will be mighty good friends of ours, cause we don't give a dern. Publish it, Write it. Sing it. Swing it. Yodel it. We wrote it, that's all we wanted to do"
Last edited by jo131; 08/07/13 10:54 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,793
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,793 |
Joanne, there is plenty of precedent for this in the software world where millions of folks create software and release it for collaboration or use by others. you can release it for non-commercial use or you can have it wide open (so Dolly can record it and solely profit from it!) if you are not familiar with Creative Commons ( http://creativecommons.org/), that would be a good place to start reading as they have a complete process for licensing copyrightable works. should you decide to proceed you could explore what they offer, and then set up your collaborative network using that (or some other) as the basis/requirement for participating.
Last edited by JohnJohnJohn; 08/07/13 12:27 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,793
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,793 |
oh, and just to clarify, I am not suggesting that your idea for a collaborative project is already in existence...only that some of the tools you would need like licensing, are available. and those should help move your project forward should you decide to pursue it! 
Last edited by JohnJohnJohn; 08/07/13 12:36 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,538
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,538 |
There is a lovely quote in the book that quotes Woody Guthrie's copy right notice; "This song is Copyrighted in US, under Seal of Copyright 154085, for a period of 28 years, any anybody caught singing it will be mighty good friends of ours, cause we don't give a dern. Publish it, Write it. Sing it. Swing it. Yodel it. We wrote it, that's all we wanted to do" I wish that more people had Woody's attitude! Note that I am not against your idea and in fact I think it is a good one. I would gladly join in on a free for all musical experience. Hopefully all who might join in would feel the same. If it is stated up front that no ones owns the song then no one should complain!
The fitness trainer asked me, "What kind of a squat are you accustomed to doing?" I said, "Diddly."
64 bit Win 11 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,987
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,987 |
There was a site called Collaboration Central which was owned by a regular poster on the N-Track site which Mac and I frequented. It failed promptly because, in my opinion, there was no definite direction to the song and each contributor wanted to take the "germ" of the song in separate directions. It soon became a divisive thing that came between good friends.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Jo, Every year thousands of hack and more professional (people that get paid writing music) participate in the February Album Writing Month challenge to write 14 songs in the month of February. I've been a participant for 5 or 6 years. Each year collaborations are done by hundreds from these thousands of participants. I encourage you to join in next year at www.fawm.orgA smaller group of people go really crazy with it and do 50/90, writing 50 songs in 90 days over the northern hemisphere summer months. Many collaborations happen there as well. There are also other songwriting sites where collaborations and meetups are part of the joy of participation. Check out the Just Plain Folks website. http://www.jpfolks.com/forum/ubbthreads.php/ubb/postlist/Board/4/page/1Lots of folks looking to collaborate there. As for 'making it big', well, good luck - literally. Making it small can be had by all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,085
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,085 |
There's an old adage.... "too many cooks in the kitchen spoil the broth". I encourage you to really check out the links Scott posted, especially JPFolks. Not saying you idea is good or bad - personally not something I'd be interested in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,793
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,793 |
Jo, Every year thousands of hack and more professional (people that get paid writing music) participate in the February Album Writing Month challenge to write 14 songs in the month of February. I've been a participant for 5 or 6 years. Each year collaborations are done by hundreds from these thousands of participants. I encourage you to join in next year at www.fawm.orgA smaller group of people go really crazy with it and do 50/90, writing 50 songs in 90 days over the northern hemisphere summer months. Many collaborations happen there as well. There are also other songwriting sites where collaborations and meetups are part of the joy of participation. Check out the Just Plain Folks website. http://www.jpfolks.com/forum/ubbthreads.php/ubb/postlist/Board/4/page/1Lots of folks looking to collaborate there. As for 'making it big', well, good luck - literally. Making it small can be had by all. I agree on FAWM and 50/90 whole heartedly! in fact, I'm in the middle of 50/90 right now!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,931
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,931 |
Hi All
Thanks all for the responses. I appreciate you all taking the time to comment.
I think on the FAWN and JPfolks collaborations there is always an element of “ownership” on the songs that are produced (correct me if I am wrong here please).
Don, “collaboration central” does sound like a bit like what I am suggesting but my question is was there any underlying notion of “ownership” of the song or the ideas? Because if this is so, there is almost certainly going to be broken friendships about the direction a certain idea takes.
Mario, what you say about a “free for all musical experience” is more what I am envisaging.
Scott, the intention is not to “make it big” but just the opposite ie not to make anything at all (financially speaking) but to enrich ourselves through the experience.
Josie; on the “too many cooks spoil the broth”, the book I am talking about tries to disprove this with loads of examples where mass collaboration has wielded extraordinary results (such as Linux, Craigslist and I Love Bees). It proposes that we are moving away for the top down authoritarian model like MacDonalds to a more egalitarian system.
John; I have not had a really good look around Creative Commons but it seems to talk about a system to license your work. I am saying that the work doesn't get licensed and there is no such thing as "your work". It is everybody's.
(PS. I hope I don’t come across as defensive in this reply. Just really wanted to gauge if people would be interested in something like this)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,793
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,793 |
I think you are right about FAWM in that there is still ownership or shared ownership for collabs.
As far as licensing goes, seems to me it would be a necessary component to do what you are proposing. If there is no ownership at all maybe someone down the line would claim/establish ownership and turn around and prohibit you from ever using the song? Or they decide to make a song you care deeply about the theme for something horrendous. If you have licensed the work you can cover some of these issues in advance.
Open source software can still be owned/copyrighted and often is but it is then licensed with specific requirements as to its usage. Sometimes those requirements are strict such as no commercial use allowed and sometimes they are completely wide open for any sort of use without even attribution. But even in those cases you usually get a license and not ownership of the software.
But that is all the technical/business side of things plus I understand what you are proposing is a bit different. I gave this some thought about the creative side and from my perspective I just don't see how it would work. Creatives tend to be proud of their work and I think it would be very difficult to create songs in this manner. We do it, at least in part, to be able to step back and say "I did that!"
Do you know of anything like this that has been tried? I am not very much in tune with the music, art or literature worlds but would be curious to know if this concept has worked anywhere outside of things like software.
Oh, one other question...I was curious how Craigslist and I Love Bees related to this idea? One is a privately held corporation and the other a viral marketing campaign. Although I guess they both engage(d) tremendous numbers of people.
Last edited by JohnJohnJohn; 08/08/13 04:29 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,793
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,793 |
one other thing I was going to mention about FAWM and 50/90, they do something called an exquisite corpse where multiple participants each take something others have previously worked on and they add to it and pass it along. It seems more structured (like a game) and maybe more restrictive than what you are thinking but might be interesting for you to check out (personally I do not care for these that much!) Here is a link to some conversation, http://fiftyninety.fawmers.org/content/exquisite-corpse-charlie-delta-echoand here is a link to an example, http://fiftyninety.fawmers.org/song/1888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,931
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,931 |
Hi John Sorry about my absence, I was off sailing for the weekend so was not at my computer. If there is no ownership at all maybe someone down the line would claim/establish ownership and turn around and prohibit you from ever using the song? I think on this point, I suppose there is that risk but it would be totally against the spirit of the thing. (People are always stealing songs!!) Or they decide to make a song you care deeply about the theme for something horrendous. On this, I don’t think that anybody would become particularly attached to a song..It’s not theirs to become attached to, their name is not on it. So they wouldn’t really care if somebody made something horrendous out of it, (same as you probably wouldn’t care is somebody took a song of mine and did something horrendous with it). Creatives tend to be proud of their work and I think it would be very difficult to create songs in this manner. We do it, at least in part, to be able to step back and say "I did that!" This is the beauty of this, you can have a small part in something that can become great, you can say, “I helped with that melody or I wrote that lyric” Do you know of anything like this that has been tried? Not sure yet, will get back to you on this one. Yes, Craigslist and I love bees all involve(d) collaboration on a massive scale. As far as I understand, with I love Bees, there was no financial reason for people to play at all (correct me it I am wrong. I never played!). I will check out the FAWM thing.
Last edited by jo131; 08/12/13 02:38 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs Special Extended Until August 31st!
XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs Special Extended Until August 31st!
The XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs special offers are now available until August 31st at 11:59pm PDT!
Ready to take your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 experience to the next level? Now’s the perfect time! Expand your style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs—packed with a wide variety of genres to inspire your next musical creation.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-9 includes 900 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). With over 3,500 styles (and 35 MIDI styles) included in Xtra Styles PAKs 1-20, the possibilities are endless!
Get the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Windows or for Mac.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Get Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 19 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Listen to demos and order now! For Windows or for Mac.
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Don’t miss this chance to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box setup—at a great price!
Mac 2025 Special Upgrade Offers Extended Until August 15th!
It's not too late to upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® and save! We've extended our special until August 15, 2025!
We've added many major new features to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, including advanced AI tools like the amazing BB Stem Splitter and AI Lyrics Generator, as well as VST3 plugin support, and Equalize Temp. Plus, there’s a new one-stop MIDI Patches Picker with over 1,100 MIDI patches to choose from, all neatly categorized by GM numbers. The MultiPicker Library is enhanced with tabs for the SongPicker, MIDI Patch Picker, Chord Builder, AI Lyrics Generator, and Song Titles Browser, and the tabs are organized into logical groups. The Audiophile Edition is enhanced with FLAC files , which are 60% smaller than AIFF files while maintaining identical audio quality, and now ships on a fast 1TB SSD, and much more!
Check out all the new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® here:
Purchase your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac during our special to save up to 50% off your upgrade purchase and receive a FREE BONUS PAK of amazing new Add-ons. These include the 2025 RealCombos Booster PAK, Look Ma! More MIDI 13: Country & Americana, Instrumental Studies Set 22: 2-Hand Piano Soloing - Rhythm Changes, MIDI SuperTracks Set 44: Jazz Piano, Artist Performance Set 17: Songs with Vocals 7, Playable RealTracks Set 4, RealDrums Stems Set 7: Jazz with Mike Clark, and more!
Upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for just $49 and add 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and 20 RealStyles, FLAC Files for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks, Look Ma! More MIDI 14: SynthMaster, MIDI SuperTracks Set 45: More SynthMaster, Artist Performance Set 18: Songs with Vocals 8, and RealDrums Stems Set 8: Pop, Funk & More with Jerry Roe.
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs!
New RealTracks Released with Band-in-a-Box 2025!
We’ve expanded the Band-in-a-Box® RealTracks library with 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 449-467) across Jazz, Blues, Funk, World, Pop, Rock, Country, Americana, and Praise & Worship—featuring your most requested styles!
Jazz, Blues & World (Sets 449–455):
These RealTracks includes “Soul Jazz” with Neil Swainson (bass), Mike Clark (drums), Charles Treadway (organ), Miles Black (piano), and Brent Mason (guitar). Enjoy “Requested ’60s” jazz, classic acoustic blues with Colin Linden, and more of our popular 2-handed piano soloing. Plus, a RealTracks first—Tango with bandoneon, recorded in Argentina!
Rock & Pop (Sets 456–461):
This collection includes Disco, slap bass ‘70s/‘80s pop, modern and ‘80s metal with Andy Wood, and a unique “Songwriter Potpourri” featuring Chinese folk instruments, piano, banjo, and more. You’ll also find a muted electric guitar style (a RealTracks first!) and “Producer Layered Guitar” styles for slick "produced" sound.
Country, Americana & Praise (Sets 462–467):
We’ve added new RealTracks across bro country, Americana, praise & worship, vintage country, and songwriter piano. Highlights include Brent Mason (electric guitar), Eddie Bayers (drums), Doug Jernigan (pedal steel), John Jarvis (piano), Glen Duncan (banjo, mandolin & fiddle), Mike Harrison (electric bass) and more—offering everything from modern sounds to heartfelt Americana styles
Check out all the 202 New RealTracks (in sets 456-467)
And, if you are looking for more, the 2025 49-PAK (for $49) includes an additional 20 RealTracks with exciting new sounds and genre-spanning styles. Enjoy RealTracks firsts like Chinese instruments (guzheng & dizi), the bandoneon in an authentic Argentine tango trio, and the classic “tic-tac” baritone guitar for vintage country.
You’ll also get slick ’80s metal guitar from Andy Wood, modern metal with guitarist Nico Santora, bass player Nick Schendzielos, and drummer Aaron Stechauner, more praise & worship, indie-folk, modern/bro country with Brent Mason, and “Songwriter Americana” with Johnny Hiland.
Plus, enjoy user-requested styles like Soul Jazz RealDrums, fast Celtic Strathspey guitar, and Chill Hop piano & drums!
The 2025 49-PAK is loaded with other great new add-ons as well. Learn more about the 2025 49-PAK!
Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac!
With your version 2025 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Or upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2025 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 33 new RealTracks and 65+ new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 29 new RealTracks and 45+ new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 20 new RealStyles.
- Look Ma! More MIDI 13: Country & Americana
- Instrumental Studies Set 22: 2-Hand Piano Soloing - Rhythm Changes
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 44: Jazz Piano
- Artist Performance Set 17: Songs with Vocals 7
- Playable RealTracks Set 4
- RealDrums Stems Set 7: Jazz with Mike Clark
- SynthMaster Sounds and Styles (with audio demos)
- 128 GM MIDI Patch Audio Demos.
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyles,
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- Look Ma! More MIDI 14: SynthMaster,
- Instrumental Studies Set 23: More '80s Hard Rock Soloing,
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 45: More SynthMaster
- Artist Performance Set 18: Songs with Vocals 8
- RealDrums Stems Set 8: Pop, Funk & More with Jerry Roe
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®!
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Mac!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 20.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 20 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
New! XPro Styles PAK 9 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and higher for Mac!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 9 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 29 RealTracks/RealDrums!
We've been hard at it to bring you the latest and greatest in this 9th installment of our popular XPro Styles PAK series! Included are 75 styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres (25 styles each) that fans have come to expect, as well as 25 styles in this volume's wildcard genre: funk & R&B!
If you're itching to get a sneak peek at what's included in XPro Styles PAK 9, here is a small helping of what you can look forward to: Funky R&B Horns, Upbeat Celtic Rock, Jazz Fusion Salsa, Gentle Indie Folk, Cool '60s Soul, Funky '70s R&B, Smooth Jazz Hip Hop, Acoustic Rockabilly Swing, Funky Reggae Dub, Dreamy Retro Latin Jazz, Retro Soul-Rock Fusion, and much more!
Special Pricing! Until July 31, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 9 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Windows!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 20.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 20 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums58
Topics84,646
Posts782,303
Members39,714
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean