Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
I've just won a bid on a Rode K2 valve mic so looking forward to getting that one. But I also think I need a vocal booth. Got my eye on a SE Electronics Reflexion Filter PRO. Does anyone use these and are they necessary or perhaps, do they make a real difference because marketing hype is so strong these days.

thanks
Paul

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Paul,

They are useful if you put your mic too close to a reflecting surface. However, you can accomplish the same and better by placing your K2 in front of an open closet or wardrobe that is stuffed with wooly/cottony clothing when you record. Not crammed, just hanging in there - making sure that none of the back wall is visible in the vicinity of the mic.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,033
Veteran
Online Happy
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,033
Paul, yes, I have used the better Reflexion Filter with success for several years with my ribbon mic (for recording wind instruments). As Scott says, there are other ways to get to the same place, but mine does the job well since I do not have a full-sized sonically isolated vocal booth in my spare bedroom!

Another kind of filter to consider is a pop filter. These can be had for maybe $30, or just stretch pantyhose tightly over a grid a few inches in front of the mic to prevent vocal pops into a mic.

WARNING: pay careful attention to the center of balance adjustments when mounting the Reflexion Filter and mic. With a heavier condenser and shock mount, the placement has to be just right, or a nudge will knock the whole thing over.



Last edited by Matt Finley; 12/09/13 06:46 PM.

BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
I record from my small office/ex dining room. It's a multipurpose room - computer repairs, office, recording studio (if you can call it that). My recordings to date were recorded in their using a dynamic mic with a basic pop filter. So I'm hoping the new mic will make a noticeable improvement. Thanks for your advise.

Here's a sample
https://soundcloud.com/devonbiker/theres-power-in-the-blood

PS I know there's no substitute for a trained voice.

Last edited by PaulH; 12/10/13 02:36 AM.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Paul,

Your recording sounds nice and clear. I don't necessarily hear any comb filtering going on - which is what a Reflexion filter is going to solve. Now, with the Rode, you will have a greater tendency to have comb filtering going on because it's pattern has less off-axis rejection than most dynamic microphones.

Don't be surprised if you end up using your dynamic microphone. In my opinion, you already have a good sound going. I wouldn't put an awful lot of stock in getting the Rode K2 going if you find that you don't see an immediate improvement.

It's hard to give advice without full knowledge of what you have going on - but in my opinion, listening to the track above, I'm doubting that you are going to hear a marked difference. Your recording levels seem appropriate, you don't have noticeable proximity effect going on, no comb filtering audible, and your voice sounds nice.

You might play a little with high pass filtering, and peel off the very bottom end of what you've recorded, but there's not an obvious overload on low frequencies like what happens with a great deal of home recorded vocals.

In my little mic locker, I really like my EV PL80a dynamic mic, though I paid quite a bit less for it than my large diaphragm condenser - unless I'm doing very quiet whispery vocals then I use the LDC.

I honestly think that given your description of your room, that the dynamic mic might give you a better result than the K2 and Reflexion filter.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
M
Mac Offline
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
M
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Hi Paul,

Good singing, good intonation, strong power from proper use of air, you may not know this, but that makes you 90% there already.

One can get a lot of mileage out of the clothes closet as vocal booth. You know, the closet with all the wifey's coats and dresses hanging in it.

Push the clothes aside somewhere in the middle of the rack, leaving a space between them to set the mic. The hard wall at back of closet makes the ~50% hard reflection, the two "walls" of the coats and dresses make up the ~50% soft absorption.

Try it before buying anything.

Another method I have used at home, try using horizontal ropes with blankets and/or quilts over them to create a temporary Vocal Booth. Top of blankets should be higher than top of singer's head. This one yields a really "dry" recording that lends itself to application of Ambience effects plugins such as a good sounding reverb.

I know a youngster who placed his only SM58 mic on a boom stand in front of his mattress set upright against the wall in the corner of his bedroom - and produced his first album that way. Sounded good. So be creative and experiment a bit, find what works for you without spending money needlessly. The soundwaves moving in the air won't know the difference.

That's still one of my most favorite old hymns.

And you sang it like you meant it.

Strong Performance.


--Mac

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
Thanks for your encouragement guys. I'm a bit of a dummy when it comes to solving problems. Think I have to buy the best gear to achieve it. It's too late on the mic it's on it's way and before reading this I'm already the high bidder on a SE Electronics Reflection Filter Pro. I've never been happy with my vocals, and that song posted is probably my best effort to date. Checking out the internet and YouTube has convinced me that something higher end like the Rode K2 will give me smoother vocals with a bit more depth. So will have to see how that pans out. I can always sell it but they don't seem to be budging at the moment. A few on ebay not shifting.

That leads me to other questions I have on trying to get a better mix and I may need to start another thread. Apart from my sound card, hi fi & mic, everything else has been bought in the last 12 months. My current setup is...

BIAB 2013 EverythingPak
Presonus Audiobox 22VSL.
Studio One Pro
Melodyne Editor
Sennheiser HD280Pro headphones
VRM Box

Beyerdynamic TGX80 mic
ASUS Xonar Essence STX Sound Card
NAD AMP, B&W bookshelf Speakers + Rel Sub.

I'm in more spend mode at the moment, and would like to get a couple of studio monitors to connect to my AudioBox 22VSL. I'm thinking of Yamaha HS8 vs KRK Rokit8?

That said I am frustrated with my mixes, no where near as dynamic and loud as professional recordings. The phrase "well duh" comes to mind knowing you can't match a basic home studio with professional studios but it is annoying me. Plus I don't know how to mix. I have the basics but it's alot of trial n error and many many hours of editing.

Last edited by PaulH; 12/11/13 02:49 PM.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,499
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,499
I have a couple good dynamic mike, and one condenser, and i have not touched the condenser for a while now. The darned things sounded great, but picked up a mouse fart at 200 yards. so if something happened like the ice maker dropping in the other room, or the garbage truck coming around the bend a take was ruined. The dynamic mike are just so much more directional in nature.


HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini Sonoma with 16 gig of ram, BiaB 2025, Realband, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 9 32c , Melodyne 5 editor, Presonus Audiobox 1818VSL, Presonus control app.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
M
Mac Offline
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
M
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Originally Posted By: Robh
The dynamic mike are just so much more directional in nature.


You can get a condenser mic that has cardioid directional characteristics.

You can also get omnidirectional dynamic mics.

It is more likely to be the Sensitivity specification of the large diaphragm condenser mic that is allowing the mic to pickup all of those background sounds better.

And, if the condenser is a Large Diaphragm Condenser, they are typically going to be more sensitive than the medium or small, simply due to the added surface area of the diaphragm.

Sometimes use of the Mic Pad control on the preamp or mixer's input can be put to good use when the mic is overly sensitive.


--Mac

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,790
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,790
Originally Posted By: PaulH
That said I am frustrated with my mixes, no where near as dynamic and loud as professional recordings. The phrase "well duh" comes to mind knowing you can't match a basic home studio with professional studios but it is annoying me. Plus I don't know how to mix. I have the basics but it's alot of trial n error and many many hours of editing.

Paul, I am also fairly new to the whole production side of things. Here are a few things I recommend that have helped me a lot,

- The book Mixing Secrets for the Small Studio - I bought this and read it cover to cover a couple of times and still refer to it! the author has a wealth of additional info at his website for free including raw tracks to use in your own mix experiments.

- The video tutorials from The Recording Revolution - I bought their videos on editing, mixing, EQ, compression, mastering and vocals. I have watched most of them once but they are great for watching over again.

- I wanted to get some KRK monitors but I really do not have a room where I can use them effectively so I am stuck using headphones. I bought a decent pair of headphones and also bought the VRM box from Focusrite. The headphones are a nice private way to mix but you can have issues with the stereo separation heard in headphones not translating well to speakers so the VRM box attempts to resolve that issue by simulating various studio monitors.

- And I recently purchased Izotope software for mixing, vocals and mastering. Have not used it extensively yet but I am absolutely amazed at how much better my mixes sound just by using their presets.

My personal (amateur) opinion is you may already have enough hardware and just need to focus on training, practice and maybe software.

Last edited by JohnJohnJohn; 12/12/13 01:53 PM.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
M
Mac Offline
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
M
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Learning the Audio Compressor plugin inside and out is what I think makes the largest difference between what the big studios output and what the home recordists are striving for.

Many home recordists either bypass that aspect, or look for instantaneous one-button software solutions that, while they can indeed help, just can't cover the situation in the same fashion for differing sets of tracks.

PCM digital audio, I often find myself applying a different instance of compression on each track, with different settings to suit, followed by one instance of compression on the Master Bus as well, typically set as a Limiter.


--Mac

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
Originally Posted By: Robh
i have not touched the condenser for a while now. The darned things sounded great, but picked up a mouse fart at 200 yards. so if something happened like the ice maker dropping in the other room, or the garbage truck coming around the bend a take was ruined. The dynamic mike are just so much more directional in nature.


Yep I have a similar problem. Been recording with my Rode K2 and it picks up everything. I have wooden floor boards so even a soft tap on carpet with your foot to keep time transfers onto the recording as deep rumble. Not sure how to fix this - put mic on desk rather than on floor with mic stand? However the recordings arn't a million miles from my dynamic mic, just smoother to my ears. Not a massive improvement BUT the improvement has made me sound better.

Here's a song I did with my children, they are singing into my dynamic mic and I'm on the Rode K2.

https://soundcloud.com/devonbiker/hes-got-theh-whole-world-in

Last edited by PaulH; 12/14/13 12:37 PM.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
Thanks for your input guys, all are good points raised. Although expensive I do want to try the SE Electronics vocal booth because I am unable to sing in a cupboard. I will report back when I get one. Again I doubt it will make a massive difference but the collection of all the improvements makes for better recording. And yes I definitely need a crash course with mixing, it's trial n error at the moment.

Last edited by PaulH; 12/14/13 12:44 PM.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,790
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,790

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: VST3 Plugin Support

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® now includes support for VST3 plugins, alongside VST and AU. Use them with MIDI or audio tracks for even more creative possibilities in your music production.

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Macs®: VST3 Plugin Support

Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: Using VST3 Plugins

Join the conversation on our forum.

Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac Videos

With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll also keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.

From overviews of new features and walkthroughs of the 202 new RealTracks, to highlights of XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAKs 18, the 2025 49-PAK, and in-depth tutorials — you’ll find everything you need to explore what’s new in Band-in-a-Box® 2025.

Reference this forum post for One-Stop Shopping of our Band-in-a-Box® 2025 Mac Videos — we’ll be adding more videos as they’re released!

Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac is Here!

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac is here, packed with major new features and an incredible collection of available new content! This includes 202 RealTracks (in Sets 449-467), plus 20 bonus Unreleased RealTracks in the 2025 49-PAK. There are new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 4, two new sets of “RealDrums Stems,” XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAK 19, and more!

Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac with savings of up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special—available until July 31, 2025! Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.

2025 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
We've packed our Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK with some incredible Add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is automatically included with most Band-in-a-Box® for Mac 2025 packages, but for even more Add-ons (including 20 Unreleased RealTracks!) upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49. You can see the full lists of items in each package, and listen to demos here.

If you have any questions, feel free to connect with us directly—we’re here to help!

Band-in-a-Box 2025 Italian Version is Here!

Cari amici
È stata aggerate la versione in Italiano del programma più amato dagli appassionati di musica, il nostro Band-in-a-Box.
Questo è il link alla nuova versione 2025.

Di seguito i link per scaricare il pacchetti di lingua italiana aggiornati per Band-in-a-Box e RealBand, anche per chi avesse già comprato la nuova versione in inglese.

Band-in-a-Box 2025 - Italiano
RealBand 2025 - Italiano

Band-in-a-Box 2025 French Version is Here!

Bonjour à tous,

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 pour Windows est disponible en Français.
Le téléchargement se fait à partir du site PG Music

Pour ceux qui auraient déjà acheté la version 2025 de Band-in-a-Box (et qui donc ont une version anglaise), il est possible de "franciser" cette version avec les patchs suivants:

BIAB 2025 - francisation
RealBand 2025 - francisation

Voilà, enjoy!

Band-in-a-Box 2025 German Version is Here!

Band-in-a-Box 2025 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!

Die deutsche Version Band-in-a-Box® 2025 für Windows ist ab sofort verfügbar!

Alle die bereits die englische Version von Band-in-a-Box und RealBand 2024 installiert haben, finden hier die Installationsdateien für das Sprachenupdate:

https://nn.pgmusic.com/pgfiles/languagesupport/deutsch2025.exe
https://nn.pgmusic.com/pgfiles/languagesupport/deutsch2025RB.exe

Update Your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 to Build 1128 for Windows Today!

Already using Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 1128 now from our Support Page to enjoy the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.

Stay up to date—get the latest update now!

Forum Statistics
Forums58
Topics84,298
Posts777,439
Members39,614
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
Newest Members
weedindubai, Claudio Paolini, bjornen71, CATBELLOU, Banjopotamus
39,613 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 148
zedd 120
DC Ron 106
nonchai 104
WaoBand 102
rsdean 86
Today's Birthdays
timbalera, WineRider
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5