|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,446
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,446 |
I've played various kinds of gigs so far in my career, restaurants, small bars, dance clubs, show clubs, cruise ships, and even concerts as the warm up act for the headliner.
I've done a lot of 'sonic wallpaper' gigs where we were supposed to be background music and not listened to. We did one about a year ago, it was a tech convention, and we played while the attendees were having dinner - all gentle instrumentals. We of course did our best, and more or less played for each others ears. When dinner was over, dozens of people stopped by to tell us how much they enjoyed our music.
We play a dinner gig at a yacht club where perhaps the last half to one hour is for dancing. Low volume (about 65db in front of the stage) and gentle so the people can talk during dinner. I've gotten used to the fact that people will seem like they are not listening, and at the end of the gig come up and say, "Thanks for a wonderful evening!"
They may seem like they aren't listening, but that doesn't mean they aren't listening.
And even if they are not and you are doing it just for the money that night; what's wrong with that? How many people here have day jobs that they do just for the money?
I tried to get partially out of music twice in my life to become a weekend warrior. I took day jobs and tried to become a "normal" citizen. I guess it was societal pressure that made me want to try that.
My first job was as a telephone installer/repairman. That was before cell phones when Ma Bell ruled the industry.
Climbing telephone poles is dangerous. There are two kinds of people who climb poles, those who have fallen off the pole and those who haven't fallen of a pole YET. You hold yourself up with two spikes, each has about 1/16-1/8" stuck in a splintered pole that thousands of spikes have torn up in the past.
So one day I had this pole to climb. It was in the back yard with 4 chain link fences intersecting at the pole. Something you don't want to straddle if you fall off the pole. There were also galvanized garbage pails to add insult to the injury.
I climbed the pole and opened the terminal, and I immediately realized that hundreds of paper wasps had built their home in the terminal and weren't too happy about having the lid removed. Well doing something quickly on the pole can certainly mean a "cut out" which means you have time to say about "Oh shi" before you hit the ground. Four fences, garbage pails, and an anatomical part of me that wouldn't like that.
So I slowly and carefully climbed down the pole with my heart pounding. Fortunately I didn't get bit.
Now if I get a bad audience (which is extremely rare) or have to learn a song I don't like, I think of the wasps and everything is fine.
A bad day playing music is better than a good day at any day gig I can think of.
--------
Art?
The problem I see in art, is that there is an elitist group that defines what good art is and what isn't good art. Often their blessings go to other people in the elitist group regardless of talent or lack of it.
I've seen worse than those white canvases with a few brush strokes on them. Especially when it comes to installations; stacks of milk cartons, found items thrown in a trash pile, and the worst one I've seen, an old discarded mattress up against the wall covered with donuts. Art? I think not.
But if the art elitists say it's art, the sheep will follow and claim it's art.
In the late 50s or 60s a monkey did paintings and until they found out it was the artist's monkey, the adjectives just kept flying and they were considered master pieces.
And what about Pollock? I saw a documentary where a woman living in a mobile home was given a Pollock her friend bought in a thrift store because it was the ugliest painting she has ever seen.
The woman kept it, a friend suggested it might be a Pollock and it might be worth millions.
She took the painting to art dealers and critics all over the country, and they all agreed it was a cheap imitation because it didn't have Pollock's soulful inspiration in it. And these people included curators in some of the top museums in the land.
Well after some time, someone found Pollocks fingerprints on the back, had the paint analyzed and found it to be the same as the ones that were on the front and the lady was an instant millionaire and the most respected people of the art elite had to eat crow.
------
It's easy to measure technical ability. As mentioned Andrew Wyeth had great technical skill, and as far as I'm concerned did great art. Norman Rockwell had great technical skill and most artists consider him an illustrator.
But technical ability doesn't make art. True art has to have something that transcends mere technical prowess. I've heard plenty of very fast bebop, country, and pop players who seem like they are just playing scales, and others who take those rapid notes and make melodies out of them.
I've heard bands doing their original songs that duplicated tired old chord progressions with uninspiring words and performed with no emotion. And I've heard original 12 bar blues tunes, performed by technically adequate musicians, but with so much soul they blew me away.
So you can't equate art with technical prowess - although if you have the talent for the art, the more technical ability you have with your tools, the better you can convey your art to your audience.
So what I think is art may not be your definition and that's OK.
Saturday at home I listened to the Moscow Philharmonic do Shostakovitch's 4th symphony - the one he didn't release until Stalin died because he feared for his very life. It's a wonderful piece of art. On the way to an errand my iPod played Neil Diamond's "Brother Love's Traveling Salvation Show" and I'm listening to the musicians, background singers and Neil and it moves me, it's also a wonderful piece of art. A few tunes later Muddy Water's "You Can't Lose What You Never Had" came on and it moves me in a different way - and I think it's a wonderful piece of art. That night Leilani sang "Unchained Melody", her vocals raised the hair on the back of my neck and as I looked out a few couples stopped dancing to stand there and stare at her in amazement and I thought the way we covered that song, the backing track, my wind synth playing, and especially Leilani's vocals made a great work of art.
I've been a musician all my life, I've played in jazz bands where the likes of Ira Sullivan, Duffy Jackson and others came to sit in, I've played in cover bands at singles bars trying to do it exactly like the record, I've warmed up for headliners like The Four Seasons, The Association, and various Motown stars while their records were number one on billboard, and I've also played seedy dives where the only reason the band was there is so one table couldn't hear the drug deal going on at the next table.
I have no regrets, and even though I'm of retirement age, I have no plans to retire. As long as I can fog a mirror and there is someone who will want to hear me, I'll play music. If nobody wants to pay me anymore, I'll do it in public parks, at the VA hospital, for charity events and other non-commercial venues.
In the late 1980s I met a guy playing the piano bar on a cruise ship. Irving Bloom who got his start playing piano in silent movie houses. At one time he was president of the New York local of the AFofM. He was 82 years young at the time, and was curious about the synthesizers that the new keyboard players in bands were bringing on the ship. He said that if he was still in his 70s he'd buy one. Irving never lost his enthusiasm for music, was an artful player and a good entertainer as well. When I'm 82 I hope to be that alive.
Irving is now playing in the 'great gig in the sky' and while he was here he touched the emotions of countless people.
No matter what you play, if you move the audience, it's good music, whether other musicians think so or not.
I'm very glad I've been a professional musician most of my life. If I had pursued the electronics engineering that I took in college, I'd have a lot more money right now, but would I have had a happier life so far? I doubt it.
Insights and incites by Notes
Bob "Notes" Norton Norton Music https://www.nortonmusic.com
100% MIDI Super-Styles recorded by live, pro, studio musicians for a live groove & Fake Disks for MIDI and/or RealTracks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/17/14 05:50 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
furry
|
05/17/14 05:56 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
MarioD
|
05/17/14 07:03 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/17/14 07:42 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Matt Finley
|
05/17/14 08:30 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/19/14 02:50 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/17/14 08:52 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/17/14 11:04 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/18/14 11:29 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Guitarhacker
|
05/18/14 01:15 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/19/14 02:54 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Notes Norton
|
05/18/14 01:32 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/18/14 11:47 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
05/19/14 12:53 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/19/14 02:57 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JoanneCooper
|
05/18/14 01:32 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/19/14 12:23 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/19/14 01:32 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/19/14 03:24 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/19/14 07:50 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/19/14 08:26 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/19/14 10:18 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/20/14 12:42 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/19/14 02:48 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Al-David
|
05/23/14 04:12 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/18/14 01:53 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/19/14 02:53 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Don Gaynor
|
05/18/14 05:54 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/18/14 06:11 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Don Gaynor
|
05/18/14 07:04 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/19/14 07:23 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Don Gaynor
|
05/19/14 08:14 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
KeithS
|
05/18/14 07:34 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Guitarhacker
|
05/19/14 11:48 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JoanneCooper
|
05/19/14 04:48 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/19/14 05:58 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Notes Norton
|
05/19/14 12:33 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/19/14 01:35 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/19/14 12:48 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/19/14 12:52 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/19/14 04:58 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/19/14 04:40 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/19/14 05:09 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/19/14 05:09 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/19/14 05:25 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Guitarhacker
|
05/20/14 12:34 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/19/14 10:23 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Cornet Nev
|
05/20/14 12:41 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Notes Norton
|
05/20/14 01:48 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/20/14 04:06 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/20/14 04:14 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/20/14 04:58 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/20/14 02:32 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Kemmrich
|
05/20/14 02:43 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
raymb1
|
05/20/14 02:56 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/20/14 04:32 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/20/14 04:39 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Scott H. Olson
|
05/20/14 04:48 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/20/14 05:30 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/20/14 08:11 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Guitarhacker
|
05/20/14 08:13 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/20/14 08:46 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
rockstar_not
|
05/20/14 11:24 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
05/21/14 04:04 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/21/14 11:08 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/21/14 04:41 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/21/14 04:23 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Notes Norton
|
05/21/14 12:59 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
rockstar_not
|
05/21/14 01:42 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/21/14 02:07 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/21/14 04:57 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
rockstar_not
|
05/21/14 11:10 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Don Gaynor
|
05/21/14 11:56 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
RichMac
|
05/21/14 10:50 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Guitarhacker
|
05/22/14 12:43 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
MarioD
|
05/22/14 01:04 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/22/14 02:40 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Notes Norton
|
05/22/14 01:22 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/22/14 02:40 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/22/14 02:49 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/23/14 12:00 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/22/14 03:17 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/22/14 03:35 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/22/14 04:36 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/22/14 05:18 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/22/14 05:54 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Notes Norton
|
05/23/14 02:09 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/23/14 04:50 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/23/14 04:55 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Guitarhacker
|
05/22/14 03:19 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/22/14 03:42 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/22/14 03:48 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/22/14 03:51 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/22/14 04:00 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
floyd jane
|
05/22/14 04:20 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/23/14 12:07 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
rockstar_not
|
05/23/14 03:30 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/22/14 04:27 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Guitarhacker
|
05/22/14 05:55 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/22/14 07:21 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/23/14 12:02 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Don Gaynor
|
05/22/14 10:55 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/23/14 02:54 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Don Gaynor
|
05/23/14 04:09 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/23/14 04:45 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/23/14 06:32 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/24/14 04:05 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Al-David
|
05/24/14 05:07 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Matt Finley
|
05/24/14 04:23 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
rockstar_not
|
05/24/14 04:54 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/24/14 10:02 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
musiclover
|
05/24/14 12:31 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/24/14 05:42 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/24/14 06:17 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/24/14 06:22 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/24/14 09:07 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/25/14 01:26 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/25/14 10:43 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/24/14 06:12 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/24/14 02:03 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/24/14 06:20 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Notes Norton
|
05/24/14 02:06 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/24/14 03:51 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
rockstar_not
|
05/24/14 04:32 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
raymb1
|
05/24/14 06:54 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Notes Norton
|
05/25/14 02:44 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
MarioD
|
05/25/14 02:48 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/25/14 03:12 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Don Gaynor
|
05/25/14 06:31 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/25/14 02:56 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/25/14 06:18 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
musiclover
|
05/25/14 08:09 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
05/25/14 08:59 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/25/14 08:33 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/25/14 10:27 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Kajun Jeaux
|
05/26/14 05:15 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/26/14 10:45 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
musiclover
|
05/26/14 11:42 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
05/26/14 12:37 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/26/14 12:06 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
MarioD
|
05/26/14 01:25 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/26/14 01:51 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Guitarhacker
|
05/26/14 12:53 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/26/14 01:48 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Guitarhacker
|
05/26/14 01:07 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Joe V
|
05/26/14 01:13 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/26/14 01:38 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
05/26/14 02:01 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/26/14 05:06 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
05/26/14 08:27 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/26/14 09:16 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/26/14 02:32 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/26/14 02:41 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
DrDan
|
05/26/14 10:06 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/26/14 10:25 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
05/26/14 10:32 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/26/14 10:27 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/27/14 01:41 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Guitarhacker
|
05/27/14 12:25 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Notes Norton
|
05/27/14 02:16 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
raymb1
|
05/27/14 06:36 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
musiclover
|
05/27/14 09:12 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
05/28/14 02:10 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
MarioD
|
05/28/14 03:42 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
05/28/14 05:44 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
MarioD
|
05/28/14 07:35 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Guitarhacker
|
05/29/14 12:28 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/29/14 04:27 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
raymb1
|
05/28/14 04:09 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/28/14 04:27 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/27/14 03:06 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/27/14 03:21 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/28/14 02:27 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Notes Norton
|
05/28/14 03:01 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/28/14 04:05 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/28/14 03:58 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/28/14 04:24 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/29/14 04:24 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
MarioD
|
05/29/14 12:45 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/29/14 10:13 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/29/14 04:41 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Notes Norton
|
05/29/14 01:40 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/29/14 03:55 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/29/14 04:08 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Carl914
|
07/16/14 05:24 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
07/16/14 07:38 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
07/16/14 06:22 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
07/16/14 10:10 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JoanneCooper
|
07/17/14 05:04 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
07/17/14 07:11 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Guitarhacker
|
07/17/14 12:50 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Carl914
|
07/17/14 08:51 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
07/17/14 09:27 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
07/18/14 12:25 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Sundance
|
07/18/14 03:38 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Carl914
|
07/18/14 12:50 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
07/18/14 01:15 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
07/18/14 01:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: AI Stems & Notes - split polyphonic audio into instruments and transcribe
This video demonstrates how to use the new AI-Notes feature together with the AI-Stems splitter, allowing you to select an audio file and have it separated into individual stems while transcribing each one to its own MIDI track. AI-Notes converts polyphonic audio—either full mixes or individual instruments—into MIDI that you can view in notation or play back instantly.
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Bonus PAK and 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®
With your version 2026 for Windows Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
- MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
- Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
- Playable RealTracks Set 5
- RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
- SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
- Android Band-in-a-Box® App (included)
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
- Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
- RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
- SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
Video: New User Interface (GUI)
Join Tobin as he takes you on a tour of the new user interface in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®! This modern GUI redesign offers a sleek new look with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, and a smoother workflow. The brand-new side toolbar puts track selection, the MultiPicker Library, and other essential tools right at your fingertips. Plus, our upgraded Multi-View lets you layer multiple windows without overlap, giving you a highly flexible workspace. Many windows—including Tracks, Piano Roll, and more—have been redesigned for improved usability and a cleaner, more intuitive interface, and more!
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Introducing XPro Styles PAK 10 – Now Available for Windows Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 10 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 28 RealTracks and RealDrums!
Few things are certain in life: death, taxes, and a brand spankin’ new XPro Styles PAK! In this, the 10th edition of our XPro Styles PAK series, we’ve got 100 styles coming your way! We have the classic 25 styles each from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, and rounding out this volume's wildcard slot is 25 styles in the Praise & Worship genre! A wide spanning genre, you can find everything from rock, folk, country, and more underneath its umbrella. The included 28 RealTracks and RealDrums can be used with any Band-in-a-Box® 2026 (and higher) package.
Here’s just a small sampling of what you can look forward to in XPro Styles PAK 10: Soft indie folk worship songs, bumpin’ country boogies, gospel praise breaks, hard rockin’ pop, funky disco grooves, smooth Latin jazz pop, bossa nova fusion, western swing, alternative hip-hop, cool country funk, and much more!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 10 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 10 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Introducing Xtra Styles PAK 21 – Now Available for Windows Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest Xtra Styles PAK installment—the all new Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher)!
Rejoice, one and all, for Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box® is here! We’re serving up 200 brand spankin’ new styles to delight your musical taste buds! The first three courses are the classics you’ve come to know and love, including offerings from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, but, not to be outdone, this year’s fourth course is bro country! A wide ranging genre, you can find everything from hip-hop, uptempo outlaw country, hard hitting rock, funk, and even electronica, all with that familiar bro country flair. The dinner bell has been rung, pickup up Xtra Styles PAK 21 today!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Energetic folk rock, raucous train beats, fast country boogies, acid jazz grooves, laid-back funky jams, a bevy of breezy jazz waltzes, calm electro funk, indie synth pop, industrial synth metal, and more bro country than could possibly fit in the back of a pickup truck!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 21 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 21 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 21.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 21 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 21 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Introducing XPro Styles PAK 10 – Now Available for Mac Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 10 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 28 RealTracks and RealDrums!
Few things are certain in life: death, taxes, and a brand spankin’ new XPro Styles PAK! In this, the 10th edition of our XPro Styles PAK series, we’ve got 100 styles coming your way! We have the classic 25 styles each from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, and rounding out this volume's wildcard slot is 25 styles in the Praise & Worship genre! A wide spanning genre, you can find everything from rock, folk, country, and more underneath its umbrella. The included 28 RealTracks and RealDrums can be used with any Band-in-a-Box® 2026 (and higher) package.
Here’s just a small sampling of what you can look forward to in XPro Styles PAK 10: Soft indie folk worship songs, bumpin’ country boogies, gospel praise breaks, hard rockin’ pop, funky disco grooves, smooth Latin jazz pop, bossa nova fusion, western swing, alternative hip-hop, cool country funk, and much more!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 10 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 10 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Introducing Xtra Styles PAK 21 – Now Available for Mac Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest Xtra Styles PAK installment—the all new Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher)!
Rejoice, one and all, for Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box® is here! We’re serving up 200 brand spankin’ new styles to delight your musical taste buds! The first three courses are the classics you’ve come to know and love, including offerings from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, but, not to be outdone, this year’s fourth course is bro country! A wide ranging genre, you can find everything from hip-hop, uptempo outlaw country, hard hitting rock, funk, and even electronica, all with that familiar bro country flair. The dinner bell has been rung, pickup up Xtra Styles PAK 21 today!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Energetic folk rock, raucous train beats, fast country boogies, acid jazz grooves, laid-back funky jams, a bevy of breezy jazz waltzes, calm electro funk, indie synth pop, industrial synth metal, and more bro country than could possibly fit in the back of a pickup truck!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 21 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 21 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 21.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 21 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 21 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics85,313
Posts790,863
Members39,856
| |
Most Online25,754 Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|