Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,395
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,395 |
I've played various kinds of gigs so far in my career, restaurants, small bars, dance clubs, show clubs, cruise ships, and even concerts as the warm up act for the headliner.
I've done a lot of 'sonic wallpaper' gigs where we were supposed to be background music and not listened to. We did one about a year ago, it was a tech convention, and we played while the attendees were having dinner - all gentle instrumentals. We of course did our best, and more or less played for each others ears. When dinner was over, dozens of people stopped by to tell us how much they enjoyed our music.
We play a dinner gig at a yacht club where perhaps the last half to one hour is for dancing. Low volume (about 65db in front of the stage) and gentle so the people can talk during dinner. I've gotten used to the fact that people will seem like they are not listening, and at the end of the gig come up and say, "Thanks for a wonderful evening!"
They may seem like they aren't listening, but that doesn't mean they aren't listening.
And even if they are not and you are doing it just for the money that night; what's wrong with that? How many people here have day jobs that they do just for the money?
I tried to get partially out of music twice in my life to become a weekend warrior. I took day jobs and tried to become a "normal" citizen. I guess it was societal pressure that made me want to try that.
My first job was as a telephone installer/repairman. That was before cell phones when Ma Bell ruled the industry.
Climbing telephone poles is dangerous. There are two kinds of people who climb poles, those who have fallen off the pole and those who haven't fallen of a pole YET. You hold yourself up with two spikes, each has about 1/16-1/8" stuck in a splintered pole that thousands of spikes have torn up in the past.
So one day I had this pole to climb. It was in the back yard with 4 chain link fences intersecting at the pole. Something you don't want to straddle if you fall off the pole. There were also galvanized garbage pails to add insult to the injury.
I climbed the pole and opened the terminal, and I immediately realized that hundreds of paper wasps had built their home in the terminal and weren't too happy about having the lid removed. Well doing something quickly on the pole can certainly mean a "cut out" which means you have time to say about "Oh shi" before you hit the ground. Four fences, garbage pails, and an anatomical part of me that wouldn't like that.
So I slowly and carefully climbed down the pole with my heart pounding. Fortunately I didn't get bit.
Now if I get a bad audience (which is extremely rare) or have to learn a song I don't like, I think of the wasps and everything is fine.
A bad day playing music is better than a good day at any day gig I can think of.
--------
Art?
The problem I see in art, is that there is an elitist group that defines what good art is and what isn't good art. Often their blessings go to other people in the elitist group regardless of talent or lack of it.
I've seen worse than those white canvases with a few brush strokes on them. Especially when it comes to installations; stacks of milk cartons, found items thrown in a trash pile, and the worst one I've seen, an old discarded mattress up against the wall covered with donuts. Art? I think not.
But if the art elitists say it's art, the sheep will follow and claim it's art.
In the late 50s or 60s a monkey did paintings and until they found out it was the artist's monkey, the adjectives just kept flying and they were considered master pieces.
And what about Pollock? I saw a documentary where a woman living in a mobile home was given a Pollock her friend bought in a thrift store because it was the ugliest painting she has ever seen.
The woman kept it, a friend suggested it might be a Pollock and it might be worth millions.
She took the painting to art dealers and critics all over the country, and they all agreed it was a cheap imitation because it didn't have Pollock's soulful inspiration in it. And these people included curators in some of the top museums in the land.
Well after some time, someone found Pollocks fingerprints on the back, had the paint analyzed and found it to be the same as the ones that were on the front and the lady was an instant millionaire and the most respected people of the art elite had to eat crow.
------
It's easy to measure technical ability. As mentioned Andrew Wyeth had great technical skill, and as far as I'm concerned did great art. Norman Rockwell had great technical skill and most artists consider him an illustrator.
But technical ability doesn't make art. True art has to have something that transcends mere technical prowess. I've heard plenty of very fast bebop, country, and pop players who seem like they are just playing scales, and others who take those rapid notes and make melodies out of them.
I've heard bands doing their original songs that duplicated tired old chord progressions with uninspiring words and performed with no emotion. And I've heard original 12 bar blues tunes, performed by technically adequate musicians, but with so much soul they blew me away.
So you can't equate art with technical prowess - although if you have the talent for the art, the more technical ability you have with your tools, the better you can convey your art to your audience.
So what I think is art may not be your definition and that's OK.
Saturday at home I listened to the Moscow Philharmonic do Shostakovitch's 4th symphony - the one he didn't release until Stalin died because he feared for his very life. It's a wonderful piece of art. On the way to an errand my iPod played Neil Diamond's "Brother Love's Traveling Salvation Show" and I'm listening to the musicians, background singers and Neil and it moves me, it's also a wonderful piece of art. A few tunes later Muddy Water's "You Can't Lose What You Never Had" came on and it moves me in a different way - and I think it's a wonderful piece of art. That night Leilani sang "Unchained Melody", her vocals raised the hair on the back of my neck and as I looked out a few couples stopped dancing to stand there and stare at her in amazement and I thought the way we covered that song, the backing track, my wind synth playing, and especially Leilani's vocals made a great work of art.
I've been a musician all my life, I've played in jazz bands where the likes of Ira Sullivan, Duffy Jackson and others came to sit in, I've played in cover bands at singles bars trying to do it exactly like the record, I've warmed up for headliners like The Four Seasons, The Association, and various Motown stars while their records were number one on billboard, and I've also played seedy dives where the only reason the band was there is so one table couldn't hear the drug deal going on at the next table.
I have no regrets, and even though I'm of retirement age, I have no plans to retire. As long as I can fog a mirror and there is someone who will want to hear me, I'll play music. If nobody wants to pay me anymore, I'll do it in public parks, at the VA hospital, for charity events and other non-commercial venues.
In the late 1980s I met a guy playing the piano bar on a cruise ship. Irving Bloom who got his start playing piano in silent movie houses. At one time he was president of the New York local of the AFofM. He was 82 years young at the time, and was curious about the synthesizers that the new keyboard players in bands were bringing on the ship. He said that if he was still in his 70s he'd buy one. Irving never lost his enthusiasm for music, was an artful player and a good entertainer as well. When I'm 82 I hope to be that alive.
Irving is now playing in the 'great gig in the sky' and while he was here he touched the emotions of countless people.
No matter what you play, if you move the audience, it's good music, whether other musicians think so or not.
I'm very glad I've been a professional musician most of my life. If I had pursued the electronics engineering that I took in college, I'd have a lot more money right now, but would I have had a happier life so far? I doubt it.
Insights and incites by Notes
Bob "Notes" Norton Norton Music https://www.nortonmusic.com
100% MIDI Super-Styles recorded by live, pro, studio musicians for a live groove & Fake Disks for MIDI and/or RealTracks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/17/14 05:50 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
furry
|
05/17/14 05:56 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
MarioD
|
05/17/14 07:03 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/17/14 07:42 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Matt Finley
|
05/17/14 08:30 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/19/14 02:50 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/17/14 08:52 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/17/14 11:04 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/18/14 11:29 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Guitarhacker
|
05/18/14 01:15 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/19/14 02:54 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Notes Norton
|
05/18/14 01:32 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/18/14 11:47 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
05/19/14 12:53 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/19/14 02:57 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JoanneCooper
|
05/18/14 01:32 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/19/14 12:23 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/19/14 01:32 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/19/14 03:24 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/19/14 07:50 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/19/14 08:26 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/19/14 10:18 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/20/14 12:42 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/19/14 02:48 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Al-David
|
05/23/14 04:12 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/18/14 01:53 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/19/14 02:53 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Don Gaynor
|
05/18/14 05:54 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/18/14 06:11 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Don Gaynor
|
05/18/14 07:04 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/19/14 07:23 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Don Gaynor
|
05/19/14 08:14 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
KeithS
|
05/18/14 07:34 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Guitarhacker
|
05/19/14 11:48 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JoanneCooper
|
05/19/14 04:48 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/19/14 05:58 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Notes Norton
|
05/19/14 12:33 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/19/14 01:35 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/19/14 12:48 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/19/14 12:52 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/19/14 04:58 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/19/14 04:40 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/19/14 05:09 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/19/14 05:09 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/19/14 05:25 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Guitarhacker
|
05/20/14 12:34 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/19/14 10:23 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Cornet Nev
|
05/20/14 12:41 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Notes Norton
|
05/20/14 01:48 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/20/14 04:06 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/20/14 04:14 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/20/14 04:58 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/20/14 02:32 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Kemmrich
|
05/20/14 02:43 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
raymb1
|
05/20/14 02:56 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/20/14 04:32 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/20/14 04:39 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
olemon
|
05/20/14 04:48 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/20/14 05:30 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/20/14 08:11 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Guitarhacker
|
05/20/14 08:13 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/20/14 08:46 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
rockstar_not
|
05/20/14 11:24 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
05/21/14 04:04 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/21/14 11:08 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/21/14 04:41 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/21/14 04:23 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Notes Norton
|
05/21/14 12:59 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
rockstar_not
|
05/21/14 01:42 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/21/14 02:07 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/21/14 04:57 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
rockstar_not
|
05/21/14 11:10 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Don Gaynor
|
05/21/14 11:56 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
RichMac
|
05/21/14 10:50 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Guitarhacker
|
05/22/14 12:43 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
MarioD
|
05/22/14 01:04 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/22/14 02:40 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Notes Norton
|
05/22/14 01:22 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/22/14 02:40 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/22/14 02:49 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/23/14 12:00 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/22/14 03:17 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/22/14 03:35 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/22/14 04:36 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/22/14 05:18 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/22/14 05:54 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Notes Norton
|
05/23/14 02:09 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/23/14 04:50 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/23/14 04:55 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Guitarhacker
|
05/22/14 03:19 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/22/14 03:42 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/22/14 03:48 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/22/14 03:51 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/22/14 04:00 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
floyd jane
|
05/22/14 04:20 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/23/14 12:07 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
rockstar_not
|
05/23/14 03:30 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/22/14 04:27 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Guitarhacker
|
05/22/14 05:55 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/22/14 07:21 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/23/14 12:02 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Don Gaynor
|
05/22/14 10:55 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/23/14 02:54 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Don Gaynor
|
05/23/14 04:09 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/23/14 04:45 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/23/14 06:32 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/24/14 04:05 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Al-David
|
05/24/14 05:07 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Matt Finley
|
05/24/14 04:23 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
rockstar_not
|
05/24/14 04:54 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/24/14 10:02 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
musiclover
|
05/24/14 12:31 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/24/14 05:42 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/24/14 06:17 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/24/14 06:22 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/24/14 09:07 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/25/14 01:26 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/25/14 10:43 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/24/14 06:12 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/24/14 02:03 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/24/14 06:20 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Notes Norton
|
05/24/14 02:06 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/24/14 03:51 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
rockstar_not
|
05/24/14 04:32 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
raymb1
|
05/24/14 06:54 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Notes Norton
|
05/25/14 02:44 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
MarioD
|
05/25/14 02:48 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/25/14 03:12 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Don Gaynor
|
05/25/14 06:31 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/25/14 02:56 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/25/14 06:18 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
musiclover
|
05/25/14 08:09 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
05/25/14 08:59 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/25/14 08:33 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/25/14 10:27 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Kajun Jeaux
|
05/26/14 05:15 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/26/14 10:45 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
musiclover
|
05/26/14 11:42 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
05/26/14 12:37 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/26/14 12:06 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
MarioD
|
05/26/14 01:25 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/26/14 01:51 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Guitarhacker
|
05/26/14 12:53 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/26/14 01:48 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Guitarhacker
|
05/26/14 01:07 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Joe V
|
05/26/14 01:13 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/26/14 01:38 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
05/26/14 02:01 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/26/14 05:06 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
05/26/14 08:27 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/26/14 09:16 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/26/14 02:32 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/26/14 02:41 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
DrDan
|
05/26/14 10:06 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/26/14 10:25 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
05/26/14 10:32 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/26/14 10:27 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/27/14 01:41 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Guitarhacker
|
05/27/14 12:25 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Notes Norton
|
05/27/14 02:16 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
raymb1
|
05/27/14 06:36 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
musiclover
|
05/27/14 09:12 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
05/28/14 02:10 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
MarioD
|
05/28/14 03:42 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
05/28/14 05:44 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
MarioD
|
05/28/14 07:35 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Guitarhacker
|
05/29/14 12:28 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/29/14 04:27 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
raymb1
|
05/28/14 04:09 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/28/14 04:27 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/27/14 03:06 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
05/27/14 03:21 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/28/14 02:27 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Notes Norton
|
05/28/14 03:01 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/28/14 04:05 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/28/14 03:58 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
05/28/14 04:24 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/29/14 04:24 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
MarioD
|
05/29/14 12:45 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
05/29/14 10:13 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/29/14 04:41 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Notes Norton
|
05/29/14 01:40 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/29/14 03:55 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Pat Marr
|
05/29/14 04:08 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Carl914
|
07/16/14 05:24 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
07/16/14 07:38 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
90 dB
|
07/16/14 06:22 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
07/16/14 10:10 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
JoanneCooper
|
07/17/14 05:04 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
07/17/14 07:11 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Guitarhacker
|
07/17/14 12:50 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Carl914
|
07/17/14 08:51 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
07/17/14 09:27 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
07/18/14 12:25 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Sundance
|
07/18/14 03:38 AM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Carl914
|
07/18/14 12:50 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
07/18/14 01:15 PM
|
Re: Performing for Nothing, your views?
|
Danny C.
|
07/18/14 01:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs Special Extended Until August 31st!
XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs Special Extended Until August 31st!
The XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs special offers are now available until August 31st at 11:59pm PDT!
Ready to take your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 experience to the next level? Now’s the perfect time! Expand your style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs—packed with a wide variety of genres to inspire your next musical creation.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-9 includes 900 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). With over 3,500 styles (and 35 MIDI styles) included in Xtra Styles PAKs 1-20, the possibilities are endless!
Get the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Windows or for Mac.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Get Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 19 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Listen to demos and order now! For Windows or for Mac.
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Don’t miss this chance to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box setup—at a great price!
Mac 2025 Special Upgrade Offers Extended Until August 15th!
It's not too late to upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® and save! We've extended our special until August 15, 2025!
We've added many major new features to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, including advanced AI tools like the amazing BB Stem Splitter and AI Lyrics Generator, as well as VST3 plugin support, and Equalize Temp. Plus, there’s a new one-stop MIDI Patches Picker with over 1,100 MIDI patches to choose from, all neatly categorized by GM numbers. The MultiPicker Library is enhanced with tabs for the SongPicker, MIDI Patch Picker, Chord Builder, AI Lyrics Generator, and Song Titles Browser, and the tabs are organized into logical groups. The Audiophile Edition is enhanced with FLAC files , which are 60% smaller than AIFF files while maintaining identical audio quality, and now ships on a fast 1TB SSD, and much more!
Check out all the new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® here:
Purchase your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac during our special to save up to 50% off your upgrade purchase and receive a FREE BONUS PAK of amazing new Add-ons. These include the 2025 RealCombos Booster PAK, Look Ma! More MIDI 13: Country & Americana, Instrumental Studies Set 22: 2-Hand Piano Soloing - Rhythm Changes, MIDI SuperTracks Set 44: Jazz Piano, Artist Performance Set 17: Songs with Vocals 7, Playable RealTracks Set 4, RealDrums Stems Set 7: Jazz with Mike Clark, and more!
Upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for just $49 and add 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and 20 RealStyles, FLAC Files for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks, Look Ma! More MIDI 14: SynthMaster, MIDI SuperTracks Set 45: More SynthMaster, Artist Performance Set 18: Songs with Vocals 8, and RealDrums Stems Set 8: Pop, Funk & More with Jerry Roe.
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs!
New RealTracks Released with Band-in-a-Box 2025!
We’ve expanded the Band-in-a-Box® RealTracks library with 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 449-467) across Jazz, Blues, Funk, World, Pop, Rock, Country, Americana, and Praise & Worship—featuring your most requested styles!
Jazz, Blues & World (Sets 449–455):
These RealTracks includes “Soul Jazz” with Neil Swainson (bass), Mike Clark (drums), Charles Treadway (organ), Miles Black (piano), and Brent Mason (guitar). Enjoy “Requested ’60s” jazz, classic acoustic blues with Colin Linden, and more of our popular 2-handed piano soloing. Plus, a RealTracks first—Tango with bandoneon, recorded in Argentina!
Rock & Pop (Sets 456–461):
This collection includes Disco, slap bass ‘70s/‘80s pop, modern and ‘80s metal with Andy Wood, and a unique “Songwriter Potpourri” featuring Chinese folk instruments, piano, banjo, and more. You’ll also find a muted electric guitar style (a RealTracks first!) and “Producer Layered Guitar” styles for slick "produced" sound.
Country, Americana & Praise (Sets 462–467):
We’ve added new RealTracks across bro country, Americana, praise & worship, vintage country, and songwriter piano. Highlights include Brent Mason (electric guitar), Eddie Bayers (drums), Doug Jernigan (pedal steel), John Jarvis (piano), Glen Duncan (banjo, mandolin & fiddle), Mike Harrison (electric bass) and more—offering everything from modern sounds to heartfelt Americana styles
Check out all the 202 New RealTracks (in sets 456-467)
And, if you are looking for more, the 2025 49-PAK (for $49) includes an additional 20 RealTracks with exciting new sounds and genre-spanning styles. Enjoy RealTracks firsts like Chinese instruments (guzheng & dizi), the bandoneon in an authentic Argentine tango trio, and the classic “tic-tac” baritone guitar for vintage country.
You’ll also get slick ’80s metal guitar from Andy Wood, modern metal with guitarist Nico Santora, bass player Nick Schendzielos, and drummer Aaron Stechauner, more praise & worship, indie-folk, modern/bro country with Brent Mason, and “Songwriter Americana” with Johnny Hiland.
Plus, enjoy user-requested styles like Soul Jazz RealDrums, fast Celtic Strathspey guitar, and Chill Hop piano & drums!
The 2025 49-PAK is loaded with other great new add-ons as well. Learn more about the 2025 49-PAK!
Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac!
With your version 2025 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Or upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2025 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 33 new RealTracks and 65+ new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 29 new RealTracks and 45+ new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 20 new RealStyles.
- Look Ma! More MIDI 13: Country & Americana
- Instrumental Studies Set 22: 2-Hand Piano Soloing - Rhythm Changes
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 44: Jazz Piano
- Artist Performance Set 17: Songs with Vocals 7
- Playable RealTracks Set 4
- RealDrums Stems Set 7: Jazz with Mike Clark
- SynthMaster Sounds and Styles (with audio demos)
- 128 GM MIDI Patch Audio Demos.
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyles,
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- Look Ma! More MIDI 14: SynthMaster,
- Instrumental Studies Set 23: More '80s Hard Rock Soloing,
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 45: More SynthMaster
- Artist Performance Set 18: Songs with Vocals 8
- RealDrums Stems Set 8: Pop, Funk & More with Jerry Roe
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®!
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Mac!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 20.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 20 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
New! XPro Styles PAK 9 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and higher for Mac!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 9 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 29 RealTracks/RealDrums!
We've been hard at it to bring you the latest and greatest in this 9th installment of our popular XPro Styles PAK series! Included are 75 styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres (25 styles each) that fans have come to expect, as well as 25 styles in this volume's wildcard genre: funk & R&B!
If you're itching to get a sneak peek at what's included in XPro Styles PAK 9, here is a small helping of what you can look forward to: Funky R&B Horns, Upbeat Celtic Rock, Jazz Fusion Salsa, Gentle Indie Folk, Cool '60s Soul, Funky '70s R&B, Smooth Jazz Hip Hop, Acoustic Rockabilly Swing, Funky Reggae Dub, Dreamy Retro Latin Jazz, Retro Soul-Rock Fusion, and much more!
Special Pricing! Until July 31, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 9 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Windows!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 20.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 20 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums58
Topics84,598
Posts781,468
Members39,696
|
Most Online25,754 Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|