|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,504
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,504 |
You can in fact bend a guitar string flat with a whammy bar, i.e. a vibrato bar. That is of course assuming you have a whammy bar on your guitar. Thank you for not calling it a tremolo - Leo Fender got a lot of things right, but got that name wrong. I use the whammy on my Parker to bend down, and since it floats, I can use it to bed up too, but if I want to bend anything but a chord up, I just bend strings. -------------------- As far as the record companies 'dumbing down' music, I say they are partially to blame. Record companies want the bulk of their catalog to be the musicians they can exploit the most - and that usually means inexperienced ones. They will have some artists that get big dollars because their records are 'automatics' and don't need a lot of promotion to be a hit. The rest of the recording universe is filled with one-hit-wonders (in the past) and one-CD-wonders (in the present). When Motown was courting us, we had experienced entertainment management and lawyers. When Motown made their final offer of .02 per record (they got publishing rights and half the songwriter credits for anything we wrote) --- the royalties were to pay for (1) the inflated cost of the recording session (2) inflated promotional costs and (3) inflated tour operating costs. Management did the numbers and figured we'd need to sell almost 2 million copies to break even, and in the late 60s there weren't half as many people on the planet as there are now, and 2 million was very uncommon on a first record. They hired their second choice band to cut the records. If we hit 3 million on the first record, we would have had a chance to be an 'automatic' and get a better deal on the next record. The record company made much its profit from the band paying back those high mark-up services. So by using mostly inexperienced people, they end up with simple music because the musicians may be talented, but haven't had the time to get more in their brains. Secondly the record companies decided that songs had too long of a shelf life in the 1960s and 1970s. They could make twice as much money if the song went from hot to passe twice as fast. So the music should not have the staying power of a "Hotel California", "Bohemian Rhapsody", or "Stairway To Heaven" anymore, but last 3 weeks on the charts and then be replaced with something new. Simple music does that. ------------ The general public likes what it is told to like in the media. Especially the younger ones who want to be 'in' with their peers. If the record companies wanted the public to like jazz, they could do it, but the production costs for jazz are higher, and the artists want more money, so the result is less profit for the corporation. So the public is trained to listen to the simplest of the simple music. And that's the problem with corporations. A small business only needs to make enough profit to pay the salaries of the employees and make some profit for the owners. Anything else is extra. Most corporations have up to 49% of the business owned by people who do not contribute anything physical to the corporation. All they have is money in stock, and they want that stock to be worth more and more every quarter. Now in order for the corporation to make more and more and more and more money every quarter, it has to sell more and more and more and more widgets. If they just stayed steady like a small business, the stock wouldn't grow and the stockholders would bail out. But nothing can grow forever, sooner or later it reaches saturation, the big record companies did what they could to keep making more and more and more profits, but many of the things they did to make more profit resulted in a decline of the quality of the music, and it only stalled the moment of saturation, (nothing can grow forever) and now they are on the decline. But that's all drifting away from the thread topic, which I said I would agree to disagree on. So I maintain this position, I feel if a singer cannot sing on pitch, he/she is not a singer. It is like a ball player that can't hit or catch a ball. Some of you feel that AT is only one more effect and you have the right to disagree with me. Notes
Bob "Notes" Norton  Norton Music
https://www.nortonmusic.com
100% MIDI Super-Styles recorded by live, pro, studio musicians for a live groove
& Fake Disks for MIDI and/or RealTracks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 16,136
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 16,136 |
I recently ran across the article that Josie posted but was not aware of this thread until it was pointed out to me today by a friend. BIAB has opened new vistas for Janice and me re musical genres. For many years we played in a bluegrass band where band members would fuss even about a little reverb.
Know how many bluegrass musicians it takes to change a light bulb? Five....one to change the bulb and four to complain about it being electric.
So this whole auto tune thing is relatively new to me (I never listened to Cher). This morning in a restaurant I heard a pop diva sustain a high note perfectly for a ridiculously long time and started thinking about vocal manipulation in the studio and that lead me to this thread.
I played upright bass for many years and perhaps folks thought I needed auto tune or a similar effect. I've recorded Janice off and on for 25 years and have never thought about it....perhaps folks listen to our stuff and wonder why the hell I don't use it. Dunno. I love Ozone 6 and Nectar 2 and BIAB and Logic Pro X and digital recordings and my mobile devices, i.e., I have nothing against high technology when it comes to things musical. I do find it interesting that folks get so exercised over this issue. Short of being out in public in a eatery or grocery store I NEVER listen to music that I don't like. Taylor Swift seems to be a very bright young lady with a ton of business acumen but I could care less about her music or how it is created. I guess it's because for our 34 years together Janice and I have tended to listen to what is now called Americana -- and it tends to be a tad rough around the edges.
To paraphrase Gregg Allman it doesn't matter what the genre is...if it has soul it's good. And from my perspective soulful singing has a lot of moving notes. Some times I feel that "follow the bouncing ball" singers think that a "bent note" singer is "pitchy." Again, just dunno. Like Jerry Garcia once said to David Grisman...."they are all just notes."
Pardon the acknowledged ramble. Just thinking out loud via the keyboard. :-)
Our albums and singles are on Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, YouTube Music, Pandora and more. If interested search on Janice Merritt. Thanks! Our Videos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,606
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,606 |
My thoughts on AT;
Use it when it fits
Don't avoid using it, but if you do use, use it intentionally
I've used it for various reasons on tracks, some recorded by singers with very good pitch. One use is for a 'doubled' track. Tune one a bit and not the other ..
On the flip side;
Imagine if Dylan had used it .. or Robert Smith .. it would have wrecked the recording.
It's a tool. You don't need every tool for a given job, but if you do need it feel free to use it.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,109
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,109 |
this whole auto tune thing is relatively new to me ...<snip> I've recorded Janice off and on for 25 years and have never thought about it....perhaps folks listen to our stuff and wonder why the hell I don't use it.
well... I'm thinking you never thought about using autotune with Janice because... SHE DOESN'T NEED IT!! You already knew that, but if I hadn't said it, my head would have exploded. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,724
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,724 |
Josie,
I know this response strays a bit from the topic or at least the intent of the topic, but it has 100% to do with perfect pitch.
Not sure if you have heard Image and Family on the online site at which I perform from time to time, but the son, Robert has perfect pitch. Robert is also Autistic, but learned all of his major and minor chords on his keyboard in less than one hour.
But what really blows me away is when his dad kicks off a tune and Robert, after hearing just one note of the intro turns around and says "wrong key".
Bottom-line is that it never ceases to amaze me when I hear someone define a note just by hearing it.
Later,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,689
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,689 |
Maybe it's my ears that are a bit off, but I don't think Johnny Cash worried too much about perfect pitch.
Don S.
Hey, Happy New Year to One and All!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,499
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,499 |
Yea I don't watch Tommy's Youtubes anymore, too depressing  . I was never that fast/accurate in my prime. Even in my own mind I was never THAT good, and you know we all THINK, or at least thought at one point in time, that we are guitar [trumpet, drum, bass, sax,..] Gods in our own minds (to deny that truth is to lie to yourself). OK, see, now I'm depressed again! I think I'll go to shooting range and turn some gun powder into smoke. Larry
Win10Pro,i9,64GB,2TBSSD+20TBHDDs,1080TI,BIAB'24,Scarlett18i8,Montage7,Fusion 8HD,QS8,Integra7,XV5080,QSR,SC-8850,SPLAT,FL21&others,Komp.14,IK suite&others, just a guitar player-AXE FX III &FM9T, FishmanTP, MIDIGuitar2, GK2/3'sw/GI20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,204
Posts801,930
Members40,067
| |
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean