|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,868
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,868 |
Herb,
Sounds like you may need to run the Audio/MIDI latency adjust once in RB on that machne ..
I don't use the lappy now for music. When I did, and if I used my Focusrite interface, there was no latency issues. It was only when I used the MME driver that I had issues.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,201
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,201 |
I use a Beheringer UCA202 on my computer, and I'm pretty happy with it. I've had to fiddle with it to get things to work in Reaper when working with real-time monitoring, but for playback it works just fine.
I've also got one hooked up to a little netbook that I user to run my EWI from. The UCA202 seems to play well with older hardware.
I've also used it with an old laptop to interface to my HD-1. I'd tried interfacing it to a number of devices (such as the M-Track Plus) to run the MIDI to USB and realtime audio, but nothing would work - I kept getting nasty audio glitches from the buffers.
I finally got it to work by using the M-Track for the MIDI, but the UCA202 for the audio out. Worked like a charm.
-- David Cuny My virtual singer development blogVocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?BiaB 2025 | Windows 11 | Reaper | Way too many VSTis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,827
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,827 |
Low Cost 99c 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,868
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,868 |
I still say you get what you pay for.
Size alone says you're getting more for the cost with the full sized interfaces vs the subcompacts..... and the small gizmo's don't have external controls, meters, or phantom power with low Z inputs among the other options on the full sized ones.
You should not have to use 2 interfaces or sound cards to record and playback properly. One card/interface should do the job. Problems with timing sync can and do occur with 2 cards. That's a whole other direction for a discussion. The goal is to have one interface doing the job properly.
Referring to the subcompact cards......However, give it a try.... the worst that could happen is that it doesn't work as you would need it to, and you return it for a refund.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,867
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,867 |
I still say you get what you pay for.
Size alone says you're getting more for the cost with the full sized interfaces vs the subcompacts..... and the small gizmo's don't have external controls, meters, or phantom power with low Z inputs among the other options on the full sized ones.
You should not have to use 2 interfaces or sound cards to record and playback properly. One card/interface should do the job. Problems with timing sync can and do occur with 2 cards. That's a whole other direction for a discussion. The goal is to have one interface doing the job properly.
Referring to the subcompact cards......However, give it a try.... the worst that could happen is that it doesn't work as you would need it to, and you return it for a refund. Herb's right. At a minimum, I think it's best to get to get the best signal path you can afford. There is enough audible difference between the lowest cost unit to the units near the $100 cost to spring for the higher priced unit. Low cost USB mixers such as the Behringer Xenyx Q802USB model is the point in these lower cost USB mixers that begin to offer external features that are valuable to the home studio musician. Built in EQ, and compression don't require any CPU power and have zero latency. Aux send provides the ability to add additional external hardware effects without using any CPU power. There are enough line in's that multiple devices such as a keyboard or Voicelive can be attached and quickly rerouted. In my opinion, these mixers will generate about the same white noise level as the low cost interfaces such as m-audio, Presonus and Focusrite. Even if the unit is is limited to 44.1/16 digital conversion, the quality of the preamp's and associated circuitry will yield a better digital signal due to the higher quality audio signal.
BIAB 2026:RB 2026, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
|
eddie1261
Unregistered
|
|
eddie1261
Unregistered
|
Still comes back to one semantic concept though guys. Every post here includes the the "interface". When we define "interface". we say "a piece of hardware that creates a connection between one function and another".
The original post was about how to render. The rendering process all takes place inside the computer. It happens in the RAM, where programs execute, and outputs to the hard drive for storage. Nowhere in that sentence is there any access to the sound amplification and output functions of this signal chain. You should be able to render with NO soundcard or interface once you have input your chord chart and picked your style. Remember, when you generate a real track, you don't hear it while it is being generated. Only after. Thus the generation of the track is not at all reliant on sound hardware to make the sound of the track come out of the speakers for your review.
All that said, I will ALWAYS advise, having been a nerd for so long, to get the best quality you can afford. I understand budgets. I am retired too. I have a fixed income too. But.... when I want something that is going to make my sound quality better, I will cut a corner and find the money to spend $100 or so for good sound. That's $3.33 a day. What is $3.33 these days? One beer? A fast food meal? A gallon and a half of gas?
I still have not really heard an accurate account of the issue that started this conversation. I remember rharv commenting about using BIAB 2006 but I came into the mix in 2009, so that is lost on me.
Last edited by eddie1261; 09/21/15 05:58 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,827
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,827 |
Yes , all said and done it should work fine with the current AC97. I could try BB2006 in XP under VitualBox as it has AC97 option but I'm sure it would work fine with the current card else you go buy a knew card and have the same problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,827
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,827 |
Just remembered I had an old laptop with XP, tried BB2006 on it,
soloed the track with Ctrl+click
Audio menu > Render Midi to Stereo wav > DXI Direct Render (save to WAV file)
and it rendered fine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,382
PG Music Staff
|
|
PG Music Staff
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,382 |
We should be able to get rendering to work without needing to buy additional hardware.  If the original poster gives our tech support line a call between 10AM and 5PM Pacific Standard time, we'll be happy to help. 1-866-983-2474 We'll go over all the settings, but I'm guessing the Roland VSC just isn't enabled. Thanks Kent PG Music
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,827
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,827 |
Hey Kent, you guys should use Teamviewer, I use to spend hours on the phone helping others until I used Teamviewer !
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,868
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,868 |
The original post was about how to render. The rendering process all takes place inside the computer. It happens in the RAM, where programs execute, and outputs to the hard drive for storage. The interface is MORE than just a door or gateway into the computer. A good interface will make a world of difference and a crappy one will be a huge stumbling block to the fastest computer. If all the interface did was pass date through to the computer after converting the audio to digital, any interface would work as well as the next one. But that is not the case. The interface/soundcard actually does a huge amount of processing before the digital data goes elsewhere in the computer.... such as to the DAW software. The same thing applies to out-going data. Why else would you spend $300 or more on an interface when $30 should theoretically, get the same exact results? It's because the processing that goes on in that more expensive unit is worth the cost. As a test.... unplug and remove ALL of your sound cards or for (MOBO) built in cards, go into the hardware manager and disable the built in sound card..... then attempt to render a track. See what happens. When you're finished trying, or if you succeed.... Reboot the computer or go back to hardware manager and enable the sound card afterward. If you can render a track in this manner, I will stand corrected, but I do not think it will work without a sound card being present and active in the computer.
Last edited by Guitarhacker; 09/22/15 01:46 AM.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
|
eddie1261
Unregistered
|
|
eddie1261
Unregistered
|
The interface is MORE than just a door or gateway into the computer. A good interface will make a world of difference and a crappy one will be a huge stumbling block to the fastest computer. If all the interface did was pass date through to the computer after converting the audio to digital, any interface would work as well as the next one. But that is not the case. The interface/soundcard actually does a huge amount of processing before the digital data goes elsewhere in the computer.... such as to the DAW software. The same thing applies to out-going data. True in every way Herb, but it is NOT critical to rendering, and that is his concern. Rendering is just math and bytes, not actual sound. After it is rendered, then it becomes sound. You literally can render with NO sound hardware. You just can't listen to what you rendered. A blind guy can paint. He just can't see his work. A deaf computer can render. It just can't "hear". (Though it worked out okay for Beethoven...)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 2
Newbie
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 2 |
Focusrite 212/214 are pretty wicked interfaces...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,572
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,572 |
One other thing about the OP's request. He has a HP Pavilion PC. From past bad experience, I found out it's a very bad idea to try to expand one of these. The power supply is the bare minimum to run the PC they provide. There were also no places in mine to add an additional hard drive, no additional unused power cables, this kind of thing. An external sound card by USB is a good solution.
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,216
Posts802,016
Members40,070
| |
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean