|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 138
Apprentice
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 138 |
I use BIAB to make jazz numbers, using the (wonderful) jazz bass & piano Real Tracks and Real Drums. (I don't use midi at all).
I make the BIAB SGU files on a good recent Dell Latitude; render the SGUs to WAV files (with the maximum allowable +30db volume increase), then convert the WAV files to MP3's at 192bps.
The quality of the resulting MP3 tracks is pretty good. My first question is: is there anything I can do to make the quality even better ?
My second question is: I spend a lot of time mixing - ie getting the volume balance between the three instruments right. Is there any benefit in doing that in Real Band, rather than BIAB ? Are there any other clever tricks for mixing I should know about ?
Many Thanks for your help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,840
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,840 |
Since you are using RealTracks and RealDrums, you didn't indicate whether you used the audiophile versions (true WAV files) or the standard version (WMA files, which can be converted to WAV, but are still lossy audio from the original audiophile WAV's).
If using the WMA files, then by creating MP3's, you are re-compressing the files and losing additional fidelity from files that had already lost some fidelity when they were originally converted to WMA. So my recommendation would be to use either the WAV files themselves (which is the best you'll get), or convert to higher rate (256 or 320). While 192 makes pretty good MP3's, there is still an audible difference between that and the higher rates (do a side-by-side comparison and you'll hear it). Of course, your audience may never know or care.
Secondly, I find it easier to mix the balance using RealBand rather than in BIAB. You have a lot more control and can use additional effects on a track-by-track basis, as well as the overall mix.
John Laptop-HP Omen I7 Win11Pro 32GB 12TB SSD Desktop-ASUS-I7 Win10Pro 32GB 12TB SATA BB2026/UMC204HD&404HD/Casios/Cakewalk/Reaper/Studio One/Notion/Dorico/Noteworthy/NI/Halion/IK http://www.sus4chord.com (under rehosting/construction)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,616
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,616 |
+1 Each time you run a conversion you will lose quality. The tracks are shipped compressed to 160bps in a WMA format. Theoretically, you'll never get better quality than 160. If you have the space, convert your song to WAV and leave it there. Converting WMA to WAV to MP3, according to some audiophiles, is a big No-No. This is known as transcoding and some strange sounds can result. The one I've heard most is a a 'swirling, swishing' sound, especially with the cymbals. This will be less noticeable in performance than if making a CD. But as John said... Quote:
Of course, your audience may never know or care.
Also +1 on RealBand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 812
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 812 |
Hi,
I do have some experience in this area and I'd like to pass on some info that may help you>
1. Before worrying about sampling rates, etc, it is far more important to worry about the encoder used for the conversion. A good and free way to go is to download Audacity. Also download the LAME encoder!!! This is very important. Make sure that encoder is installed in the Audacity folder in your Program files. When you export your WAV files in Audacity, LAME will be used automatically.
2. Bit and Sample rate are important, as well as choosing variable bit rate (VBR) You can do an experiment yourself, try converting to MP3 and make 2 files, 1 with VBR, the other without. Next, choose at least 160 for the first file, and 256 for the second. You will hear a big difference! Also you should notice that the 256 VBR file has much smoother and realistic dynamics.
I use BIAB everyday in making new tracks for my iPod, as I play many gigs with this setup. I am always on the lookout for a better way to do the above procedure. Maybe other posters have some great tips I don't know about, but this should get you pointed in the right direction.
Ed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,199
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,199 |
Andy,
In answer to your second question, I think you should move the file to Real Band, and do your mixing there. In addition to the mixing, you can also add effects on a per track basis, as well as effects to the overall sound
Also, the panning and sound staging is a little easier in Real Band.
I would recommend using BIAB as the starting point, and finishing up in Real Band.
Gary
I'm blessed watching God do what He does best. I've had a few rough years, and I'm still not back to where I want to be, but I'm on the way and things are looking far better now than what they were!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,900
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,900 |
Endorsed - both Gay and Edward.
Sound advice
Follow That Dream Sam Karaoke King -------------------- Turning that corner again - I have to keep following that dream, no matter what
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 138
Apprentice
|
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 138 |
John, Rachael, Gary, Ed and Sam -
Many thanks indeed for your time and wise advice.
- It sounds like the best bet is to use the WMA RT files, as downloaded, and to look at the encoding.
- I use iTunes-8 to convert the WAV files to MP3s. I've tended to assume that's a decent converter ? What do you think ?
- I've now tried increasing the bit rate from 192 to 256 and 320, with and without VBR (in iTunes), but I can't really hear the difference. I'm listening through a decent Hi Fi set-up (NAD plus B&W speakers) - but i can't even hear the difference between the 192kbps MP3's and the original WAV files !! Maybe I'm just not listening for the right things....?
(- I've yet to get to grips with RB... That's the next project....)
Thanks again for your generous help. Best - Andy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,616
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,616 |
I don't use iTunes but what I read is that the MP3 encoder is not any good. The blogs say the reason is that Apple wants you to use (for obvious reasons) their AAC format and not MP3. My opinion is that the best MP3 encoder out there is the LAME. It's free, open-source, and is available at http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showforum=55Best thing is to make your WAV file in BIAB and leave it as such. If space is a limitation, investigate lossless formats such as FLAC, WMA lossless, etc. which will compress the WAV by roughly half keeping all of the audio fidelity. Nothing is lost. You will have the best possible sound given that your original RT was WMA 160. If you must convert, there are plenty of conversion front-end GUIs are out there. Avoid using the BIAB built-in MP3 conversion as you are restricted to what codecs you have installed in Windows. As I mentioned in my earlier post, you won't get any better quality than the original 160 WMA files no matter what you convert them to. You should try to minimize your conversions to avoid the transcoding issues. Rachael
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 138
Apprentice
|
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 138 |
Thanks again Rachael,
I'm now comparing the rendered WAV files with files made with different MP3 compression settings in ITunes 8. I'm still finding it hard to hear any difference from 192kbps upwards tho....
Best - Andy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,900
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,900 |
Follow That Dream Sam Karaoke King -------------------- Turning that corner again - I have to keep following that dream, no matter what
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 21
Enthusiast
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 21 |
I wasn't aware of the audiophile difference or I may have gone that route. No one's fault but mine. However, the sound of the tracks I now have are mighty good, I can't say that I percieve any lack of quality. I think WMAs are pretty lossless anyway, aren't they? If they is any difference it will not stop me from making cd's and demos. If I get a big record deal I will buy the audiophiles and redo them. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
That is my thinking on the subject, also, gmanbat.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,217
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,217 |
.
>>>...The quality of the resulting MP3 tracks is pretty good. My first question is: is there anything I can do to make the quality even better ?...>>>
At the risk of flogging the obvious, I recommend playing back through the best speakers you can get. I use and recommend Logitech 3-piece computer speakers. I have them in every room in the house and i use them for gigs. Many pros of my acquiantance also use them for gigs.
They are no good for monitoring mixes though...they process the sound too much.
>>>...Are there any other clever tricks for mixing I should know about ?...>>>
Studio monitors do not have to be expensive. I use Radio Shack Miniumus-7 powered by a very good but old Kenwood stereo amp from a flea market. The Kenwood has lots of tone-shaping capability. The key is that it can be set to FLAT when I need it to be flat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
PowerTracks Pro 2026 for Windows is Here!
PowerTracks 2026 is here—bringing powerful new enhancements designed to make your production workflow faster, smoother, and more intuitive than ever.
The enhanced Mixer now shows Track Type and Instrument icons for instant track recognition, while a new grid option simplifies editing views. Non-floating windows adopt a modern title bar style, replacing the legacy blue bar.
The Master Volume is now applied at the end of the audio chain for consistent levels and full-signal master effects.
Tablature now includes a “Save bends when saving XML” option for improved compatibility with PG Music tools. Plus, you can instantly match all track heights with a simple Ctrl-release after resizing, and Add2 chords from MGU/SGU files are now fully supported... and more!
Get started today—first-time packages start at just $49.
Already using PowerTracks Pro Audio? Upgrade for as little as $29 and enjoy the latest improvements!
Order now!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows Special Offers End Tomorrow (January 15th, 2026) at 11:59 PM PST!
Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PST on Thursday, January 15, 2026!
We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.
Another exciting new addition is the new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. You can view the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to process an entire track or focus on specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Windows to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!
Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.
If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® Special Offers Extended Until January 15, 2026!
Good news! You still have time to upgrade to the latest version of Band-in-a-Box® for Windows® and save. Our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® special now runs through January 15, 2025!
We've packed Band-in-a-Box® 2026 with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can process an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PST on January 15th, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® today! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
Happy New Year!
Thank you for being part of the Band-in-a-Box® community.
Wishing you and yours a very happy 2026—Happy New Year from all of us at PG Music!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,103
Posts800,263
Members40,036
| |
Most Online44,367
Mar 4th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean