Originally Posted By: PeterGannon

Adding these 6/8 styles isn't some "simulation" as you've called it. It is intentional because this brings these styles into the world of 4/4 where they belong. 6/8 is just a thing for notation, it is not something that people count 1-2-3-4-5-6 as they play.

Well, yes, I absolutely agree with this comment if the PG Music product was only used for listening. But PG Music has developed the product to be far more than that, it is both sophisticated and complex and includes notation and graphics that visually represent what the user is both playing and listening to.

And if the user hears 1-2-3-4-5-6 like you state, then the user should visually see 1-2-3-4-5-6, or have I missed something here?

I apologize in advance if I've misunderstood the connection between listening to 6 eighth-note beats and seeing notation that only adds up to 4 quarter notes.

When I work with a live band, I Never count a 6/8 song in as 4/4 time (emphasis supplied). Audible and Visual should co-relate, surely. Others mileage may vary, but unfortunately mine doesn't. I'm not trying to be confrontational, just stating my opinion based on my extensive music theory learnings.

The chart should accurately reflect what the users hears as well as what the user reads, otherwise, why has written music ever bothered to have such as thing as 6/8 notation - when it apparently really belongs in a 4/4 world?


BIAB & RB2025 Win.(Audiophile), Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors, AKG K271 Studio H'phones