|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Beginners Forum
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 18
Enthusiast
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 18 |
Hello all -
First post for this newbie. I liken working with computers and software to learning to drive an 18-wheel rig: it's cumbersome, it's slow, I'm lumbering, there's a lot of gears to navigate, a lot of mistakes, etc. etc.
So I'm muddling thru Windows BIAB 2016 w/ 2017 upgraded RTs.
I created a song on my laptop (Windows 10), converted it to .mp3 and e-mailed it to my PC (Windows 7) to play on iTunes, but it sounds faint and dull on the PC.
The mp3 version sounds great on the laptop, tho the file is identified as .WAV and not mp3 as I had specified at file conversion. What gives?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginners Forum
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,292
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,292 |
MP3s compress the data. In other words you will lose data when you use MP3. The more compression you use the more data you lose. This is called lossy compression. If you chose 128 kbps then you will lose a lot of data. Lower than 128 kbps MP3s are really terrible. To get wav type quality you should use 320 kbps MP3s, although 192 kbps and up also sound OK with some genres of music.
Wavs do not compress data so that is why they sound so good. There are other music file compression programs that do not lose data. Programs like Flac and Ape are two such programs. They are called lossless programs. If you have a player that can use either of these that would be the optimum way to go IMO. Otherwise use MP3s that are 192 kbps or higher.
Note that sometimes when sending others 128 kbps MP3s I have had to have a song set for wav and another version of the song mixed for MP3. However if you use the 192 kbps or higher you should not have to do this. YMMV
PS - I use the free Audacity program for converting wavs to MP3s.
{edit} - I forgot to say welcome to the most friendliest site on the web!
Last edited by MarioD; 01/31/17 05:49 AM.
Principal: Your child always causes trouble in school.
Me: My child causes trouble at home, do I ever call you?
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginners Forum
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,806
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,806 |
If you render your MP3s at 256 or 320, I find almost imperceptible differences in the sound. When I rip my music, I generally rip it twice. Once at 128 for my iPod Classic that gets used in the car (where there is lots of noise anyway, and that allows for a lot of songs) and again at 320 for playback on my home audio system (a much better listening environment).
And just to clarify, Mario, is talking about lossy data compression (ripping to different audio formats, such as MP3 or WMA), not audio compression (such as running a VSTi compressor). Two completely different things.
John Laptop-HP Omen I7 Win11Pro 32GB 12TB SSD Desktop-ASUS-I7 Win10Pro 32GB 12TB SATA BB2026/UMC204HD&404HD/Casios/Cakewalk/Reaper/Studio One/Notion/Dorico/Noteworthy/NI/Halion/IK http://www.sus4chord.com (under rehosting/construction)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginners Forum
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 18
Enthusiast
|
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 18 |
Thanks for the quick response, guys, but back up the truck a second...
Where am I specifying a kbps?
I hit the WAV icon, giving me "Export Song as Audio," then I click "Export as MP3," then Save (to my desktop). I attach it to an email & send to the PC to open in iTunes: dullness ensues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginners Forum
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,806
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,806 |
If you haven't installed updated codecs on your computer, you may very well be getting 56kbps encoding by default.
I generally don't do it directly from BIAB; I usually just export to WAV and from there convert to MP3 using a dedicated program, where I can choose my codec (usually LAME) and bit rate settings.
John Laptop-HP Omen I7 Win11Pro 32GB 12TB SSD Desktop-ASUS-I7 Win10Pro 32GB 12TB SATA BB2026/UMC204HD&404HD/Casios/Cakewalk/Reaper/Studio One/Notion/Dorico/Noteworthy/NI/Halion/IK http://www.sus4chord.com (under rehosting/construction)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginners Forum
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,292
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,292 |
Thanx John for clarifying. I wasn't even thinking about audio compression when I wrote that message! My bad! I should have specified the difference but I'm glad that you did.
Principal: Your child always causes trouble in school.
Me: My child causes trouble at home, do I ever call you?
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginners Forum
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,292
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,292 |
I use Audacity for all of my conversions. You can download Audacity here: http://www.audacityteam.org/download/windows/Then scroll down and download LAME MP3 encoder from the same page. If you look at Audacity you will see that you can do a lot more than conversions with it. When converting a wav to a MP3 you can choose from many data compressions. Click on File/Export Audio and scroll down to MP3 files in Save as type. Then click on Options and pick your kbps in the scroll down arrow in the Quality window: see attached image. 
Principal: Your child always causes trouble in school.
Me: My child causes trouble at home, do I ever call you?
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginners Forum
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,462
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,462 |
FWIW, as far as I know, mp3 format has a 16kHz top end cutoff regardless of the bitrate, so you lose something in the top end no matter what. Regardless of codec or software used.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginners Forum
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,974
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,974 |
FWIW, as far as I know, mp3 format has a 16kHz top end cutoff regardless of the bitrate, so you lose something in the top end no matter what. Regardless of codec or software used. I had not heard that but it makes sense. A search came up with an article that states MP3 top end frequency cut off is related to the sampling conversion. The chart below is copied from ++ THIS ++ link. bit rate > cut-off frequency > compression 1411kbps > 20kHz > 1:1 320kbps > 19.5kHz > 1:4.4 192kbps > 18kHz > 1:7.3 160kbps > 17kHz > 1:8.8 128kbps > 16kHz > 1:11 96kbps > 15kHz > 1:14.7 64kbps > 11kHz > 1:22 32kbps > 5kHz > 1:44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginners Forum
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,451
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,451 |
Check out Nyquist rate for a further explanation.
BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Slate VSX, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginners Forum
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,974
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,974 |
Check out Nyquist rate for a further explanation. Yeah Matt, I'm very familiar with Nyquist as it applies to a wave file but never thought that it applied to lossy MP3 formats. Don't know if I didn't think it through or just had blinders on. Of course sometimes even I wonder about how much I don't think things through. For instance, do you also know that the only data recorded in a sample is waveform gain? I was dumbfounded when I found that out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginners Forum
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,451
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,451 |
Unless I'm mistaken, the Nyquist rate will tell you the highest frequency that can be produced by a specific sample rate, so that would explain why the highs disappear in successively lower MP3 encoding rates.
BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Slate VSX, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginners Forum
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,753
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,753 |
BTW, the trick to getting the free LAME mp3 codec into Audacity's access is you have to go to Edit | Preference and then Library. From there it will install it sort of automagically for you. It will take you to a link at the Audacity website. In that link you will choose LAME or something like that.
Then when you want to convert a .wav to mp3.
In Audacity...
File
Open | navigate to your .wav file. It will import it for you.
File
Export Audio
At the bottom of the Export dialog you can change the compression rate.
Last edited by Tobias; 01/31/17 08:54 PM.
Does the noise in your head bother me ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginners Forum
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,727
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,727 |
I created a song on my laptop (Windows 10), converted it to .mp3 and e-mailed it to my PC (Windows 7) to play on iTunes, but it sounds faint and dull on the PC.
The mp3 version sounds great on the laptop, tho the file is identified as .WAV and not mp3 as I had specified at file conversion. What gives?
So... what every said above is correct... every time you covert a WAVE file to MP3 you are losing 80% or more of the original data depending on the bit rate of the MP3. I always convert to 320kbs MP3 files unless there is a really good reason not to use 320kbs. But... lets back up a bit. When you finished the song and exported the wave, did you do anything else to that wave at that point or did you proceed directly to the MP3 converter? The reason I ask is because many folks at that point will process the wave file with what is called "mastering software" to add some sparkle and thump to the music. I prefer to call it polishing or sweetening the song because "mastering" is something totally different but I am OK calling it "small "m" mastering" as well. It's simply the process of adding compression, reverb, and EQ tweeks to the finished song to make it sound a bit better and more cohesive. Essentially, when you listen to the Wave or the MP3, there should really be very little sonic difference between the 2 files. Most people would not be able to tell you which one was which. Especially at the higher MP3 bit rates. You also should understand that the different music players software will affect the sound quality more than the Wave to MP3 conversion. I would check that MP3 on several different players to see if that is the problem. Barring that, go back to the original Wave and do some of the polishing and sweetening I mentioned. One other thing to check on. Be sure that the exported WAVE is normalized to just under 100%. I like to shoot for 96% on the highest peak. Run some compression first to bring the entire wave into a relatively consistent looking form. You want the finished wave to look like this.  In this photo.... the compression rate is consistent but not as high as it could be because there's quite a few spikes and "airspace" above the main body of the energy. The song is on my website and sounds good. By cranking up the compression a bit more, the song would have gained more "apparent volume" but lost some of it's dynamic range... the difference between the loudest and softest parts of the music. Once you get the compression right, and it might take a few tries if you're not worked with this before, you can then use the normalize function. Normalize brings the highest peak to a designated level that you set relative to 0dB. You don't want to go above 0dB. As a footnote to the compression thing.... in the picture above, if I had cranked the compression up to max, that section toward the end that is obviously lower in volume would have been indistinguishable from the rest. To much compression is not a good thing. All of that is important because you mentioned a "faint and dull sounding MP3"..... again, that should not happen if your levels are all correct before you convert to MP3, and you have done some proper sweetening. I hope this helps you find the reasons for the weak and dull sound you ended up with in the MP3.
Last edited by Guitarhacker; 02/01/17 04:24 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginners Forum
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 260
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 260 |
Herb, do you use WavePad for your 'mastering software'?
Andy
BIAB 2017 Ultra
Windows 8 and 10
Scarlet 18i8
Reaper and Mixpad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginners Forum
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,462
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,462 |
Even simpler; use PGRTA plugin (or any other frequency analyzer) and look the frequency range of the mp3. See how much it differs from the same wav file.
The better the analyzer the more you'll notice.
I'm sure quite a bit of real-life results depend on the actual codec/rate being used for the conversion.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginners Forum
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,591
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,591 |
Hello all -
First post for this newbie. I liken working with computers and software to learning to drive an 18-wheel rig: it's cumbersome, it's slow, I'm lumbering, there's a lot of gears to navigate, a lot of mistakes, etc. etc.
So I'm muddling thru Windows BIAB 2016 w/ 2017 upgraded RTs.
I created a song on my laptop (Windows 10), converted it to .mp3 and e-mailed it to my PC (Windows 7) to play on iTunes, but it sounds faint and dull on the PC.
The mp3 version sounds great on the laptop, tho the file is identified as .WAV and not mp3 as I had specified at file conversion. What gives?
Thanks. I think it always will. I'm no expert, but my understanding of history is that Apple wanted to load as many songs on to the 32Mb memory of the iPod as it could. Bear in mind, this was the dark ages of memory. Mine has 4Gb now. OK, so this guy comes along, takes an MP2 (stereo) and adds a third track. That third track went along and eliminated everything it could. If there was a pause or a silence, the third track would simply tell the audio file when to cut and when to resume. We're talking high tech nano second stuff, here. Basically, a midi on steroids. The MP3 are made to be played on portable players. What you are hearing is compression quality. Your machine is probably just fine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginners Forum
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,727
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,727 |
Herb, do you use WavePad for your 'mastering software'? Yes. It's a good program and I use it to listen to and work on my exported waves. In Wavepad I trim the start and the end, and I also run the normalize function on the wave. After I have done those chores, I convert it to mp3 in Wavepad. Wavepad seems to have a player that sounds extremely close to my DAW, which is always a good thing. In other words, it doesn't sound to me like it's adding any color to the sound. AND.... I can't tell any sonic difference in Wavepad between the final Wave and the mp3 that came from it.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginners Forum
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,806
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,806 |
I do the same as Herb, but I use Diamond Cut DC8 to do the same thing. I use it to cut off the front and tail. I use it to normalize the wave, as well as apply any mastering effects. DC8 has a lot of filters and effects, mainly designed for cleaning up records and tapes that have been digitized, but works just as well on audio files I create. And DC8 lets me rip to MP3 (or use a host of other CODECS). We're going to start beta testing DC10 pretty soon, so I'm looking forward to that (I help beta test). They also have a very friendly forum (like here) where you get to interact directly with Craig and Rick (the founders of Diamond Cut).
John Laptop-HP Omen I7 Win11Pro 32GB 12TB SSD Desktop-ASUS-I7 Win10Pro 32GB 12TB SATA BB2026/UMC204HD&404HD/Casios/Cakewalk/Reaper/Studio One/Notion/Dorico/Noteworthy/NI/Halion/IK http://www.sus4chord.com (under rehosting/construction)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginners Forum
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,451
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,451 |
My method is similar to John's. I use Adobe Audition 1.5, which is the old Cool Edit Pro converted to Adobe and patched once before Adobe mucked it up. [I also have Adobe Audition 3 so I know].
BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Slate VSX, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows Special Offers End Tomorrow (January 15th, 2026) at 11:59 PM PST!
Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PST on Thursday, January 15, 2026!
We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.
Another exciting new addition is the new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. You can view the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to process an entire track or focus on specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Windows to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!
Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.
If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® Special Offers Extended Until January 15, 2026!
Good news! You still have time to upgrade to the latest version of Band-in-a-Box® for Windows® and save. Our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® special now runs through January 15, 2025!
We've packed Band-in-a-Box® 2026 with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can process an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PST on January 15th, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® today! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
Happy New Year!
Thank you for being part of the Band-in-a-Box® community.
Wishing you and yours a very happy 2026—Happy New Year from all of us at PG Music!
Season's Greetings!
Wishing everyone a happy, healthy holiday season—thanks for being part of our community!
The office will be closed for Christmas Day, but we will be back on Boxing Day (Dec 26th) at 6:00am PST.
Team PG
Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: The Newly Designed Piano Roll Window
In this video, we explore the updated Piano Roll, complete with a modernized look and exciting new features. You’ll see new filtering options that make it easy to focus on specific note groups, smoother and more intuitive note entry and editing, and enhanced options for zooming, looping, and more.
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: AI Stems & Notes - split polyphonic audio into instruments and transcribe
This video demonstrates how to use the new AI-Notes feature together with the AI-Stems splitter, allowing you to select an audio file and have it separated into individual stems while transcribing each one to its own MIDI track. AI-Notes converts polyphonic audio—either full mixes or individual instruments—into MIDI that you can view in notation or play back instantly.
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Bonus PAK and 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®
With your version 2026 for Windows Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
- MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
- Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
- Playable RealTracks Set 5
- RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
- SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
- Android Band-in-a-Box® App (included)
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
- Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
- RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
- SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics85,758
Posts795,897
Members39,952
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean