I'll be doing a new Windows pc build, and trying to spend from $400 to $600 on CPU/mobo/Ram - what will give me the best bang for a music recording workstation that includes simultaneous use of:
a.) Band in a Box b.) Presonus Firepod c.) Native Instruments virtual instruments.
For the processor - is money better spent on more cores, or less cores with higher clock speeds ?
I'm not sure how to find out whether, when the apps for each of these are running at the same time - whether they will take advantage of multiple cores and/or hyperthreading.
For the processor - is money better spent on more cores, or less cores with higher clock speeds?
More cores as more processing can be handled at the same time. Multiple cores usually do not have that much smaller of clock speed.
Originally Posted By: Joe V
I'm not sure how to find out whether, when the apps for each of these are running at the same time - whether they will take advantage of multiple cores and/or hyperthreading.
Your machine will normally have it's own method to decide but you can right-click on a process in Task Manager and direct it to which processors are being used. I've got 8 cores and only split the cores manually one time. Windows manages it pretty well.
Thanks for your feedback Steve, and in general what you're saying is absolutely correct. But I thought my very narrow question with these particular types of apps may not conform to the generalization.
My understanding was that the applications have to specifically be coded to use more than one core, otherwise they can ONLY use one.
Now, I named 3 different pieces of software - and generally, one would think that SEPARATE applications that run simultaneously would naturally use different cores...but with add-ins and virtual instruments, and software that works in an integrated way, I wasn't so sure this is possible....I think the only way to know would be to be the developer - or - as you very well may have - to watch how many cores are working at the same time as you simultaneously run BB, digital recording, and loaded VI's at the same time.
I don't know - maybe I have overcomplicated it - but I think it's possible the multiple cores are not used as much as you would hope given these 3 music apps.
My understanding was that the applications have to specifically be coded to use more than one core, otherwise they can ONLY use one.
I would think most apps out there are set to do that. Since PG software is a 32 bit app it may be just use one core.
As far as the Windows 10 side, by default, all apps are allowed to jump on any of the available processors as indicated in my screenshot. I just haven't seen an easy way to identify which processors your current apps running are using. There are 3rd party apps you can pick up that can assist in defining those processors but you may have indeed overcomplicated this.
As far as if this is just trying to help you in deciding more cores.... More cores, more betta.... Both my laptop and PC are 8 cores. I've rarely had a time when the whole machines lock up since apps kind of split their time among processors.
The best thing for me was switching to DDR4 RAM ... amazing the difference in speed! I got a new computer for Christmas with 8GB of DDR4 RAM and an I5-6th generation processor. Talk about fast!
I went from an I6-2nd generation CPU and 8GB of DDR3 to what I described above and the difference is unbelievable. It now takes BIAB less than 10 seconds to fully load. Once I compose a song using all 6 basic tracks (approximately 4-minute song - including Brent Mason lead guitar tracks) it generates in 20 seconds or less. None of that is exaggerated.
Just thought I'd throw that out there as an extra thing to consider. But .......... DDR4 RAM is ridiculously expensive right now. Glad mine was already included with the computer. Good luck with your build!
Thanks for sharing AI-David...are you an Artificial Intelligence enthusiast, or are those just initials ? BTW - how do you know it's mostly the ram vs. the faster CPU due to newer CPU architecture and faster clock speeds ? Likely both contribute - but do they do so equally or does one contribute more than the other ? I know a lot about simple basics things and generalizations with PC's - but when it comes to a complicated use scenario - like DAWs with virtual instruments and BB running, I really am clueless as to the extent each component plays in raising the overall performance bar....Even the articles I've read rarely explain things at that level. You kind of have to read lots of articles and infer....perhaps one of our low level BB coding engineers can explain better ?
Bottom line - faster, newer generation (more efficient) CPUs and multiple cores will result in better performance - I get that. I just find it interesting to know which components are limiting performance in a fully-loaded DAW.
Thanks for sharing AI-David...are you an Artificial Intelligence enthusiast, or are those just initials ? BTW - how do you know it's mostly the ram vs. the faster CPU due to newer CPU architecture and faster clock speeds ? Likely both contribute - but do they do so equally or does one contribute more than the other ? I know a lot about simple basics things and generalizations with PC's - but when it comes to a complicated use scenario - like DAWs with virtual instruments and BB running, I really am clueless as to the extent each component plays in raising the overall performance bar....Even the articles I've read rarely explain things at that level. You kind of have to read lots of articles and infer....perhaps one of our low level BB coding engineers can explain better ?
Bottom line - faster, newer generation (more efficient) CPUs and multiple cores will result in better performance - I get that. I just find it interesting to know which components are limiting performance in a fully-loaded DAW.
Hi!
My full name is Alan David (yes, David is my last name), but in the music biz, I'm more well-known as Al David. I threw in the hyphen because most sites don't allow spaces in usernames. That's not the case here at PG Music Forums but I didn't know that when I opened my account.
I'm not an expert at anything other than saying "Yes ma'am" to my wife. My brother and I owned a computer store back in Missouri. I now live in Northern Alabama.
The 2 reasons I attribute most of the difference to the DDR4 RAM are:
1. My older computer had an I5 - 2nd generation CPU. Statistically, it's almost (not quite) as fast as the 6th generation. There is, indeed, a difference but it's not a huge difference. But that does, in fact, account for some of the difference, perhaps 15 - 20 percent of the difference.
In more technical terms, here is the compelling difference. The an important factor is a huge difference in capacity. DDR4 is able to accomodate a much higher RAM capacity per Gigabyte compared to DDR3. DDR3 RAM can theoretically use about 128 GB while while DDR4 RAM can go up to 512 GB. That's a very significant difference. Now, bandwidth in numbers - The frequency speed of DDR3 ranges from 800 MHz on the low end and tops out at 2133 MHz. DDR4 memory ranges from a low of 1600 MHz and tops out at 3200 MHz. Thus, DDR4 has a much higher rate (speed) of data handling than DDR3. I have 2666 MHz in my computer. There are other differences (better error detection and correction, for example) favoring the DDR4 but the two I mentioned are the major differences.
This also helps to reduce the load on the processor when using demanding software. Although that doesn't make operations any faster, it might extend the life of your CPU, allowing it to run somewhat cooler. Just a couple of extra benefits besides speed.
For simpler, more ordinary tasks, a significant speed difference isn't usually apparent. But for more intensive, memory-hungry programs, the difference is more obvious.
Right now, DDR4 memory is more than twice the price of DDR3. Also, you have to have a different motherboard for DDR4. The cost to upgrade, therefore, is substantial.
I probably told you more than you were anticipating, but it might be helpful to know.
I can understand DDR4 RAM making a serious improvement in BIAB. But if you want the program to load faster and act snappier, running it on an SSD will help the most. The RealTracks and RealDrums can be elsewhere. Regeneration depends mostly on the speed of one CPU core. Or so it has been said here.
BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
For what it's worth to those also in the market - after doing a bunch of reading and listening to the great advice from local friends and PG friends, I went with:
We’ve expanded the Band-in-a-Box® RealTracks library with 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 449-467) across Jazz, Blues, Funk, World, Pop, Rock, Country, Americana, and Praise & Worship—featuring your most requested styles!
Jazz, Blues & World (Sets 449–455):
These RealTracks includes “Soul Jazz” with Neil Swainson (bass), Mike Clark (drums), Charles Treadway (organ), Miles Black (piano), and Brent Mason (guitar). Enjoy “Requested ’60s” jazz, classic acoustic blues with Colin Linden, and more of our popular 2-handed piano soloing. Plus, a RealTracks first—Tango with bandoneon, recorded in Argentina!
Rock & Pop (Sets 456–461):
This collection includes Disco, slap bass ‘70s/‘80s pop, modern and ‘80s metal with Andy Wood, and a unique “Songwriter Potpourri” featuring Chinese folk instruments, piano, banjo, and more. You’ll also find a muted electric guitar style (a RealTracks first!) and “Producer Layered Guitar” styles for slick "produced" sound.
Country, Americana & Praise (Sets 462–467):
We’ve added new RealTracks across bro country, Americana, praise & worship, vintage country, and songwriter piano. Highlights include Brent Mason (electric guitar), Eddie Bayers (drums), Doug Jernigan (pedal steel), John Jarvis (piano), Glen Duncan (banjo, mandolin & fiddle), Mike Harrison (electric bass) and more—offering everything from modern sounds to heartfelt Americana styles
And, if you are looking for more, the 2025 49-PAK (for $49) includes an additional 20 RealTracks with exciting new sounds and genre-spanning styles. Enjoy RealTracks firsts like Chinese instruments (guzheng & dizi), the bandoneon in an authentic Argentine tango trio, and the classic “tic-tac” baritone guitar for vintage country.
You’ll also get slick ’80s metal guitar from Andy Wood, modern metal with guitarist Nico Santora, bass player Nick Schendzielos, and drummer Aaron Stechauner, more praise & worship, indie-folk, modern/bro country with Brent Mason, and “Songwriter Americana” with Johnny Hiland.
Plus, enjoy user-requested styles like Soul Jazz RealDrums, fast Celtic Strathspey guitar, and Chill Hop piano & drums!
With your version 2025 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Or upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
The 2025 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 33 new RealTracks and 65+ new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 29 new RealTracks and 45+ new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 20 new RealStyles.
Look Ma! More MIDI 13: Country & Americana
Instrumental Studies Set 22: 2-Hand Piano Soloing - Rhythm Changes
MIDI SuperTracks Set 44: Jazz Piano
Artist Performance Set 17: Songs with Vocals 7
Playable RealTracks Set 4
RealDrums Stems Set 7: Jazz with Mike Clark
SynthMaster Sounds and Styles (with audio demos)
128 GM MIDI Patch Audio Demos.
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyles,
FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
Look Ma! More MIDI 14: SynthMaster,
Instrumental Studies Set 23: More '80s Hard Rock Soloing,
MIDI SuperTracks Set 45: More SynthMaster
Artist Performance Set 18: Songs with Vocals 8
RealDrums Stems Set 8: Pop, Funk & More with Jerry Roe
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Mac!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
New! XPro Styles PAK 9 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and higher for Mac!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 9 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 29 RealTracks/RealDrums!
We've been hard at it to bring you the latest and greatest in this 9th installment of our popular XPro Styles PAK series! Included are 75 styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres (25 styles each) that fans have come to expect, as well as 25 styles in this volume's wildcard genre: funk & R&B!
If you're itching to get a sneak peek at what's included in XPro Styles PAK 9, here is a small helping of what you can look forward to: Funky R&B Horns, Upbeat Celtic Rock, Jazz Fusion Salsa, Gentle Indie Folk, Cool '60s Soul, Funky '70s R&B, Smooth Jazz Hip Hop, Acoustic Rockabilly Swing, Funky Reggae Dub, Dreamy Retro Latin Jazz, Retro Soul-Rock Fusion, and much more!
Special Pricing! Until July 31, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Windows!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
New! XPro Styles PAK 9 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and higher for Windows!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 9 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 29 RealTracks/RealDrums!
We've been hard at it to bring you the latest and greatest in this 9th installment of our popular XPro Styles PAK series! Included are 75 styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres (25 styles each) that fans have come to expect, as well as 25 styles in this volume's wildcard genre: funk & R&B!
If you're itching to get a sneak peek at what's included in XPro Styles PAK 9, here is a small helping of what you can look forward to: Funky R&B Horns, Upbeat Celtic Rock, Jazz Fusion Salsa, Gentle Indie Folk, Cool '60s Soul, Funky '70s R&B, Smooth Jazz Hip Hop, Acoustic Rockabilly Swing, Funky Reggae Dub, Dreamy Retro Latin Jazz, Retro Soul-Rock Fusion, and much more!
Special Pricing! Until July 31, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: VST3 Plugin Support
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® now includes support for VST3 plugins, alongside VST and AU. Use them with MIDI or audio tracks for even more creative possibilities in your music production.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Macs®: VST3 Plugin Support
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: Using VST3 Plugins
One of our representatives will be happy to help you over the phone. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday, and 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST Saturday. We are closed Sunday. You can also send us your questions via email.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you on our Live Chat or by email. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday; 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST (GMT -8) Saturday; Closed Sunday.
Both my laptop and PC are 8 cores. I've rarely had a time when the whole machines lock up since apps kind of split their time among processors.
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean