|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381
Expert
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381 |
I've happily posted works on the internet without any thought to officially registered copyright, membership in PRO's, formal publishing or any other such stuff above my place in the music business. Up to me, I'd continue to do so happily.
Lately, I've gone back to Fiverr looking for people to play a lead instrument on a chordal arrangement made in BIAB. I asked for something "melodic". Now, I know they give rights to commercial use and it is considered a "work for hire"...but this is about right and wrong, and not about "rights".
What if what they come up with is really uniquely "melodic" in the sense that it becomes "the song"? What if it is so coherent and beautiful that it could stand alone even without my "backing"? I truly hope that happens, and that it is not simply joining the harmony....if that makes sense.
There is, to my mind, a continuum between playing along and composing within limits where a collaborator/musician affects the outcome to such a degree that he/she ought to be considered a co-writer.
While I ponder that, I think I need to prepare for such contingencies to share in a more concrete "business" way not just credit but ownership.
But I don't have a clue how, even if I can figure out "when".
What do I need to do? If it's good advice, I might even start doing it for myself (and my back catalogue and collaborations).
Last edited by Tangmo; 05/27/20 02:22 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,058
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,058 |
When people hire me to play on their tracks, I do a lot of preparation to build on what they already have, not introduce something that might warrant a co-write decision. I use their music to suggest the harmony, counterpoint, or even hook. I think that takes more skill than just doing my own thing.
BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,820
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,820 |
You are hiring a musician to perform on your session, in other words a session musician. Part of the agreement should be the musician receives money up front and in return signs away their rights to any audio they provide you.
One of the reasons people hire session musicians is to have access to their creativity. I've heard that most of the signature riffs you hear in popular music were created by session musicians "on demand". The producer says "we need something special" and they deliver time after time.
Jim Fogle - 2025 BiaB (Build 1128) RB (Build 5) - Ultra+ PAK DAWs: Cakewalk Sonar - Standalone: Zoom MRS-8 Laptop: i3 Win 10, 8GB ram 500GB HDD Desktop: i7 Win 11, 12GB ram 256GB SSD, 4 TB HDD Music at: https://fogle622.wix.com/fogle622-audio-home
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381 |
Thanks, Matt. I'm assuming, though, when people hire you to play on their tracks, they have already written a melody. All I "wrote" was a chord progression. I suppose there is melody in there (even if it's just the root notes), but it's not coherent and beautiful.
Likely what I will get back is improv over chords. That's probably not "co-write" worthy. But it is possible that I'll get back something I can also do for myself--draw out a melody from the progression that stands alone and "becomes" the composition or the song. It's melody that is copyright-able, and rightly so. Nobody hums chords. And to my mind, regardless of whether or not they worked for hire, that is something worth recognizing.
Note: I'm speaking as a song-writer. The world of composition has never really been my world, and both law and custom may apply differently.
Jim. Yes, they sign away rights to audio. I can use it any way I see fit. But there remains that component on the continuum when a simple improv or lead-line becomes the piece itself. Not a riff. Not a phrase. The piece.
I'm not trying to protect myself here. I'm trying to do the right thing.
Anyway, answers that tell me how to do THIS will also inform me how to do it for solo works and other collaborations, past and future.
Last edited by Tangmo; 05/27/20 03:01 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,820
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,820 |
Tangmo,
I understand your intent and where you're coming from. The law is one thing but what's right is another.
Jim Fogle - 2025 BiaB (Build 1128) RB (Build 5) - Ultra+ PAK DAWs: Cakewalk Sonar - Standalone: Zoom MRS-8 Laptop: i3 Win 10, 8GB ram 500GB HDD Desktop: i7 Win 11, 12GB ram 256GB SSD, 4 TB HDD Music at: https://fogle622.wix.com/fogle622-audio-home
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 253
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 253 |
Jim is correct. That's what session musicians get paid to do, there's no "agreement" per se, it's just an industry standard and it's always been done that way. It's a fair arguement that they should get some kind of royalty - in most countries, artists/producers/session musicians get a performance royalty, or "performance in a sound recording". The U.S. is one of a very small group of countries that does not pay that royalty. Efforts have been made, and continue to be made, to change this, but the radio broadcasters lobby is one of the most powerful lobbying groups in the U.S. and they have thus far completely blocked that from happening. They should not, IMO, get a co-writer credit on the songs they play on however. If a session musician ever asked me for that, I would tell them (not very politely) to pack their gear and take a hike. They get paid a fee to perform a service - they get paid regardless if the song ever gets recorded, or becomes a hit, or not. They assume none of the risk, take on none of the responsibility of trying to get the song recorded, or played, etc. To get paid master or demo scale, and get writing credit on top of that, is double dipping and there's no way I would ever go along with that. It should be addressed in the performance in a sound recording, and that's not happening because of broadcasters. Watch a bit of the videos below of legendary session guitarist Reggie Young. He played some of the most iconic guitar licks in history, and he didn't get songwriter credit for any of them - never expected to. He DID argue later in life that they (studio musicians) should get a performance royalty, and I agree with that. But that's entirely different than writing credit. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EEkHO6jxjchttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-6zd-z1qm8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,058
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,058 |
Tangmo, no, none of the artists I played for gave me a song with no melody. A chord progression alone is not copyright-able so I suppose I would negotiate at this point, and depending on what results I might ask to be a co-writer. The song would not be finished enough without a melody for me to do my session work.
BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381 |
Roger, I don't know how or if you collaborate and/or share song-writing credits but imagine this: Someone brings you a really nice, somewhat unusual chord progression and demos it strumming on acoustic for three minutes. You write a melody line for it. Would you not think it was reasonable that you get at least a share of the writer's credit? That's essentially what I've done...wrote a (hopefully) good progression. It's something beyond the usual, and because it is BIAB, it's something more produced and polished than a guitar strumming. My guy might spice up the progression with complimentary lines, licks, etc. Is he a co-writer? No. Neither is PGMusic or the players on RealTracks. He got paid and I got what I got. But my guy MIGHT write a beautiful, coherent, hummable melody from my progression that works as a complete piece of music on its own, even if it no longer needs my progression at all. Is he a co-writer? Forgetting what the law says...I think he is. My having paid him does not mean he is not. If music business lawyers need to get involved to justify their existence, we'd just call it an advance on future royalties.  Indeed, he may even turn out to be the primary writer. And I'm not the least bit sad about it! A good number of my songs have started this way...someone else's chord progression in a produced work (backing?) inspires my vocal melody. (on the music side of the write). I guarantee you, I think I'm co-writer of the music...but I'd NEVER EVER contest that if he thought differently. I would not have done MY bit if he had not does his. Again, song-writing and music composition may be two different worlds and models. I'm not trying to parse the two. I'm not trying to protect myself. I'm not trying to either follow or break custom. I'm just looking for coherent info on how to set up shop so I can do what I want.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Seems like the only solution to your personal dilemma is for you to also write the melody lines and pay the 5er musicians to play the melody you wrote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 253
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 253 |
I've been writing songs for a living since 1985, and have cowritten hundreds of songs with other writers during that time. All I'm telling you is what I've always done, what all of my peers have always done, and the general way the business has always been done, and provided the Reggie Young example.
If you feel morally compelled to give someone writer credit, knock yourself out. It's really that simple, it's your song-your choice. Over the years I've had artists record songs of mine and make changes to them (Trace Adkins & Ricky Van Shelton made substantial changes that I disagreed with) without asking for or receiving songwriter credit. I've also had artists/producers try to 'strong arm' me into giving them writing credit on songs that they've made no change to whatsoever, with the stated threat that if I don't, they won't record the song(s) - in which case I've always said no, usually in a pretty colorful manner. I've also had a substantial number of artists record songs of mine and copy the demo I produced, on more than one occasion note-for-note. The musicians who played the signature licks/solos didn't get writer credit, and I didn't get production credit on those projects either.
For me personally, if I sit down in a room with someone to write, and a song gets written during that time, they are a co-writer on it - doesn't matter if they don't have a word or a note in the song, my feeling has always been that I wouldn't have written what I wrote if that person hadn't been there...maybe they said or did something that spurred a thought. Not everyone does it that way, that's just me.
Bottom line is, if you genuinely feel the person in question made a substantial contribution to the WRITING of the song, by all means give them a piece of the writer credit. But understand there is a significant difference between WRITING and PRODUCTION. Coming up with a great solo, or intro, or turnaround, or ending; a grooving bass line or drum pattern; adding pushes, stops, or any dynamic movements - things like that are production, not songwriting - and it has been my experience, and is my opinion, that those do not warrant songwriting credit, unless the musician(s) in question are willing to waive their payment for playing on the project as side men.
Hope all that stuff clarifies what I was saying. Cheers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381 |
Thanks, Roger. You're not the first professional song-writer I've "talked" with and I value your perspective on all this. I actually agree with everything you said...especially the part about adding some color to a refusal to be strong-armed. I'll be happy to collaborate on vocabulary, but I have the feeling you've got it covered. What I will do is listen to my guy's contribution all by itself. If it sounds like a lead-line or improv over chords, he got paid and I am satisfied. If it sounds like a real coherent melody, then I'll decide and come up with a way to notate it. Hell, I may even post it like that for "comment". The real purpose of the thread, though, is to say I just feel like I've been playing in the internet sand-box for a long time and, even though I have no plans or any real dreams of turning "professional", I'd like to organize my "hobby" in a more professional manner. It can't hurt. And if it doesn't cost me an arm and a leg, I'd just feel better about it and more willing to "reach out", if that makes sense.
Last edited by Tangmo; 05/28/20 06:09 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381 |
Seems like the only solution to your personal dilemma is for you to also write the melody lines and pay the 5er musicians to play the melody you wrote.
I laugh maniacally now, but one day it may still happen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 732
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 732 |
I've been writing songs for a living since 1985, and have cowritten hundreds of songs with other writers during that time. All I'm telling you is what I've always done, what all of my peers have always done, and the general way the business has always been done, and provided the Reggie Young example.
If you feel morally compelled to give someone writer credit, knock yourself out. It's really that simple, it's your song-your choice. Over the years I've had artists record songs of mine and make changes to them (Trace Adkins & Ricky Van Shelton made substantial changes that I disagreed with) without asking for or receiving songwriter credit. I've also had artists/producers try to 'strong arm' me into giving them writing credit on songs that they've made no change to whatsoever, with the stated threat that if I don't, they won't record the song(s) - in which case I've always said no, usually in a pretty colorful manner. I've also had a substantial number of artists record songs of mine and copy the demo I produced, on more than one occasion note-for-note. The musicians who played the signature licks/solos didn't get writer credit, and I didn't get production credit on those projects either.
For me personally, if I sit down in a room with someone to write, and a song gets written during that time, they are a co-writer on it - doesn't matter if they don't have a word or a note in the song, my feeling has always been that I wouldn't have written what I wrote if that person hadn't been there...maybe they said or did something that spurred a thought. Not everyone does it that way, that's just me.
Bottom line is, if you genuinely feel the person in question made a substantial contribution to the WRITING of the song, by all means give them a piece of the writer credit. But understand there is a significant difference between WRITING and PRODUCTION. Coming up with a great solo, or intro, or turnaround, or ending; a grooving bass line or drum pattern; adding pushes, stops, or any dynamic movements - things like that are production, not songwriting - and it has been my experience, and is my opinion, that those do not warrant songwriting credit, unless the musician(s) in question are willing to waive their payment for playing on the project as side men.
Hope all that stuff clarifies what I was saying. Cheers. In the early days and I am sure even to today, people have forced people to add "writers" to their songs so they have to split the proceeds. They used to do it with Elvis' stuff all the time, basically if you wanted Elvis to record your song, you need to play ball etc. I agree with what you are saying here. Production choices etc. are not co-writing the song. I also agree that if the guy talking in a commercial get's paid every time it airs, the guys or girls playing the music should to and they still don't here in the US. Many songs that the "wrecking crew" folks played on would not have been what they were without their (the studio musicians) contributions so there should have been a way for them to get something other than union scale for their work, but that is the way it works still.
My wife asked if I had seen the dog bowl. I told her I didn't even know he could.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381 |
Watched the videos Roger linked. Just makes me that much more determined to do what's right. My fiverr guy will make more money than I will. But if he actually accomplishes what I asked for...
We'll see.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 6,735
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 6,735 |
Imagine a very-berry talented hairstylist will start shaving his/hers "logo" on customers heads...
...And then you apply for a 500K executive job and you win that bid.
Would the stylist be entitled to "royalty" because he perfected your "looks" that he/she might presume tipped the scale in your favor when you got the job?
I see it like this, if you like what you got, tip the performer or even better, spread the word about him/her.
P.S. Just having fun. Interesting discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381 |
Imagine, now, a very talented hairstylist using your head as a canvas to create a new logo and use pictures and video of it to turn his TM into a 500K asset. His money or yours? I offered my "head" and paid him for the "haircut" and if it turns into something beyond my real expectations...(fades out pondering).
*******************
The conundrum isn't whether or not to do it. Roger told me I could do it if I want to. So there.
It's more of a judgement call concerning WHEN I might want to do it. That depends on how far above it stands.
HOW! Now that's the real problem. If I want to and think it's right, HOW the hell do I do it in a (semi) professional manner?
Last edited by Tangmo; 05/28/20 03:10 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 253
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 253 |
As to the how, you don't have a lot of options. If you're wanting (insisting) on giving songwriting credit to someone who may or may not be deserving of it, all you have to do is determine how much of your copyright (property) you would like to give away.
50%? 25%? More, or less? Totally up to you.
Just understand you will now be co-owners on a piece of intellectual property, in perpetuity. You can't do anything with the song without your co-writer's approval or blessing. A movie studio wants to put your song in a feature film, but your "cowriter" won't agree to the contract? It's dead in the water.
I applaud the moral position driving your thought process, but the business side of it doesn't make sense. One of my old publishers had a plaque on his desk that said "Emotion + Business = Big Mistakes".
I'll also say this, as someone who feeds his family by writing songs. If I were to make a melodic suggestion on your song, and you offered me co-writing credit, I wouldn't take it. Because I (and this is me personally) don't want my name on anything that I don't feel like I made a significant contribution to.
Follow your own conscience on this, I hope I'm not backseat driving. I just think you should have all the information to consider that you can get.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381 |
Roger, thanks for that. What if the rights were assigned to a publishing company that I owned 100% of. Would my guy have a say in whether a not a piece was placed? I'm talking about the rights to the composition, no matter who recorded it...not necessarily the rights to the audio that will eventually likely make its way to the showcase here.
Last edited by Tangmo; 05/28/20 04:00 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 253
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 253 |
Possibly, but there's no obligation (or real incentive) for the prospective cowriter to give you their share of the publishing. Again, once you give writing credit, you have given away property. In that scenario, if I'm the co-writer, there's no way I'd give you my publishing. The way the royalty structure on a song works, half of the revenue is the writer share and the other half is the publishing share. So on a 50/50 co-write, each writer's royalties are 25% of the total, the other 25% being the publishing share.
Asking someone to give you their publishing is asking them to relinquish half of their potential income. No way in hell I would do that.
Again, and I say this very respectfully....you're trying to be very kind and generous in a business setting - that's rarely a good move. It's called the music business, not music benevolence.
As I read what I've responded with to you, I recognize that some of it may come across as harsh or greedy....but when art and commerce intersect, it's a pretty big collision. For years and years, I had to swallow bitter pill after bitter pill because songwriters are, and always have been, the lowest rung on the music business ladder and consequently get stepped on the most. I've seen a lot of peers and friends make really bad business decisions that effected them for the rest of their lives. Perhaps I err too much on the side of "keeping what's yours", but it's because of how many repeated times I've seen songwriters duped in business dealings because it's our nature to consider what we do "art", when everyone else in the business views what we do as "commerce".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New RealTracks Released with Band-in-a-Box 2025!
We’ve expanded the Band-in-a-Box® RealTracks library with 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 449-467) across Jazz, Blues, Funk, World, Pop, Rock, Country, Americana, and Praise & Worship—featuring your most requested styles!
Jazz, Blues & World (Sets 449–455):
These RealTracks includes “Soul Jazz” with Neil Swainson (bass), Mike Clark (drums), Charles Treadway (organ), Miles Black (piano), and Brent Mason (guitar). Enjoy “Requested ’60s” jazz, classic acoustic blues with Colin Linden, and more of our popular 2-handed piano soloing. Plus, a RealTracks first—Tango with bandoneon, recorded in Argentina!
Rock & Pop (Sets 456–461):
This collection includes Disco, slap bass ‘70s/‘80s pop, modern and ‘80s metal with Andy Wood, and a unique “Songwriter Potpourri” featuring Chinese folk instruments, piano, banjo, and more. You’ll also find a muted electric guitar style (a RealTracks first!) and “Producer Layered Guitar” styles for slick "produced" sound.
Country, Americana & Praise (Sets 462–467):
We’ve added new RealTracks across bro country, Americana, praise & worship, vintage country, and songwriter piano. Highlights include Brent Mason (electric guitar), Eddie Bayers (drums), Doug Jernigan (pedal steel), John Jarvis (piano), Glen Duncan (banjo, mandolin & fiddle), Mike Harrison (electric bass) and more—offering everything from modern sounds to heartfelt Americana styles
Check out all the 202 New RealTracks (in sets 456-467)
And, if you are looking for more, the 2025 49-PAK (for $49) includes an additional 20 RealTracks with exciting new sounds and genre-spanning styles. Enjoy RealTracks firsts like Chinese instruments (guzheng & dizi), the bandoneon in an authentic Argentine tango trio, and the classic “tic-tac” baritone guitar for vintage country.
You’ll also get slick ’80s metal guitar from Andy Wood, modern metal with guitarist Nico Santora, bass player Nick Schendzielos, and drummer Aaron Stechauner, more praise & worship, indie-folk, modern/bro country with Brent Mason, and “Songwriter Americana” with Johnny Hiland.
Plus, enjoy user-requested styles like Soul Jazz RealDrums, fast Celtic Strathspey guitar, and Chill Hop piano & drums!
The 2025 49-PAK is loaded with other great new add-ons as well. Learn more about the 2025 49-PAK!
Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac!
With your version 2025 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Or upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2025 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 33 new RealTracks and 65+ new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 29 new RealTracks and 45+ new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 20 new RealStyles.
- Look Ma! More MIDI 13: Country & Americana
- Instrumental Studies Set 22: 2-Hand Piano Soloing - Rhythm Changes
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 44: Jazz Piano
- Artist Performance Set 17: Songs with Vocals 7
- Playable RealTracks Set 4
- RealDrums Stems Set 7: Jazz with Mike Clark
- SynthMaster Sounds and Styles (with audio demos)
- 128 GM MIDI Patch Audio Demos.
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyles,
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- Look Ma! More MIDI 14: SynthMaster,
- Instrumental Studies Set 23: More '80s Hard Rock Soloing,
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 45: More SynthMaster
- Artist Performance Set 18: Songs with Vocals 8
- RealDrums Stems Set 8: Pop, Funk & More with Jerry Roe
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®!
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Mac!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 20.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 20 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
New! XPro Styles PAK 9 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and higher for Mac!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 9 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 29 RealTracks/RealDrums!
We've been hard at it to bring you the latest and greatest in this 9th installment of our popular XPro Styles PAK series! Included are 75 styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres (25 styles each) that fans have come to expect, as well as 25 styles in this volume's wildcard genre: funk & R&B!
If you're itching to get a sneak peek at what's included in XPro Styles PAK 9, here is a small helping of what you can look forward to: Funky R&B Horns, Upbeat Celtic Rock, Jazz Fusion Salsa, Gentle Indie Folk, Cool '60s Soul, Funky '70s R&B, Smooth Jazz Hip Hop, Acoustic Rockabilly Swing, Funky Reggae Dub, Dreamy Retro Latin Jazz, Retro Soul-Rock Fusion, and much more!
Special Pricing! Until July 31, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 9 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Windows!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 20.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 20 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
New! XPro Styles PAK 9 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and higher for Windows!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 9 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 29 RealTracks/RealDrums!
We've been hard at it to bring you the latest and greatest in this 9th installment of our popular XPro Styles PAK series! Included are 75 styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres (25 styles each) that fans have come to expect, as well as 25 styles in this volume's wildcard genre: funk & R&B!
If you're itching to get a sneak peek at what's included in XPro Styles PAK 9, here is a small helping of what you can look forward to: Funky R&B Horns, Upbeat Celtic Rock, Jazz Fusion Salsa, Gentle Indie Folk, Cool '60s Soul, Funky '70s R&B, Smooth Jazz Hip Hop, Acoustic Rockabilly Swing, Funky Reggae Dub, Dreamy Retro Latin Jazz, Retro Soul-Rock Fusion, and much more!
Special Pricing! Until July 31, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 9 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: VST3 Plugin Support
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® now includes support for VST3 plugins, alongside VST and AU. Use them with MIDI or audio tracks for even more creative possibilities in your music production.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Macs®: VST3 Plugin Support
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: Using VST3 Plugins
Join the conversation on our forum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums58
Topics84,398
Posts778,683
Members39,648
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean