That is hogwash. I just finished a CD that was recorded at 44.1 at 24 bits. 24 tracks. Sounded great, and it is out on Jazz radio stations right now (its a big band CD).

Recording 24bits DOES make a difference, but 96Khz doesn't guarantee anything other than you are going to have huge files to work with. Things like the microphones used, the preamps, etc, etc matter a lot more than simply sticking the recorder at 96khz/24bits.

And I'm not a HUGE fan of compression either.....but that is another subject

Quote:

Hey Guys,

Need a little help in understanding BIAB realtracks quality vs recording quality. It's my understanding that a track recorded at 44.khz/16bit is basically cd quality, but a track recorded at 96k 24 bit is professional quality. I know that depending what recording equipment you use depends on the overall quality of your recorded product. The perfect world(as I understand it) is to record everything in 96k 24 bit and then after compression, effects,etc you end up with a perfect "professional" level product. How do the realtracks measure up to those standards? If I recorded vocals and lets say a guitar track at 96k/24 bit, and then added some realtracks to finish out the song, would the final mix have the capability of a "professional" product? Still trying to put all the pieces together. Thanks Again,
Roger


Musician, Polymath, Google Jedi, Apple Master, Windows Wrangler and Digital Wizard. High ratings in Nerd-fu & Geek-fu.

M1 Mac Mini, MacBook Pro Touchbar 15", Intel 27" iMac, M1 Mac Mini
https://musician.social/@ericdano