I swore I posted this yesterday, but- yes, the rates are the same. I setup the daw project with all the same basic settings as RB.

After taking a look at this I have found out some things. First, the garbled track is a dreamy guitar specifically. It's spotty within the whole track, but still usable. That happened because the dreamy guitar didn't like the time stretch and got wacky- essentially, normal behavior. I was asking a tempo of 65 for the dreamy guitar to work at 90- a tough one for that style of playing for that guitar. I'm actually glad a lot is still usable because I like the dreamy guitars. I'll keep them in mind for slower tunes. Second thing is that I regenerated the other tracks that picked up some pops on the ones and they sounded better. I think there is still some work to be done on the software side to get things smoother when piecing together a RT performance during generate. But it's also just a matter of tempos too and the user has to plan a bit when making that first initial choice of song tempo, when it comes to RT's. Not everything is gonna work well at different tempos, even considering double/half time options. Some things just won't work well. So, consider what instruments you want to use and how many of them have a good array of tempos and choose accordingly.

For all that is going on in the software to juggle the demands of the user, I'd say it's all remarkably powerful. The software can still benefit with fine tuning of things, and the user can benefit with a full understanding of how best to coax what they want out of the software. But I must say, for all the little wranglings, either on my end or just the software, it's fun, interesting, challenging, and bottom line- it's sounds pretty freakin amazing. I'll post this song in another thread so ya'll can hear it. It's got my toes tappin! LOL!

Dan