There are other, simpler explanations to why people might not be jumping on your solution:
- It's not officially supported, and they prefer to use tools that offer support. . . check
- It requires using Reaper, and they don't use Reaper. . . . check
- They don't see working as Reaper as an improvement over working in BiaB. . . check
- They don't see the current situation as needing the solution you propose.
. . .
checkDifferent users have different needs, and none of these possibilities require assuming that anyone is "deranged", lacks "rational thought", or has "hurt feelings".
And... a reference to cancel culture. Again, you're resorting to name calling.
I suggest that real issue isn't anything you've named, but that you haven't tried to understand people who aren't you.
Sure, you've got a great solution that solves many of the problems that are important to you. But there's a cost to going to that solution, and there are rational reasons why someone might not want to adopt that solution.
To convince people to go to your solution, you'll need to do more than show that it's as good, or even better than their current solution. You'll need to show that it's
significantly better in order to get people to adopt that.
And I don't think you've been able to convince people, mostly because you don't understand
why they aren't adopting your solution.
Going back to the UJAM thread - I honestly don't know why you're so excited about the UJAM guitars. To my ear, they're only OK. The naming of the various styles means I won't have a clue what it'll sound like until I try it. And the UI is fine for what it does, but not especially better or worse than the one in NI Session Guitarist or many of the other VI guitars I've got.
It's not enough to build a better mousetrap when people are satisfied with "good enough".
You're going to make enemies of people who would be your allies if you continue to belittle and insult them, instead of understanding their reluctance, and bridging that gap.