Originally Posted by TheMaartian
OK, I switched BiaB to WAS (always) audio. Now, my ASIO driver remains at 48K, and BiaB uses 48K for both Input and Output audio, even though audio output is going to the monitors connected to my RME audio interface. [shrug]

I don't understand, but I'm happy now! Thanks everyone!
OK, well that's good at least. Hopefully you'll also still get the low-latency you expect.


Originally Posted by justanoldmuso
Mr M...you asked why in bb asio 48k is listed at bottom.

same here BUT i believe that asio dialog just lists the interface/driver capabilities.
i may be wrong but it doesnt necessarily mean that bb can utilise 48k ?
I'd also been thinking device capability, but for my device it lists 22050<no>, 44100<yes>, 48000<yes> and 96000<yes>, but not the 88200 that it also supports. I don't see 22050 in the USB audio specs, though there's a lot to search.

My guess on this is that BiaB enquires only about sample rates it can handle directly or with the resampler, then uses the "directly" 44.1kHz if available or the resampler only if 44.1kHz is not available.

It seems to me very remiss to force a sample rate on the user, especially if there's a resampler built in. I guess PGM would argue that no resampling gives better audio quality, which is probably true but not necessarily helpful.

Jazz relative beginner, starting at a much older age than was helpful.
AVL:MXE Linux; Windows 11
BIAB2025 Audiophile, a bunch of other software.
Kawai MP6, Ui24R, Focusrite Saffire Pro40 and Scarletts
.