|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,933
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,933 |
I see a difference between using BB and things like SynthV where you have to actually do things manually to create the music you want Like type in a few chord letters and click the export button?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,906
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,906 |
I see a difference between using BB and things like SynthV where you have to actually do things manually to create the music you want Like type in a few chord letters and click the export button? Actually yes. It can be that simple. I've always considered BB to be kinda like Black Box Voodoo, just short of AI. Especially how it handles the real tracks. However, You do have to spend more time and effort and thought as well as planning, to create the song in BB, especially if you're doing something more than a basic song. Breaks, pushes, pauses, modulations, tempo changes, selection of additional instruments, automation of solos and such things.... same with Synth V.... it takes more than a little bit of effort to dial in a good performance. Unlike the prompt for an AI song: "Hard rock style with guitars and male singer about the girl that cheated on him. "
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,327
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,327 |
I agree with Herb.
I will add: learning about the structure of the song(s), experimenting with different chords, progressions, tracks, programming particular sections, partial regeneration, manual fusion of different styles, 3rd party instruments and elements, etc. etc.
To me BIAB was always more of a composing/learning tool, not a cover song generator, I only very recently started explore "Songs", just to learn how their structure is laid out in BIAB.
JJJ,
Stop lying to your aunt!
P.M. me, I will send you a Holiday card.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 2,742
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 2,742 |
Why do we use BIAB to create songs? One, because it is fun. Two, it can provide instrumental tracks we can not play ourselves. Third, and most important is cost because we can not afford to pay live studio musicians to play for us. Which one of you would rather have Brent Masion on BIAB or Brent Masion live at your house?
When you post a song you made with BIAB, can you call it your song? When you go into the studio and create a song live with other musicians, can you call it your song?
I submit that the only way to say a song is your song is to play all the parts live and record it, including the vocal. Even then it is likely not very original because you based the song on what you learned from other people.
All you can truly say is this is a song that was created by the manipulation of a piece of software called BIAB which by the way took many hours to learn how to use. I was also embellished using several other computer software programs and generated through the collaboration of whatever other musicians or technicians you used both live and electronic.
Is there any "art" involved in computer software-generated music? Well, I say yes there is.
When and if AI gets to the point where you can tell it exactly what you want to hear track by track it will most likely supersede most human musicians for commercial music. Musicians may become like vintage cars. Greatly loved and super expensive.
I would not mind so much going back to horses and sailing ships but I'd be dammed if I would give up air conditioning...lol
I can say that I much preferred the days of not having all this computer stuff and having to play live and record in a studio on two-inch tape.
As far as typing two or three words and having a song come out and calling it my original work; let these genetically defective sub-humanoid lying, lazy "people" say whatever they want. They do the best they can. They just don't know any worse...lol
yes, I know, not a very politically correct statement. Anyway, I learned all this from Eddie, so it is you guys' fault for putting up with all his snide remarks.... I for one miss him!
Cheers,
Billy
Last edited by Planobilly; 12/11/24 09:36 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,598
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,598 |
There are plenty of folks who think using BIAB is cheating just as much as AI generation is cheating but here we are on the BIAB forum!
Just to play devil's advocate for a minute...isn't the entirety of human music and art, knowledge and achievement, incrementally built based on the work of previous humans?
William Faulkner: "Immature artists copy, great artists steal"
Igor Stravinsky: "A good composer does not imitate; he steals"
Steve Jobs: "Good artists copy, great artists steal"
Maybe AI just helps more people steal faster? I kind of agree with Mr Faulkner, Mr Stravinsky and Mr Jobs. However: - Stealing something from a great musician (for example transcribing a Geoge Benson's solo to try to integrate some of his phrasing into you vocabulary as a musican) requires a lot of time, technique, effort and discipline. - Even a trained monkey can steal anything from AI.
Latest BIAB version, latest build.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,933
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,933 |
I see a difference between using BB and things like SynthV where you have to actually do things manually to create the music you want Like type in a few chord letters and click the export button? Actually yes. It can be that simple. I've always considered BB to be kinda like Black Box Voodoo, just short of AI. Especially how it handles the real tracks. However, You do have to spend more time and effort and thought as well as planning, to create the song in BB, especially if you're doing something more than a basic song. Breaks, pushes, pauses, modulations, tempo changes, selection of additional instruments, automation of solos and such things.... same with Synth V.... it takes more than a little bit of effort to dial in a good performance. Unlike the prompt for an AI song: "Hard rock style with guitars and male singer about the girl that cheated on him. " You make excellent points but you have to admit that using BIAB, even when you invest significant time and effort to customize the results, is still a LOT closer to AI generated music than it is to a group of musicians, engineers and producers executing their collective decades of experience in the studio, right? That group of musicians, engineers and producers almost certainly view us BIAB users much the same as we may be viewing those who simply use AI to generate everything. Don't get me wrong, I love BIAB and it has enabled me to produce fully realized versions of my songs that would have never been possible without it but I also realize it has been a pretty big shortcut for me. I'm guessing AI is providing similar joy for others who cannot realize their music any other way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,933
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,933 |
JJJ,
Stop lying to your aunt!
P.M. me, I will send you a Holiday card. My aunt was always mean to me. I'm gonna put toenails in her cake!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,327
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,327 |
Ummm, toenails...
Crunchy!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,906
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,906 |
When you post a song you made with BIAB, can you call it your song? When you go into the studio and create a song live with other musicians, can you call it your song?
I submit that the only way to say a song is your song is to play all the parts live and record it, including the vocal. Even then it is likely not very original because you based the song on what you learned from other people. Absolutely, yes. You wrote it, therefore it is your song no matter how, or who records the tracks. It's not a requirement for me to record everything myself to call a song that I wrote, completely, my song. Regardless of what I learned from other folks, my piano teacher as a child, the drum teacher in school, the musicians I have played with, and the music I listen to on the radio, unless I am copying something, if I thought it up on my own, it is fully my creation.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,933
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,933 |
When you go into the studio and create a song live with other musicians, can you call it your song? Well, those chaps from Liverpool got 99% of the credit, glory, fame, money, etc. even though Mr. Martin was the "AI" they used on most of those later albums! He was quite possibly my favorite Beatle!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 2,742
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 2,742 |
Well Herb we can agree to disagree. Even if you write the entire score, the musicians you use in the studio will interpret it differently. That is the reason we may chose to use one studio musician over another.
You can say that you created the song but the creation part was general in nature and did not only involve you. The lyrics are certainly yours to claim if they are not too derivative. If you wrote all the parts out in standard notation and the musicians tried their best to play as written it still will not come out exactly as it was imagined by you. The production engineers and other studio people will change the sound.
You may have impregnated the woman but she created the baby.
People who know who they are and are ok with themselves generally give credit to all who were involved in the creation of a song. Most people get left out of the credit because of money.
If we are talking about a BIAB song or other similar types of software the "creation" part has already been done by others for the most part and we normally indicate this on this forum. But the moment you upload it to Soundcloud and do not indicate it was electronically created it is more or less impossible to tell who did what.
This is all about ethics and telling the exact truth. The legal implications have little or nothing to do with ethics or telling the truth.
Omitting the facts is just another form of evading the truth.
Well, this is my take and no one needs to agree with me. This is just my thinking on the matter and not a post to try to convince anyone to agree or disagree.
This whole AI discussion rapidly becomes about the concerns related to who owns what and who will get paid, plus the whining about all the years of work I put in to learn how to do what you can now do with zero effort.
I spent a huge amount of time, money, and effort learning how to use woodworking hand tools. I now do that work with computer numerically controlled electric tools. Not to say I never use hand tools or that I don't enjoy working with hand tools. The CNC machines produce much better results than I can do by hand.
As military pilots, we have spent zillions of dollars learning to fly and we love what we do, only to be replaced by computer pilots who are not subject to the g force with the latest aircraft. The latest discussion is around do we allow those "AI pilots" to have full independent control of who they kill.
If Ai takes your job there is not much that can be done about it. Get over it and go to number next. What other choice would you have? As we have seen of late violent action in an attempt to change things besides being stupid and barbaric simply will not change the state of the medical insurance system.
What people often fail to understand is that music creation software is not so much about creating music but about creating profit for the makers of the software.
Cheers,
Billy
Last edited by Planobilly; 12/11/24 01:13 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,254
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,254 |
David
I personally don’t think there is much difference between using AI and using BIAB to generate drums and using synth v to generate vocals. I see a lot of difference. First, there's the ethical dimension. With BiaB and SynthV, the people whose instruments and voices are used willingly entered into a contract to have their instruments and voices used for the creation of new works, and were compensated for their work. At its core, BiaB is automated loops. I've got a number of bass and drum loop construction sets. Similarly, SynthV is based on concatenative synthesis. For both products, there's a direct correlation between the source material and the end result. That's not the case with AI. There's no way to know where the guitar riff, the drum groove or the vocal came from. The people whose songs AI learned from never intended their music to be used as raw materials for someone else's song. AI classifies and reconstructs, but doesn't know where the source material for the songs came from, or how much might be infringing. The developers can only hope that the process of using lots of source material will end up hiding where AI took the ideas from. AI has never sung, never held a drumstick, fretted a guitar, bowed a string, blown a horn or reed. AI has only seen the end result. Every sound that it's produced has been derived from someone else's work. Second, I'm talking about what it means to take credit for the creation of something. If I tell someone that I "wrote" a song, I mean that the words a melody were created by me. If it was co-written by someone else, it would be dishonest to claim full credit. If I only suggested ideas for a song, but I didn't actually write the words, it would also be dishonest to claim credit for the creation of the song. Just because AI won't tell others that we didn't do the work ourselves doesn't mean we should give ourselves any more credit than if that work hadn't been done by a person. Almost every abled bodied and able mined person can learn to play drums and can learn to sing. It is just a matter of whether that person sees the worth in developing these skills or not. And that's their right. There's no requirement that someone learn to play drums or sing. I can play drums and sing, but use BiaB and SynthV. If you check out my songs, you'll see that I credit BiaB for the backing tracks, and SynthV for the vocals. Is the opportunity cost of learning these skills worth, say, sending less time playing a sport or writing or painting or whatever other things the person want to do with their time? I'm not saying that people can't use these tools. I object to people taking credit for work done by others as if it were their own.
-- David Cuny My virtual singer development blogVocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?BiaB 2025 | Windows 11 | Reaper | Way too many VSTis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,759
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,759 |
....I object to people taking credit for work done by others as if it were their own. Thanks, David. That's all I have to say on this topic.
DC Ron
BiaB Audiophile
Presonus Studio One
ASUS I9-12900K DAW, 32 GB RAM
Presonus Faderport 16
Too many guitars (is that a thing?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,327
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,327 |
In my teen / college years I've done some sculpting. Instructor would bring a model and give us couple of hours to do a clay sketch. You would have to set up armature and work clay fast to grasp as much detail as you can. Then at your own time we finished work from memory. Instructor and model were paid, studio was paid for, clay and armature and knifes were bought in the store.
Who gets the credit? Instructor for arranging the model? Model - the subject? Studio space / art department? Clay manufacturer - because it was made "ready to use"? Armature maker because it defined size and motion limit of the wire? Can they all potentially be credited?
Before BIAB partial regeneration, in my head, I imagined RT's as "snakes", because like a snake it would swirl if you try to pinch it modify (chords, etc) at any place. It was driving me nuts as it would generate material that didn't fit my song idea well enough. When PGM rolled out partial regeneration, it somewhat reminded me of clay, as you can almost literally "sculpt" the track piece by piece to shape it pretty close to your liking.
I am wondering, how many of participants of this thread use BIAB's partial regeneration? Raise your hand.
P.S. If you do, thank JJJ as he was one of leading voices to promote & lobby for it. If you don't use it... you really should give it a try.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,933
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,933 |
In my teen / college years I've done some sculpting. Instructor would bring a model and give us couple of hours to do a clay sketch. You would have to set up armature and work clay fast to grasp as much detail as you can. Then at your own time we finished work from memory. Instructor and model were paid, studio was paid for, clay and armature and knifes were bought in the store.
Who gets the credit? Instructor for arranging the model? Model - the subject? Studio space / art department? Clay manufacturer - because it was made "ready to use"? Armature maker because it defined size and motion limit of the wire? Can they all potentially be credited?
Before BIAB partial regeneration, in my head, I imagined RT's as "snakes", because like a snake it would swirl if you try to pinch it modify (chords, etc) at any place. It was driving me nuts as it would generate material that didn't fit my song idea well enough. When PGM rolled out partial regeneration, it somewhat reminded me of clay, as you can almost literally "sculpt" the track piece by piece to shape it pretty close to your liking.
I am wondering, how many of participants of this thread use BIAB's partial regeneration? Raise your hand.
P.S. If you do, thank JJJ as he was one of leading voices to promote & lobby for it. If you don't use it... you really should give it a try. I use it for every song! I wish they would take it further...instead of having to click regen a bunch of times just have a popup with all possible options available to preview.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,327
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,327 |
"I use it for every song!"
That's FANTASTIC, Sherlock! You fought hard for it.
"I wish they would take it further...instead of having to click regen a bunch of times just have a popup with all possible options available to preview."
Lets wait till the dust from 2025 settle and discuss it in wishwell. I have a couple of suggestions too on the subject. I like the fact that PGM took the feature seriously and done several ways you can do this, but I agree, it still needs a few improvements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,254
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,254 |
I am wondering, how many of participants of this thread use BIAB's partial regeneration? Raise your hand. I've used it on occasion - really useful. It's one of those things that in retrospect seems so obvious you sort of wonder why it wasn't there from the beginning. 
-- David Cuny My virtual singer development blogVocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?BiaB 2025 | Windows 11 | Reaper | Way too many VSTis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,936
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,936 |
I have to tell an AI related story. I was demoing LyricLab at an AI expo a while back and 99% of the people there were not musicians and not interested in creating music until I learned a trick.
I would ask them a few questions like their name and the name of a loved one, the nature of the relationship etc. I would then type in “give me a love song about Craig the brave (or kind or loving or whatever) and Belinda his beautiful wife” (daughter, etc).
The AI would spit out some personalised lyrics (to which of course they said “that’s us”, no matter how corny or generalised the actual lyrics were). To really blow them away I would paste the lyrics into a suno like tool and play them an actual song.
Before AI, if a person like even thought of creating a personalised song like this he would have to go to a lot of trouble and expense.
AI (and BIAB for that matter) is democratising the process of music creation. Just like Canva has democratised design , Shopify e-commerce, Amazon publishing , Robinhood investing, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,254
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,254 |
Before AI, if a person like even thought of creating a personalised song like this he would have to go to a lot of trouble and expense. But that person isn't creating a personalized song. They are having a personalized song created for them. In the past, it would have had to be created by a person, who would have some set of expenses. With AI, the expenses are entirely different, and far less. AI (and BIAB for that matter) is democratising the process of music creation. Just like Canva has democratised design , Shopify e-commerce, Amazon publishing , Robinhood investing, etc. AI has made personalized songs accessible to everyone by removing the traditional costs. Music can now be created by AI cheaply, and on a mass scale. AI music differs significantly from Canva, Shopify, Amazon publishing, Robinhood investing, etc. These are all web-based applications that have leveraged the UI, making it possible for ordinary users to interact with the applications in a way that doesn't require them to be experts. Cost reduction has come about by generalizing a process, and then spreading those costs over many users. With Shopify and Canva, the tools like templates and widgets have been created by the company. Users choose templates and then customize them. You can't just tell Shopify that you want a website that looks like some other website you've seen on the internet. They are basically iterations of similar layout applications that have been available for decades. This is also true for Amazon publishing, Robinhood investing, and so on. In contrast, cost-reducing democratization in AI has come about because AI has mined millions of songs on the internet without regard to ownership. It has played, analyzed, deconstructed, and stored that analysis in a format that allows reconstruction of the material in a new configuration. The sounds that AI generates aren't an imitation of the instruments and voices, they are a literal amalgamation of those instruments and voices, down to fret noises and vocal tics. The people whose music is used as raw material for AI have paid the cost of purchasing, learning, and recording instruments. AI bears none of these costs, because it doesn't compensate the people who paid those costs. While there are licensing agreements, they reflect the clout of the licensed artists, not the percentage to which those artists contributed to the AI's training. So while these are all tools that have reduced barriers to entry, the means by which they've done this are entirely different.
-- David Cuny My virtual singer development blogVocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?BiaB 2025 | Windows 11 | Reaper | Way too many VSTis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,906
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,906 |
AI..... it's already killing some aspects of original music.
I was, for a period of time, one of the writers for the biggest of the custom song companies. It was income that was much better than streaming income, and faster than my BMI income. They would send me jobs for writing a custom song for a client. The client would include the details.... their story, and I had a couple of days to write, record, and submit the song. It was fun. I had to write quickly and meet that deadline. Early on, a couple of years ago, I was getting quite a few jobs. Then, as AI started to be a thing, I noticed the jobs dropping off to nothing. This drop-off was noticeable this year.
Why would someone pay $100 or more for a song, wait a week, and then get the song which may not be exactly what you want, when you can get a free, or low cost AI account for a month, input the prompt info, and have a really good quality song that includes the information you want, and get it in 20 seconds?
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Special Offers Extended Until May 31st!
Good news- we've extended our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® special offers until May 31, 2026!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 is packed with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can transcribe an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, and much more!
There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®.
When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PDT on May 31st, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.
Check out the Band-in-a-Box® for Mac packages page to find the best package for you.
Holiday Weekend Hours
It's Victoria Day Long Weekend in Canada. Our Customer Service hours are:
Saturday, May 16: Closed
Sunday, May 17: Closed
Monday, May 18: 8:00am - 4:00pm
Regular hours resume Tuesday, May 19th!
Today's the Last Day of the Band-in-a-Box 2026® for Mac Special!
Order before 11:59pm PDT today (May 15, 2026) to save up to 50% off your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® upgrade and receive a FREE Bonus PAK loaded with great new Add-ons to use with this new version!
Don't wait - order today!
Check out all the new features in the redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac - Special Offers End at 11:59pm PDT on Friday, May 15th, 2026!
Order before 11:59pm PDT on Friday, May 15th and SAVE up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® version 2026 for Mac Upgrade packages... and that's not all! With your version 2026 for Mac purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks... that's 222 NEW RealTracks available with version Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac!
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® today for as little as $49! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all available purchase options.
Learn more about the Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK here.
If you have any questions about which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We're here to help!
202 New RealTracks Released with Band-in-a-Box 2026!
With Band-in-a-Box® 2026, we've released 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 468-488) in a variety of genres—featuring your most requested styles!
Jazz, Funk & World (Sets 468-475):
Our new jazz, funk & blues RealTracks include a groovin’ collection of RealTracks and RealDrums! These include more requested “soul jazz” RealTracks featuring artists Neil Swainson (bass), Charles Treadway (organ), Brent Mason (guitar), and Wes Little (drums). There are new “smooth jazz” styles (4), which include a RealTracks first: muted trumpet, as well as slick new smooth jazz brushes options for drums. Blues lovers will be thrilled—there are more “classic acoustic blues” styles, including guitar (5), bass (4), and drums (10) with blues master Colin Linden, featuring understated and tasty background acoustic soloing, plus brushes drums and acoustic bass. There are also new electric blues RealTracks, including electric blues with PG favorite Johnny Hiland (3) and soulful electric slide guitar from Colin Linden (4). If you love funk & gospel, there are great new options this year, including gospel organ (3) from Charles Treadway, as well as new funk, tango, and rock ’n’ roll drums (3) and bass (1). And for big, bold arrangements, we have uptempo soul horns (4) featuring a three-part hip horn section with options for a full mix or stems of each individual horn — plus an accompanying rhythm section (4) of drums, bass, guitar, and electric piano!
Rock & Pop (Sets 476–482):
Our new rock & pop RealTracks bring a powerful mix of requested favorites, fresh genres, and modern chart-inspired styles! We have more of our popular “Producer Layered Acoustic Guitars (15)” featuring Band-in-a-Box favorite Brent Mason. We’ve continued our much-requested disco styles (10), and added new Celtic guitar (5) with a more basic, accessible approach than our previous Drop-D or DADGAD offerings. There are also highly requested yacht rock styles (17), inspired by the smooth, polished soft-rock sound of the late ’70s and early ’80s — laid-back grooves, silky electric pianos, warm textures, elegant harmonic movement, and pristine production aesthetics. Fans of heavier styles will love our new glam metal (13), capturing the flashy, high-energy sound of ’80s arena-ready guitar rock. We also have a set of rootsy modern-folk rock (18), with a warm, organic sound combining contemporary folk textures and driving acoustic strumming. And we’ve added lots of new modern pop styles (16) — the kinds of sounds you’re hearing on the radio today, featuring exciting new drums, synths, and cutting-edge RealTracks arrangements.
Country, & Americana (Sets 483–488):
Our new country & Americana RealTracks deliver a rich collection of acoustic, electric, and roots-inspired styles! We have new country pop (9) with legendary guitarist Brent Mason. There is also a potpourri (14) of bouzouki, guitars, banjo, and more, perfect for adding texture and character to contemporary acoustic arrangements. We’ve added funky country guitar (5) with PG favorite Brent Mason, along with classic pedal steel styles (5) featuring steel great Doug Jernigan. There are more country songwriter styles (8) that provide intimate, rootsy foundations for storytelling and modern Americana writing. Finally, we have “background soloing” acoustic guitar (12) with Brent Mason — simpler, but still very tasty acoustic lines designed to sit beautifully behind vocals or act as a subtle standalone solo part.
Check out all the 202 new RealTracks (in sets 468-488)!
And, if you are looking for more, the 2026 49-PAK (for $49) includes an impressive collection of 20 bonus RealTracks, featuring exciting and inspiring additions to add to your RealTracks library. You'll get new country-rhythm guitar styles from PG Music favorites Johnny Hiland and Brent Mason, along with modern-pop grooves that capture today’s radio-ready sound! There are also new indie-folk styles with guitar, bass, 6-string bass used as a high-chording instrument, acoustic guitar, and banjo. Plus, dedicated "cymbal fills" RealDrums provide an added layer that work very well with low-key folky styles with other percussion.
The 2026 49-PAK is loaded with other great new add-ons as well. Learn more about the 2026 49-PAK!
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
With your version 2026 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
- MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
- Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
- Playable RealTracks Set 5
- RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
- SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
- iOS Android Band-in-a-Box® App
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
- Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
- RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
- SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)
Learn more about the Bonus PAK and 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,334
Posts803,479
Members40,098
| |
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean