|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,694
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,694 |
Long story short: When attempting to load a BiaB 2025 song into RealBand 2025 Build 5 the error message in the title of this post shows up and most of the complicated chords like Aadd2 are stripped out of the chord sheet. Anyone seen this or have any notion as to why? PGMusic helpdesk is aware and has the file, but couldn't diagnose right away, so thought I'd ask the RB group. Found I COULD rebuild the song in RealBand since the chords aren't really "invalid" but thought I'd try the work-smarter-not-harder approach first.  THANKS! UPDATE: PGMusic contacted me and said add2 chords don't work with RB. I think they mean add2 chords can't be IMPORTED, since I can enter add2 chords and they play fine. It's just that add2 chords will be stripped out when loading a BiaB song.
Last edited by DC Ron; 05/01/25 05:59 PM.
DC Ron
BiaB Audiophile
Presonus Studio One
ASUS I9-12900K DAW, 32 GB RAM
Presonus Faderport 16
Too many guitars (is that a thing?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,602
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,602 |
Well there's yer problem Good catch
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,093
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,093 |
I hope Jeff Y is across this, as he is always instrumental in quickly resolving such potential issues.
BIAB & RB2026 Win.(Audiophile), Windows 10 Pro & Windows 11, Cakewalk Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Session Keys Grand S & Electric R, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M, Pioneer Active Monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,766
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,766 |
Confirmed and reported, bug id# 4996
I work here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,978
PG Music Developer
|
|
PG Music Developer
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,978 |
Until this is fixed, it turns out that chords such as "Aadd2" and "Badd2" are actually the same exact chord (in both RealBand and BB) as "A2" and "B2" based on looking at the map that defines which intervals are present in each chord type. I would have expected that "2" chords would be defined without the 3rd included (or the 3rd defined as flat) but they are defined with the 3rd, 5th, and 9th included which is the same way that "add2" chords are defined in the map. If you change the chords to just "2" chords you'll get the same results as "add2" without the error occurring.
Thanks.
Last edited by Jeff Yankauer; 05/07/25 05:21 PM.
Jeff Yankauer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,694
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,694 |
Jeff, that's good to know, if somewhat surprising. Would have sworn that at least some of the BiaB RTs play without the 3rd, like in an old school guitar power chord. Appreciate the tip, will experiment with that.
DC Ron
BiaB Audiophile
Presonus Studio One
ASUS I9-12900K DAW, 32 GB RAM
Presonus Faderport 16
Too many guitars (is that a thing?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,978
PG Music Developer
|
|
PG Music Developer
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,978 |
Yeah, I've entered C2 in some songs and I've heard it played without the 3rd and include the 2nd (which is what I would expect), but then again, I've also seen it omit the 2nd and just play a regular major chord as was the case when I tried entering C2 with the ZZJazz style.
Jeff Yankauer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,844
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,844 |
As long as I can remember, BIAB/RB has never properly supported an add2 or a sus2 chord. As has been stated, sometimes you get the "3" (an add2 chord) and sometimes you don't (a sus2 chord). Also, the A2 designation is used whether it's an add2 or add9 (the octave being the difference, but BIAB doesn't differentiate).
John Laptop-HP Omen I7 Win11Pro 32GB 12TB SSD Desktop-ASUS-I7 Win10Pro 32GB 12TB SATA BB2026/UMC204HD&404HD/Casios/Cakewalk/Reaper/Studio One/Notion/Dorico/Noteworthy/NI/Halion/IK http://www.sus4chord.com (under rehosting/construction)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,766
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,766 |
As long as I can remember, BIAB/RB has never properly supported an add2 or a sus2 chord. As has been stated, sometimes you get the "3" (an add2 chord) and sometimes you don't (a sus2 chord). Also, the A2 designation is used whether it's an add2 or add9 (the octave being the difference, but BIAB doesn't differentiate). The problem often comes down to MIDI vs RealTrack. With MIDI styles we're usually able to handle every chord, since MIDI notes can be added or moved or changed easily, but with RealTracks we're stuck with whatever the musician recorded. Sometimes they don't record every single possible chord - this can be due to a number of factors, the most logical of which is whether it's possible to play such a chord (6 strings on a guitar can be quite limiting when a complex chord has more than 6 notes), and also whether such a chord is contextually appropriate for the genre (for example a C7susb9#11b13 may be useful for jazz but not so useful for punk rock). As well, data storage was a limiting factor not that long ago, and RealTracks from the early years may be missing some of the more complex chords in an effort to reduce bandwidth and storage space.
I work here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,035
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,035 |
Simon,
All you said is intuitive, correct and good information but doesn't really explain why PG Music combines some chord labels under one label.
I'm not sure I know enough chord theory to provide a good example but several examples are given in earlier posts to this thread.
My thought is since BiaB started as a midi based program the program should be able to accept and display almost any chord. In cases where the displayed chord does not match RealTrack audio, the RealTrack transcription should be updated to display the recorded chord.
I know I for one use BiaB as a learning tool. Learning how a chord sounds is difficult if not impossible when the chord displayed does not match the audio playback.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,792
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,792 |
I tend to agree with all said here, especially Simon's comments. I often play with a friend who plays the keyboards and when practicing certain songs that have some more let's say complicated chords he might play the extentions while i play the simper chords on the guitar. The crowd hears the proper notes and are none the wiser. I find a good way to solve this in a recorded song is to use a midi track for something like the piano and then add the guitar part more simplified. Just my take nothing earth shattering or fancy but it works.
HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini Sonoma with 16 gig of ram, BiaB/RB 2026, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 11 , Presonus Audiobox USB96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,766
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,766 |
Simon,
All you said is intuitive, correct and good information but doesn't really explain why PG Music combines some chord labels under one label. Because it's much better to have something play than nothing. If you entered an Add2 chord and one of the RT's didn't have any Add2's, would you prefer for the RT to play a Sus2 or would you prefer that instrument drop out completely for that chord? I'm not sure I know enough chord theory to provide a good example but several examples are given in earlier posts to this thread.
My thought is since BiaB started as a midi based program the program should be able to accept and display almost any chord. In cases where the displayed chord does not match RealTrack audio, the RealTrack transcription should be updated to display the recorded chord.
I know I for one use BiaB as a learning tool. Learning how a chord sounds is difficult if not impossible when the chord displayed does not match the audio playback. That's a good idea, I'll suggest it.
I work here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,662
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,662 |
Because it's much better to have something play than nothing. If you entered an Add2 chord and one of the RT's didn't have any Add2's, would you prefer for the RT to play a Sus2 or would you prefer that instrument drop out completely for that chord? Would not the logical behaviour in the absence of an add2 be to simply play the triad?
Jazz relative beginner, starting at a much older age than was helpful.
AVL:MXE Linux; Windows 11
BIAB2026 Audiophile, a bunch of other software.
Kawai MP6, Ui24R, Focusrite Saffire Pro40 and Scarletts
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,766
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,766 |
Would not the logical behaviour in the absence of an add2 be to simply play the triad? I think Sus2 would be better than a major triad. If I want a 2, I'd rather a different flavour of 2 than no 2.
I work here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,662
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,662 |
Would not the logical behaviour in the absence of an add2 be to simply play the triad? I think Sus2 would be better than a major triad. If I want a 2, I'd rather a different flavour of 2 than no 2. Aye. I was more thinking of the alternative to "drop out completely". I was a little in two minds about triad or sus2, but I think it probably depends mostly on what the melody is playing against the chord. Whether or not the melody has the '2'. That may be a tricky question even if the melody is present in the project. Probably impossible for a backing-only work.
Jazz relative beginner, starting at a much older age than was helpful.
AVL:MXE Linux; Windows 11
BIAB2026 Audiophile, a bunch of other software.
Kawai MP6, Ui24R, Focusrite Saffire Pro40 and Scarletts
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,766
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,766 |
Aye. I was more thinking of the alternative to "drop out completely". Ahhh gotcha. There is a hierarchy in place for when certain chords aren't available as to what is "close enough" to replace it, to avoid having it drop out completely. I was a little in two minds about triad or sus2, but I think it probably depends mostly on what the melody is playing against the chord. Whether or not the melody has the '2'. That may be a tricky question even if the melody is present in the project. Probably impossible for a backing-only work. Yep, it would come down to a song-by-song basis. If it doesn't sound good, at least it's not hard to change it.
I work here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,035
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,035 |
There is a hierarchy in place for when certain chords aren't available as to what is "close enough" to replace it, to avoid having it drop out completely. Simon, is the chord hierarchy documented in a file accessible to users? If not, should it be? If so what is the best search term and location to hunt for it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,602
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,602 |
While you are at it .. what are the colonel's secret spices?
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,566
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,566 |
I don't use RealBand and thus do not read the forum for it, but Jim alerted us to the topic being discussed.
Blast it, I've been writing the same thing for decades about the 2 chords. Very few listen. All you have to do is read the chord shortcut description in the file, /BB/data/pgshortc.txt
; Note these are already defined in BB, and you can't over-ride these shortcuts
;sus2@2 add2@2 m+@m#5 dim7@dim 7aug@7+ sus4@sus 11@9sus 9sus4@9sus
;13sus4@13sus add9@2 7sus4@7sus s@7sus h@m7b5 d@dim J@MAJ7
; f@7b9 m7+@m7#5 NC@C. no chord l@7Alt u@(Blues) 7u@7(Blues)
; Lyd@lydian Lyd@lyd Lyd@4#
This to me clearly implies that BIAB handles sus2, add2, and add9 chords the same as a 2 chord. All four chord types give you the same thing. PG Music, is that wrong?
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,766
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,766 |
Simon, is the chord hierarchy documented in a file accessible to users? If not, should it be? If so what is the best search term and location to hunt for it? I believe it's part of the "secret sauce". I'm also pretty sure it's done on a case-by-case basis depending on the RealTrack in question. While you are at it .. what are the colonel's secret spices? I'll give you a hint - the first one is: This to me clearly implies that BIAB handles sus2, add2, and add9 chords the same as a 2 chord. All four chord types give you the same thing. PG Music, is that wrong? I've personally seen some RealTracks that have both sus2 and add2 chords in them. These would be some of the newer "12 key" RT's - don't ask me which ones though, I don't remember.
I work here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,566
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,566 |
Thank you Simon. Then if some or all of these chords are indeed handled differently, it might be time to update that pgshortc.txt file.
Bonus points if you can get NC implemented, as mentioned in that file.
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,566
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,566 |
ps sus2 is a strange animal. To where does it resolve? 🤨
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,766
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,766 |
Thank you Simon. Then if some or all of these chords are indeed handled differently, it might be time to update that pgshortc.txt file. That file is only for assigning shortcuts, not for chord handling. Bonus points if you can get NC implemented, as mentioned in that file. I will add a note to the NC request. ps sus2 is a strange animal. To where does it resolve? 🤨 I was taught it typically resolves to a major triad, though I'll be the first to admit that my education on music theory was far from exhaustive.
I work here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,581
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,581 |
ps sus2 is a strange animal. To where does it resolve? 🤨 Thanks for asking the question, Matt. I've also struggled with this. You inspired me to do a Google search and see what people are doing in 2025. I found that the article below is useful reading. https://www.contemporaryschoolofpiano.com/how-to-use-suspended-chords/--Noel
MY SONGS...Audiophile BIAB 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,844
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,844 |
I love the sound of sus chords and resolving to the root chord, whether sus4 or sus2. In fact my email address and web site (which I really need to pay more attention to) is sus4chord.
At church, I joke that my favorite chord is the Gsus chord.
John Laptop-HP Omen I7 Win11Pro 32GB 12TB SSD Desktop-ASUS-I7 Win10Pro 32GB 12TB SATA BB2026/UMC204HD&404HD/Casios/Cakewalk/Reaper/Studio One/Notion/Dorico/Noteworthy/NI/Halion/IK http://www.sus4chord.com (under rehosting/construction)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,766
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,766 |
At church, I joke that my favorite chord is the Gsus chord. Truly the holiest of chords. And I love that the joke is technically correct given how often the sus4>sus2>maj resolution is used in choral music.
I work here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,192
Posts801,798
Members40,064
| |
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean