Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Songwriting
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 177
Apprentice
OP Online Content
Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 177
Hi folks!
To add colour to my songs and elevate sections, I often use vocals in addition to the main vocal, and to be honest, it also helps obscure my sometimes-lacking main vocal. I've listed below some of the vocal techniques I use in my songwriting production, and wonder if you have some suggestions of other ideas I could use?

BV - vocal fattening - I usually record a second and third main vocal and pan these 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock and dropped back 6 - 12 db to sit behind the main vocal but thicken it up
Harmony - 3rds, 5ths, 6ths, 7ths above or below - singing the same lyric and meter as the main vocal
Key words or phrases - as per harmony or unison but only emphasizing a key word or short phrase
Octaves - above or below the main vocal - singing the same lyric and meter as the main vocal
Call and answer - the main vocal sings one line with the BV singing the response
Ooos and ahhs - this might be layering other notes used in the chord triads or a line cliche
Dit dit dit dit - repeated 8th notes e.g. listen to 'Girl' bridge by The Beatles
Counter melody - Second vocal with different or complimentary melody and meter that sits behind or weaves around the main vocal e.g.'Blue' bridge by The Jayhawks or 'Scarborough Fair/Canticle' by Simon and Garfunkel

Any other suggestions (with examples if you have them)?

Andrew D


Regards,
Andrew D
Adelaide, Sth Aust
Soundcloud: https://on.soundcloud.com/SQE4btVvNVkLq74e9
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@andrewoftheantipodes
Songwriting
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,205
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,205
I use BV and harmony a lot. In almost every song actually.

I will tune only the main vox while leaving the others untuned. I'm generally very careful to be sure timing is perfect. I either fix it with punch or use volume automation judiciously to cover the nits.

A very nice plugin that does this automatically, and I have mentioned it before, is called Trivox. It goes in the FX bin on the main vox but it doesn't change the main vox. It creates 3 additional copies of the main vox. The octave above and below, and a third one. They are all adjustable to whatever interval you want. The cool thing is you can tell it the key of the song and major or minor and it sings the exact, correct note to harmonize the main vox. This is one of my nits with most harmonizers that let you select the interval and follow it regardless of the dissonance of the harmonized note. Trivox is intelligent and adjusts the intervals such as thirds to stay in harmony. You can also select the level of each note as well as a few other features plus total automation for every single feature and adjustment in it. I've been using it for almost everything I have done recently because it saves me a lot of time tracking multiple box tracks and mixing them.

I still tend to use multiple tracks and there's a new song I will be posting soon that doesn't use Trivox at all.

Just a FYI.

Last edited by Guitarhacker; 05/17/25 06:30 AM. Reason: clarification

You can find my music at:
www.herbhartley.com
Add nothing that adds nothing to the music.
You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.

The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
Songwriting
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,781
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,781
I've been trying for years to get good, usable doubling and harmonies without having to sing those parts. I'm not a good enough singer to accurately and reliably sing those parts myself. And, truth be told, I'm a bit lazy about trying over and over to get them just right.

So, I bought a double-tracking plugin (can't recall the name right now) and was never happy with the results. Then I tried just duplicating my vocal track and time shifting it a wee bit. That kinda worked for doubling but I was never thrilled with it. I even tried the harmony feature in early versions of the Nectar plugin from izotope with poor results.

I tried using the TC Helicon feature (I think that was the name) that was built into BIAB a few versions ago but it sounded way too robotic and was cumbersome to use. I bought an actual TC Helicon vocal harmonizer pedal from Sweetwater and while it is kinda cool it is waaayy too fake and robotic sounding!

So I bought Waves Doubler plugin but I couldn't get any decent doubling that I liked. I bought the Trivox plugin on GuitarHacker's advice but, again, I just didn't like the results I got even though I remain quite impressed with the harmony results GH got with it!

I had almost given up until I purchased Synth V last year. This product produces awesome synthesized vocal tracks using sung inputs from different vocalists. I quickly discovered how to import my vocal track, convert it to MIDI, assign a voice, clean it up and produce a new track with a different singer singing my vocal track! So, for doubling this can be extremely useful but what about harmonies? Well, you can edit the MIDI to pitch up or down. And I found a couple of scripts that will pitch up or down while also maintaining correct harmony notes! Game Changer! It is quite a bit of work to go from recorded vocal to synthesized harmony but def Game Changer!!!!

So, problem solved, right? Right!

BUT, as I mentioned earlier, I am lazy. 😂 So, when Nectar 4 came out I listened to their demos and was curious about the new and improved harmony/doubling feature. I had been disappointed by this feature in Nectar before but the upgrade was affordable so I took the plunge. And OMG, SUPER GAME CHANGER for me!!! Problem def solved!

I copy my recorded vocal track to a new track in my DAW, apply the desired harmony effects (usually just by choosing a preset), mute the main vox on the new track and just cut the areas where I don't want the harmony.

The Nectar 4 solution is fast and easy and it sounds awesome! I am beyond delighted with this! I'm still very happy with Synth V too but will mainly use it only when I want a different voice. For harmonies generated from my vocals it is Nectar 4 forever!

Songwriting
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,205
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,205
Quote
I bought the Trivox plugin on GuitarHacker's advice but, again, I just didn't like the results I got even though I remain quite impressed with the harmony results GH got with it!]

The secret to this is....less is perfect


You can find my music at:
www.herbhartley.com
Add nothing that adds nothing to the music.
You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.

The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
Songwriting
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,781
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,781
Originally Posted by Guitarhacker
Quote
I bought the Trivox plugin on GuitarHacker's advice but, again, I just didn't like the results I got even though I remain quite impressed with the harmony results GH got with it!]

The secret to this is....less is perfect

Yeah, I know I've been chasing a unicorn when what I need to do is settle for a donkey! A friend pointed out that no matter what I do I will prolly never get a generated harmony part that stands up as a duet like Simon and Garfunkel (I can get damn close with Synth V and a LOT of work.) But I also don't wanna bury it so deep in the mix that you can barely hear it! I've prolly also made a big mistake by trying to depend on presets (did I mention I am lazy?) So, for me, at least for now, Nectar 4 is working like a charm!

Songwriting
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 177
Apprentice
OP Online Content
Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 177
Originally Posted by Guitarhacker
I use BV and harmony a lot. In almost every song actually.

I will tune only the main vox while leaving the others untuned. I'm generally very careful to be sure timing is perfect. I either fix it with punch or use volume automation judiciously to cover the nits.
...
I still tend to use multiple tracks and there's a new song I will be posting soon that doesn't use Trivox at all.
Just a FYI.
Thanks Herb! I hadn't thought of using volume automation. I do punch in and have occasional spliced and moved to correct the timing, but with average success. I'll check out Trivox, but on my limited pocket-money budget, probably won't get it. Too many ideas, not enough $$! I'll watch out for your next post.
Andrew D


Regards,
Andrew D
Adelaide, Sth Aust
Soundcloud: https://on.soundcloud.com/SQE4btVvNVkLq74e9
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@andrewoftheantipodes
Songwriting
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 177
Apprentice
OP Online Content
Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 177
Originally Posted by JohnJohnJohn
I've been chasing a unicorn when what I need to do is settle for a donkey!
Thanks John! Now there's an idea for a song!
Andrew D


Regards,
Andrew D
Adelaide, Sth Aust
Soundcloud: https://on.soundcloud.com/SQE4btVvNVkLq74e9
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@andrewoftheantipodes
Songwriting
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,646
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,646
For my demos, I normally sing the backgrounds I need with varying degrees of success and diminishing returns as I get older (turned 71 a couple days ago).

Having Nectar 4, I’m looking forward to checking it out the way that Notes is describing.


BIAB 2024 Audiophile, 24Core/60CoreGPU Core M2 MacStudioUltra/8TB/192GB Sequoia, M1 MBAir, 2012 MBP/color]
[color=#FF0040]Digital Performer11, LogicPro

Finale27/Dorico/Encore/SmartScorePro64/Notion6 /Overture5
Songwriting
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,474
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,474
That's a good list. Might also think about various combinations, like thickening the harmonies and/or the BGVs.

Another good "coloring" for vocals is a slight delay, which can be panned with or separate from the vocal. I almost always pan harmonies (at least slightly), too.

Waves' Abbey Road Automated Double Track is another simple solution for thickening, though it won't make you sound exactly like the Beatles.

Used to use a lot of shortcuts like Melodyne to create doubled tracks or harmony lines, but now I just go ahead and sing everything. Doesn't really take much more time (if any) and I like the results much better. I'll use composite vocals for all vocal parts to compensate for my lack of, uhm...precision.

As important as vocal arrangements are, and they are one of my favorite things to do, how they fit with the backing track arrangement is just as important. So carving out space (ie stereo image) and/or bandwidth (ie EQ) is necessary. Like a lot of you, I'll leave lead vocals, stereo drums and bass centered and distribute everything around left and right. I'll probably use a high pass filter on a harmony or BGV bus since I don't need those frequencies. I'll probably compress the BGVs a bit so they sit in the mix better.

The list goes on...


DC Ron
BiaB Audiophile
Presonus Studio One
StudioCat DAW dual screen
Presonus Faderport 16
Too many guitars (is that a thing?)
Songwriting
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 177
Apprentice
OP Online Content
Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 177
Originally Posted by DC Ron
That's a good list. Might also think about various combinations, like thickening the harmonies and/or the BGVs.

Another good "coloring" for vocals is a slight delay, which can be panned with or separate from the vocal. I almost always pan harmonies (at least slightly), too.

So carving out space (ie stereo image) and/or bandwidth (ie EQ) is necessary. Like a lot of you, I'll leave lead vocals, stereo drums and bass centered and distribute everything around left and right. I'll probably use a high pass filter on a harmony or BGV bus since I don't need those frequencies. I'll probably compress the BGVs a bit so they sit in the mix better.

The list goes on...

Thanks Ron for these useful tips!

Andrew D


Regards,
Andrew D
Adelaide, Sth Aust
Soundcloud: https://on.soundcloud.com/SQE4btVvNVkLq74e9
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@andrewoftheantipodes
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To

Moderated by  Andrew - PG Music, PeterGannon 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Band-in-a-Box 2025 Italian Version is Here!

Cari amici
È stata aggerate la versione in Italiano del programma più amato dagli appassionati di musica, il nostro Band-in-a-Box.
Questo è il link alla nuova versione 2025.

Di seguito i link per scaricare il pacchetti di lingua italiana aggiornati per Band-in-a-Box e RealBand, anche per chi avesse già comprato la nuova versione in inglese.

Band-in-a-Box 2025 - Italiano
RealBand 2025 - Italiano

Band-in-a-Box 2025 French Version is Here!

Bonjour à tous,

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 pour Windows est disponible en Français.
Le téléchargement se fait à partir du site PG Music

Pour ceux qui auraient déjà acheté la version 2025 de Band-in-a-Box (et qui donc ont une version anglaise), il est possible de "franciser" cette version avec les patchs suivants:

BIAB 2025 - francisation
RealBand 2025 - francisation

Voilà, enjoy!

Band-in-a-Box 2025 German Version is Here!

Band-in-a-Box 2025 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!

Die deutsche Version Band-in-a-Box® 2025 für Windows ist ab sofort verfügbar!

Alle die bereits die englische Version von Band-in-a-Box und RealBand 2024 installiert haben, finden hier die Installationsdateien für das Sprachenupdate:

https://nn.pgmusic.com/pgfiles/languagesupport/deutsch2025.exe
https://nn.pgmusic.com/pgfiles/languagesupport/deutsch2025RB.exe

Update Your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 to Build 1128 for Windows Today!

Already using Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 1128 now from our Support Page to enjoy the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.

Stay up to date—get the latest update now!

Update to RealBand® 2025 Build 5 Windows Today!

Already using RealBand® 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 5 now from our Support Page to ensure you have the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.

Get the latest update today!

PowerTracks Pro Audio 2025 for Windows is Here!

PowerTracks Pro Audio 2025 is here! This new version introduces many features, including VST3 support, the ability to load or import a .FLAC file, a reset option for track height in the Tracks window, a taller Timeline on the Notation window toolbar, new freeze buttons in the Tracks window, three toolbar modes (two rows, single row, and none), the improved Select Patch dialog with text-based search and numeric patch display, a new button in the DirectX/VST window to copy an effects group, and more!

First-time packages start at only $49. Already a PowerTracks Pro Audio user? Upgrade for as little as $29!

www.pgmusic.com/powertracks.htm

Video: Summary of the New Band-in-a-Box® App for iOS®

Join Tobin as he takes you on a tour of the new Band-in-a-Box® app for iOS®! Designed for musicians, singer-songwriters, and educators, this powerful tool lets you create, play, and transfer songs effortlessly on your iPhone® or iPad®—anytime, anywhere.

Band-in-a-Box® for iOS® :Summary video.

Check out the forum post for more information.

Forum Statistics
Forums58
Topics83,999
Posts773,471
Members39,521
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
Newest Members
Simson Tyler, cman, PadraigK, Mike19073, Joel McLaughlin
39,521 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 184
DC Ron 100
rsdean 97
Noel96 75
WaoBand 73
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5