|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 253
Apprentice
|
Apprentice
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 253 |
Obviously if you can make your own tracks and your singing with a trained voice you are a musician...The Karaoke guy is someone who can only perform with the discs...I know a couple of them ,they try to get up and sing w/a band and they simply cant do it. They cant stay in time without the words on the screen also they are continually waiting for all of the cues from the record in order to start their phrases they are unable to listen and make music with other people....I consider myself a musician and I do perform w/backing tracks just like you....either of us could go to a karaoke night for fun if we wanted to but we are musicians who know how to create music vocally and also with an instrument we can use backing tracks that someone else created if we want to , we can make our own if we want to, we can also make music with other musicians...I'm sure you know as well as I do that a lot of time and effort goes into being a musician. So just buying a machine that plays karaoke discs or showing up where there is one is not the same as actually being a musician who uses backing tracks. So clarify Mike you and I are not a karaoke guys. But they do exist and I like to see a real musician like yourself perform when I go out to hear live music...I actually enjoy listening to someone do a single with backing tracks, especially those created by the performer....Ive been to karaoke nights before and most of the time I feel like I'm watching learn how to sing while intoxicated. I hope you don't think I'm calling you a karaoke guy:)
...........Jeff......
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251 |
Wow! Did we get away from “ethical considerations” or what? That never happens here!  I’ve been watching this thread, but haven’t felt compelled to comment thus far, ……………. (you’re welcome. LOL). When the subject of “karaoke” came up, I essentially just scanned the comments. Then I noticed that “karaoke” seemed to be a sore spot for Mike when he said: Quote:
Define karaoke guy
So my initial thought was a group of Japanese businessmen having a fun night out, or a redneck/average guy trying to belt out his best impersonation of Elvis, Merle Haggard or Bob Seger on a dare from his buddies.
After a couple of more comments, I decided to look up karaoke on Wikipedia:
Quote:
The concept of creating studio recordings that lack the lead vocal has been around for probably nearly as long as recording itself. Many artists, amateur and professional, perform in situations where a full band/orchestra is either logistically or financially impractical, so they use a "karaoke" recording; however, they are actually the original artists.
So if we take this definition on face value, if you sing to a backing track and don’t play an instrument, then it’s “karaoke”. I’ll have to admit that if I walk in somewhere and see someone singing to a backing track and they aren't playing an instrument, then I don’t think of them as “musicians”.
Now if this same person was singing and playing an instrument, then I would take time to stop and take notice of what they were doing. If they also mentioned they were playing some of the backing tracks, and/or they’d written the song, then I’d be trying to get a closer seat.
Being a singer doesn’t make you a musician, it makes you a singer. That’s not a bad thing! But don’t expect musicians to think of you as a musician unless you sing AND play while performing.
Also, being able to program backing tracks also doesn’t make you a musician.
Being able to sing is primarily an “accident” of birth, although voice lessons can improve on any level of vocal competence.
Being able to play an instrument is primarily hard work, desire to play, and lessons from anywhere you can get them. In other words, you “earn” this ability. Very few are “accidents” of birth.
That’s why there is a distinction.
So if you’re a good singer, …………be thankful. If you’re a good musician, ……… be glad you worked for it.
If you can do both, ……… do it. You’ll be recognized as a singer and musician.
But if you only do one, don’t get pissed when you aren’t recognized as the other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,439
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,439 |
G'day Bob, to continue somewhat off topic... I'm going to respectfully disagree with you. A singer is still a musician (and no, I don't sing myself*). It's just that their instrument happens to be their voice instead of a guitar, or (as in my case) a trombone, or a piano etc.. The voice even has strings (vocal chords), a resonance chamber (chest and oral cavity), a "bow" (the breath), so one could even argue (very loosely) that it belongs to the string family A good singer will put at least as much effort into perfecting their instrument as any other good musician, just as a poor singer will put in as little effort as they can get away with, just like any other poor musician (instrumentalist(?)). Some will have more native talent, some will have less, again, just like any other musician, but please don't think of singers as not being musicians. In my work with the singers at church and in the musical societies I play for I have the great privilege of working and being associated with some extremely good musicians. They all work very hard to make their performance the best they can with out differentiation to what instrument they play, be it artificial or natural. *Actually I do sing a pretty good tenor solo: Ten or twelve miles away, so low you can't hear me 
--=-- My credo: If it's worth doing, it's worth overdoing - just ask my missus, she'll tell ya  --=--You're only paranoid if you're wrong!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251 |
Lawrie, Quote:
A singer is still a musician (and no, I don't sing myself*). It's just that their instrument happens to be their voice instead of a guitar, or (as in my case) a trombone, or a piano etc.. The voice even has strings (vocal chords), a resonance chamber (chest and oral cavity), a "bow" (the breath), so one could even argue (very loosely) that it belongs to the string family
As you always do, you've made some very good points. When i was trying to make a distinction between singers and musicians, it wasn't for the purpose of putting "singers" on a level below musicians.
Allow me to explain. I've often played for people before and when I was finished, they may say something along the lines of "I wish I had that GIFT!"
While this sounds like a compliment, it makes me want to say "GIFT MY ASS!". Why? Because it wasn't a gift. It was something I've spent thousands of hours working to achieve, with callouses, sore fingers and sleepless nights to prove it.
When it comes to singing, ........... you can never be a GREAT singer unless you were born with that ability! I'm a mediocre singer, ...... and I have to practice to be that good! If I worked the rest of my life for every waking moment, ....... I'd never be a great singer. I'd still be mediocre.
If I put the same amount of time into playing guitar, I would be a great guitarist. How do I know? Because I've approached it before. I never reached it, but I approached it. All it would have taken was more time and effort.
Jackie Evancho is a great singer. She hasn't had time to "work for it". She was born with it.
While both singing and playing an instrument are all part of music, ......... they are two distinctly different things.
One is a singer. The other is a musician. Both are essential, but their roles are different. We could go into all of the other people who make music possible, but that doesn't mean they're musicians.
If you don't play an instrument, then you aren't a musician! You may be a songwriter, composer or singer, but that doesn't make you a musician. You have to "earn" that distinction!
I would think all of the great singers out there would agree. They are the singers. Those of us who play are the musicians!
(Putting on flame retardant suit now!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,439
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,439 |
G'day Bob, no flame retardants needed mate With respect, I think you do yourself a disservice. I know people who have worked their backsides off to learn to play well and have never succeeded. They simply don't have the native talent. They have nothing more than a wish to build on. I know musicians who have worked hard and know their theory inside out, yet can barely play two notes one after the other. I know musicians who have serious trouble with rhythm - they just ain't got it. I know one guy who can read fly spots, but can't play swing to save his life unless it's written out as crotchet/quaver triplets or written in 12/8... You have reached the level you have by working hard to maximise your native talent. Without the work, you could not achieve your potential. Without the talent, you have no potential to achieve. Quote:
If you don't play an instrument, then you aren't a musician! You may be a songwriter, composer or singer, but that doesn't make you a musician. You have to "earn" that distinction!
If you change "musician" to "instrumentalist" then I agree.
--=-- My credo: If it's worth doing, it's worth overdoing - just ask my missus, she'll tell ya --=--You're only paranoid if you're wrong!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251 |
Lawrie, Quote:
If you change "musician" to "instrumentalist" then I agree.
Once again, great points.
But if you aren't an instrumentalist, how can you be a musician?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,439
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,439 |
 Quote:
But if you aren't an instrumentalist, how can you be a musician?
Be a singer...
--=-- My credo: If it's worth doing, it's worth overdoing - just ask my missus, she'll tell ya --=--You're only paranoid if you're wrong!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,333
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,333 |
I invested about 8,000 dollars in my daughter's voice. She started piano and dropped it. She couldn't sing but had an instructor with a Master's Degree in Music as a vocal coach. There were scales, exercises, breathing lessons, warm ups, tips for singing with a cold, sight reading, and tons of other stuff included. And this is at a very low level, you can go to any great music school and pay 50k a year for voice lessons.
So I TOTALLY disagree you have to be born with it. Anyone, given 2 hours a day work, a good teacher, and proper preparation, work ethic, and support can learn the instrument called voice just like they can learn the clarinet.
Our local university has a Dr. of music (and she's a good friend.wings and beverages once a week) who has written a book on singing for seniors, and runs such a program for seniors.
A voice is an instrument. Mines damaged. (Radiation burns) And I'm still trying. Very trying.
Just ask the wife.
My daughter went from a very poor singer to a passable one. At the present she's too much into other things, like trying to figure out how to leave home at 20 and still travel the world with her friends.
John Conley
Musica est vita
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251 |
Lawrie, Quote:
With respect, I think you do yourself a disservice. I know people who have worked their backsides off to learn to play well and have never succeeded. They simply don't have the native talent. They have nothing more than a wish to build on.
I'm not saying everyone can play or sing, because it isn't true.
But I've seen TONS of people who could learn to play if they were willing to put the time and effort into it. But they're not willing. They think it should just come "naturally"!
The only people I've seen who are capable of of being "good" or "great" singers were people who had that talent without any coaching or teaching. They can still sing better than most of us, ............. and they don't even have a clue what key they're singing in! But they can do it.
That is a "gift".
You're right about being able to reach certain levels of "mastering" an instrument being a "gift" or "talent".
It's just something that comes at a much higher price than being able to sing well.
For me, that means it should be seperated on a musical plane.
An analogy would be like telling someone to go into the next room and "pick up" a diamond. (That's the singer).
Then you tell the other person to walk a thousand miles and pick up one just like it! (That's the musician, or instrumentalist, if you will.)
It's just not the same thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251 |
Lawrie, Quote:
Be a singer...
HEHE. But you still wouldn't be musician! LOL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,439
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,439 |
Quote:
An analogy would be like telling someone to go into the next room and "pick up" a diamond. (That's the singer).
Then you tell the other person to walk a thousand miles and pick up one just like it! (That's the musician, or instrumentalist, if you will.)
It's just not the same thing.
For the most part this can be true, but I know instrumentalists who do exactly that... I hate them - well, not really. I know this one guy - he can pick up any instrument, within a few minutes he's playing a passable tune - give him a week and you'd never know he hasn't spent his entire life perfecting it.
Saw him pick up a flute once. Took him less than a minute to figure out a passable embouchure and the next to run a C scale... I don't think he'd ever picked up a flute before - mongrel... Of course, he has spent his entire life with music (I think he's about 22 or 23) and so has a bit of experience behind him which transfers from instrument to instrument, and grows every time he does it.
AND he's the best conductor I've ever worked for. Serious native talent. On the down side, he hasn't got social skills worth a damn, and very little respect for any authority beside his own, though he has been working on that and it is improving. I suspect he has mild Aspergers.
I will agree that singers are a group apart; they never have to carry their instruments...
Bob, I understand your irritation. I even share it to an extent, but I aim mine towards those ignorant enough to ignore the possibility that developing skills takes work - these people are usually pretty useless at just about everything anyhow.
--=-- My credo: If it's worth doing, it's worth overdoing - just ask my missus, she'll tell ya --=--You're only paranoid if you're wrong!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251 |
Lawrie, I can relate. A guy I used to play with was blind. He was also a multi instrumentalist. I'd just just began experimenting with jazz diatonic progressions. He played primarily bluegrass. So did I. I told him to just play lead over the chords I was going to play on his mandolin. I didn't know what I was going to play, and neither did he! I launched into a heavily syncopated diatonic progression with 2-3 chord changes per bar. We played for about 5 mins and he "tore it up" and everything sounded perfect! After we finished, he said "That was cool! What key was it in?"!!!!!!!!!!!!! If he hadn't been blind, ................ I'd have kicked his ass!!!!! ........ LOL. He just knew what sounded right! And he played it off the cuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,926
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,926 |
Quote:
It's just something that comes at a much higher price than being able to sing well.
?????
Tell that to an opera singer who has turned him- or herself into an instrument and see what they think.
I probably misunderstood. I do that a lot.
R.
"My primary musical instrument is the personal computer."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251 |
Richard, Quote:
It's just something that comes at a much higher price than being able to sing well.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
?????
Tell that to an opera singer who has turned him- or herself into an instrument and see what they think.
I would, ....... but I can't stand stand to be in the same room as an opera singer!
Especially if they're singing!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251 |
Last edited by bobcflatpicker; 12/30/10 02:43 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,439
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,439 |
I've been reading back and thinking a bit about both Bob and Richard's comments.
The thought occurred to me that what we've been talking about could be related to instrument quality.
For the sake of my point you need to consider the voice as an instrument:
Any musically talented person should be able to learn an instrument. The harder they work the better they will get at their chosen instrument, but a time will come when the limitations of the instrument will limit further improvement.
Thus you get "student", "intermediate" and "professional" grade instruments. If I may digress into the brass world for a while as what expertise I have is grounded here:
Student grade instruments are usually built to wider tolerances in order to reduce cost. They are often heavier guage brass to help them take knocks a bit better and there is less choice in options. They come with a "standard" mouthpiece and usually include a fairly robust case.
Professional grade instruments are built to much closer tolerances (price is usually much less of an object when compared to performance). The guage of the brass is often lighter, though not always - this depends on the sound you are seeking. You will have options in alloy's available (Nickel silver, yellow, gold or red brass - raw, lacquered or silver plate etc.). They won't come with a mouthpiece as you are expected to already have a preferred one. They often don't come with a case as many pro's prefer to use a gig bag (I don't, but then I don't make a living at it either).
Intermediates or "step up" horns fall somewhere in between these.
What this means is that once you reach the limits of your instrument, you have the option to (try to) purchase a better one. Sadly singers don't have this option - if their voice is ordinary, then that's what they have.
However, training and practice - work - allows one to maximise one's results. Put a poor trombone player on my nice new custom Rath and they'll still sound just as bad. Put a good trombone player on a student horn and thay'll make it sound great. But it still won't be as good as when they're on their pro. horn (though they can surprise you sometimes...). I have several 'bones of various kinds and quality. The latest (Rath R10F) is by far the easiest to play. Now, I get "my" sound no matter which horn I'm using, though on my Besson (which is closest in bore and bell specification to my Rath) I have to work much harder to get a similar result to the Rath. The Rath is easier to play... I'm sure you find a similar phenomenon with your guitars. Body shape and stiffness, pickups, angle of the neck, string selection, the action &etc.. The better the quality, the easier it is to play.
The same applies for singers. A well trained singer with a poor voice can sound pretty good, a poorly or untrained singer with a good or great voice will potentially sound pretty good too, but to actually be good or great they will still need training and practice. They just get to start with the "pro grade horn" instead of the "student model"... In other words, "It's easier to play"...
--=-- My credo: If it's worth doing, it's worth overdoing - just ask my missus, she'll tell ya --=--You're only paranoid if you're wrong!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,439
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,439 |
G'day Bob, hmmm. Is a drummer a musician? (I regularly tease my son about giving up music to play the drums ) What about other percussion? Is a percussionist still a musician if (s)he decides to experiment with other objects to hit? I would say: "Of course they are.". OK, what about a didgeridoo? Strictly speaking a didge. is a brass instrument (played by buzzing ones lips in a mouthpiece) but you also sing into a didge. As well as glottal stops and other vocal techniques... Is this singing or playing? What if I use a megaphone? Like a didge. it will amplify my voice - am I still singing or am I now playing an instrument? I guess we have a somewhat different perspective. I'm a brass player. We brass players are intimately connected to our instruments using all the vocal apparatus of our bodies (including the vocal chords for some effects) in a way that no other instrument is. We-ell OK, other wind instruments do come pretty close... OTOH you are a string player. No part of your vocal apparatus is involved in playing your instrument. (unless, like me, you need to "hold your mouth right" when you're concentrating ) I guess point of view is really important.
--=-- My credo: If it's worth doing, it's worth overdoing - just ask my missus, she'll tell ya --=--You're only paranoid if you're wrong!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,333
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,333 |
Well if you have a real look on a big screen TV at your vocal chords you'd get that the voice is an instrument.
I've had that 'opportunity' 4 times in the last year.
Bob, you dragged up what I consider to be the thaw in your argument on voice.(Ethnocentric - where music is concerned in this case.)
Were you part of a faculty of music I'd suggest your POV would be 180 degrees the other way.
I think the voice is far more complex than most instruments.
But I'd defer to Matt here, he's the only person I know who taught music in a 'liberal arts' environment, who frequents the environs.
John Conley
Musica est vita
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251 |
Lawrie, Quote:
I guess point of view is really important.
You're right. It is.
Take care and Happy New Year!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs Special Extended Until August 31st!
XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs Special Extended Until August 31st!
The XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs special offers are now available until August 31st at 11:59pm PDT!
Ready to take your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 experience to the next level? Now’s the perfect time! Expand your style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs—packed with a wide variety of genres to inspire your next musical creation.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-9 includes 900 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). With over 3,500 styles (and 35 MIDI styles) included in Xtra Styles PAKs 1-20, the possibilities are endless!
Get the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Windows or for Mac.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Get Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 19 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Listen to demos and order now! For Windows or for Mac.
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Don’t miss this chance to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box setup—at a great price!
Mac 2025 Special Upgrade Offers Extended Until August 15th!
It's not too late to upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® and save! We've extended our special until August 15, 2025!
We've added many major new features to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, including advanced AI tools like the amazing BB Stem Splitter and AI Lyrics Generator, as well as VST3 plugin support, and Equalize Temp. Plus, there’s a new one-stop MIDI Patches Picker with over 1,100 MIDI patches to choose from, all neatly categorized by GM numbers. The MultiPicker Library is enhanced with tabs for the SongPicker, MIDI Patch Picker, Chord Builder, AI Lyrics Generator, and Song Titles Browser, and the tabs are organized into logical groups. The Audiophile Edition is enhanced with FLAC files , which are 60% smaller than AIFF files while maintaining identical audio quality, and now ships on a fast 1TB SSD, and much more!
Check out all the new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® here:
Purchase your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac during our special to save up to 50% off your upgrade purchase and receive a FREE BONUS PAK of amazing new Add-ons. These include the 2025 RealCombos Booster PAK, Look Ma! More MIDI 13: Country & Americana, Instrumental Studies Set 22: 2-Hand Piano Soloing - Rhythm Changes, MIDI SuperTracks Set 44: Jazz Piano, Artist Performance Set 17: Songs with Vocals 7, Playable RealTracks Set 4, RealDrums Stems Set 7: Jazz with Mike Clark, and more!
Upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for just $49 and add 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and 20 RealStyles, FLAC Files for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks, Look Ma! More MIDI 14: SynthMaster, MIDI SuperTracks Set 45: More SynthMaster, Artist Performance Set 18: Songs with Vocals 8, and RealDrums Stems Set 8: Pop, Funk & More with Jerry Roe.
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs!
New RealTracks Released with Band-in-a-Box 2025!
We’ve expanded the Band-in-a-Box® RealTracks library with 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 449-467) across Jazz, Blues, Funk, World, Pop, Rock, Country, Americana, and Praise & Worship—featuring your most requested styles!
Jazz, Blues & World (Sets 449–455):
These RealTracks includes “Soul Jazz” with Neil Swainson (bass), Mike Clark (drums), Charles Treadway (organ), Miles Black (piano), and Brent Mason (guitar). Enjoy “Requested ’60s” jazz, classic acoustic blues with Colin Linden, and more of our popular 2-handed piano soloing. Plus, a RealTracks first—Tango with bandoneon, recorded in Argentina!
Rock & Pop (Sets 456–461):
This collection includes Disco, slap bass ‘70s/‘80s pop, modern and ‘80s metal with Andy Wood, and a unique “Songwriter Potpourri” featuring Chinese folk instruments, piano, banjo, and more. You’ll also find a muted electric guitar style (a RealTracks first!) and “Producer Layered Guitar” styles for slick "produced" sound.
Country, Americana & Praise (Sets 462–467):
We’ve added new RealTracks across bro country, Americana, praise & worship, vintage country, and songwriter piano. Highlights include Brent Mason (electric guitar), Eddie Bayers (drums), Doug Jernigan (pedal steel), John Jarvis (piano), Glen Duncan (banjo, mandolin & fiddle), Mike Harrison (electric bass) and more—offering everything from modern sounds to heartfelt Americana styles
Check out all the 202 New RealTracks (in sets 456-467)
And, if you are looking for more, the 2025 49-PAK (for $49) includes an additional 20 RealTracks with exciting new sounds and genre-spanning styles. Enjoy RealTracks firsts like Chinese instruments (guzheng & dizi), the bandoneon in an authentic Argentine tango trio, and the classic “tic-tac” baritone guitar for vintage country.
You’ll also get slick ’80s metal guitar from Andy Wood, modern metal with guitarist Nico Santora, bass player Nick Schendzielos, and drummer Aaron Stechauner, more praise & worship, indie-folk, modern/bro country with Brent Mason, and “Songwriter Americana” with Johnny Hiland.
Plus, enjoy user-requested styles like Soul Jazz RealDrums, fast Celtic Strathspey guitar, and Chill Hop piano & drums!
The 2025 49-PAK is loaded with other great new add-ons as well. Learn more about the 2025 49-PAK!
Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac!
With your version 2025 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Or upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2025 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 33 new RealTracks and 65+ new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 29 new RealTracks and 45+ new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 20 new RealStyles.
- Look Ma! More MIDI 13: Country & Americana
- Instrumental Studies Set 22: 2-Hand Piano Soloing - Rhythm Changes
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 44: Jazz Piano
- Artist Performance Set 17: Songs with Vocals 7
- Playable RealTracks Set 4
- RealDrums Stems Set 7: Jazz with Mike Clark
- SynthMaster Sounds and Styles (with audio demos)
- 128 GM MIDI Patch Audio Demos.
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyles,
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- Look Ma! More MIDI 14: SynthMaster,
- Instrumental Studies Set 23: More '80s Hard Rock Soloing,
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 45: More SynthMaster
- Artist Performance Set 18: Songs with Vocals 8
- RealDrums Stems Set 8: Pop, Funk & More with Jerry Roe
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®!
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Mac!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 20.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 20 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
New! XPro Styles PAK 9 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and higher for Mac!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 9 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 29 RealTracks/RealDrums!
We've been hard at it to bring you the latest and greatest in this 9th installment of our popular XPro Styles PAK series! Included are 75 styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres (25 styles each) that fans have come to expect, as well as 25 styles in this volume's wildcard genre: funk & R&B!
If you're itching to get a sneak peek at what's included in XPro Styles PAK 9, here is a small helping of what you can look forward to: Funky R&B Horns, Upbeat Celtic Rock, Jazz Fusion Salsa, Gentle Indie Folk, Cool '60s Soul, Funky '70s R&B, Smooth Jazz Hip Hop, Acoustic Rockabilly Swing, Funky Reggae Dub, Dreamy Retro Latin Jazz, Retro Soul-Rock Fusion, and much more!
Special Pricing! Until July 31, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 9 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Windows!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 20.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 20 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums58
Topics84,579
Posts781,218
Members39,691
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean