|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,279
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,279 |
Muso, if you joined in 2020, as your avatar shows, than honestly, I believe you are the first person I know from my time here that constantly pitches RB.
Last edited by Rustyspoon#; 02/09/26 09:06 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,647
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,647 |
Rusty
If you go through the pg forums past threads you can read about real band users commenting they don't understand why some band in a box users struggle trying to do certain functions in band in a box that are a breeze in real band.
in this thread itself you have heard from various real band users suggesting real band has a good solution for the stated need of the user.
Go back through recent threads even and you will see various real band users commenting how they use real band in songs.
I'm just trying to be fair Rusty.
Om
my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..) https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs(90 songs created useing bb/rb) (lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,808
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,808 |
Misha, I also pitch it! I have used it consistently for years. Using Reaper, Sonar, Mixbus, and Studio One pro along the way. I always come back to RB. One of the reasons many do not "Pitch" RB is that usually when they do they get jumped on for bringing it up. I am not accusing you of that but it happens and used to happen a lot. SO many that use it just keep quiet. If you look on a daily basis there are a lot of people on that forum right now 389 on BiaB thread, 38 on the Mac BiaB thread, 19 on the plugin thread, and 41 on the RB thread. That is the way it is every time i look so a reasonable amount here use it. 2nd most on the site. I know it is a bit different from how most DAWs are set up, but so are many others. In the last three years several very powerful upgrades have been added to RB and it does a lot of things very good. It as Muso said does stuff no other DAW does example RST generation and partial regen. fast and slick. No other DAW in the world does that not even with the BiaB plugin which after 7 years does not do Partial regen.
My point is that it makes a very powerful companion to BiaB. To your very important point above BiaB does record and does a fair job for those who do not need a lot just a vocal and maybe one instrument. A little refining may go a long way. One option is save the file open it in RB add a couple track mix and master right there in a traditional DAW environment and your done. I have my RB set up with a template where each track has the Harrison 32C channel strip on the first 8 tracks, and SSL master strip on the Master channel. So easy to dial in a very powerful mix.
HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini Sonoma with 16 gig of ram, BiaB/RB 2026, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 11 , Presonus Audiobox USB96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,741
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,741 |
FWIW - I think PGM is cut to thin with the number of products they are supporting, i.e VST3 plug-in, BiaB, RB, and Mac computers. I would love them to take BiaB and incorporate it into the VST3 plug-in and get it working correctly and take BiaB incorporate it into RB and get it working correctly. IMHO that would satisfy the all users and leave PGM with just two programs; RB for those whom want to record in BiaB and the plug-in for those whom use other DAWs.
Just my two cents
I arrived early to a restaurant.
The manager asks, "do you mind waiting a bit?"
I said no.
"Good", he said. "Take these drinks to table 3"
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,279
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,279 |
OM,
I am not sure what you are saying... Quick browse gave me a solid understanding that most users (except you) in RB discussions joined at least 10 years ago or prior to that. My argument was that I have not seen any recently joined people who praised that software. I will take some of it back as it seems, judging by your joining year (2020) you are an exception. However, 6 years is a lot of years without at least a handful of new "visible" supporters. As you've said, be fair.
----------------
Regardless of that, the conversation is about BIAB + recording audio into BIAB. It's not a discussion about RB.
as rharv said:
"This whole argument is workflow related."
That is true.
Once PGM properly integrates existing functions to Track View, the issue of sending people elsewhere for straight forward audio recording in BIAB will be gone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,808
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,808 |
Point taken, however it will not be totally gone as BiaB is still limited to how many tracks one can record on. When people record many types of modern and even vintage music it requires multiple tracks to fit things like partial track recordings, comped vocals and guitar takes, loops to add certain sounds into it. i doubt BiaB will ever be a unlimited track recording studio. As Jim pointed out earlier that was never it's mission. Mario said "incorporate BiaB into the plugin and RB" It is already incorporated there. The plugin is BiaB light. It would imagine that it is literally impossible to incorporate all of BiaB into the plugin. Way too much code. As far as RB it has all of BiaB it needs. It needs a few modern refinements and it does exactly what it was designed to do. Assist BiaB when Users want a more open architecture to do traditional recording. Yes back to the point of this post. The tracks view needs a few of the upgrades to make it right for those who just want to add a couple tracks to their BiaB creation. +1000
As far as new people coming into RB how would we know 90% of the user base does not post here. Of the ones who do few post in RB do to the backlash we all received over the years. I have been using PTPA since 2003 ands then RB since 2008 And have a very deep understanding of what's under the hood. Year ago i did a head to head with Reaper and Sonar VS RB on a creation of a cover song from a internet midi file. Time to create, time to add "flavor tracks" (my take) and lyrics and mix to finished. RB more than held it's own. In my mind it won the contest. While Sonar and Reaper did a very nice job of a simple turn the midi into usable tracks. Neither had any advantage over RB when it came to processing midi with synths. Sonar might have had a very slight edge due to it having better build in synths but using back then sound fonts they all did equally well.
Why do i say RB won the battle? It had the ability to add RTs and RDs that added realism to the tracks and take it from a simple cover to a personal take on the song.
Misha i am not trying to argue the point as your view is valid in regard to adding tools to the tracks view it is just when someone dismisses RB as unimportant in the discussion i do not agree. JAOM has a long history recording and his points are relevant.
HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini Sonoma with 16 gig of ram, BiaB/RB 2026, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 11 , Presonus Audiobox USB96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,870
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,870 |
<< " however it will not be totally gone as BiaB is still limited to how many tracks one can record on. When people record many types of modern and even vintage music it requires multiple tracks to fit things like partial track recordings, comped vocals and guitar takes, loops to add certain sounds into it. i doubt BiaB will ever be a unlimited track recording studio" >>
BIAB functions as a very robust, digital multitrack recorder similar to Tascam, Zoom and other standalone hardware digital recorders. The same multitrack recording principles of those devices apply to BIAB Flagship program. BIAB has never suffered a lack of tracks to compete with any recording studio. BIAB can do everything you mention today and could as far back as 2014 when audio recording was added to the program.
BIAB 2026:RB 2026, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,598
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,598 |
My goal is to integrate my own bass tracks with real tracks. The live interaction of bass with real tracks makes them more "real". With my Motu interface and line out from amp I don't think there is any difference regarding whether recording in Biab or Sonar. Once recorded I can easily audition various real tracks or drums if I stay in Biab.
Another reason I like this is that I spend too much time searching for bass lines that don't fit the groove.
My 2 cents. I see your point. The real issue, to me, isn't the lack of features (automation features, audio clip manipulation, editing tools, take recording, routing, etc.), but the lack of stability and standardization in BIAB compared to other specialized software when it comes to recording and working with audio. Personally, I use Reaper, a program with many virtues, but first and foremost, a rock-solid program, ultra-efficient with system resources (the installer weighs an incredible 15 megabytes), and with a super intuitive user interface, as any DAW should be. BIAB also has many virtues (you won't find any other software that produces better quality tracks out there), but certainly, audio processing, robustness, or the user interface is not where it shines. It’s better to use each tool for what it was designed for; that said, you have nothing to lose by trying it for yourself.
Last edited by Cerio; 02/10/26 12:14 PM.
Latest BIAB version, latest build.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,279
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,279 |
Rob, I know your tender feelings toward RB. I don't interrupt any conversations on RB when it lives in it's own space. I never did. Regardless of our mirror opposite views on it , this discussion should focus on BIAB + recording Audio into BIAB. This subject is important to me personally, and I share frustration of OP and all those who want a straight forward, user friendly approach. I feel it is simply wrong to send people elsewhere instead of advocating to standardize this in BIAB. Which should be no brainer.
-------
Cerio,
While I share your sentiment on "It’s better to use each tool for what it was designed for", there are exceptions. This is one of those. Most responders share views based on their own workflows and don't consider that other users might not want to get involved in learning a whole new software to just get a few tracks of audio into BIAB the easy way - and be done. Would you, yourself would want to learn another software if all that you needed was to record your vocals or single instrument (1-8 tracks) on top of BIAB arrangement? I definitely would not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,598
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,598 |
Would you, yourself would want to learn another software if all that you needed was to record your vocals or single instrument (1-8 tracks) on top of BIAB arrangement? I definitely would not. I spent MANY hours trying to make BIAB work for me, but I just gave up. I learned, like many others, to use BIAB just for what it is good for: generating backing tracks.
Latest BIAB version, latest build.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,279
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,279 |
Would you, yourself would want to learn another software if all that you needed was to record your vocals or single instrument (1-8 tracks) on top of BIAB arrangement? I definitely would not. I spent MANY hours trying to make BIAB work for me, but I just gave up. I learned, like many others, to use BIAB just for what it is good for: generating backing tracks. I guessing, you wanted a bit more than just getting a few tracks of audio recorded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,647
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,647 |
Fwiw.
When the new tracks view in bb came out I communicated to PG all the neat features that I thought it should have.
all the usual audio and MIDI features.
The basic concept being one Central View to do most of one's work in creating a song thus saving the user flicking around between different views and menus and commands etc etc.
I also requested some global things like unique chord track Tempo track and lyric track marker track and various others.
I'm sure I'm not the only one making the above requests for more digital audio workstation features.
I wanted band in the Box users to be able to access lots of features that I currently enjoy in real band tracks View
And other views like bars View.
So don't jump on me.
I also wanted to ensure the band In The Box users didn't have to flick backwards and forwards to other music programs and maybe thus saving the band In The Box user spending money on other programs.
I've spent lots of time doing this to and fro over the years using Reaper real band and band in the box together with other programs.
We shall see what the future holds.
Om
Last edited by justanoldmuso; 02/11/26 12:26 PM.
my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..) https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs(90 songs created useing bb/rb) (lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
With your version 2026 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
- MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
- Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
- Playable RealTracks Set 5
- RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
- SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
- iOS Android Band-in-a-Box® App
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
- Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
- RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
- SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)
Learn more about the Bonus PAK and 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,268
Posts802,523
Members40,079
| |
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean