|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 89
Enthusiast
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 89 |
For a songwriter without a band, the combination of Band-in-a-Box and Power Tracks has enabled me to create versions of dozens of original songs, which otherwise would not have seen the light of day. I do use other software in combination with them, but only insofar as mastering a song or final mix. I usually start off a song by scouring varying styles in BB for the drum and bass tracks which I will use for the rhythm section. Often, I will render several drum or bass tracks I think might work well from BB into wav files and then import them into Power Tracks (I've nothing against 'Real Band', just prefer PT) If I am unhappy with a given one as is, I will edit the bass or drums by copying and pasting various bits together from the several different real tracks I have chosen. Next, it's time for me to record myself playing the guitar tracks of my song. Once that is done, I go back to BB and repeat the aforementioned process with respect to piano or organ or whatever else may be desired. I use only 'real tracks', despite I have been using these PG programs even before they existed, because they sound better, obviously. Anyway, I think it pretty amazing that I can present my music to listeners as as tightly knit as I do with full musical accompaniment. Now if only computers could sing, as well  Here is a link to an original song of mine, if there is more than one song showing, I can't help that, it's just the way a ReverbNation link works in this forum. (In any event, all of my current releases, have been produced via BB & PT). But since, I am really not a bad guy, because I would like to get my songs heard any possible way I can get them out. Let's just leave it at that. Thanks for listening to 'No Bad Guy' and kudos to PG Music. Feedback, good bad indifferent - highly appreciated. Pariahdise - No Bad GuyR.F. Goggin (Pariahdise)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,582
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,582 |
Hi RF, Welcome to the forums And congratulations on posting a song. "Bad Guy" is certainly very energetic! You must have had a lot fun putting this one together. It might be my system but the vocals sounded quiet in comparison to the backing. Have you tried creating a version with the vocals increased by around 2 dB? It would be an interesting comparison. Keep up the good work! All the best, Noel
MY SONGS...Audiophile BIAB 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 89
Enthusiast
|
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 89 |
Hello, Noel
I don't think I will ever completely master the art of mixing tracks properly, but I will certainly keep trying, and have look at my vocal volumes, per your suggestion. Thanks to you, indeed, for the listen, and the welcome..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815 |
Hey, good and energetic tune. It has a Tom Petty flavor a little (nothing wrong with that, for sure). Noel's probably right about the vocal levels. The DI acoustic guitar might be a trifle loud, too. Have you thought about just putting a mic on the acoustic? Nice lead break, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 89
Enthusiast
|
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 89 |
Thanks, for listening, Kevin. I usually mic the acoustic on every song I record, just to have a version of it if I elect to use it. I will go through my files and see whether your thoughts might improve the song.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,086
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,086 |
Hi R. F.,
Welcome to the forum!
Sounds like you are having a blast rocking out on No Bad Guy. I enjoy a rocking foot tapping acoustic guitar tune. Thought I heard a little British influence in there too.
NIce feel on this one.
Thanks for sharing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 89
Enthusiast
|
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 89 |
Yes, can't hide the British Invasion in my blood But also have some Country roots to go with it via Mom & Dad (Lorreta Lynn, Dolly Parton, Hank Williams, Conway Twitty, Merle Haggard - you get the idea), who would spin the old vinyls constantly. And since 'Bad Guy' was about Dad who has passed on, I decided therefore it needed to be country-fied somewhat, not sure if I succeeded on that front, but the slide guitar bits helped Feels like a real friendly place hereabouts, it's a wonder I didn't think to come around sooner. I didn't realize it existed actually. A person can learn quite a bit around here to better present their music to the public. I've got a lot of reading to start doing, I reckon, it can only improve my work. I cut the gain on the electric acoustic and lowered the backing vocal on the song this morning, per the suggestions I received in this forum. Also, uploaded a new one to RN this morning, called 'Visions'. Maybe I should just post it here, instead of starting a new thread if anyone cares to listen or critique. It's tempo is a lot slower by comparison, almost a ballad I'd say. If I am breaking any rules or forum etiquette, I am sure someone will let me know? I shall be and am willing to listen to anything by anyone, but although I have been using BIAB and PT for quite some time, I still consider myself an amateur at recording and mixing, so I can only comment modestly from that standpoint, as I've quite a bit to learn yet. I just listened to 'I'm Moving On' from your link, and liked it, it's got a cool groove to it, sounds like a studio recording.. http://www.reverbnation.com/open_graph/song/15116785 - Visions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,079
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,079 |
Good stuff that, it has a really catchy hook with "never a bad guy" and it doesn't sound like it uses Real Tracks. The only advice I can give is raise the vocals a little, I know all too well that that is hard especially if, like me, you don't like the sound of your voice  Alyn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,427
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,427 |
Jeez, some energy going on there RF! Yes, just a little lift on the vocal volume would be just right. Keep on rocking like that!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815 |
Quote:
...Also, uploaded a new one to RN this morning, called 'Visions'. Maybe I should just post it here, instead of starting a new thread if anyone cares to listen or critique. ...
It might be better to wait a week or so and then start a new thread for it. Folks might not notice it in a follow-up post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 89
Enthusiast
|
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 89 |
Thanks for all the suggestions, will get on the vocal volume. I wonder if Bob Dylan likes the sound of his own voice, gibson? I'd say no, the way he mumbles half the time You get used to hearing and appreciating your vocals if you keep at it, however, and if you are not a natural singer, then you have to work at it, try different approaches, breath differently, whatever must be done. Including, were you myself, countless attempts to get a worthy vocal or even those one or two notes you just can't quite hit. Thanks Kemmrich, I will just leave well enough alone and make no thread for 'Visions'. When I woke up this morning I listened to it and realized that in order to make the song shorter (because it's so long) that my increasing the tempo - should not have been done, so it wasn't quite ready to be promoted to start with, I was just excited to have it rolling. I have restored its natural tempo, while I edit the vocals on the fly. I do that quite a bit, live edit I mean. Which, I am sure is not such a good thing, but once a song is out in the public arena it has a wonderful way of highlighting its inadequacies for me..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 89
Enthusiast
|
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 89 |
And the drums and bass are indeed 'real tracks', as well as guitar bits that sound countryish.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,079
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,079 |
Quote:
Including, were you myself, countless attempts to get a worthy vocal or even those one or two notes you just can't quite hit.
My comment was written from the heart as I too have countless attempts to get the vocals right. My DAW incrementally numbers each take and I have seen that the final accepted take can be up to 20 and above!!! I am getting better these days as I now rehearse the vocals at an early stage so that I can change the key easily if nescessary in BIAB. It does mean however I now need the capo more on my old songs to be able to strum as I want. I pay more attention to my vocal range when I write these days!! I still dislike my voice tho'  
Thoroughly enjoyed "No Bad Guy" and that hook
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 89
Enthusiast
|
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 89 |
I know not everybody can sing well and I am including myself, but only lately have I realized that for all my life I have been belting out vocals with pure, wreck-less abandon or bombastic emotion. Emotion is good, of course 98% of the time. But if you're singing with one side of your brain (your subconscious, perhaps?) and not paying attention to what you are doing with other side (your intellect), then for me at least, my limitations will surely come into play along the way. So only for the past few months or so, I use both my head and my heart, and I have been doing a lot of critical thinking about my singing; trying different things, staying conscious of how I breathe, using stomach muscles I never used before. Identifying 'laziness' in my style (that's a big one I think), and paying close attention to pronouncement. It's paying off, slowly but surely, but it is a very repetitive process that taxes my patience, which is always in short supply to begin with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,079
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,079 |
Quote:
it is a very repetitive process that taxes my patience, which is always in short supply to begin with.
Yup I agree with that too!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,369
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,369 |
Well, you have one up on me----struggling voice and don't play an instrument worth a lick!
Your guitar playing is very good, and I agree with some of the other posters here...I think that with repetitive takes, cut/paste, punch-in, etc. you can get to a very acceptable representation of your work.
I find that the hardest thing about this is not having patience--with the vocal recording and with tweaking the arrangement to get it to match what's in my mind. Plus, I'm always being drawn into the "next thing" and, if I don't stick with it, would probably abandon some work before getting the best that I can out of it.
--And, don't forget this: no matter what you think of your "production", sharing your creative work gives others (like me) lots of ideas and creative inspiration--so the sharing is very important!
One suggestion I would have about this particular song is for you to get in closer to the mike and make your singing more "present"--you sound too far away, and I think that even upping the volume on the voice wouldn't be as effective as getting closer and a bit more intimate on the recording.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 89
Enthusiast
|
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 89 |
Thanks for that, It's something I needed to be told, as I have been struggling for three days on the vocals for my next release. My biggest problem seems to be my desire to sing my lungs out as a rock artist basically might vs. the limitations of my range. I capitulated on the number I am working on and sung much softer, save for the very last chorus at the end. That's staying in, just because I am stubborn enough to leave it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,699
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,699 |
hi rf welcome to the forum vocals need to be more out front keep them comeing eric
AMD (TM) 5950 4.9 GHz 16Core Processor 64 bit 32 bits of ram windows 10 pro 64 bit os. sound card Antelope ZenQ guitars Ibanez 2202a 1968 les Paul Custom and Cavin ae 185 Guitar boss Gt-100,GT1000 pedal Yamaha HS8 studio monitors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 89
Enthusiast
|
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 89 |
Thanks FMM for listening. I just cut the gain -1 on every track except the vocals and replaced the mp3 @ ReverbNation. I appreciate all the advice I have been given and as soon as something is ready, I will be sure to run it here first.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,199
Posts801,849
Members40,065
| |
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean