|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,616
Expert
|
OP
Expert
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,616 |
I'm getting back around to purchasing myself a Christmas present in the form of an amplifier for home audio. A thread I made here a while back has me looking at two recommended amps: CROWN XLS1000 found HERE or QSC GX3 found HERE The Crown is Class D and the QSC is Class B. I've researched the difference between the Class B/D and found a lot of techie stuff that I don't really understand. Does anybody have an simple explanation and/or recommendation based on this? I really like the weight of the Crown - 9 lbs vs. 27 lbs. I also like the warranty of the QSC - 6 years vs 3 years. Other issues I read about are fan noise but appears to have been corrected. I appreciate any feedback Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
My choice between those two would be the QSC, Rachael.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,697
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,697 |
No way to try to explain this without getting technical. All I know is class D is called a switching amp and doesn't need the large heavy transformers other amps have plus they somehow put out a lot more power too. That's what makes them so light and also makes them a big winner for stage use. All the newest powered PA speakers from JBL, Yamaha, EV, QSC and others are now using class D amps.
I needed to upgrade my stage rig and I bought the new EV ELX112P powered speaker for my keyboards. It's only a 12" but that thing is a beast and it only weighs 36 pounds. I've done two gigs where I've played bass through it plus some big band gigs with all those loud horns and it's great. Small, clean, very powerful and it looks good too. It has a 600W Class D amp plus neodymium speaker magnets. Whole new world compared to old style boat anchor amps and heavy ferrite magnet speakers. I have an old 500W Peavey power amp that weighs over 50 pounds.
For home use though and comparing absolute sound quality I'll defer to Mac. He knows this stuff, if he likes the sound of the heavy transformers in your quiet living room great, that's not so important at a noisy live gig.
Bob
Biab/RB latest build, Win 11 Pro, Ryzen 5 5600 G, 512 Gig SSD, 16 Gigs Ram, Steinberg UR22 MkII, Roland Sonic Cell, Kurzweil PC3, Hammond SK1, Korg PA3XPro, Garritan JABB, Hypercanvas, Sampletank 3, more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,342
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,342 |
Both brands make good amplifiers. I wouldn't bother too much about those extra years of waranty. If the thing doesn't break in the first three years, chances are it will continu to work well. BTW: what are the terms of those extra three years of waranty? Wear and tear will probably be excluded...
The weight would bother me. When you have to travel a lot with the amp, you'll want a lighter amp. Most likely you'll want a flightcase for the amp. That throws in a few pounds also
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021 |
I have an XLS1000 I use for my tops and an XLS1500 I use for subs. I run both in bridge mono.I love them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Quote:
For home use though and comparing absolute sound quality I'll defer to Mac. He knows this stuff, if he likes the sound of the heavy transformers in your quiet living room great, that's not so important at a noisy live gig.
Bob
Stop assuming things. There does not have to be a "heavy transformer" in the power supply of the amp.
The class B circuit can be powered from a modern switching power supply. In this instance, that QSC is likely indeed using that "heavy" transformer, but she is not on the road, this is for home use.
At that point, I think, from experience, that it isn't any gain to using a switching power supply compared to the durability of said supplies in the field.
There is a reason for that 6 year warranty, she should take advantage of that.
and an amp for home reproduction doesn't need all the computer controlled wow factor stuff the new crowns offer, the level of complexity there is something that Rachael certainly doesn't need to have to fool with either.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 103
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 103 |
Class B is the more common design used for solid state amps, especially smaller
and older amps. The class also applies to tube amps, but only talking about solid
state amps here.
In a class B amp, the output transistors must dissipate some of the total power being
supplied to the output stage. The rest is delivered to the load. At full output, most
of the power is sent to the speaker, but about 25% is lost by the output transistors
as heat. At lower levels, the percentage of power lost in the transistors is higher.
For example at 1/2 power, 50% is lost in the output transistors.
This means that the transistors must be relatively large and mounted on a large heat
sink. This adds size and weight to the amp. Also, these amps often use linear
power supplies - 60 Hz transformer, rectifier, etc. These large transformers also
add a lot of weight.
In a class D amp, the ouput transistors are operated as switches; they are either
full on, or full off, hence the name switch mode. When a transistor is off, there
is no current through it, and the power dissipated by the transistor is zero. When
the transistor is on, the voltage across the transistor is zero, so again the power
dissipated is zero. Think of the switch on a toaster. When it is off there is no
current through the switch or the heating element. No current, no power. When the
switch is on, the switch remains cold even though it is carrying the full current
to the element.
So the class D amp approaches 100% efficiency, delivering all of the power to the
speaker and having very little lost in itself. This means smaller transistors and
heat sinks. These amps often also have switching power supplies (same principle as
the amp) and eliminate the heavy 60 Hz transformer. A much smaller high frequency
transformer is used. So lots of size and weight savings.
The classes (A, B, AB, C) refer to the biasing of the transistor or tube used in an amplifier
stage. Class A is biased in it's linear operating region. Class B is biased at or near it's
off state. In an audio amp, Class B is used if the stage is "push pull" with one transistor
handling the positive portion of the signal and one transistor handling the negative.
Class AB is biased in the linear region, but not in the center of the region like class A,
but closer to the off state (the "cutoff" point). Although the device itself is operated in a
nonlinear manner, the overall response of the amplifier stage can be linear, and will be
for audio amps. Class C is biased beyond cutoff and used in certain RF stages.
Class D is not a biasing scheme in the same sense as the others. It was simply assigned
the next available letter, if I'm not mistaken. It does not stand for "digital".
So how do you get audio out of a couple of switches?
The transistors are switched at a very high rate. If you look at the average voltage level at
the output transistors, you will see a value that depends on the relative on / off times of the
two two transistors. If each are on for equal time periods, the average will be zero. This is
what occurs during a zero signal condition. If the positive transistor is on for a longer period
than the negative one, then the average will be some positive value. And the longer it is on,
relative to the negative side, the more positive the average will be. The same is true if the
negative transistor is on for a longer time compared to the positive. Except now the average
will be some negative value.
The circuit that drives these output transistors uses the audio signal to control the relative on
and off times. The result is an on /off time for the transistors that very closely follows the voltage
level of the signal. This means that the average voltage level at the transistor output also closely
follows the audio signal. Now all you need to do is remove the high switching frequency from the
output, which is done by filtering as it is above the audio range. All that remains then is the average,
which is a perfect analog of the input signal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Size and weight savings are one thing.
Circuit complexity and reliability are another thing, though.
Guess which type of amp is seen on our service benches more than the other these days?
Class D is cool stuff, no question about that, and if spec'ing an amp or amp stack for a touring outfit, may indeed be what I might recommend.
The Crowns, however, also come with all that software controlled stuff, Digital Comm Networking lines, and the setup, care and feeding of them, still in its infancy, is the stuff of engineering types and not our young lady sitting at home and desiring to hear some music reproduction and perhaps her own electric instruments, Band in a Box, etc.
Another issue with the software controlled amp and its communication is that, just like with other softwares, we often see the need for firmware updates and the likes, which, incidentally at this point in time often mean that the amp has to go to some authorized service center. There have also been a growing list of mods issued in the service bulletins. This may be okay for the touring company, which may buy the things by the pickup truck load in the first place and have included readily available spares. Rachael will not have that option.
Her amp will be installed in basically one place in her home and that's it.
Meanwhile, it will be subjected to powerline surges, maybe a few lightning strikes further down the powerline, possibly a couple of user input mistakes as well as just the plain enough desirability of simplicity coupled with the fact that an older design has reached maturity means to me that out of the two choices given, the QSC is still my choice.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 103
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 103 |
Is that the trend now for new amps, software control?
Are they using it even when digital signal processing isn't used?
I used to have a DVD player with a reset button!
I no longer have it, and won't buy anything else with one either (except a PC).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Am wondering whether megafiddle drives a car or truck or if megafiddle is still hitchin' old Dobbin to the buggy... <grin>
Well, software control of power amps is a trend as far as the engineering of large soundsets is concerned. It brings a level of control over certain things that was hitherto rather difficult if not impossible to implement. With more and more use of software controlled environments, with virtual mixers on pad screens using wifi communication to control house PA systems and the like, with the advent of Line Array speaker systems that depend upon Time Alignment routines, it just makes sense.
But as I've been trying to point out, all that is not needed for Rachael's two speakers in the home, so why should she have to purchase it and why should she have to be able to deal with it just to power her home speakers? The answer is that she does not have to deal with it. There also is indeed a reliability factor, any time an engineerin design increases component count, which increase can be for perfectly valid reasons if one considers the *context* for which such features are implemented, which often makes them desirable features under the right circumstances, said component count will automatically change the statistical odds of the possibilities of failure.
As far as consumer products that incorporate software control, one will be hard put to find appliances of any kind that do not contain at least a minimal processor and bit of software of some kind inside them. Old linear or analog controls have already been religated to the trash heap of history. Even the lowly Washing Machine and Dishwasher now have Digital controls in them for timing and such, there likely is not a single factory left able to build analog clock movements. And for good reason.
The Crown amplifiers with the digital comm and other features is bound to increase in utility and the robustness of such will be totally solved over time, that's my prediction.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 103
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 103 |
Quote:
Am wondering whether megafiddle drives a car or truck or if megafiddle is still hitchin' old Dobbin to the buggy... <grin>
--Mac
Actually a pickup, but you are not too far off. This one is the very first vehicle
I ever owned (bought just this past April) with those new-fangled power windows!
And I am sorry I ever looked under the hood!
I can appreciate the advantages of software control and microcontroller based devices.
The processing speed of modern computers and controllers is truly amazing. Back in the
80's I was working on a program for generating fractal images. The program had to run
overnight for one very low resolution image with just a few colors. Now, even with an
obsolete processor, it takes only seconds, and is high resolution with 24 bit color.
The high speed alone opens up all kinds of possibilities.
And I agree about the complexity adding reliability problems. Not only that, but it can
get in the way if it's something you don't need, making it difficult to use, especially
for casual use.
But that reset button on the DVD player (actually I think it was a recorder) - it should
have been a warning signal. Why would a designer add a reset button unless they expected
the device to crash now and then? Which is exactly what it did.
Dagnabbit!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
At least they gave you the button.
I could relate the horror stories of devices like your player that can only be reset by a trip to the factory service center, but then I'd get in trouble for mentioning brand names...
There will be a day when such devices will be so robust that everyone will take such for granted.
Amd by that time, technology will birth something else brand new and the cycle will start all over again for whatever that will be.
By the time we got carburetors that actually worked rather well from idle through the full rpm range, nobody bought any because Electronic Fuel Injection flat blew that old technology right outta the water. Today we enjoy the full Stoichiometric from darn near zero rpm to redline, even on mom's little economy model.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021 |
For Rachel keep the amp as basic as possible. My Crowns are indeed fairly complex and flexible in their function.
I used to be an electronics tech for a very well known Yacht Co..I can't tell you how much money was spent having me come out and do the secret hand shake,i.e.,master reset of a piece of gear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 134
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 134 |
IMHO
For home audio, or studio, you'd want a fanless design.
If anything is going to fail, it's likely going to be a mechanical part, like a fan.
Class-AB may be a more traditional design, but Class-D is now the more common if you consider all application of audio amplifiers. Sound wise, there's no difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,616
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,616 |
I didn't realize that the Crown was so complex. I figured to just 'set it and forget it'. A couple of music site user reviews talks of excessive fan noise for these units. However, some say the issue has been resolved. Now to see if my local Guitar Center has them in stock to check out the fan issue.
Thanks to everyone who chimed in! It was very helpful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,220
Posts802,031
Members40,070
| |
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean