|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,085
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,085 |
Carolyne,
A dynamic singer sings like a violinist or great guitarist plays and every single note should NOT be perfect or it will sound unhuman and suck the soul out of your voice. Even the tutorials from the maker of Melodyne tell you to always trust your EARS more than your eyes.
Melodyne is great but it has trouble with dynamic singers. It is tedious to use on vocals for singers like me, you and Janice (if anyone ever wished to use it on her) because the three of us "play" our voices like an instrument depending on the song and style we're doing.
Big labels hire people specifically to pitch correct so that the singer's character is not affected. I have researched this subject extensively and I use Melodyne essentials but not on everything. So I'm not against it but just an fyi. If you are not careful you will end up with a bunch of sharp notes in your phrasing.
In fact, based on a little experiment I did once. I think it's so easy to misuse Melodyne on vocals that people have become used to hearing sharp to the point they can't tell as much as they think they can.
When you run a solo guitar part through Melodyne it's fascinating how many "off" notes you will SEE by the top players that sound great on the track. It's all about EARS not eyes.
For best results use it with a DAW where you can hear both the track you are fixing and the backing music at the same time. Watch the tutorials and learn to split the notes instead of moving the first blobs you see. Stay away from auto correct.
Hope that helps you.
Josie
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,379
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,379 |
To recap my POV.
If you're in it for fun, record your parts and move on...have fun and don't spend the money or the time....go kayaking, skiing, hiking, walk the dog, lay on the beach.... and enjoy life.... and incidentally, you can do both. You can record good tracks, fix them nicely, and still have a great life outside of the studio....they are not mutually exclusive.
If you're interested in this hobby or wish to do this thing at a more professional level, get the tools and learn them, then use them. And most importantly, learn WHEN you need them and when you don't.
At no point in my posts on this.... to my recollection without going back and reading them all again.....have I said to rely totally on the software's best guess. YOU NEED TO USE YOUR EARS and I think I reiterated this at least one time.... possibly more. There are places where you intentionally want to leave the note off pitch and several times as I know I have mentioned that I INTENTIONALLY MOVED a not to be flat by one degree or another....and that was done by EAR.
This is ART.... it's not rocket science.
I still stand by my statement that all vocal tracks can use some fixing one way or another. The important questions are.... do you really want to fix it.... and if that answer is "yes", then, by how much?
Last edited by Guitarhacker; 01/22/15 09:28 AM.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 15,423
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 15,423 |
This is part of what makes bluegrass so popular. Lots of people don't like synthetic anything, and bluegrass is the one genre that has steadfastly resisted technology's influence. Bluegrass is real, and because bluegrass musicians don't depend on technology to fix anything, they tend to be very very very good! In a post apocalyptic world, whatever musicians are left will probably be playing bluegrass (there's a song there somewhere  ) This is part of what makes bluegrass so popular. Lots of people don't like synthetic anything, and bluegrass is the one genre that has steadfastly resisted technology's influence. Bluegrass is real, and because bluegrass musicians don't depend on technology to fix anything, they tend to be very very very good! In a post apocalyptic world, whatever musicians are left will probably be playing bluegrass (there's a song there somewhere ) Yep, the best BG groups can on stage, backstage, in the studio or in the parking lot produce "car horn" harmony that is absolutely nailed in timing, phrasing and pitch. We were privileged to share the stage with the best of them and it is a thing to behold up close.
Our albums and singles are on Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, YouTube Music, Pandora and more. If interested search on Janice Merritt. Thanks! Our Videos are here on our website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 214
Apprentice
|
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 214 |
Thanks Josie,
Good counsel;I do understand. I have every intention if, and when I ever use ME, to do so sparingly, and for the right reasons in the right places.
-Carolyne
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 214
Apprentice
|
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 214 |
I think we're all pretty much in agreement.
-Carolyne
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,379
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,379 |
Thanks Josie,
Good counsel;I do understand. I have every intention if, and when I ever use ME, to do so sparingly, and for the right reasons in the right places.
-Carolyne That was how I used it on your vocal for the song that started this thread in motion.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 66
Enthusiast
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 66 |
I have been reading these posts with real interests as Herb had mentioned Melodine to me on a post giving me some feedback on my newest piece You Bring It Like A Storm. I can see I will have to pick this software up so I can Run my vocals through it when I am doing pop at the very least. But. . . I have to agree with several people who have stated in different ways that not all vocals should be handled this way or will even benefit from it. Yet, this may have nothing to do with vocal skill but rather current musical tastes. It's really nothing more than tailoring a sound to a particular expectation. In our other posts where we are chatting about this Herb has great point that modern pop simply demands that (to put it in it's worst light) soulless perfection. But I don't hear that in every genera even at the highest levels. I do however hear it in far more than just pop. I think this is about the expectation of sound and little else. I am currently writing this while listening to some 90's era alternative from a top 40 performer of the time. Her pitches are often wildly off but it's part of what drove her sound to stardom at the time (Alanis Morissette) But that was just the taste at the time. Now it's not. Just my thoughts Joe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 14
Newbie
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 14 |
I use Melodyne for some singers.. I prefer not to use it.. To me it does a better job than auto tune.. (only my opinion, no offense to others)...
I prefer not to use pitch correctors.. I'm old.. when I was a kid we had to learn everything... slow that record player down, hum the solo, figure out the notes, do section by section speed back to normal...
I find so many young singers 20-30.. whose attitude, that's the way I sang it.. I don't like to rehearse, it takes away the spontaneity of my performance,, use autotune, or melodeon to fix it.. in fact they are undisciplined and and lazy.
Since I'm retired now, and no longer earning a living from music, I send those singers away. If I spent 20 hours getting the music right, trying ideas, etc.. I expect the singer to put in an equal amount of work.. ..
if time is short, and the pitch mistake not bad, I'll fix with melodyne,, but once I hear auto tune or melodyne on a singer, I automatically lose about 25 % or more of interest in the song.
Mellodyne and autotune are great for teaching a singer to improve, when they see their flat intros, swerve up to key , then overshoot it.. or the obnoxious vibrato a lot of singers use for any note longer than a 1/4.. They can improve just by singing, watching the pitch value vibrato, consonants etc. they can improve a lot quicker..
A tape recorder is a great teacher, with pitch recognition and illustration software,, a singer can make vast improvements.. My suggestion is to take a difficult melody section, sing it slower alone, no accompianent visualize the steps, take care to land right on the note not overshoot it, or slife up into to it. don't slap a vibrato onto every note,that gets boring real fast. it.. keep the tone pure.. when you can do it, bring the tempo up to speed.. decide where you want to slide into a note, where you want to flatten the end of a note.. and learn to gradually increase the strength of your vibrato, and learn to control the speed of it.. 90% of bad singers have one setting for vibrato, it instantly turns on/off and has only one speed.. You want the speed to of the vibratro to complement the music. it doesn't necessarily have to be in sync with it, also learn to control how sharp and flat you go..
The human voice is the greatest instrument of all.. And someone who can control all the various aspects of it, is a treasure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 214
Apprentice
|
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 214 |
Thanks for the information on Melodyne, Mark. I bought ME it but can't figure out how to use it so I think it was a waste of money, as some of you warned. I just keep re-recording bad takes.
- Carolyne
Last edited by Carolyne; 02/03/15 07:44 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,379
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,379 |
It's not that difficult to learn to use.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,277
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,277 |
Thanks for the information on Melodyne, Mark. I bought ME it but can't figure out how to use it so I think it was a waste of money, as some of you warned. I just keep re-recording bad takes.
- Carolyne What are your problems? A number of us here will be glad to help so please just ask for it.
I got banned from Weight Watchers for dropping a bag of M&Ms on the floor.
It was the best game of Hungry Hippos I've ever seen!
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139 |
I have been reading these posts with real interests as Herb had mentioned Melodine to me on a post giving me some feedback on my newest piece You Bring It Like A Storm. I can see I will have to pick this software up so I can Run my vocals through it when I am doing pop at the very least. But. . . I have to agree with several people who have stated in different ways that not all vocals should be handled this way or will even benefit from it. Yet, this may have nothing to do with vocal skill but rather current musical tastes. It's really nothing more than tailoring a sound to a particular expectation. In our other posts where we are chatting about this Herb has great point that modern pop simply demands that (to put it in it's worst light) soulless perfection. But I don't hear that in every genera even at the highest levels. I do however hear it in far more than just pop. I think this is about the expectation of sound and little else. I am currently writing this while listening to some 90's era alternative from a top 40 performer of the time. Her pitches are often wildly off but it's part of what drove her sound to stardom at the time (Alanis Morissette) But that was just the taste at the time. Now it's not. Just my thoughts Joe Joe - Save your money. You, in particular, don't need Melodyne. All you need is a decent mic and a good preamp. AT may make your recordings technically sound better, but it will suck all of the life and soul out of your vocal. Don't sell your soul, Joe!  People who say AT is indiscernible have tin ears. For Pop, sure – crank that AT up! For real music, I prefer the little flaws that tell me that it's a human singing. Regards, Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 12
Newbie
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 12 |
One vote against Melodyne.
Instead of a long litany, just a few highlights off the top of my head: 1. the manual doesn't explain how you actually use the Bridge connection, the writer presumed one is born with that knowledge. 2. In my DAW, hit the usual Undo Control-Z keystroke once and poof! Melodyne plugin is gone, along with potentially hours of work. Forgot the 1000th time it's the only program in the world where one *must* use the menu to select Undo. 3. Edit a take in Melodyne, then delete the take in the DAW - the empty track still plays. 4. With many more such hassles, sound quality for transposing is still worse than my DAW, Ableton Live's best setting, Complex Pro with Envelopes set to max. I spent all the time transposing a 32-bar snippet with Melodyne, Melodyne's result sounded tinny, so I tried the same thing with just Ableton Live - and the result sounds like the real deal. I guess that's Melodyne's swan song around here...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,179
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,179 |
I think its possible to use AT without sucking the life out of the performance..
It's just a matter of how you use it.
I rarely use it as a plugin on a whole track (unless intentionally wanting that sound or working with a really poor singer).
Rather using it to 'touch up' a phrase here or there can easily be pulled off without needing a tin ear.
Don't rely on it, but don't be afraid of it.
It's a tool best used in sparse moderation most of the time.
Even then, a good AT can be used pretty transparently if set up correctly; ie it doesn't touch the sound unless it gets off by over 'X' amount. Then you can adjust how fast and how accurately it does kick in. These are the tell tale points.
Problem is, many just pick a key and the preset settings and let 'er go.
Highlighting a phrase and correcting a note or two (judiciously) can be done pretty effectively in most cases, if you want to put in the time to get it right.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,379
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,379 |
One vote against Melodyne.
Instead of a long litany, just a few highlights off the top of my head: 1. the manual doesn't explain how you actually use the Bridge connection, the writer presumed one is born with that knowledge. 2. In my DAW, hit the usual Undo Control-Z keystroke once and poof! Melodyne plugin is gone, along with potentially hours of work. Forgot the 1000th time it's the only program in the world where one *must* use the menu to select Undo. 3. Edit a take in Melodyne, then delete the take in the DAW - the empty track still plays. 4. With many more such hassles, sound quality for transposing is still worse than my DAW, Ableton Live's best setting, Complex Pro with Envelopes set to max. I spent all the time transposing a 32-bar snippet with Melodyne, Melodyne's result sounded tinny, so I tried the same thing with just Ableton Live - and the result sounds like the real deal. I guess that's Melodyne's swan song around here... My observations on this comment: Swan song around here.... not hardly. 1. I use Melodyne and have for years and I've not heard of the "bridge connection". What am I missing? And I have Melodyne Editor full version. 2. Ever heard of the "SAVE" function? Use it and you can recover from any mistakes. Decent DAW's have an UNDO command too where if you accidentally delete something, another click brings it back. If you work on anything on a computer and don't save after major edits.... it's your own fault if you lose hours of work. 3. Understand how Melodyne works. It creates a duplicate into it's own memory/track and that's what you are working on and listening to when ME is active. It doesn't edit the DAW track directly, and it doesn't play it back. It creates a parallel track that it edits and uses for playback. When you finally bounce, then it writes to the DAW track. So if you delete something in the DAW track.... yup.... melodyne isn't looking at that track anyway so you don't hear those changes. 4. You're doing something wrong. Melodyne doesn't edit the EQ to make a track sound "tinny". Melodyne edits pitch, timing, and some other characteristics of the notes but I've never seen it do EQ. My suggestion is that you spend some time learning how this operates before you go bashing the best pitch correction software available to home recording enthusiasts. This software, when used correctly in a decent DAW.... both hardware software is referred to in that statement, you can not tell Melodyne was used to fix anything. It's totally transparent.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 12
Newbie
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 12 |
Herb, With all due respect, you are dismissing my remarks without knowing what I am talking about. Eg., Melodyne Bridge is a part of Studio or Cre8. Because you get the manual for Melodyne Editor with those two, the first things a DAW user needs to know to use Melodyne is not explained, which is rather glaring. The Undo issue us a known UI problem of the plugin. Etc. As far as tinny quality, if you never heard of it, here is a comparison I did a while ago using quick 1 bar vocal samples. The sample plays first untransposed, then Melodyned, then Abletoned, then TC Heliconed (then the next group follows) Vocal comparison (14 MB wav)First group is male vocal at -6semitones, next group is male vocal at +6 semitones, next is female vocal at -6 semitones, next female +6 semitones. Extreme transposing, yes, but that's where quality differences really come out. Melodyne at its best setting produced only second best results after Ableton. HTH.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,085
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,085 |
Good heavens. +/- 6 semitones is definitely transposing and not pitch correcting. I didn't listen to the samples you posted yet but using it for vocal pitch correction it would normally be more in the cents rather than semitones.
I only have Essentials and learned by watching tutorials. If it's used correctly and that's the big IF I think it's transparent enough. Used incorrectly it's clearly audible but imho so is most everything else. I haven't seen a program yet that doesn't have issues on some systems and there's always that learning curve.
I'm sorry to hear you've had so many problems with it. That is frustrating. Luckily with Reaper, I've had no issues with the program itself.
Josie
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 12
Newbie
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 12 |
Hello Josie,
You are correct, it's transposing. I don't use pitch correcting, if my vocal take is iffy I just sing another one until I get it right (or get enough good parts to assemble into a "right" composite). 6 semitones is an important production mark as it's the farthest a track might need to be transposed to match the key of some huge, existing multitrack arrangement. (7 semitones up is already the same as 5 semitones down.)
There are bigger transposing distances, like, when I want funk guitar to sound jangly, I purposely transpose an octave up etc., but those things aren't usually done with vocals. Anyhow, I deal with transposing all day long in the studio, and all I can say (as the owner of half a dozen transposing products, including Melodyne Editor), Melodyne is not the best quality tool for transposing... anymore. My 2 cents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,379
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,379 |
mrdelurk.... What version of Melodyne are you talking about? Melodyne Bridge? Most of the DAW's that include Melodyne with it use the lowest Melodyne available which is Essentials and it has only the basic "essential" functions. If you have the ESSENTIALS version, you do NOT have the ability to alter the formant of the notes. This is important as you will see later in this post. Functions in the different versions: http://www.celemony.com/en/melodyne/functionsThere are a bunch of HOW TO videos on youtube for Melodyne. Everything from getting started to the most advanced techniques. Perhaps you should be using Autotune and not Melodyne Editor. (ME) For the style you are doing, Melodyne seems to be the wrong tool. Autotune would probably fit the job better. Everything has it's limits and going 6 semitones in either direction is certainly pushing the envelope with melodyne to retain that transparent quality it's known for. If I recall correctly, I used ME to take a certain lady's voice who sang only the lead melody, and moved some of her notes to harmony notes. I don't recall the exact distance they were moved, it was quite far, but the result came out sounding halfway decent...after I spent some time adjusting the formants. You hear her starting around 30 seconds in. All of the harmony parts started out as a unison track of her singing with me, on the melody. I used Editor to move and fix the notes. She then sings a verse without Editor being used on it. She echos over the chorus in her natural voice then another harmony by Editor. There is another female singer on this as well.... providing some background fills towards the end. And again at the end, harmony by Editor as both ladies are singing. (neither of the ladies could sing harmony very well so ME was used to create one on the lead female vox) The result is here>>>> http://soundclick.com/share.cfm?id=8575294Melodyne Editor (and assistant) has formant control which, if used properly can be used to get those voices sounding a bit more natural. If you are not aware of what formants are or what they do, I suggest learning about them and playing with that control function if your version has formant control. Basically, when you move a note more than half to a full semi-tone, you must adjust the formant to keep that voice sounding natural. If the pitch is moved and the formant is not.... you end up with some weird sounding stuff. I believe that is what you are describing as "tinny" in your post. Not EQ as I was thinking you were saying..... improper formants that don't match the pitch. Youtube has a bunch of videos on ME....this one is on formants: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPAINeIGxMcSome of what I heard in your clip sounds like what they show in this video.... formants are the answer... but...even then, if you listen to that clip soloed out... it's still not very natural sounding. The further you push a note from it's native tone.... the more you will need to adjust ALL of the parameters of that note to attempt to retain it's character. And the further you go, the more the artifacts will show up as evidenced in the clip you provided. As good as ME or AT is, neither of them can move notes large distances and have them sound natural. Technology just hasn't gotten there yet. Give them a few more years. When you push something beyond it's design limits and get poor results, don't blame the software.
Last edited by Guitarhacker; 02/21/15 03:38 AM.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 12
Newbie
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 12 |
Hello Herb, Before I bought my Melodyne Editor DNA, I went through lesser versions of Melodyne, so my referral to Melodyne Bridge relates to those versions. (Cre8 and Studio) Most audio transposing tools I use (not just Melodyne) offer formant control. While perhaps useable for gentle vocal fixes within a few cents, it makes transposition results far, far worse once serious semitone distances are involved. Having tested in detail what it can offer long ago, I avoid it like ebola. If it works for you for vocal autotuning and subtle harmonies (something I don't do, so I can't comment on ... nice song, congratulations) - wonderful, at least you have a use for it. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New RealTracks Released with Band-in-a-Box 2025!
We’ve expanded the Band-in-a-Box® RealTracks library with 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 449-467) across Jazz, Blues, Funk, World, Pop, Rock, Country, Americana, and Praise & Worship—featuring your most requested styles!
Jazz, Blues & World (Sets 449–455):
These RealTracks includes “Soul Jazz” with Neil Swainson (bass), Mike Clark (drums), Charles Treadway (organ), Miles Black (piano), and Brent Mason (guitar). Enjoy “Requested ’60s” jazz, classic acoustic blues with Colin Linden, and more of our popular 2-handed piano soloing. Plus, a RealTracks first—Tango with bandoneon, recorded in Argentina!
Rock & Pop (Sets 456–461):
This collection includes Disco, slap bass ‘70s/‘80s pop, modern and ‘80s metal with Andy Wood, and a unique “Songwriter Potpourri” featuring Chinese folk instruments, piano, banjo, and more. You’ll also find a muted electric guitar style (a RealTracks first!) and “Producer Layered Guitar” styles for slick "produced" sound.
Country, Americana & Praise (Sets 462–467):
We’ve added new RealTracks across bro country, Americana, praise & worship, vintage country, and songwriter piano. Highlights include Brent Mason (electric guitar), Eddie Bayers (drums), Doug Jernigan (pedal steel), John Jarvis (piano), Glen Duncan (banjo, mandolin & fiddle), Mike Harrison (electric bass) and more—offering everything from modern sounds to heartfelt Americana styles
Check out all the 202 New RealTracks (in sets 456-467)
And, if you are looking for more, the 2025 49-PAK (for $49) includes an additional 20 RealTracks with exciting new sounds and genre-spanning styles. Enjoy RealTracks firsts like Chinese instruments (guzheng & dizi), the bandoneon in an authentic Argentine tango trio, and the classic “tic-tac” baritone guitar for vintage country.
You’ll also get slick ’80s metal guitar from Andy Wood, modern metal with guitarist Nico Santora, bass player Nick Schendzielos, and drummer Aaron Stechauner, more praise & worship, indie-folk, modern/bro country with Brent Mason, and “Songwriter Americana” with Johnny Hiland.
Plus, enjoy user-requested styles like Soul Jazz RealDrums, fast Celtic Strathspey guitar, and Chill Hop piano & drums!
The 2025 49-PAK is loaded with other great new add-ons as well. Learn more about the 2025 49-PAK!
Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac!
With your version 2025 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Or upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2025 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 33 new RealTracks and 65+ new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 29 new RealTracks and 45+ new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 20 new RealStyles.
- Look Ma! More MIDI 13: Country & Americana
- Instrumental Studies Set 22: 2-Hand Piano Soloing - Rhythm Changes
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 44: Jazz Piano
- Artist Performance Set 17: Songs with Vocals 7
- Playable RealTracks Set 4
- RealDrums Stems Set 7: Jazz with Mike Clark
- SynthMaster Sounds and Styles (with audio demos)
- 128 GM MIDI Patch Audio Demos.
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyles,
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- Look Ma! More MIDI 14: SynthMaster,
- Instrumental Studies Set 23: More '80s Hard Rock Soloing,
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 45: More SynthMaster
- Artist Performance Set 18: Songs with Vocals 8
- RealDrums Stems Set 8: Pop, Funk & More with Jerry Roe
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®!
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Mac!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 20.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 20 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
New! XPro Styles PAK 9 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and higher for Mac!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 9 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 29 RealTracks/RealDrums!
We've been hard at it to bring you the latest and greatest in this 9th installment of our popular XPro Styles PAK series! Included are 75 styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres (25 styles each) that fans have come to expect, as well as 25 styles in this volume's wildcard genre: funk & R&B!
If you're itching to get a sneak peek at what's included in XPro Styles PAK 9, here is a small helping of what you can look forward to: Funky R&B Horns, Upbeat Celtic Rock, Jazz Fusion Salsa, Gentle Indie Folk, Cool '60s Soul, Funky '70s R&B, Smooth Jazz Hip Hop, Acoustic Rockabilly Swing, Funky Reggae Dub, Dreamy Retro Latin Jazz, Retro Soul-Rock Fusion, and much more!
Special Pricing! Until July 31, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 9 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Windows!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 20.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 20 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
New! XPro Styles PAK 9 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and higher for Windows!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 9 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 29 RealTracks/RealDrums!
We've been hard at it to bring you the latest and greatest in this 9th installment of our popular XPro Styles PAK series! Included are 75 styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres (25 styles each) that fans have come to expect, as well as 25 styles in this volume's wildcard genre: funk & R&B!
If you're itching to get a sneak peek at what's included in XPro Styles PAK 9, here is a small helping of what you can look forward to: Funky R&B Horns, Upbeat Celtic Rock, Jazz Fusion Salsa, Gentle Indie Folk, Cool '60s Soul, Funky '70s R&B, Smooth Jazz Hip Hop, Acoustic Rockabilly Swing, Funky Reggae Dub, Dreamy Retro Latin Jazz, Retro Soul-Rock Fusion, and much more!
Special Pricing! Until July 31, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 9 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: VST3 Plugin Support
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® now includes support for VST3 plugins, alongside VST and AU. Use them with MIDI or audio tracks for even more creative possibilities in your music production.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Macs®: VST3 Plugin Support
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: Using VST3 Plugins
Join the conversation on our forum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums58
Topics84,399
Posts778,690
Members39,648
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean