Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,931
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,931 |
Hello All I am sure you are all getting very bored of this but this is (probably) the last song for the album. This song was selected by friend of mine, Marion, who is a wonderful vocalist and performer. I met Marion on a song writing course at the end of 2013. After Guenter did such a wonderful job with "Its Time (the Last Farewell)" I asked him if he wanted to mix this one. I also did a mix of the song, which is more like my original mix, so that Marion had a couple of options to chose from. Guenter and I would love to hear from you guys which one you would choose for the album and why. Your input is much appreciated. Kiss me Slowly with Marion Leibbrant (my mix) Kiss me Slolwy with Marion Leibbrant (Guenters mix)
Last edited by JosieC; 05/31/15 06:24 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 4,052
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 4,052 |
Hello Josie,
Isn't this a fine project! Another fine song. We got to say we prefer version A. The folky,country arrangement really suits the song.
Rob and Anne-Marie
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,688
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,688 |
I prefer mix A too but it's not a runaway. Guenter's mix on the vocals were better as well as his build up as the song progressed. However, the bass seemed too busy for the song in mix B.
Having heard the original, your mix seemed to retain some of the familiarity of the original to me and even though you staggered instruments entering the song along the way, the song did not seem to build as a result. Maybe you should play with having orchestration begin earlier.
A similar style to your mix is played a lot on our local radio and those songs use horns a lot. Your chord progression is common in this area and trumpet/sax combo's are heard in nearly all the songs. Check out Josie's (Sundance) User Forum post from Jan. 2013 - "She's in Love" for a sample of the horn sound.
I like the song and either version works fine other than being contrasted against each other.
Charlie
Last edited by c_fogle; 05/31/15 06:53 AM.
BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,494
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,494 |
Dear Jo !
Wonderful song and vocals ! I loved everything about this production !:))
Cheers Dani
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 15,491
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 15,491 |
There's a lot to like about both mixes and that is helped by it being a good song to start with.
I think the choice would be based not on which is "right" or "best" but rather on what you want the total package to feel like.
"A" sounds like a folky ballad.
"B" sounds like a light rock ballad.
Personally I'm inclined toward the light rock sound. But Janice's take may be different. We'll see!
Hard to go wrong either way and I enjoyed the listens.
Bud
Our albums and singles are on Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, YouTube Music, Pandora and more. If interested search on Janice Merritt. Thanks! Our Videos are here on our website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 7,051
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 7,051 |
Just to make the decision harder, I'm going to have to say B. Both mixes are excellent. A is more your style but I think B is really nice (Guenter is the remix master) and I think it will add variety to the project. Both are very nice! Take care. Greg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 12,493
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 12,493 |
Joanne...
Your mix is excellent. One of your best ever I think. Nice instrumentation, good balance, crisp and clear. The vocal with the harmonies got a little hot a couple of times (not by much). It is, however, a "dated" sound - pure 50's... Very well done - if you want that sound - but dated, nonetheless... in that musical bed, the vocal (and harmonies) become more a part of the production than the star of the show. It was a hallmark of that style. It was always tough for a vocal to rise above that cadence...
Guenter's production/mix gives you a "current" sound. The song and the vocal are more "the star" - it has a "sexiness" that the other does not (cannot by its nature). When she sings "kiss me slowly" it sounds like she really wants to be kissed. I never got that feeling with the 50's style. The guitar solo adds to the sexiness of the song - smoldering (I'd like to know what RT it is). The instrumentation causes the vocal to ooze feeling. I kept comparing the two at different spots to see if they were the same vocal...
So... my vote would definitely be Guenter's. For the feeling that it evokes. Your production/mix is beautiful - so if that were your choice, it certainly is not a wrong choice...
floyd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,888
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,888 |
Hi Floyd, in my opinion you nailed it. Here is what I wrote Joanne to explain my decision: "The song reminded me too much of Donna by Ritchie Valens ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMcHbh6HBDk) and hundreds of songs from the late 50s and early 60s which used the same chord pattern and rhythm. So I used some Maj7 to jazz it up a little and got rid of the 6/8 measure." Here is the lead: RT1168_Guitar, Electric, Soloist RockBalladBrent Ev 065 Guenter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,440
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,440 |
I think, personally, either mix would be a good one. Unlike the song we worked on together which was very similar, there is a WIDE disparity between these 2 versions. Choosing which one will come down more to a matter of taste. Do you prefer the 50's retro sound or the smooth sexy sound.
Mix A: this has a dated 50's sound. However the groove is good. The feel "fits like a glove". IMHO, the vocals could come up a bit overall because I think they are a few dB low in the mix. I thought the bgvh were a bit loud but I think that you like it that way. As Floyd pointed out, that was par for the course in the 50's and 60's style music this represents. the guitar solo needs to be lowered significantly. It's a good solo and fits well, but it's too loud in relation to the mix. Pay attention to the transitions. for example, at the end of the guitar solo, the singer and solo are happening at the same time. That's not good. They're stepping on each other. The listener is processing the ending to the solo which is expected at that point, and suddenly, before they are expecting it, the singer starts and they miss that magic that should be there. Edit the guitar solo so that it clearly is ended BEFORE the singer hits her first notes. Make those transitions clean and clear. A few seconds of break between the parts is ideal. With a definite ending and a break there's the expectation that the singer should be coming in...and there she is...right on time as expected. Details matter. I would edit the solo to stop on the high note before she comes in..... edit or envelope the notes after the high one and it works well. The problem in that edit is ending the note properly. Cut short, it sounds like a bad edit.... that's where it takes creativity and thought to end it so it sounds natural. I usually go hunting for that same note near the end of the song and copy/paste it in for the edit.... sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't. Also a re-render of the track will produce DIFFERENT notes..... my solo on The Best Christmas is comped from 5 renderings of the same track. All depends on how much work you're willing to do to get it "right".
Mix A needs some simple fixes, mostly related to levels and perhaps a bit of EQ to brighten the vox at the very beginning of the song and some judicious editing or envelopes. The vox sound a bit muffled when she starts singing.... but seems to clear up as the song moves along.
Mix B: I don't like the groove or the feel of this one. The bass (especially) and drums made this version too busy for the soft smooth sexy feeling this song should have. I would spend some time trying other bass parts to find one that fits the feel and still maintains a sweet groove for this song. I currently think the bass part and to some degree, the drums are the main issues with this version. vocals are well done. good eq, nice levels for the lead and the bgvh. These are the best part of this mix. nice guitar tone on the lead/solo and the fills. Keep this guitar tone into the final mix. The clean phased guitar is cool but I think I might would lower it a bit...a few dB at most. AND....look at using a string pad or a nice sampled string section with cello's, violins, etc. Doing that, I feel, would free you to use the clean guitar more like spice as opposed the main ingredient. This version would really benefit from a sweet string section rendered from a high quality sampled VST.
Personal opinion: I would favor the B mix simply due to it's NOT having a 50's groove. That said, it's also the version that needs the biggest re-working to get where it should be. If time is an issue, the A mix is the closest to being ready to go with a few minor tweeks to levels and EQ as I already mentioned above.
Good song.
Last edited by Guitarhacker; 06/02/15 02:02 AM.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 87
Enthusiast
|
Enthusiast
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 87 |
Hello, very beautiful song Josie!
BIAB USER SINCE 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,987
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,987 |
Beautiful song! I like both mixes, but like Floyd said, Guenter's does give it a more current feel. Either one is good though. Herb does have some good suggestions.
Steve
Steve Young Music"In order to compose, all you need to do is remember a tune that nobody else has thought of." - Robert Schumann
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,659
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,659 |
Guenter's version for the win.
But they're both very good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 277
Apprentice
|
Apprentice
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 277 |
They are both nice. I can picture one during cocktail hour, and the second during the dance set. So, for me it would depend, like someone else suggested, on how it fits in or compliments the rest of your songs. Very nice performance either way.
Last edited by nobilis; 06/02/15 07:44 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,615
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,615 |
This has a early seventies feel. Thanks for sharing. Great song great mix. Rob
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 4,335
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 4,335 |
I like both mixes, but I am leaning towards Guenter's. I agree with Herb and Charlie, the bass is too busy. Other than that I like the more modern sound. Great vocals and another great song for your standout project. Tom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,931
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,931 |
Hi Rob and and Marie – Thanks for listening. So glad this project is nearing an end! But it has been great fun and a learning experience to say the least.
Charlie – Thank you very much for your detailed response. We appreciate it.
Dani – Thanks for popping in and leaving your nice comments.
Hi Janice and Bud You said “I think the choice would be based not on which” is "right" or "best" but rather on what you want the total package to feel like” and I think you are spot on. I think mix B is going to be a better choice for the album because it is so different from my version and this project has wielded such diverse compositions. I do think it is the variety of the album that is going to be attractive.
Greg – Thanks. And yes, as explained above, I see your point.
Floyd – Thank you so much for your detailed response
Guenter – Thanks for this and THANK YOU for the hard work you put in to making this song come out so nicely.
Herb – Thank you so much for taking the time to comment in such detail about both the mixes. This certainly a huge learning curve for me. I learn such a huge amount on every song I mix. It looks like we are all leaning to Guenter’s mix.
PRADDON – Thank you! You are most kind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,931
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,931 |
Steve – Nice to hear from you again.
David – It looks like that one is the favourite. Thanks
Patrick, Rob and Tommy – Thank you for taking the time to listen to both versions and comment. It has been a most useful exercise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,040
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,040 |
Josie, Great song and both mixes are wonderful. I suppose it comes down to the sound of the rest of album. I personally like big production of mix B SD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,296
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,296 |
I think it's so cool that you have two mixes! I heard that first one and REALLY liked it. Then I heard the second one and REALLY liked it! ha! Big help there, right? One thing I am curious about, the first one the harmonies don't seem as smooth as the second. Where they done differently, or just mixed differently, or...am I just off? For the first mix, given the strong vibrato, I would recommend singing the lead a second time with no vibrato at all. Then use that track to generate the harmonies, leaving the second lead out altogether. It may give you a smoother result  Moving on, this is a cool song! I could see someone like KT Lang wanting to do this. It's just such a great feel. Thanks for the share!
Chad (Hope that makes it easier) TEMPO TANTRUM: What a lead singer has when they can't stay in time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,079
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,079 |
Joanne and Guenter, Both versions are good! I would not be able to choose as they almost sound like 2 different songs, beautiful write. My collab now sticks out like a sore thumb good stuff Alyn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs Special Extended Until August 31st!
XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs Special Extended Until August 31st!
The XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs special offers are now available until August 31st at 11:59pm PDT!
Ready to take your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 experience to the next level? Now’s the perfect time! Expand your style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs—packed with a wide variety of genres to inspire your next musical creation.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-9 includes 900 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). With over 3,500 styles (and 35 MIDI styles) included in Xtra Styles PAKs 1-20, the possibilities are endless!
Get the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Windows or for Mac.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Get Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 19 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Listen to demos and order now! For Windows or for Mac.
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Don’t miss this chance to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box setup—at a great price!
Mac 2025 Special Upgrade Offers Extended Until August 15th!
It's not too late to upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® and save! We've extended our special until August 15, 2025!
We've added many major new features to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, including advanced AI tools like the amazing BB Stem Splitter and AI Lyrics Generator, as well as VST3 plugin support, and Equalize Temp. Plus, there’s a new one-stop MIDI Patches Picker with over 1,100 MIDI patches to choose from, all neatly categorized by GM numbers. The MultiPicker Library is enhanced with tabs for the SongPicker, MIDI Patch Picker, Chord Builder, AI Lyrics Generator, and Song Titles Browser, and the tabs are organized into logical groups. The Audiophile Edition is enhanced with FLAC files , which are 60% smaller than AIFF files while maintaining identical audio quality, and now ships on a fast 1TB SSD, and much more!
Check out all the new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® here:
Purchase your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac during our special to save up to 50% off your upgrade purchase and receive a FREE BONUS PAK of amazing new Add-ons. These include the 2025 RealCombos Booster PAK, Look Ma! More MIDI 13: Country & Americana, Instrumental Studies Set 22: 2-Hand Piano Soloing - Rhythm Changes, MIDI SuperTracks Set 44: Jazz Piano, Artist Performance Set 17: Songs with Vocals 7, Playable RealTracks Set 4, RealDrums Stems Set 7: Jazz with Mike Clark, and more!
Upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for just $49 and add 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and 20 RealStyles, FLAC Files for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks, Look Ma! More MIDI 14: SynthMaster, MIDI SuperTracks Set 45: More SynthMaster, Artist Performance Set 18: Songs with Vocals 8, and RealDrums Stems Set 8: Pop, Funk & More with Jerry Roe.
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs!
New RealTracks Released with Band-in-a-Box 2025!
We’ve expanded the Band-in-a-Box® RealTracks library with 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 449-467) across Jazz, Blues, Funk, World, Pop, Rock, Country, Americana, and Praise & Worship—featuring your most requested styles!
Jazz, Blues & World (Sets 449–455):
These RealTracks includes “Soul Jazz” with Neil Swainson (bass), Mike Clark (drums), Charles Treadway (organ), Miles Black (piano), and Brent Mason (guitar). Enjoy “Requested ’60s” jazz, classic acoustic blues with Colin Linden, and more of our popular 2-handed piano soloing. Plus, a RealTracks first—Tango with bandoneon, recorded in Argentina!
Rock & Pop (Sets 456–461):
This collection includes Disco, slap bass ‘70s/‘80s pop, modern and ‘80s metal with Andy Wood, and a unique “Songwriter Potpourri” featuring Chinese folk instruments, piano, banjo, and more. You’ll also find a muted electric guitar style (a RealTracks first!) and “Producer Layered Guitar” styles for slick "produced" sound.
Country, Americana & Praise (Sets 462–467):
We’ve added new RealTracks across bro country, Americana, praise & worship, vintage country, and songwriter piano. Highlights include Brent Mason (electric guitar), Eddie Bayers (drums), Doug Jernigan (pedal steel), John Jarvis (piano), Glen Duncan (banjo, mandolin & fiddle), Mike Harrison (electric bass) and more—offering everything from modern sounds to heartfelt Americana styles
Check out all the 202 New RealTracks (in sets 456-467)
And, if you are looking for more, the 2025 49-PAK (for $49) includes an additional 20 RealTracks with exciting new sounds and genre-spanning styles. Enjoy RealTracks firsts like Chinese instruments (guzheng & dizi), the bandoneon in an authentic Argentine tango trio, and the classic “tic-tac” baritone guitar for vintage country.
You’ll also get slick ’80s metal guitar from Andy Wood, modern metal with guitarist Nico Santora, bass player Nick Schendzielos, and drummer Aaron Stechauner, more praise & worship, indie-folk, modern/bro country with Brent Mason, and “Songwriter Americana” with Johnny Hiland.
Plus, enjoy user-requested styles like Soul Jazz RealDrums, fast Celtic Strathspey guitar, and Chill Hop piano & drums!
The 2025 49-PAK is loaded with other great new add-ons as well. Learn more about the 2025 49-PAK!
Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac!
With your version 2025 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Or upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2025 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 33 new RealTracks and 65+ new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 29 new RealTracks and 45+ new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 20 new RealStyles.
- Look Ma! More MIDI 13: Country & Americana
- Instrumental Studies Set 22: 2-Hand Piano Soloing - Rhythm Changes
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 44: Jazz Piano
- Artist Performance Set 17: Songs with Vocals 7
- Playable RealTracks Set 4
- RealDrums Stems Set 7: Jazz with Mike Clark
- SynthMaster Sounds and Styles (with audio demos)
- 128 GM MIDI Patch Audio Demos.
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyles,
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- Look Ma! More MIDI 14: SynthMaster,
- Instrumental Studies Set 23: More '80s Hard Rock Soloing,
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 45: More SynthMaster
- Artist Performance Set 18: Songs with Vocals 8
- RealDrums Stems Set 8: Pop, Funk & More with Jerry Roe
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®!
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Mac!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 20.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 20 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
New! XPro Styles PAK 9 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and higher for Mac!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 9 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 29 RealTracks/RealDrums!
We've been hard at it to bring you the latest and greatest in this 9th installment of our popular XPro Styles PAK series! Included are 75 styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres (25 styles each) that fans have come to expect, as well as 25 styles in this volume's wildcard genre: funk & R&B!
If you're itching to get a sneak peek at what's included in XPro Styles PAK 9, here is a small helping of what you can look forward to: Funky R&B Horns, Upbeat Celtic Rock, Jazz Fusion Salsa, Gentle Indie Folk, Cool '60s Soul, Funky '70s R&B, Smooth Jazz Hip Hop, Acoustic Rockabilly Swing, Funky Reggae Dub, Dreamy Retro Latin Jazz, Retro Soul-Rock Fusion, and much more!
Special Pricing! Until July 31, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 9 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Windows!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 20.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 20 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums58
Topics84,507
Posts780,138
Members39,677
|
Most Online25,754 Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|