|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 161
Apprentice
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 161 |
Hi there,
I am going to try to record my voice in biab and would like some advice about a microphone to buy.
Now I have to say I am not a great singer, though some songs I am passable enough in. So to be honest an expensive microphone is not going to make my voice sound good, it may help a good singer but not me I'm afraid.
So any recommendations on cheapy mics to buy and if its also a good idea to buy one of those pop shields to cut down on breath noise etc, or can you get a small shield to fit around mic?
Kind regards
Jan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815 |
I bought an MXL V63M condenser mic for ~ $49 and a Art TubeMP Studio Preamp (~$29) from Amazon.com a little over a year ago and I have been pleased with what I can get out of it. My voice isn't that good and my range is limited, but I do what I can do. I have some recording at the soundclick site listed below that have examples of my vocals (and acoustic guitar) recorded through this mic and preamp (mic --> preamp --> tascam 224 audio interface --> PC --> Sonar HS 6XL).
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,342
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,342 |
I'd go for a Shure SM58.
For about $100 you'll have the world's most used vocal microphone. Countless hits have been recorded with the SM58 and most if not all rental companies use SM58's.
If you want to cut down on cost: do it on the popscreen. You can easilly make your own with a piece of electrical wiring and a nylon stocking.
Last edited by Mike sings; 04/01/09 08:44 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,792
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,792 |
I went to Musician's friend and bought a behringer XM8500, well actually three of them, for $59 They sell for $19 each, and i find them to be very comparable to the SM58, which i also have. For the money that would be a great choice. Add one of those to a nive Art tube pre and for around $50 you would have what you need for your purposes.
HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini Sonoma with 16 gig of ram, BiaB/RB 2026, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 11 , Presonus Audiobox USB96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 29
Enthusiast
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 29 |
OK, don't everybody beat me up at once, but Radio Shack has a few good options. I've got one I use in church and also use it for some home recording at home. When at home I run it through a TEAC 6-channel mixer. Works nice as a pre-amp and allows me to plug other components in at the same time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,792
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,792 |
I have one RS mike that is a shure made product and it works just fine, i have done several recordings and played live with it. The Teac will work, but does not usually have the routing to monitor the mix like a dedicated mixer would have, but heck experiment and see how it works for you.
HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini Sonoma with 16 gig of ram, BiaB/RB 2026, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 11 , Presonus Audiobox USB96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 161
Apprentice
|
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 161 |
Hi again, Thanks very much for all your kind replies and suggestions. I was checking out the behringer XM8500 on the uk amazon site and this shure mic came up as well, the shure c606 which seems to have got good reviews on there. Some suggest its as good as the sm58! http://www.amazon.co.uk/Shure-C606-Dynam...0337&sr=8-2Will do a little more thinking before I commit. thanks again very much Regards Jan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,724
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,724 |
Jan, Before you buy check out the CAD 189. I offer this for a couple reasons 1st of all this mic makes my voice sound a lot better than it actually is, I know this for a fact. Secondly the company is very generous when it comes to charities and community projects and from the top they are just fine people, I know this through personal dealings. Also not for sure but I am thinking this mic is priced to be competitive with Shure. Just my 2 cents. Good Luck,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 235
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 235 |
Hi Jan, I am not going to recommend a mic, since it is in the end always a personal thing, but I try to show some things that might help you in chosing one. Best way though is go into a shop and try them out. Chose dynamic mikes, condenser, or ribbon? There you got allready a choice that determines a lot in your recording. I try to mention the most important things to consider, in a generalized way (because I aim it at this question): Advantage/disadvantage/usage/budget versus quality Dynamic: adv.: * more robust than the other types * often cheaper * no extra power needed * more related to "live"situations: less chance for feedback (because it's lower sensitivity especially for the high frequencies) disadv.: * less responsive ("lazier", not very suitable for softer sounds) * less lineair recordings usage: * live performance * studio (louder)instrument miking * for vocals less used than condensers budget: There are already some pretty nice ones for little money (starting around 50-100 euro) Condenser:adv: * very responsive * more clear and lineair recording (what you hear is what you get) * (imo the best choice for vocals)disadv.: * Powersupply needed (mostly +48v--> on a lot of mixerdesks build in -phantom power, or use a seperate unit especially for supplying this phantom power). Some optionally use also batteries, which skips the need of the power options mentioned above. * Vulnerable, so more sensitive for damage * More feedbackchance in a system where you work with speakers such as live performance (studio: if you are not doing this yet: use headphones to eliminate this and as well crosstalk from the speakers). usage: * mostly studio * almost every source budget: There are already some pretty nice ones for little money (starting around 50-100 euro) Ribbon: A bit of-condenser-like microphone, but precharged. (don't react with it is different, coz I know, it is just the response quality I talk about) Thus: adv.: * Very responsive * no extra power needed * often very cheap (but that is really much less quality then the more expensive ones). disadv.: * Extremely vulnerable Usage: * studio budget: The real nice ribbons are more expensive (starting from approx 200-300 euro) Then to end this thing a nice priced internet providing shop in Europe with quite a large assortment: Online shop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 18
Enthusiast
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 18 |
Hey Jan. If you go to this site and click on the song "Waiting In The Wings" you'll hear me singing into a Blue Snowball USB mic with no effects and just my soundcard that came with my Dell. It's recorded straight onto my computer with no mixing. And it plugs right into the usb port. I'm still working on it but it will give you an idea of it's sound and it's easy to use and it costs about 70 or 80 dollars through Amazon. http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=460722370Steve
Last edited by SEHatfield; 04/02/09 04:43 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 474
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 474 |
Hi Jan.
Like abadio says a mic is always a personal thing.But I think that if this is your first mic, I would personally go for the SM57.
It is a dynamic mic, and this mics are (like abaudio says) robust, they need no extra power, and it is not to expensive.
Like Mike say you have the worlds most used vocal mic, and countless hits have been made with SM57.
If this mic is good enough for the professionals it should not be to far of as a starter mic ?.
A pop screen is not to expensive, but like Mike say you can easilly make one from a piece of wire and nylon stocking (The hazardous part is to take your girlfriends nylonstocking)
There are also cheap rubber foam pop "pop screens" you can place directly on the mic. They will take away a little breath noice and sibilance. To my upinion the wire popper screen is a better solution.
Best regards
Tono
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 235
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 235 |
Citaat:
Hi Jan.
Like abadio says a mic is always a personal thing.But I think that if this is your first mic, I would personally go for the SM57.
Best regards
Tono
Are you s(h)ure you are not talking about the SM58? The SM58 is a "vocal" mic (mostly used for live performance) and the SM57 is (mostly) used as an instrumental mic (especially drums and amps). Not saying it is not possible, just naming the usual usage...
I'll be back...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 474
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 474 |
You are absolutely correct abaudio. I was talking about the SM58 of course.
Thank you for the correction.
Best regards
Tono.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 161
Apprentice
|
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 161 |
Thank you all for your very kind and helpful advice. I have decided that I will go for a shure c606 mic as some of the reviews I have read for it state that it is almost as good as the sm58 but only 1/3 of the price.
kind regards
Jan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
The Shure SM-57 was originally designed by the Shure Brothers as a Vocal Mic. (first named the "Unidyne") It exhibits the "vocal peak" in its frequency curve, by design. I still use one for vocals, they are great vocal mics for baritones. An SM-57 with the Shure designed long foam boot can work and sound very much like an SM-58, too. They use the same capsule. Whenever this one comes upm I refer folks to this webpage, in which an SM-57was used for every track on the song featured there: The "All '57 Song" I think (I KNOW) that a '57 is more versatile for home recording than a '58, although either can serve you very well. The '57, however, can be pressed into service as a vocal mic, guitar mic, wind instrument mic, stringed instrument mic, drum mic, etc. without much coloration. That makes it still a first choice for many on-location recording and broadcast soundstages. AND studio. --Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 474
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 474 |
Good information as always Mac.always something new to learn.
It can also be a good thing to listen to Ray Thigpens album "50 years singing and playing" the lead vocal is all done with an SM57,
and to my upinion the results is exelent.
Best regards
Tono.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,216
Posts802,006
Members40,070
| |
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean