Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,298
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,298
Originally Posted By: Charlie Fogle
The way comping is being addressed here, you guys are correct that it doesn't take 100 takes to get it right. However, many big studio recordings are done over a considerable period of time, sometimes months or more... No takes are discarded.. The singer comes in several times over a period of several months. New vocals are recorded with alternate phrasing. Different mic's may be used to try a different tone. The vocalist may be asked by the producer to try the song with a different emotional vibe.

There may be several 'alternate' versions of the same song, each requiring different phrasing and emotion. New or additional producers may be brought in - their input can change the direction or breath new life into a song everyone knows is a hit but for some reason or other, the magic hasn't been found yet.

100 takes isn't so awesome over a six month period.
And in the digital domain today, nothing is discarded.

Listen to the out takes and alternate versions of the Beatles and Beach Boys songs available on YouTube. Many early versions of their hits vary greatly from the final commercial single. Also, back in the day, album versions of a song many times differed from the single release.

I also think you guys may be underestimating how advanced tape splicing/editing was back in the day. They really could take pieces from 5-6 different takes of a song music and vocals and cut/splice them into a single composite. There was also a lot of bouncing between machines to save various versions and experiments...
Its not unusual to hear the Beatles stop and restart a song at a bridge or 2nd verse. That could be edited into a completely separate first verse recorded at a different time.




Exactly!


Chad (Hope that makes it easier)

TEMPO TANTRUM: What a lead singer has when they can't stay in time.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,298
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,298
Originally Posted By: Guitarhacker
Many of my songs are first or second vocal take. Because recently, I haven't even been doing layering. I've gotten really lazy on a few songs.

One take.... punch in on a few mistakes or glitches.... fix the rest with Melodyne...and I'm done.

I didn't mean to insinuate that everyone comping more than 2 dozen tracks was lying about it.... I know they do that, and I know they know what they're doing. It was more like an exaggeration on my part to illustrate how absurd that sounds.... 100 tracks and fixing syllables.


I personally have wondered if the number of times they redo a vocal, or any instrument, swells to the allowed budget!


Chad (Hope that makes it easier)

TEMPO TANTRUM: What a lead singer has when they can't stay in time.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 674
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 674
Originally Posted By: HearToLearn
Quote:
but was he also the vocalist or was he recording someone else?


He was recording others.

Quote:
do professional vocalists really do 100 takes? I can't imagine doing this because after 20+ takes the vocalist is going to be worn out and the rest of the vocal takes are going to be crap anyway - assuming they are done all in one day.


They are NOT all done in a single day by any means.

that would definitely make more sense to do them over more than 1 "session."

I'm absolutely not questioning that your friend did it or not. and I'm sure if one person would do it then there are others who would as well. I just can't imagine it really being practical (which I know you've already said you aren't defending the practicality of it).

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 674
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 674
Originally Posted By: HearToLearn
Originally Posted By: Guitarhacker
Many of my songs are first or second vocal take. Because recently, I haven't even been doing layering. I've gotten really lazy on a few songs.

One take.... punch in on a few mistakes or glitches.... fix the rest with Melodyne...and I'm done.

I didn't mean to insinuate that everyone comping more than 2 dozen tracks was lying about it.... I know they do that, and I know they know what they're doing. It was more like an exaggeration on my part to illustrate how absurd that sounds.... 100 tracks and fixing syllables.


I personally have wondered if the number of times they redo a vocal, or any instrument, swells to the allowed budget!


yep! most places aren't going to come in WAY below budget! laugh

Beagle #322797 12/03/15 11:38 AM
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,298
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,298
Quote:
yep! most places aren't going to come in WAY below budget! laugh


SO VERY TRUE! laugh


Chad (Hope that makes it easier)

TEMPO TANTRUM: What a lead singer has when they can't stay in time.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,604
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,604
I guess it varies with your work flow.
I opened a project and checked the number of 'comps' (edits for one track) .. was surprised. I suppose if the one vocal track has a couple dozen, the others added on may approach 50 pretty quickly here.
100 for professional work doesn't seem unfathomable at all. Heck I may have projects with that many, ain't got time to count 'em!


Attached Files (Click to download or enlarge) (Only available when you are logged in)
VocalComp.jpg (85.74 KB, 142 downloads)

I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,866
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,866
Originally Posted By: HearToLearn

I personally have wondered if the number of times they redo a vocal, or any instrument, swells to the allowed budget!


I have no doubt, and, very likely, a reasonable overage.

Who leaves money on the table when it's there for the taking?


You can find my music at:
www.herbhartley.com
Add nothing that adds nothing to the music.
You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.

The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
rharv #322908 12/04/15 03:13 AM
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,298
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,298
Originally Posted By: rharv
I guess it varies with your work flow.
I opened a project and checked the number of 'comps' (edits for one track) .. was surprised. I suppose if the one vocal track has a couple dozen, the others added on may approach 50 pretty quickly here.
100 for professional work doesn't seem unfathomable at all. Heck I may have projects with that many, ain't got time to count 'em!



That helps put it in perspective.

Thanks for posting this!


Chad (Hope that makes it easier)

TEMPO TANTRUM: What a lead singer has when they can't stay in time.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 128
P
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
P
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 128
I guess with me I am recording to evaluate live performance.....so I want all my vocals single take to see if they are ready for live performance. I record vocals, backing tracks, and live instruments and then evaluate. It gives you a measure on mixing balance and performance. For me I seldom get thru a vocal completely flawless but totally acceptable. My fiance who has a fantastic voice is pretty much flawless.....drives me crazy. So none of this applies to why we comp...for me it just gives me some insurance that I have enough to work with. When I recorded my band for a demo I wanted it to be completely live so it was a fair representation of us live. Because we didn't do retakes just set up and played thru I had a few I had to toss because of issues I couldn't do anything with.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,094
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,094
Great article.

I am aware of comping, but have to admit that I probably didn't understand the depths that are used to get the 'good' 'better' 'best' takes.


BIAB & RB2026 Win.(Audiophile), Windows 10 Pro & Windows 11, Cakewalk Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Session Keys Grand S & Electric R, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M, Pioneer Active Monitors.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,867
C
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
C
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,867
There are many examples on YouTube of recording sessions where you 'see' comping being done but there's no reference noting it. Usually, the emphasis of the video is a more global subject like in
this link to Shania Twain and Lionel Ritchie recording "Endless Love". The recording session is portrayed for the viewer to feel the insecurities and struggles of Shania, so we see her sing a phrase, stop, and so on. But note the recording is being done phrase by phrase. It's not just due to her struggles because even when she nails a take spot on, she stops singing and recording stops. Each and every time.
Endless Love


BIAB 2026:RB 2026, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,298
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,298
Originally Posted By: Charlie Fogle
There are many examples on YouTube of recording sessions where you 'see' comping being done but there's no reference noting it. Usually, the emphasis of the video is a more global subject like in
this link to Shania Twain and Lionel Ritchie recording "Endless Love". The recording session is portrayed for the viewer to feel the insecurities and struggles of Shania, so we see her sing a phrase, stop, and so on. But note the recording is being done phrase by phrase. It's not just due to her struggles because even when she nails a take spot on, she stops singing and recording stops. Each and every time.
Endless Love



A few things struck me about this video.

-What you already pointed out.

-The casualness of the environment.

Gone are some of the illusions of the BIG recording studios to pump out a track like this.

thanks for sharing this! I never knew this was out there...even the remake of the song. VERY cool! I enjoyed it A LOT!


Chad (Hope that makes it easier)

TEMPO TANTRUM: What a lead singer has when they can't stay in time.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 128
P
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
P
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 128
This is my favorite video on Sound Engineering:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2Rhh_4GZmU

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,867
C
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
C
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,867
"thanks for sharing this! I never knew this was out there...even the remake of the song. VERY cool! I enjoyed it A LOT!"

Here's a better one. You get to see David Foster write a song and create the demo on his keyboard at his home studio.

Again, note the copious use of punch in recording.

Shania Twain and David Foster recording "Today"

Last edited by Charlie Fogle; 12/08/15 02:15 AM.

BIAB 2026:RB 2026, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 16,134
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 16,134
And then there were Ella and Frank...


Our albums and singles are on Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, YouTube Music, Pandora and more.
If interested search on Janice Merritt. Thanks!
Our Videos
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,298
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,298
Originally Posted By: Janice & Bud
And then there were Ella and Frank...


Meaning?


Chad (Hope that makes it easier)

TEMPO TANTRUM: What a lead singer has when they can't stay in time.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,604
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,604
There wasn't a lot of comping with Ella .. not so sure about Frank, he always had something up his sleeve. (grin)

I've liked Mr Foster for a long time, it took me a few years to realize I was appreciating his editing/production techniques more than the music. But that's just me.
He had a couple solo things I really liked, and they were probably made on a pretty tight budget at the time ..


I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
rharv #324090 12/09/15 02:02 AM
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,094
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,094
Some really great material in this thread, for sure.

One of my favorite CD's is "David Foster Recordings".

Sheer genius no matter how you look at it. From piano to production and everything in between.


BIAB & RB2026 Win.(Audiophile), Windows 10 Pro & Windows 11, Cakewalk Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Session Keys Grand S & Electric R, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M, Pioneer Active Monitors.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,792
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,792
All I can say on this is , .......I can't believe we have a beagle sighting!


HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini Sonoma with 16 gig of ram, BiaB/RB 2026, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 11 , Presonus Audiobox USB96
Rob Helms #325299 12/15/15 03:39 AM
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 674
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 674
Originally Posted By: Robh
All I can say on this is , .......I can't believe we have a beagle sighting!


What's up Rob?! good to see ya!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!

All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!

It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.

What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?

XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!

Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!

The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.

The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.

The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.

Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.

The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.

Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!

Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos

With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.

Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.

Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!

Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!

Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.

Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!

Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.

2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.

Holiday Weekend Hours

As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:

April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours

Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!

— Team PG

Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!

If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!

If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.

Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!

Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.

Forum Statistics
Forums57
Topics86,201
Posts801,893
Members40,066
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
Newest Members
isledge, Gtrplr66, Mando Kat, GlennMans, François Sohm
40,066 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 126
zedd 109
DC Ron 100
rsdean 90
Noel96 89
vicarn 62
Today's Birthdays
Jay Street, JazzLOCO Almenas, smallchamber
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5