|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 235
Apprentice
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 235 |
Who Really Owns The Music?
A lot of questions have come up recently about copyrights and music ownership, and there's a lot of misinformation floating around out there about percentages, who controls what, and who you hafta pay when doing somebody else's songs. Radio play, TV play, songs in movies, Internet broadcasting, and live shows all have different rates. If there's any interest in this subject, I'll do some more posts like this. Here's a sample of how they might look:
Copyright Lemme see if I can break it down simply for ya.
It all starts with the copyright; the copyright tells the world who wrote the song, and who has the final say on where and how that music is heard. Simply stated, a "copyright" give the the owner the "exclusive right to make and control copies". Nobody is permitted to make a copy of the music, or to perform it live, without the permission of the copyright holder.
So, if you're a songwriter, how do you get a copyright for a song? Pretty simple. Once you have a song in some tangible form (not just in your head), you have an automatic copyright, and you have the right (and the responsibility) to use the copyright symbol (©), the date of creation, and the author's name to make it official and binding. If you make a cassette, CD, tape recording, or sheet music, you simply add that information (© 2009 - your name) somewhere plainly visible and you're covered - kinda.
I mean, what's to stop someone from singing "Stairway to Heaven" and claiming they wrote it, then suing Led Zeppelin? How do you prove who came up with the song first? That's where the government comes in; they have a service to let you register your copyright with the government. Then, if there's a dispute as to who wrote it the earliest registration with the government wins - at least, most of the time.
Registering your copyright with the government has some real added benefits: You can sue for extra damages and court costs, you can use the registration date to prove you got there first, and it helps all around to have it registered.
But, in a lawsuit, the most important point you have to prove is that the copier had access to your song - a chain of people or events that ties the copier back to your song. In the case of George Harrison's "My Sweet Lord", it was easy for the original copyright holders to prove that Harrison must have heard The Chiffons' "He's So Fine" at some point in his musical career BEFORE he wrote "My Sweet Lord".
The courts ruled it was "accidental plagiarism", and George Harrison settled the matter completely, by buying all the rights to "He's So Fine". If George hadn't worked it out, the original writers could have sued for all the royalties to "My Sweet Lord", triple punitive damages, and court costs.
Next post: the publisher's role in music.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,689
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,689 |
Pretty complex subject, eh?
I try to stay with PD stuff to avoid problems. One thing that I've found confusing is that someone will record an old song that was originally written prior to 1921/22 and claim a copyright, which appears to be simply a copyright of their arrangement.
Your thoughts?
Don S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,696
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,696 |
I'm way too old to be using "cool" Harvey but "Cool" stuff - keep her goin'  . In the past and currently I've registered my songs with a performing rights organization - here in Canada I use SOCAN. So there is an established date in that way. I also have the songs sharing rights with me under my publishing company name (I'm sole client.) Ian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,217
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,217 |
.
Thanks for clearing this up Harvey. It seems simple, bet gets complicated real fast.
As a schoolteacher, I get something called "fair use," which I am told allows me to use copyrighted material in the classroom. So then what if I show a DVD movie in class and then view it again at home? Am I in violation the second time? What's the difference?
Here's another one: I bought my favorite album, years ago, on vinyl. Now vinyl is obsolete. Since I own the music that I bought, I should be able to copy my friends CD of the album.
Yes, I know. The answers to these situations are pretty obvious. I'm just saying its not so simple in the real world.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,217
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,217 |
.
>>>...As a schoolteacher, I get something called "fair use," which I am told allows me to use copyrighted...>>>
Again as a teacher, allow me to point out that the past tense is "copyrighted." No such word as "copywritten." (bigsmile)
....<ducking and running...>>> .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,058
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,058 |
Always trying to learn more about this.Good info is always needed Wyndham
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,987
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,987 |
harvey, thanks for tackling this important subject for us.
what about parodies? my son sounds like john fogarty of ccr fame and has done a lot of 'twisted tune' parodies with seattle dj, bob rivers. what is required before one can do a parody? several on this forum are interested.
what about 'covers'? say, for example, i play a wedding reception and my playlist includes several copyrighted tunes. am i in violation to 'cover' them?
thanks,
don
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 235
Apprentice
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 235 |
Yes, theoretically, you're in violation of the copyright law if you include "covers" as part of your playlist without paying ASCAP, BMI, or SESAC. "Fair use" and "parodies" are a little more difficult to explain, and I'll cover that part of the copyright law in a more complete post later.
For example, if you make a copy of a rental movie as an example to show in your class for further discussion, that would be "fair use", BUT, if you didn't buy the movie, watching a "home-recorded copy" of a movie you borrowed or rented is against the law.
Yes, you can legally make a copy of a vinyl album you own to a CD, but no, you can not copy your friend's store-bought CD of the same music.
Parodies are a very touchy subject. Most people usually ask the songwriter's permission to use the song as the basis for a parody. They can try and withhold permission, but then it comes down to a court case if they wanna sue.
Last edited by Harvey Gerst; 09/02/09 03:52 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 235
Apprentice
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 235 |
Quote:
Pretty complex subject, eh?
I try to stay with PD stuff to avoid problems. One thing that I've found confusing is that someone will record an old song that was originally written prior to 1921/22 and claim a copyright, which appears to be simply a copyright of their arrangement.
Your thoughts?
Don S.
Yes, you can copyright arrangements and/or performance versions, but it's a little tricky. For a long time, if you went to BMI, and did a search for "Kum Ba Ya", my name would come up as the writer of the song. Our manager sent in the copyright as a "songwriter's copyright", not the correct "performance copyright".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,085
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,085 |
To add a little more mud to the murky water - I read that the date is no longer required. For example if you post your song lyrics - Instead of the old C 2009 Your Name it is now acceptable as C Your Name. (C being the copyright symbol.) This is also true for books, etc.
Sorry I forgot how to type the copyright symbol - brain fog.
Josie
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 235
Apprentice
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 235 |
Num lock on, then hold Alt, and type: 0169
Alt + 0169 = ©
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 235
Apprentice
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 235 |
Quote:
To add a little more mud to the murky water - I read that the date is no longer required. For example if you post your song lyrics - Instead of the old C 2009 Your Name it is now acceptable as © Your Name. This is also true for books, etc.
Josie
Actually Josie, that's not true for music stuff. Here's what the Copyright Office has to say about it:
The notice for visually perceptible copies should contain three elements. They should appear together or in close proximity on the copies. The elements are: 1 The symbol © (the letter C in a circle), or the word "Copyright," or the abbreviation "Copr."; and 2 The year of first publication. If the work is a derivative work or a compilation incorporating previously published material, the year date of first publication of the derivative work or compilation is sufficient. Examples of derivative works are translations or dramatizations; an example of a compilation is an anthology. The year may be omitted when a pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work, with accompanying textual matter, if any, is reproduced in or on greeting cards, postcards, stationery, jewelry, dolls, toys, or useful articles; and 3 The name of the owner of copyright in the work, or an abbreviation by which the name can be recognized, or a generally known alternative designation of the owner.* Example: © 2007 Jane Doe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
The "Mechanical Copyright" is different from the Songwriter's Copyright.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,085
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,085 |
Harvey, Thank you for clearing that up - obviously some misinformation floating around that I picked up. Sheesh.
Josie
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 537
Journeyman
|
Journeyman
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 537 |
I read that only the melody can be copyright. Not the chords or lyrics???
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Melody, and of course, lyrics can be copyrighted.
Chord changes by themselves cannot be covered by copyright, thank God, or there would be very few copyrights to be had by now. An arrangement that consists of melody and lyrics, plus chord changes underlying them as a whole, can be copyrighted.
For example, you can pen new and entirely different lyrics to "Happy Birthday to You" melody, but you would infringe on the copyright holder of that song if you attempted to sing your lyrics to their copyrighted melody. You also couldn't use their lyrics with your melody without infringing.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,445
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,445 |
Recently there was a song by Kid Rock called "All Summer Long", which used the riffs from "Werewolves of London" and "Sweet Home Alabama". Does copyright cover riffs too?
Cheers, Keith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,446
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,446 |
Actually only the words to Happy Birthday are copyrighted, because the melody is from a much older and public domain song called "Good Morning To You".
If you play your music in a commercial setting (restaurant, lounge, banquet hall) there is a good possibility that they have a license from ASCAP (in the USA) and you can legally play the songs there --- as long as they have that license. I often see an ASCAP sticker posted on the window to the manager's/owner's office.
Another big misconception is that as long as no money changes hands, it's OK to trade or download copyrighted material. Nothing can be further from the truth. Money has nothing to do with it. If you sing "Happy Birthday" to a family member in a restaurant that doesn't have a license, you are in violation of the law and technically a criminal.
Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer and I'm not qualified to give legal advice. This is just my interpretation of the advice I paid a lawyer to give me.
Insights and incites by Notes
Bob "Notes" Norton Norton Music https://www.nortonmusic.com
100% MIDI Super-Styles recorded by live, pro, studio musicians for a live groove & Fake Disks for MIDI and/or RealTracks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,058
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,058 |
Since we are in the area, is there such a thing as a "limited" or "pay as you go" mechanical for using a song on a cd that has a small outlet. Example of someone playing limited gigs and selling their cd that one or two songs were covers but the number of sales per year might be 50 or less. Another example would be selling a limited number of backing track that include the lyrics printed out and/or a demo of the song "El Paso" The chord changes don't require the mechanical but the melody and lyrics do but the volume of sales is low. thanks Wyndham
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Quote:
Actually only the words to Happy Birthday are copyrighted, because the melody is from a much older and public domain song called "Good Morning To You".
Both songs were originally written and copyrighted by the same two sisters, though. They are long gone and a holding company now owns the rights to Happy Birthday, which kind of explains all the lawyers huntin' down restaurants and such for singing "their" song.
Don't make the mistake of thinking that an instrumental version of Happy Birthday is some kind of workaround or loophole. It isn't. You will just find yourself with a Cease and Desist letter. I think the holding company bought the rights to both songs anyway, or perhaps the sisters did indeed copyright the version with new lyrics at once, dunno. But I do know I've been in one band that was stopped from simply playing the melody just the same as if I'd sung the words. New York City. Land o' lawyers. 'n music snitches, too, apparently.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: AI Stems & Notes - split polyphonic audio into instruments and transcribe
This video demonstrates how to use the new AI-Notes feature together with the AI-Stems splitter, allowing you to select an audio file and have it separated into individual stems while transcribing each one to its own MIDI track. AI-Notes converts polyphonic audio—either full mixes or individual instruments—into MIDI that you can view in notation or play back instantly.
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Bonus PAK and 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®
With your version 2026 for Windows Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
- MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
- Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
- Playable RealTracks Set 5
- RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
- SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
- Android Band-in-a-Box® App (included)
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
- Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
- RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
- SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
Video: New User Interface (GUI)
Join Tobin as he takes you on a tour of the new user interface in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®! This modern GUI redesign offers a sleek new look with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, and a smoother workflow. The brand-new side toolbar puts track selection, the MultiPicker Library, and other essential tools right at your fingertips. Plus, our upgraded Multi-View lets you layer multiple windows without overlap, giving you a highly flexible workspace. Many windows—including Tracks, Piano Roll, and more—have been redesigned for improved usability and a cleaner, more intuitive interface, and more!
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Introducing XPro Styles PAK 10 – Now Available for Windows Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 10 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 28 RealTracks and RealDrums!
Few things are certain in life: death, taxes, and a brand spankin’ new XPro Styles PAK! In this, the 10th edition of our XPro Styles PAK series, we’ve got 100 styles coming your way! We have the classic 25 styles each from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, and rounding out this volume's wildcard slot is 25 styles in the Praise & Worship genre! A wide spanning genre, you can find everything from rock, folk, country, and more underneath its umbrella. The included 28 RealTracks and RealDrums can be used with any Band-in-a-Box® 2026 (and higher) package.
Here’s just a small sampling of what you can look forward to in XPro Styles PAK 10: Soft indie folk worship songs, bumpin’ country boogies, gospel praise breaks, hard rockin’ pop, funky disco grooves, smooth Latin jazz pop, bossa nova fusion, western swing, alternative hip-hop, cool country funk, and much more!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 10 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 10 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Introducing Xtra Styles PAK 21 – Now Available for Windows Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest Xtra Styles PAK installment—the all new Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher)!
Rejoice, one and all, for Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box® is here! We’re serving up 200 brand spankin’ new styles to delight your musical taste buds! The first three courses are the classics you’ve come to know and love, including offerings from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, but, not to be outdone, this year’s fourth course is bro country! A wide ranging genre, you can find everything from hip-hop, uptempo outlaw country, hard hitting rock, funk, and even electronica, all with that familiar bro country flair. The dinner bell has been rung, pickup up Xtra Styles PAK 21 today!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Energetic folk rock, raucous train beats, fast country boogies, acid jazz grooves, laid-back funky jams, a bevy of breezy jazz waltzes, calm electro funk, indie synth pop, industrial synth metal, and more bro country than could possibly fit in the back of a pickup truck!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 21 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 21 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 21.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 21 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 21 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Introducing XPro Styles PAK 10 – Now Available for Mac Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 10 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 28 RealTracks and RealDrums!
Few things are certain in life: death, taxes, and a brand spankin’ new XPro Styles PAK! In this, the 10th edition of our XPro Styles PAK series, we’ve got 100 styles coming your way! We have the classic 25 styles each from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, and rounding out this volume's wildcard slot is 25 styles in the Praise & Worship genre! A wide spanning genre, you can find everything from rock, folk, country, and more underneath its umbrella. The included 28 RealTracks and RealDrums can be used with any Band-in-a-Box® 2026 (and higher) package.
Here’s just a small sampling of what you can look forward to in XPro Styles PAK 10: Soft indie folk worship songs, bumpin’ country boogies, gospel praise breaks, hard rockin’ pop, funky disco grooves, smooth Latin jazz pop, bossa nova fusion, western swing, alternative hip-hop, cool country funk, and much more!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 10 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 10 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Introducing Xtra Styles PAK 21 – Now Available for Mac Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest Xtra Styles PAK installment—the all new Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher)!
Rejoice, one and all, for Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box® is here! We’re serving up 200 brand spankin’ new styles to delight your musical taste buds! The first three courses are the classics you’ve come to know and love, including offerings from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, but, not to be outdone, this year’s fourth course is bro country! A wide ranging genre, you can find everything from hip-hop, uptempo outlaw country, hard hitting rock, funk, and even electronica, all with that familiar bro country flair. The dinner bell has been rung, pickup up Xtra Styles PAK 21 today!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Energetic folk rock, raucous train beats, fast country boogies, acid jazz grooves, laid-back funky jams, a bevy of breezy jazz waltzes, calm electro funk, indie synth pop, industrial synth metal, and more bro country than could possibly fit in the back of a pickup truck!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 21 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 21 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 21.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 21 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 21 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics85,301
Posts790,748
Members39,855
| |
Most Online25,754 Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|