|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 138
Apprentice
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 138 |
I use BIAB to make jazz numbers, using the (wonderful) jazz bass & piano Real Tracks and Real Drums. (I don't use midi at all).
I make the BIAB SGU files on a good recent Dell Latitude; render the SGUs to WAV files (with the maximum allowable +30db volume increase), then convert the WAV files to MP3's at 192bps.
The quality of the resulting MP3 tracks is pretty good. My first question is: is there anything I can do to make the quality even better ?
My second question is: I spend a lot of time mixing - ie getting the volume balance between the three instruments right. Is there any benefit in doing that in Real Band, rather than BIAB ? Are there any other clever tricks for mixing I should know about ?
Many Thanks for your help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,844
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,844 |
Since you are using RealTracks and RealDrums, you didn't indicate whether you used the audiophile versions (true WAV files) or the standard version (WMA files, which can be converted to WAV, but are still lossy audio from the original audiophile WAV's).
If using the WMA files, then by creating MP3's, you are re-compressing the files and losing additional fidelity from files that had already lost some fidelity when they were originally converted to WMA. So my recommendation would be to use either the WAV files themselves (which is the best you'll get), or convert to higher rate (256 or 320). While 192 makes pretty good MP3's, there is still an audible difference between that and the higher rates (do a side-by-side comparison and you'll hear it). Of course, your audience may never know or care.
Secondly, I find it easier to mix the balance using RealBand rather than in BIAB. You have a lot more control and can use additional effects on a track-by-track basis, as well as the overall mix.
John Laptop-HP Omen I7 Win11Pro 32GB 12TB SSD Desktop-ASUS-I7 Win10Pro 32GB 12TB SATA BB2026/UMC204HD&404HD/Casios/Cakewalk/Reaper/Studio One/Notion/Dorico/Noteworthy/NI/Halion/IK http://www.sus4chord.com (under rehosting/construction)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,616
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,616 |
+1 Each time you run a conversion you will lose quality. The tracks are shipped compressed to 160bps in a WMA format. Theoretically, you'll never get better quality than 160. If you have the space, convert your song to WAV and leave it there. Converting WMA to WAV to MP3, according to some audiophiles, is a big No-No. This is known as transcoding and some strange sounds can result. The one I've heard most is a a 'swirling, swishing' sound, especially with the cymbals. This will be less noticeable in performance than if making a CD. But as John said... Quote:
Of course, your audience may never know or care.
Also +1 on RealBand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 812
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 812 |
Hi,
I do have some experience in this area and I'd like to pass on some info that may help you>
1. Before worrying about sampling rates, etc, it is far more important to worry about the encoder used for the conversion. A good and free way to go is to download Audacity. Also download the LAME encoder!!! This is very important. Make sure that encoder is installed in the Audacity folder in your Program files. When you export your WAV files in Audacity, LAME will be used automatically.
2. Bit and Sample rate are important, as well as choosing variable bit rate (VBR) You can do an experiment yourself, try converting to MP3 and make 2 files, 1 with VBR, the other without. Next, choose at least 160 for the first file, and 256 for the second. You will hear a big difference! Also you should notice that the 256 VBR file has much smoother and realistic dynamics.
I use BIAB everyday in making new tracks for my iPod, as I play many gigs with this setup. I am always on the lookout for a better way to do the above procedure. Maybe other posters have some great tips I don't know about, but this should get you pointed in the right direction.
Ed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,199
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,199 |
Andy,
In answer to your second question, I think you should move the file to Real Band, and do your mixing there. In addition to the mixing, you can also add effects on a per track basis, as well as effects to the overall sound
Also, the panning and sound staging is a little easier in Real Band.
I would recommend using BIAB as the starting point, and finishing up in Real Band.
Gary
I'm blessed watching God do what He does best. I've had a few rough years, and I'm still not back to where I want to be, but I'm on the way and things are looking far better now than what they were!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,900
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,900 |
Endorsed - both Gay and Edward.
Sound advice
Follow That Dream Sam Karaoke King -------------------- Turning that corner again - I have to keep following that dream, no matter what
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 138
Apprentice
|
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 138 |
John, Rachael, Gary, Ed and Sam -
Many thanks indeed for your time and wise advice.
- It sounds like the best bet is to use the WMA RT files, as downloaded, and to look at the encoding.
- I use iTunes-8 to convert the WAV files to MP3s. I've tended to assume that's a decent converter ? What do you think ?
- I've now tried increasing the bit rate from 192 to 256 and 320, with and without VBR (in iTunes), but I can't really hear the difference. I'm listening through a decent Hi Fi set-up (NAD plus B&W speakers) - but i can't even hear the difference between the 192kbps MP3's and the original WAV files !! Maybe I'm just not listening for the right things....?
(- I've yet to get to grips with RB... That's the next project....)
Thanks again for your generous help. Best - Andy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,616
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,616 |
I don't use iTunes but what I read is that the MP3 encoder is not any good. The blogs say the reason is that Apple wants you to use (for obvious reasons) their AAC format and not MP3. My opinion is that the best MP3 encoder out there is the LAME. It's free, open-source, and is available at http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showforum=55Best thing is to make your WAV file in BIAB and leave it as such. If space is a limitation, investigate lossless formats such as FLAC, WMA lossless, etc. which will compress the WAV by roughly half keeping all of the audio fidelity. Nothing is lost. You will have the best possible sound given that your original RT was WMA 160. If you must convert, there are plenty of conversion front-end GUIs are out there. Avoid using the BIAB built-in MP3 conversion as you are restricted to what codecs you have installed in Windows. As I mentioned in my earlier post, you won't get any better quality than the original 160 WMA files no matter what you convert them to. You should try to minimize your conversions to avoid the transcoding issues. Rachael
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 138
Apprentice
|
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 138 |
Thanks again Rachael,
I'm now comparing the rendered WAV files with files made with different MP3 compression settings in ITunes 8. I'm still finding it hard to hear any difference from 192kbps upwards tho....
Best - Andy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,900
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,900 |
Follow That Dream Sam Karaoke King -------------------- Turning that corner again - I have to keep following that dream, no matter what
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 21
Enthusiast
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 21 |
I wasn't aware of the audiophile difference or I may have gone that route. No one's fault but mine. However, the sound of the tracks I now have are mighty good, I can't say that I percieve any lack of quality. I think WMAs are pretty lossless anyway, aren't they? If they is any difference it will not stop me from making cd's and demos. If I get a big record deal I will buy the audiophiles and redo them. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
That is my thinking on the subject, also, gmanbat.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,217
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,217 |
.
>>>...The quality of the resulting MP3 tracks is pretty good. My first question is: is there anything I can do to make the quality even better ?...>>>
At the risk of flogging the obvious, I recommend playing back through the best speakers you can get. I use and recommend Logitech 3-piece computer speakers. I have them in every room in the house and i use them for gigs. Many pros of my acquiantance also use them for gigs.
They are no good for monitoring mixes though...they process the sound too much.
>>>...Are there any other clever tricks for mixing I should know about ?...>>>
Studio monitors do not have to be expensive. I use Radio Shack Miniumus-7 powered by a very good but old Kenwood stereo amp from a flea market. The Kenwood has lots of tone-shaping capability. The key is that it can be set to FLAT when I need it to be flat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,213
Posts801,994
Members40,071
| |
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean