|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 886
Expert
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 886 |
what quality are these .wma's? What quality are the audiophile .wav's?
This becomes important when working in audio mode. I generally use .ogg files due to lossiness in mp3 and wma formats.
Moo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,616
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,616 |
From what I've seen, the wma are 160 and 128. The wav's are the original masters that are used to make the wma's.
You probably know that .ogg files are also lossy just like the mp3 and wma.
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 886
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 886 |
To tell the truth I am surprised at how decent the .wma's sound.
And yes, .ogg is a lossy format like mp3 & .wma......
i5 3.20GHz, 32gb RAM, 1tb SSD OS, 12tb HDD, 4gb gForce vid card, 32" monitor, Audient id44, Win10 x64, BiaB/RB 2023, Reaper 6,IK Multimedia Total Studio 3.5 MAX, Waves 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,459
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,459 |
I've been using the .WMAs on production tracks for a couple of years now. No real problems. I'm sure some audiophiles will tell me at some point how bad they sound, but it hasn't happened yet.
Best, Tom SmithWin10/64 • i7-8700K • 24 GB RAM BIAB 2026 • Reaper 7.57 • Izotope MPS AKG C1000S • IK iRig I/O Pro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 886
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 886 |
Maybe I didn't ask the question properly- What is the sampling rate of the wma file real tracks? This is important. Thanks.
Moo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,459
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,459 |
As Rachael said above: According to AudioShell, some are 160 Kbps, some 128 Kbps. The Holds seem to be 48 Kbps.
Best, Tom SmithWin10/64 • i7-8700K • 24 GB RAM BIAB 2026 • Reaper 7.57 • Izotope MPS AKG C1000S • IK iRig I/O Pro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,616
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,582
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,582 |
Of the .WMA files I looked at in /Holds, the sample rate is 44,100. The bit rate is 48 kbps. They were mono files, 16-bit. They sound quite good, auditioned by themselves.
The audiophile versions of the Holds are also 44,100, 16-bit mono, except they are .WAV and are not compressed, so they are about 10 times larger than the comparable .WMA version.
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 225
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 225 |
Yes, the sampling rate is probably the same as the wavs, 44.1.
OGGS are also lossy, like mp3 and wma or aac.
Most of us cannot hear the difference. Some can hear a difference, or at least think they can. To spend that much more, they must really hear or think a lot of difference!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 886
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 886 |
Quote:
Some can hear a difference, or at least think they can. To spend that much more, they must really hear or think a lot of difference!
What to try a cool effect? The next time you record backing vocals, after you have mixed them, convert them to an mp3 file...way cool effect!
There is a difference between a .wav & a .wma, mp3, or any lossy scheme, and where most folks can tell it is in the human voice, because we know what it should sound like! 
i5 3.20GHz, 32gb RAM, 1tb SSD OS, 12tb HDD, 4gb gForce vid card, 32" monitor, Audient id44, Win10 x64, BiaB/RB 2023, Reaper 6,IK Multimedia Total Studio 3.5 MAX, Waves 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 886
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 886 |
My love of OGG is due to the ease of lining up tracks when working with collaborators online. MP3 and WMA create major timing issues when brought into Sonar and other DAWS. OGG and APE are the best for collaboration online.
Moo
If it has four legs and moos...it MIGHT be Mr Moohead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,582
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,582 |
That's interesting about the voice and compression, JCS. I notice it most on the drums, but I don't work much with vocals.
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
With a real good mp3 codec, like the LAME encoder, I'd bet he couldn't pass a double blindfold test on it, vocals or not.
There are physical reasons behind my bet.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 15,976
PG Music Staff
|
|
PG Music Staff
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 15,976 |
>>> My love of OGG is due to the ease of lining up tracks when working with collaborators online. MP3 and WMA create major timing issues when brought into Sonar and other DAWS. OGG and APE are the best for collaboration online.
There are no timing issues with WMA and M4a files as we use them in Band-in-a-Box. When you drag or work with the files they are WAVS anyway, so you are not manipulating WMA's.
The files are typicaly 160kbps, 44K. They are stereo or mono, depening on the instrument (e.g. Drums, Guitars, Piano are stereo. Bass and solo instruments are usually mono.)
Have Fun!
Peter Gannon
PG Music Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 886
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 886 |
Mac, if you are referring to the ability of our auditory sense ability to replace missing information, I understand about all of that...it is what the mp3 format is based around, this ability for our systems to replace the missing info. I have taken "blindfold" tests along with some other friends who wanted to try it out, and yes, we were not perfect. But when I can here the difference around 70% of the time (some were better, some where worse) then it is unreasonable to say it is all in someone's head, and that they "think" that they can tell a difference. It is like the arguments about how a DAW sounds, "Do the null test!" is the cry, but it is funny that folks can usually pick their favorite DAW from a list of tracks that have been played back thru several DAW's, when they all use the same Master track for all of them. It's all horses for course really, and something that will always have folks on both sides going "Oh Yea?!"  
i5 3.20GHz, 32gb RAM, 1tb SSD OS, 12tb HDD, 4gb gForce vid card, 32" monitor, Audient id44, Win10 x64, BiaB/RB 2023, Reaper 6,IK Multimedia Total Studio 3.5 MAX, Waves 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Quote:
Mac, if you are referring to the ability of our auditory sense ability to replace missing information, I understand about all of that...it is what the mp3 format is based around, this ability for our systems to replace the missing info.
The human voice simply does not contain much if at all above the 17KHz mp3 brickwall xeiling. Not hardly approaches it. That is the first physical hurdle I referred to above and the largest. It has nothing to do with psycho=acoustics, which is what you are referring to here. It is above 17KHz mark where the "losses" are most in an mp3 file.
Quote:
I have taken "blindfold" tests along with some other friends who wanted to try it out, and yes, we were not perfect. But when I can here the difference around 70% of the time (some were better, some where worse) then it is unreasonable to say it is all in someone's head, and that they "think" that they can tell a difference.
As an engineer, I cannot make a call on that either way. It could happen 70% of the time when throwing random answers at it also. Comprehensive testing might involve multiple, repeated tests, but really, unless you could nail it *every* time, then it is either not as apparent as you may think it to be or nonexistant. BTW -- when referring to auditory response, it is spelled, "hear" and not "here"...
If you can't identify it 100% of the time, be prepared to find out that it really isn't there to hear.
And -- be able to say out loud exactly what it is that you are listening for. Not in layman's terms, but in terms of the exact component or components.
Quote:
It is like the arguments about how a DAW sounds, "Do the null test!" is the cry, but it is funny that folks can usually pick their favorite DAW from a list of tracks that have been played back thru several DAW's, when they all use the same Master track for all of them.
Hear we go with that "usually" again...
Usually doesn't make it. Either you can hear the difference, ALL THE TIME, or you can't.
Example would be Absolute Pitch. Proven, by those who have acquired it, to be 100% accurate, 100% of the time.
The human ear system is actually quite infallible. It is that gray stuff in between that often blurs the issue.
Quote:
It's all horses for course really, and something that will always have folks on both sides going "Oh Yea?!"
And such is why companies can sell ridicuously priced "Audiophile grade" speaker cables that tout ridiculous things like the Oxygen Impregnated Copper for the high frequencies to travel on the outside of the conductor "better". Um, first of all, we are talking AUDIO frequencies here, the skin effect would not apply until the frequencies got MUCH higher than that. Physics.
There still exist a few codecs for mp3 that make hearing that it is mp3 readily apparent, though. The old "swishy" and "phasey" sound. That, too, is a dead giveaway and one should be able to nail its use 100% of the time, double blindfold or no.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 886
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 886 |
Peter-
Thanks for the info. Now I understand why you can drag these files into Sonar. That's really good news.
Moo
If it has four legs and moos...it MIGHT be Mr Moohead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 886
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 886 |
You are a very intelligent person, but the arrogance in some of your responses are too funny!  So let me get this straight, if you can not hear/repeat something 100%, then it does not count because it is not possible to hear/repeat it 100%?  What about allowing for the bad codecs, if everyone listen to the same bad codec (and there is a lot of music converted with them out there) , and "here" the difference between the mp3 & the wave, does that make them wrong to say that they can hear the difference? And usually does make it. I am sure that as a musician you usually play your instrument 100% dead on, but if you blow a couple parts thru out a gig does that mean you are a amateur, or do you keep your stats as a good musician because you "usually" play it 100%? Different levels of assumptions going on I reckon... I guess we will agree to disagree, spelling mistakes on a Internet Forum and all.... We hope you & yours have a Great Christmas!
i5 3.20GHz, 32gb RAM, 1tb SSD OS, 12tb HDD, 4gb gForce vid card, 32" monitor, Audient id44, Win10 x64, BiaB/RB 2023, Reaper 6,IK Multimedia Total Studio 3.5 MAX, Waves 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Quote:
You are a very intelligent person, but the arrogance in some of your responses are too funny!
Thank you for the flowers.
But really, I think you are confusing arrogance and someone who is simply adament because he just may know something about what he's talking about.
Quote:
So let me get this straight, if you can not hear/repeat something 100%, then it does not count because it is not possible to hear/repeat it 100%?
Pretty much. Example given concerned Absolute Pitch. If you can't identify the note heard 100% of the time, it wouldn't be called "absolute" now would it?
Quote:
What about allowing for the bad codecs, if everyone listen to the same bad codec (and there is a lot of music converted with them out there) , and "here" the difference between the mp3 & the wave, does that make them wrong to say that they can hear the difference?
Of course not, but your given example also doesn't have very much to do with what we're discussing here. And if you read my entire post up there, I believe I did indeed talk about the differences in codecs. If there is any assumption on my part at all here, it is that you would have done your blindfold using a reasonably good codec, if not the best available.
Quote:
And usually does make it. I am sure that as a musician you usually play your instrument 100% dead on, but if you blow a couple parts thru out a gig does that mean you are a amateur, or do you keep your stats as a good musician because you "usually" play it 100%?
The 100% part has always been my goal, yes. Amateur or pro doesn't matter here. Matter of fact, the amateur may just have more at stake than the pro. From the French, the word means, literally, "love of the craft". A pro merely got paid to do the job. Common misconception nowadays, I once wrote a little diatribe about that on another forum, one of the moderators made it permanent, misprints and all: What's an amateur?
Quote:
Different levels of assumptions going on I reckon... [/qyote]
I try to assume nothing, which is why I will call out anyone trying to make the subjective become the objective. . Merely trying to pass on information that I know to be true. Measurably, demonstrably true.
Quote:
I guess we will agree to disagree, spelling mistakes on a Internet Forum and all....
I am hoping that you will agree to reassess. Learning is and knowledge is power.
Quote:
We hope you & yours have a Great Christmas!
The same to you and yours.
(Um, is that the Royal "we"?...)
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 886
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 886 |
I'd like to report a thread hijacking to air traffic control.....
Moo
If it has four legs and moos...it MIGHT be Mr Moohead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac - Special Offers End at 11:59pm PDT on Friday, May 15th, 2026!
Order before 11:59pm PDT on Friday, May 15th and SAVE up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® version 2026 for Mac Upgrade packages... and that's not all! With your version 2026 for Mac purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks... that's 222 NEW RealTracks available with version Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac!
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® today for as little as $49! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all available purchase options.
Learn more about the Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK here.
If you have any questions about which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We're here to help!
202 New RealTracks Released with Band-in-a-Box 2026!
With Band-in-a-Box® 2026, we've released 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 468-488) in a variety of genres—featuring your most requested styles!
Jazz, Funk & World (Sets 468-475):
Our new jazz, funk & blues RealTracks include a groovin’ collection of RealTracks and RealDrums! These include more requested “soul jazz” RealTracks featuring artists Neil Swainson (bass), Charles Treadway (organ), Brent Mason (guitar), and Wes Little (drums). There are new “smooth jazz” styles (4), which include a RealTracks first: muted trumpet, as well as slick new smooth jazz brushes options for drums. Blues lovers will be thrilled—there are more “classic acoustic blues” styles, including guitar (5), bass (4), and drums (10) with blues master Colin Linden, featuring understated and tasty background acoustic soloing, plus brushes drums and acoustic bass. There are also new electric blues RealTracks, including electric blues with PG favorite Johnny Hiland (3) and soulful electric slide guitar from Colin Linden (4). If you love funk & gospel, there are great new options this year, including gospel organ (3) from Charles Treadway, as well as new funk, tango, and rock ’n’ roll drums (3) and bass (1). And for big, bold arrangements, we have uptempo soul horns (4) featuring a three-part hip horn section with options for a full mix or stems of each individual horn — plus an accompanying rhythm section (4) of drums, bass, guitar, and electric piano!
Rock & Pop (Sets 476–482):
Our new rock & pop RealTracks bring a powerful mix of requested favorites, fresh genres, and modern chart-inspired styles! We have more of our popular “Producer Layered Acoustic Guitars (15)” featuring Band-in-a-Box favorite Brent Mason. We’ve continued our much-requested disco styles (10), and added new Celtic guitar (5) with a more basic, accessible approach than our previous Drop-D or DADGAD offerings. There are also highly requested yacht rock styles (17), inspired by the smooth, polished soft-rock sound of the late ’70s and early ’80s — laid-back grooves, silky electric pianos, warm textures, elegant harmonic movement, and pristine production aesthetics. Fans of heavier styles will love our new glam metal (13), capturing the flashy, high-energy sound of ’80s arena-ready guitar rock. We also have a set of rootsy modern-folk rock (18), with a warm, organic sound combining contemporary folk textures and driving acoustic strumming. And we’ve added lots of new modern pop styles (16) — the kinds of sounds you’re hearing on the radio today, featuring exciting new drums, synths, and cutting-edge RealTracks arrangements.
Country, & Americana (Sets 483–488):
Our new country & Americana RealTracks deliver a rich collection of acoustic, electric, and roots-inspired styles! We have new country pop (9) with legendary guitarist Brent Mason. There is also a potpourri (14) of bouzouki, guitars, banjo, and more, perfect for adding texture and character to contemporary acoustic arrangements. We’ve added funky country guitar (5) with PG favorite Brent Mason, along with classic pedal steel styles (5) featuring steel great Doug Jernigan. There are more country songwriter styles (8) that provide intimate, rootsy foundations for storytelling and modern Americana writing. Finally, we have “background soloing” acoustic guitar (12) with Brent Mason — simpler, but still very tasty acoustic lines designed to sit beautifully behind vocals or act as a subtle standalone solo part.
Check out all the 202 new RealTracks (in sets 468-488)!
And, if you are looking for more, the 2026 49-PAK (for $49) includes an impressive collection of 20 bonus RealTracks, featuring exciting and inspiring additions to add to your RealTracks library. You'll get new country-rhythm guitar styles from PG Music favorites Johnny Hiland and Brent Mason, along with modern-pop grooves that capture today’s radio-ready sound! There are also new indie-folk styles with guitar, bass, 6-string bass used as a high-chording instrument, acoustic guitar, and banjo. Plus, dedicated "cymbal fills" RealDrums provide an added layer that work very well with low-key folky styles with other percussion.
The 2026 49-PAK is loaded with other great new add-ons as well. Learn more about the 2026 49-PAK!
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
With your version 2026 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
- MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
- Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
- Playable RealTracks Set 5
- RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
- SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
- iOS Android Band-in-a-Box® App
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
- Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
- RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
- SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)
Learn more about the Bonus PAK and 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,297
Posts802,902
Members40,085
| |
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean